logo
U.S. Birth Rate Slump Raises Red Flags for Future Housing Market

U.S. Birth Rate Slump Raises Red Flags for Future Housing Market

Yahoo4 days ago
U.S. birth rates have fallen to 1980s levels despite a population increase of 108 million people, an eyebrow-raising new report from John Burns Research and Consulting shows.
There were 3.6 million births in 2024, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, the same as in 1983. This, despite the significant population increase.
And the fertility rate has dropped to 1.6 babies per woman, according to the CDC's National Center for Health Statistics, putting the U.S. on par with most European countries.
What low birth rates mean for housing trends
'The most immediate effect will be fewer bedrooms needed for children, while the longer-term impact will be slower growth in potential renters and homebuyers,' John Burns economist Eric Finnigan tells Realtor.com®.
While seven bedrooms might be the new four for select and wealthy enclaves, the average American will be downsizing.
'Today's housing market is out of reach for many would-be buyers, which has shifted demand towards smaller, more affordable homes,' agrees Realtor.com senior economic research analyst Hannah Jones. 'Additionally, younger generations may prefer homes in more central, walkable locations, and these areas tend to offer smaller homes.'
While empty nesters and retirees will number 14 million-plus of the homebuyer segment by 2034, the typical entry level buyer, ages 30 to 44, will only number 3 million, according to the John Burns report. Not only that, 73% of recent buyers did not have a child under the age of 18 in their home, the highest share recorded.
National Association of Realtors® deputy chief economist said that buyers with children are at an all-time low. 'So, they may not need that three-bedroom, two-bath home. They may really want a two-bedroom, one-bath home, and that's not necessarily the inventory that's out there,' she says.
Additionally, the low birth rate will be a boon for landlords as more people rent and for much longer.
'Americans are waiting significantly longer to purchase homes,' says Finnigan.
The typical first-time homebuyer is now 38 years old, compared with 33 only five years ago, and an average of 31 from 1993 to 2018, says the John Burns report.
Of course, waiting longer to buy a house isn't all because of fewer babies to house.
The skyrocketing costs of homeownership—from the national median list price being an eye-popping $440,950, to the soaring price of insurance, utilities, and property taxes, and to stubbornly high interest rates—has a lot to do with it as well.
What Americans are doing instead
This delayed homeownership creates increased rental demand, with 72% of renters now age 30 or older—an all-time high, says the John Burns report.
'Renting is an increasingly favorable option, especially as buying a home remains prohibitively expensive. It is more affordable to rent than to buy in the vast majority of large U.S. metros, tipping the scales towards a renting preference,' says Jones.
Buyers who are in the market for homes are looking for smaller, older housing stock that will be more affordable and match more with their small-family lifestyles. New construction tends to build larger.
For the second quarter of 2025, the median square footage of a new construction home is 2,044 and for existing homes it's 1,794 square feet, according to Realtor.com data.
In the first four months of 2025, newly constructed home sales numbers decreased over 20% per month, according to Cotality data.
New homes now make up 12% of all home sales, a decline from 16% in early 2024. This shift is reflected in prices; since 2023, existing homes have appreciated 11%, but new homes have only appreciated 6%, Cotality data show.
And beyond buying older homes, Americans are buying and thinking smaller. After all, no need for that gargantuan McMansion with only 1.6 kids.
Buyers are asking for homes of 2,076 square feet in 2023 versus 2,260 square feet two decades ago, says a NAR poll.
'This trend toward a smaller size is even apparent in new builds,' says the Cotality report. 'Years of rising costs—for homeowners and for homebuilders—have weighed on home square footage.'
The size of newly constructed homes fell 10 square feet per year over the last five years, according to Cotality's analysis.
Savvy homebuilders will give the people what they want.
Unlike a lot of builders that focus on larger homes to maximize their profit, HHHunt Homes doesn't shy away from starter homes. The builder's single-family Kinwick community homes in Richmond, VA, begin at a relatively small 1,270 square feet and max out at 2,943 square feet.
'We are listening to the community and what they need,' HHHunt Homes' marketing manager Cara Munsey tells Realtor.com. 'The smaller and more affordable homes are what people want.'
Jones agrees. 'New construction has shifted towards smaller, more affordable homes as builders look to capture shifting buyer preferences and affordability constraints,' she says. 'Many metro areas are exploring zoning changes to allow for more densely built housing, which would also shrink the typical size of newly built homes.'
Older, smaller homes on the market
Smaller turnkey homes priced affordably in hot markets won't be active for long.
Take this two-bedroom, fully remodeled 920-square-foot house in Fresno, CA, listed at $200,000 in a market where the median price tag is $469,917. It took less than two weeks to find a buyer.
The agent, Enrique Ruiz-Sanchez of Rise Realty, tells Realtor.com that the house had 80 showings in two weeks, 10 offers, and sold for $70,000 above-ask.
'Price below market, get the bids going, that's my strategy,' he says. 'If you saw a Mercedes on sale for $10, you'd want to buy it, wouldn't you?'
What's accounting for the low birth rate?
Americans are worried about multiple factors in terms of having children, including finances, health insurance, parental leave and affordable child care, Karen Guzzo, director of the Carolina Population Center at the University of North Carolina, told the Associated Press.
'Worry is not a good moment to have kids,' she said.
Women are also bearing their first child much later than in years past, with the average starting age being 30.
Mothers in the 1970s and early 1980s typically had their first child in their early to mid-20s, says the John Burns report.
'This trend is connected to more women attending college and getting married later,' says Finnegan, the report's author.
Birth rates also slowed rapidly during the pandemic, before experiencing a mini-baby-boom in 2022, then declining again.
Concerned by the slowing birth rates, the Trump administration has floated the idea of reduced costs for in vitro fertilization and a cash bonus for baby birthers.
But polls say these so-called solutions ignore the fundamental fears over long-term child care costs, according to a survey by The Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research.
Related Articles
EXCLUSIVE: Humble 'Fisherman's Shack' on Nantucket Sells for $2 Million Just Days After Listing
$850K Nantucket 'Shack' That Looks Set To Plunge Into the Sea Is the Week's Most Popular Home
Newly Constructed $19.2M Waterfront Nantucket Home That Sold Last Year May Be Demolished: 'It Seems Like It's Kind of a Waste'
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

US accountancy body supports tax fairness for disaster victims act
US accountancy body supports tax fairness for disaster victims act

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

US accountancy body supports tax fairness for disaster victims act

The American Institute of CPAs (AICPA) has expressed strong support for the Tax Fairness for Disaster Victims Act, introduced by Representative Timothy Kennedy. Known as HR 3975, the legislation aims to provide permanent relief for individuals affected by federally declared disasters by allowing them to use the prior year's earned income for the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC). The bill's lookback rule has been included in several legislative packages in recent years but has not been made a permanent form of disaster relief. The AICPA said it has long advocated for the permanent establishment of such measures to aid those impacted by disasters. It explained that the EITC is a refundable tax credit for taxpayers with earned income below a certain threshold, which varies based on filing status and number of children. Natural disasters can disrupt work and reduce earned income, hindering taxpayers from claiming the EITC. AICPA senior manager for tax policy and advocacy Daniel Hauffe said: 'When natural disasters devastate local economies and impact taxpayers' ability to earn income, taxpayers should not lose eligibility for tax credits that would otherwise be available to them if not for their loss of income. 'The AICPA supports this bill because it would make permanent a provision that has been in numerous disaster tax relief legislative packages and, therefore, would offer clarity and certainty to taxpayers and tax practitioners.' A recent AICPA survey found that 37% of Americans have experienced fraudulent activities after being affected by natural disasters. The types of fraud include identity theft (14%), government assistance fraud (11%) and loan scams (11%). The survey also highlighted that residents in the north-east and south (both at 40%) are more susceptible to fraud compared to those in the Midwest (31%). In a separate survey, the AICPA emphasised the need for enhanced tax relief measures for disaster victims. Additionally, the survey indicated a strong public preference for extending Internal Revenue Service tax relief measures beyond initial emergency declarations. More than a third (35%) of respondents valued extended tax filing and payment relief periods post-disaster. "US accountancy body supports tax fairness for disaster victims act " was originally created and published by The Accountant, a GlobalData owned brand. The information on this site has been included in good faith for general informational purposes only. It is not intended to amount to advice on which you should rely, and we give no representation, warranty or guarantee, whether express or implied as to its accuracy or completeness. You must obtain professional or specialist advice before taking, or refraining from, any action on the basis of the content on our site. Sign in to access your portfolio

Is Salesforce (NYSE:CRM) Using Too Much Debt?
Is Salesforce (NYSE:CRM) Using Too Much Debt?

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Is Salesforce (NYSE:CRM) Using Too Much Debt?

Legendary fund manager Li Lu (who Charlie Munger backed) once said, 'The biggest investment risk is not the volatility of prices, but whether you will suffer a permanent loss of capital.' It's only natural to consider a company's balance sheet when you examine how risky it is, since debt is often involved when a business collapses. Importantly, Salesforce, Inc. (NYSE:CRM) does carry debt. But the more important question is: how much risk is that debt creating? Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. When Is Debt A Problem? Debt and other liabilities become risky for a business when it cannot easily fulfill those obligations, either with free cash flow or by raising capital at an attractive price. In the worst case scenario, a company can go bankrupt if it cannot pay its creditors. However, a more usual (but still expensive) situation is where a company must dilute shareholders at a cheap share price simply to get debt under control. Of course, plenty of companies use debt to fund growth, without any negative consequences. The first thing to do when considering how much debt a business uses is to look at its cash and debt together. How Much Debt Does Salesforce Carry? You can click the graphic below for the historical numbers, but it shows that Salesforce had US$8.44b of debt in April 2025, down from US$9.43b, one year before. However, its balance sheet shows it holds US$17.4b in cash, so it actually has US$8.97b net cash. How Healthy Is Salesforce's Balance Sheet? We can see from the most recent balance sheet that Salesforce had liabilities of US$24.2b falling due within a year, and liabilities of US$13.7b due beyond that. Offsetting this, it had US$17.4b in cash and US$4.35b in receivables that were due within 12 months. So it has liabilities totalling US$16.2b more than its cash and near-term receivables, combined. Shop Top Mortgage Rates Personalized rates in minutes A quicker path to financial freedom Your Path to Homeownership Given Salesforce has a humongous market capitalization of US$257.3b, it's hard to believe these liabilities pose much threat. Having said that, it's clear that we should continue to monitor its balance sheet, lest it change for the worse. Despite its noteworthy liabilities, Salesforce boasts net cash, so it's fair to say it does not have a heavy debt load! See our latest analysis for Salesforce Also positive, Salesforce grew its EBIT by 20% in the last year, and that should make it easier to pay down debt, going forward. There's no doubt that we learn most about debt from the balance sheet. But it is future earnings, more than anything, that will determine Salesforce's ability to maintain a healthy balance sheet going forward. So if you want to see what the professionals think, you might find this free report on analyst profit forecasts to be interesting. Finally, a company can only pay off debt with cold hard cash, not accounting profits. Salesforce may have net cash on the balance sheet, but it is still interesting to look at how well the business converts its earnings before interest and tax (EBIT) to free cash flow, because that will influence both its need for, and its capacity to manage debt. Over the last three years, Salesforce actually produced more free cash flow than EBIT. There's nothing better than incoming cash when it comes to staying in your lenders' good graces. Summing Up We could understand if investors are concerned about Salesforce's liabilities, but we can be reassured by the fact it has has net cash of US$8.97b. The cherry on top was that in converted 178% of that EBIT to free cash flow, bringing in US$13b. So we don't think Salesforce's use of debt is risky. Another factor that would give us confidence in Salesforce would be if insiders have been buying shares: if you're conscious of that signal too, you can find out instantly by clicking this link. Of course, if you're the type of investor who prefers buying stocks without the burden of debt, then don't hesitate to discover our exclusive list of net cash growth stocks, today. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data

Surging US imports and lower tariffs to lift global growth, IMF predicts
Surging US imports and lower tariffs to lift global growth, IMF predicts

Yahoo

time12 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Surging US imports and lower tariffs to lift global growth, IMF predicts

Global economic growth will be stronger than previously thought, as US imports surged and some of President Donald Trump's tariff rates have been softened since April, new projections show. Global growth is forecast to be 3% in 2025 and 3.1% in 2026, according to the International Monetary Fund's (IMF) latest World Economic Outlook. This is higher than the respective 2.8% and 3% forecast in the previous report in April. UK gross domestic product (GDP) is predicted to be 1.2% this year, and 1.4% in 2026, unchanged from revised forecasts set out in May. The upgrade to the world outlook reflects factors including a strong degree of trade 'front-loading' in recent months – referring to a rush of imports into the US. This has happened as businesses and households tried to get ahead of planned increases to US tariff rates, following Mr Trump's 'liberation day' announcements in April, according to the report. The IMF said front-loading had 'shaped economic activity in the first half of the year', adding that it was 'creating exposures that could amplify the impact of any potential negative shocks'. For example, firms could end up having too much stock, therefore pushing down future imports, or it could lead to additional holding costs or the risk of items becoming obsolete. Meanwhile, the growth upgrade since April was also driven by US tariffs being lowered since higher rates were first announced by Mr Trump, alongside improved conditions in the financial markets. This came after the US struck new trade deals, including with the UK and, most recently, the EU. The introduction of some higher tariff rates have also been paused until August, notably between China and the US, helping diffuse escalating trade tensions and open the door to negotiations. However, the IMF warned that a 'rebound in effective tariff rates could lead to weaker growth' and weigh on wider sentiment. 'Elevated uncertainty could start weighing more heavily on activity, also as deadlines for additional tariffs expire without progress on substantial, permanent agreements,' the report said. Furthermore, the IMF flagged conflict in the Middle East creating potential risks to global shipping and trade, which could further raise commodity prices like oil. On the other hand, the report found that global growth could be lifted if trade negotiations lead to lower tariffs, ease tensions, and create more certainty and predictability. The IMF also highlighted technological advancements, including the use of artificial intelligence (AI), as a way to further boost growth around the world. Chancellor Rachel Reeves said: 'The IMF's forecasts show that the UK remains the fastest growing European economy in the G7 despite the global economic challenges we are facing. 'However, I am determined to unlock Britain's full potential, which is why we are investing billions of pounds through our plan for change – in jobs through better city region transport, record funding for affordable homes, as well as backing major projects like Sizewell C to drive economic growth and put more money into people's pockets.' Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store