logo
Shakespeare didn't abandon his wife in Stratford, letter suggests

Shakespeare didn't abandon his wife in Stratford, letter suggests

CNN24-04-2025

William Shakespeare's marriage to Anne Hathaway may have been happier than previously thought, according to new research.
It has been long believed that the playwright left his wife behind when he moved to London, but new findings from the University of Bristol suggest that the couple were living together in London for some period of time between 1600 and 1610.
Shakespeare married Hathaway in 1582 and the couple shared three children. Experts have long thought that Shakespeare then moved to London from his home in Stratford-upon-Avon, leaving his family behind.
Now, a long forgotten letter may turn that theory on its head, according to Matthew Steggle, a professor of English at Bristol University.
The fragments of the letter, addressed to 'good Mrs Shakspaire,' (the name's spelling at the time) were found sewn into the binding of a 1,000-page theological book in the city of Hereford, about 50 miles from Stratford-upon-Avon.
Although the letter's writer hasn't been identified, they refer to a fatherless apprentice called John Butts.
Steggle found just one person by Butts' name who fit the criteria and lived in London at that time.
'The reason you think it's the Shakespeares is about the date and place of the letter – which you can establish largely by locating the boy at the center of it,' Steggle told CNN Thursday.
The letter writer accuses the husband of 'Mrs Shakspaire' of withholding money from Butts and asks her for the funds. In what may be a reply from Hathaway herself, the recipient stands by her husband and refuses to settle the claim.
The letter also refers to a 'Shakspaire' couple who lived in a place called Trinity Lane. Out of the four couples living in London with the surname, Steggle believes only the playwright and his wife could have afforded to live in the relatively prosperous area.
Steggle said the discovery opens the path to more revelations about the playwright's life.
'We know so little about exactly where Shakespeare lives in London, so it's another sort of data point for that,' he said. 'It's another kind of anchor on where he might have been living, how he might have been, and how he might have been living in his London career.'
As for challenging views about Shakespeare's relationship with his wife, Steggle credits a shift in attitudes towards women and greater academic work in this area.
'There's this narrative, like the film 'Shakespeare in Love,' where he's got this wife who's this kind of distant encumbrance in Stratford, and (Shakespeare is) having all these romantic love affairs in London separately,' he said, referring to the Oscar-winning 1998 movie.
The letter is a 'game-changer' that suggests Hathaway was not absent from her husband's London life, but present and engaged in his financial and social networks, argues Steggle.
'The reason it's gone unnoticed for so long is that it's not in London… where there's been a lot of quite intensive searching for Shakespeare,' Steggle said of the letter's discovery.
Looking outside the city – and in the binding of books printed by the Bard's old friend – could point the way 'towards the possibility of more discoveries.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

13 Reasons Gen X Feels Like The Forgotten Generation
13 Reasons Gen X Feels Like The Forgotten Generation

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

13 Reasons Gen X Feels Like The Forgotten Generation

Sandwiched between the loud idealism of the Boomers and the digital dominance of Millennials, Gen X often gets sidelined in the cultural conversation. They were latchkey kids turned quiet revolutionaries, carrying the weight of change without demanding a spotlight. But beneath that detached coolness lies a generation that feels distinctly overlooked—and not without reason. Here are 13 unexpected and quietly powerful reasons Gen X often feels like the invisible middle child of modern society. Gen X helped build the digital world we live in, adapting to the rise of email, dial-up, and early social media while holding down traditional jobs. Yet, today's tech culture largely belongs to younger generations, who are assumed to be the digital natives. Gen Xers are often viewed as 'too old' for new platforms but 'too young' to be nostalgic relics as this article in Forbes highlights. That weird digital no-man's-land leaves them out of both the innovation narrative and the retro appreciation era. Their contributions get erased because they were transitional—not flashy. It's hard to be remembered when you were always expected to quietly adapt. Gen X grew up with sky-high divorce rates, minimal emotional validation, and the 'figure it out yourself' parenting philosophy. That upbringing forged a hyper-independent generation praised for grit and stoicism. But that same resilience often gets mistaken for not needing support. Because they're not openly struggling or demanding change, their pain doesn't register. They become background characters in the social dialogue. Quiet endurance is noble—but it's also easily ignored. From grunge and hip-hop to indie cinema and the alt movement, Gen X was behind some of the most transformative shifts in culture as Psychology Today highlights. But those aesthetics and ideas have been co-opted, rebranded, and credited to newer generations. Think flannel and vinyl coming back without a nod to their original architects. The trend cycle skips the origin story and just slaps on a Gen Z filter. What was once revolutionary for Gen X now gets sold back to them like a lifestyle brand. That erasure stings. Boomers still dominate leadership roles while Millennials are treated as the innovation engine. Gen X? They're the dependable in-between, expected to manage everyone else's chaos. But rarely are they spotlighted, mentored upward, or included in big-picture strategy. They keep the corporate world running without ever being acknowledged for it. It's workplace invisibility in its most polished form. No drama, no thanks. As this CNN article points out, Gen X was supposed to be the first generation to do worse financially than their parents—and that forecast became all too real. They've weathered the dot-com crash, the 2008 recession, and now inflation during peak midlife expenses. Yet, financial narratives often skip over them entirely in favor of Boomer wealth or Millennial struggle. Gen X is left holding student debt and college bills at the same time. They're caring for both kids and aging parents with little structural support. But no one's putting their economic crisis on magazine covers. Unlike Millennials or Gen Z, Gen X wasn't raised with language for emotional health. Vulnerability wasn't modeled—it was avoided. Now in midlife, many are learning to process trauma or set boundaries for the first time. But the mental health conversation tends to spotlight younger generations. Gen X feels emotionally underdeveloped and out of sync in today's therapeutic age. They're healing in private while others heal in public. Gen X parents rejected the lax parenting style of Boomers and chose to raise emotionally intelligent, autonomous kids as points out. They were the first to talk about feelings at the dinner table and embrace co-parenting models. But they rarely get credit for that seismic shift. Millennial parenting is now seen as progressive and evolved, while Gen X quietly pioneered that entire playbook. They're the beta version no one credits. It's legacy without recognition. Media, tech, fashion, even wellness brands rarely cater to Gen X. The messaging always skews either older ('retire with confidence!') or younger ('here's how to go viral!'). Gen X is stuck in a demographic black hole where nothing is *for* them. They're left adapting products and narratives that weren't designed with their reality in mind. When you're never the customer, you're also never the priority. That absence is loud. Gen X rejected corporate conformity and the American Dream quietly but firmly. They turned to minimalism, DIY, and creative careers long before it was cool. But because they didn't post about it, no one noticed. Their rebellion was internal, philosophical. And that's why history forgets them—they didn't ask to be remembered. They just lived differently. Gen X is simultaneously parenting teens and supporting elderly parents. That dual pressure leaves them burnt out, with no clear place to vent or receive help. Boomers are aging out, Millennials are parenting young kids—but Gen X is stuck doing both. They're caregivers without a care system. It's unpaid labor that rarely gets acknowledged. And that sense of isolation runs deep. '90s nostalgia is everywhere, but Gen Xers are notably missing from the cast of characters being celebrated. Shows, memes, and fashion pull from their youth, but the people themselves are erased. It's as if the era mattered—but the generation didn't. Gen X is watching their memories get mined for content while they themselves remain on mute. It's a cultural extraction without a human face. And it adds to the invisibility. Gen X doesn't overshare or self-promote online the way Millennials and Gen Z do. Their core identity is built on irony, detachment, and distrust of authority. So they often sit out the viral discourse entirely. That silence gets misread as apathy or irrelevance. But it's actually a survival mechanism rooted in hard-earned skepticism. Unfortunately, algorithms don't reward restraint. Gen X doesn't crave the spotlight, but they do want to be acknowledged. They built, raised, repaired, and adapted without applause. But even quiet strength deserves recognition. Being overlooked isn't a badge of honor—it's a wound. And it's time we start seeing Gen X not just as a bridge—but as a generation with its own identity worth celebrating.

Opinion: How My California Middle School Uses Glyphs to Teach English Learners to Read
Opinion: How My California Middle School Uses Glyphs to Teach English Learners to Read

Yahoo

time3 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Opinion: How My California Middle School Uses Glyphs to Teach English Learners to Read

In the agricultural regions of California's San Joaquin Valley, schools like Firebaugh Middle School are surrounded by fields. But many of Firebaugh's students struggle to read that word. If they were to see 'field' on the board, they would likely pronounce it as 'filed,' a reflection of their unfamiliarity with the varied pronunciations in English. Firebaugh's student body is 98% Hispanic, and about 30% of its 530 sixth-, seventh- and eighth-graders are designated as English learners. Based on diagnostic testing, administrators know many of them have limited or nonexistent phonics skills. In some cases, the students did not attend elementary school and lack the basics of literacy even in their primary language. Get stories like this delivered straight to your inbox. Sign up for The 74 Newsletter If you think of reading as an equation with specific components, you might assume reading instruction is straightforward. But as with any equation, there are variables, and English learners have many of them, from Individualized Education Programs to a diversity of home languages that makes it difficult for teachers to find a starting point for reading instruction. Any supplemental instruction educators provide must be flexible enough to account for those individual differences. This is hard enough at the elementary level, but in middle school, students do not merely need to know how to read; they need to know how to read well, so they can comprehend information, analyze it and synthesize it. But in most middle schools, educators likely do not have comprehensive training in supporting basic reading development. While they may have picked up some strategies, their job and focus is to teach a single subject‚ not literacy. I'm a perfect example. I was a history major, and I am credentialed in social science. I was trained to teach ancient civilizations, modern government and economics, and everything in between — but not reading. Related Time is also a limiting factor. At Firebaugh, students rotate through a seven-period school day. Teachers cannot adapt their schedules the way elementary educators can, making it challenging to spend extra time catching up students who are not reading at grade level. We had attempted many approaches to improving literacy at Firebaugh. We added English language development classes. Educators tried to emphasize reading strategies and target specific students who were two or more grade levels behind in literacy. However, none of these efforts proved effective. Along the way, we realized many students needed pieces of the reading equation that we did not know they needed, such as decoding words. Then, we discovered an unusual approach to adolescent literacy that uses glyphs as a resource to foster reading fluency and boost comprehension for English learners. The system consists of 21 glyphs, or diacritical marks, that function as a pronunciation guide for each word. These marks (think accents or umlauts) are widely used in languages other than English to aid with pronunciation and comprehension. The system indicates which letters make their usual sound, which make a different-than-usual sound and which are silent. It also denotes syllable breaks. We implemented this glyph approach for English learners who had no experience sounding out words. In the first stage of implementation, students worked with teachers to learn the glyphs and complete core skill-building activities. In the second stage, the diacriticals — which are available for more than 100,000 words — were integrated into students' daily reading practice to build fluency and comprehension. With the markups, words like 'field' and 'filed,' for example, were no longer a problem.

State grants helps Fairmont State University plant more trees on campus
State grants helps Fairmont State University plant more trees on campus

Yahoo

time4 hours ago

  • Yahoo

State grants helps Fairmont State University plant more trees on campus

FAIRMONT — The number of native trees on the campus of Fairmont State University recently increased with help from a grant from the West Virginia Division of Forestry. In April, students and staff planted American holly, Blackhaw viburnum, common witch hazel and eastern redbud trees with the goal of boosting biodiversity on campus. Dubbed the Community EquiTree grant program, which originates on the federal level, helped plant alongside Campus Drive East, which is adjacent to Fairmont State's residence halls and outdoor recreation areas, which "will allow more students and local community members to experience the trees and their benefits," according to a press release. "As a public institution, Fairmont State University is committed to fostering a beautiful, welcoming campus where students, faculty, staff, and community members feel a true sense of belonging," the press release continued. Fairmont State's Creative Sustainability Council, a group of students, faculty and staff members, spearheaded the initiative. Assistant Construction Manager Devin Carpenter, Associate Professor of English Nathaniel Myers, and Councilmember and architecture major Ryan Williams collaborated on the grant. 'The trees themselves are a great project, helping to develop this underused space on campus into something that is both a beautiful showcase of West Virginia trees and helps to mitigate local issues like soil erosion or larger ones like global warming," Williams said. "But even more than that, I hope projects like this inspire more students to get involved. The more people are engaged with their community and campus, the more we can improve and better serve the present and the future.' The WVDOF Urban and Community Forestry program cooperates with communities to promote the long-term care of trees in cities and communities throughout the state. The program also establishes guidelines for planting, caring for and protecting trees throughout West Virginia. Fairmont State's project meets the goals of this program by providing an opportunity for students to get involved with community sustainability projects, for faculty to improve their instruction by helping others understand the importance of trees and nature, and for everyone to better understand and engage with their local environment during and after the planting. "As the trees grow, their benefits will as well. The canopies will help shade the area, especially nearby asphalt parking lots and roads, which can store heat. The roots of the trees will grow into the hillside, stabilizing the soil and preventing erosion. Additionally, their fall foliage will create a beautiful scene familiar to many West Virginians," states the press release. 'The planting of these native species not only aids in beautifying our campus but also offers back to nature a piece of what urban development once removed," Carpenter said. In the coming months, the Creative Sustainability Council will measure the success of the tree planting program using surveys to be administered in the local community and among students. A ceremonial tree planting was held on April 25, 2025 to mark the beginning of the project, which is expected to be completed this month. 'We are all very proud of Ryan and his hard work on this project,' Myers said. 'Hopefully this will inspire future projects that will contribute to sustainability on our beautiful campus.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store