What went wrong with Snow White?
Disney's live-action remake of 1937's Snow White and the Seven Dwarves, now simply Snow White, emerged this week to poor reviews and bad buzz. Rumour has it that the studio scaled back advertising for it, expecting (and ensuring) a box-office disappointment. Negative stories have been constant since the film started shooting three years ago, with the studio scrambling to control its fate — but maybe that is exactly how one of Disney's crown jewels became such a problem child.
Think about it: the first hurdle for director Marc Webb and his team was a storm in a teacup over the casting of Rachel Zegler. This was, to be clear, nonsense: if you're casting a musical Disney film you would be negligent not to consider the honey-voiced star of West Side Story who, incidentally, looks exactly like a cartoon princess. But for certain commentators, the 'White' part of Snow's name disqualified the Latina Zegler, so they claimed that Disney's casting choice was "woke" instead of obvious.
To address these critics, this film explains Snow's name in relation to her birth, in the middle of a snowstorm, as if we needed to know. But perhaps the furore is why they stuck so close to tradition in the way they dressed Snow, adopting the original film's jarringly bright blue and yellow skirt instead of bringing the kind of flare that costume designer Sandy Powell, a three-time Oscar winner and 15-time nominee, could have offered. It might also have created a general air of panic around the film.
The haters next leapt on Zegler's comments to Extra about the original; explaining how this would be different, she said "it's no longer 1937. She's not going to be saved by the prince…" and compared the relationship between the original Snow White and her prince to stalking. Zegler talked about how her Snow White would work to become the leader her father believed she could be, rather than waiting around for a love story.
This caused more faux outrage on the internet — such disrespect! — though the criticism is entirely fair if you actually watch the 1937 version. But perhaps that led Webb and the studio to feel torn between beefing up the role of Andrew Burnap's bandit leader Jonathan and telling the story of Snow White's own quest for her throne, overstuffing the story.
Then Peter Dinklage entered the chat, calling the whole idea of a new Seven Dwarves "backward" and something that perpetuated stereotypes. Disney panicked and assured the world that the new Seven would be VFX creations. Then other actors with dwarfism complained that that denied them jobs they might otherwise have had, so the studio scrambled again to assure viewers that they would still be represented. The resulting compromise pleased no-one.
On the upside, actors with dwarfism were cast to voice some of the CG dwarves, and in other roles (in Jonathan's gang, for example). On the downside, the new dwarves look extremely weird next to live actors despite the best efforts of the VFX team. They're supposed to be mythological creatures, fine, but they resemble balloons of classic Disney characters instead. And given that Jonathan has a team of bandits around him, you have to wonder if someone planned to use them instead of the small miners at some point.
Later came the political fuss. Zegler expressed her heartbreak at President Trump's re-election — hardly a niche position, but one for which she apologised soon after anyway — and her support for the Palestinian people, an equally mainstream view. Her co-star Gal Gadot, a former Miss Israel, has been steadfast in her calls for the release of Israeli hostages following the October 7 attack by Hamas and her condemnation of antisemitism.
Gadot told Variety, "I want everybody to have good life and prosperity, and the ability to raise their children in a safe environment." The two have expressed nothing but love and admiration for one another despite their differing views on the Palestinian conflict — which, given that both have chiefly expressed a desire for peace, hardly seems difficult. You might think that actors should avoid politics while they have a film coming out, but given that the film shot more than two years ago, how long exactly should they stay silent? Wouldn't we rather have celebrities who speak honestly about causes close to their heart?
And yet there was more studio panic, as the premieres were cancelled or scaled back and press junkets limited. By trying to please everyone and listen to all the critics all the time, Disney seems to have made whatever faults the film had much, much worse.
Its aggregate reviews score is hovering somewhere in the 45% range, far below the level that the talent involved should have ensured. Yet most of these controversies are nonsense. Dinklage had a fair point about stereotypes, yet it's also fair for other actors with dwarfism to just want to work on a big movie. The real issue was Disney attempting to thread the needle for both.
Controversies don't always hurt a film at the box office, but disappointing audiences will impact quite a bit. Zegler desperately tries to carry the film on her back, and Gadot and Burnap give her good and committed support (Gadot can sing! And is campy fun), but there's only so much they can do amid the design mess.
Little ones will still probably enjoy this film for its empowering message, but for the rest of us it's an oddly compromised experience. Worse, the sheer madness surrounding this film might make film studios more and more scared to confront online noise, and more timid in their choices, and that's bad news for all movies.
Snow White is in cinemas now.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Atlantic
22 minutes ago
- Atlantic
Hollywood's Nostalgia Timeline Is Getting Shorter
There's a coincidental yet meaningful connection between two of this summer's buzziest movies. The new Lilo & Stitch and How to Train Your Dragon are both remakes; beyond that, they're both live-action adaptations of animated films—each of which happened to have been co-directed by Dean DeBlois and Chris Sanders. Lilo & Stitch has made a fortune at the box office since its late-May debut; How to Train Your Dragon, which opens today, seems similarly poised for success. The two features are, if a little lacking in visual stimulation compared with their forebears, reliably entertaining. But taken together, they signal something rather alarming in Hollywood's ongoing crisis of imagination: The timeline for nostalgia is growing shorter. Since Tim Burton's big-budget take on Alice in Wonderland grossed more than $1 billion in 2010, the live-action remake has become an inevitable, pervasive cinematic trend. Fifteen years later, it seems that capturing similar financial success requires a studio to look at progressively more recent source material to work with. Disney's attempt to update the nearly 90-year-old Snow White failed at the box office earlier this year; the company shuffled efforts such as a new Pinocchio and Peter Pan off to streaming, despite the recognizable directors and casts involved. The muted response to these modern takes on decades-old classics perhaps explains the move toward reviving properties that resonate with much younger generations instead. The original Lilo & Stitch is 23 years old; How to Train Your Dragon, produced by DreamWorks Animation, is only 15. Next year, a remake of Moana will hit theaters less than a decade after the original film's release. Is that even enough time to start feeling wistful about it? Clearly, the answer is yes, given how audiences have flocked to similar adaptations. The sentimental fervor around franchises such as How to Train Your Dragon is particularly unsettling to me, because the first entry premiered when I was fully an adult; the DreamWorks canon (which also includes such films as Shrek and Kung Fu Panda) was established when I was past the ideal age to become invested. However, I've seen How to Train Your Dragon many times because my daughter is a fan; that intense familiarity helped me out as I watched the live-action version, looking for anything that might feel different about it—which would thus justify its creation. Not so much. DeBlois, who also directed the two How to Train Your Dragon sequels, makes his live-action debut by adapting his own feature; as such, the end result is wildly similar to the earlier work. The new film is again set in a Viking village that is constantly besieged by different kinds of dragons. The plucky teen son of the chief, a boy named Hiccup (played by Mason Thames), befriends a sleek black dragon named Toothless and learns that fighting the beasts isn't the only answer. The actor who voiced Hiccup's father in the animated film, Gerard Butler, returns to perform the role on-screen; in all other cases, the film uses well-suited performers to replace the voice cast. To my own surprise, I liked the new version of How to Train Your Dragon about as much as I do its ancestor. Both, to me, are above-average bits of children's entertainment that struggle with the same problems: They start to sag near the end and suffer a little from their murky color palette. I got a little choked up at the exact same point that I do while watching the 2010 Dragon, when Hiccup and Toothless take to the sky together; the boy rides on a saddle he's made for his fire-breathing pal, and the composer John Powell's excellent score soars into inspirational mode, all strings and bagpipes. If there's a difference between these redone scenes and their inspirations, it's a remarkably minor one; only good theater decorum stopped me from pulling out my phone and running the two Dragon s side by side. Hollywood is struggling to get people to buy movie tickets, so I understand the impulse to offer something that a broad swath of viewers already knows and likes. But there's simply no sense of risk in making something like How to Train Your Dragon —nothing that will convince said theatergoers that the medium has a future beyond recycling. Yes, visual-effects technology is up to the task of re-creating a cartoon on a larger scale and dotted with real actors, and yes, these redos tend to turn a profit for their makers. These shouldn't be the only reasons for art to exist. Lilo & Stitch, at least, diverges somewhat from its source material. Because most of the characters are human beings, its world seems easier to translate to one composed of flesh and blood. The film, like How to Train Your Dragon, is about a shiftless youngster (Lilo, a Hawaiian girl who has been acting out since the death of her parents) bonding with a fantasy creature (Stitch, a blue alien experiment designed as a weapon of destruction). The director Dean Fleischer Camp's tweaks for his rendition didn't particularly click for me, however. One amusing character (another alien who is searching for Stitch) is absent entirely, and the revised ending has prompted some pushback, though Fleischer Camp has tried to defend it. In theory, I should be pro-change, given that I found the carbon-copy nature of How to Train Your Dragon so irksome—except that Lilo & Stitch doesn't really commit to its big alterations. The animated versions of Lilo and her older sister, Nani, forge a closer connection after meeting Stitch and his extraterrestrial hunters; the live-action Lilo enters the care of family friends at the end of the film, so that Nani can go off to study in California. These adjustments to the girls' relationship are a bit bold, because the prior film is so emotionally focused on their frayed sisterhood, yet the remake quickly undercuts their separation with the revelation that Nani can just visit Lilo anytime she wants, thanks to some space technology that Nani has borrowed. Such a cop-out is the underlying, depressing reality with all of these remakes: No change can be too daring, no update too significant. It's heartening that Sanders, a co-director of the original Dragon and Stitch, is one of the few people working in animation who's still committed to innovation. Last year, he directed The Wild Robot; much like How to Train Your Dragon, it is an adaptation of a children's book upon which Sanders found an exciting visual spin. The movie was a critical success, a box-office hit, and an Academy Award nominee. Cinema needs more entries like The Wild Robot —novel works that take chances and trust the audience to follow along. If nothing else, they provide fodder for more live-action remakes in the near future. Hollywood can't have these nostalgic adaptations without something to redo in the first place.


Newsweek
an hour ago
- Newsweek
Pixar Announces New Original Film 'Gatto'
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Entertainment gossip and news from Newsweek's network of contributors While Pixar is now more well-known for franchises like "Toy Story," "Cars," and most recently "Inside Out," they have often found success with new projects. More Entertainment: Pixar Reveals New 'Toy Story 5' Villain Individual films like "WALL-E," "UP," "Ratatouille," "A Bug's Life," and "Elemental" remain beloved by Disney fans of all ages. And it's looking like "Elio" may continue that success. 🚨 Tickets are on sale NOW for Disney and Pixar's #Elio! 🚨 See it in theaters & 3D June 20 🎟️: — Pixar (@Pixar) May 27, 2025 Now, DisneyPixar CCO Pete Docter has revealed a new original film from the same team that created the underrated "Luca." LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - JUNE 17: (L-R) CCO of Pixar Pete Docter, Enrico Casarosa, Andrea Warren, and General Manager/President of Pixar Jim Morris arrive at the world premiere for LUCA, held at the El Capitan... LOS ANGELES, CALIFORNIA - JUNE 17: (L-R) CCO of Pixar Pete Docter, Enrico Casarosa, Andrea Warren, and General Manager/President of Pixar Jim Morris arrive at the world premiere for LUCA, held at the El Capitan Theatre in Hollywood, California on June 17, 2021. More Alberto E. Rodriguez/Getty Images for Disney Prior to the Annecy Animation Festival presentation of "Elio," Docter gave exclusive looks at multiple upcoming projects, including the previously announced "Toy Story 5" and "Hoppers." However, a ton of attention has been given to a new original film that is set to release in theaters in 2027: "Gatto." JUST ANNOUNCED: Coming to theaters in 2027 is Disney and Pixar's "Gatto.' 🐈⬛ From 'Luca' director Enrico Casarosa, the film returns to Italy, following a black cat named Nero. Indebted to a feline mob boss, Nero finds himself forced to forge an unexpected friendship that may… — Pixar (@Pixar) June 13, 2025 "Coming to theaters in 2027 is Disney and Pixar's 'Gatto,'" Pixar announced on social media. "From 'Luca' director Enrico Casarosa, the film returns to Italy, following a black cat named Nero. "Indebted to a feline mob boss, Nero finds himself forced to forge an unexpected friendship that may finally lead him to his purpose..." Specifically, Nero's friend is a street artist who seemingly adopts him against his will, per Kevin Giraud of Variety. The film is taking on a unique hand-painted look that will separate itself from other Pixar movies and will utilize Casarosa's keen ability to bring a beautiful Italian city to life. More Entertainment: Best Films to Stream in Summer 2025 on Netflix, Paramount+, Prime Video Casarosa made his directorial debut with "Luca," a heartwarming and gorgeous film that had the unfortunate timing to release during the COVID-19 pandemic. Because of this, "Luca" became the first Pixar film to be released directly to Disney+. It became the most-viewed streaming film of 2021, garnering over 10.6 billion minutes watched. It would later have a short run in theaters and garner multiple accolades, including a nomination for Best Animated Feature at the Academy Awards, eventually losing to fellow Disney film "Encanto." Needless to say, fans of "Luca" are ecstatic to see Casarosa bring the same kind of heart, fun, and artistry to another feature film. More Entertainment: 'Star Trek: Strange New Worlds' Canceled Best Netflix Original Films to Watch June 2025 'How To Train Your Dragon' Director Defends Live-Action Remake Changes 'A Minecraft Movie' Hits HBO Max for Free Streaming in June: What to Know For more Disney and entertainment news, head on over to Newsweek Entertainment.

Condé Nast Traveler
2 hours ago
- Condé Nast Traveler
I've Run 54 runDisney Races—Here's What You Need to Know Before Signing Up
Did you know you can run through Walt Disney World and Disneyland? No, I'm not talking about racing to your favorite attractions at rope drop, though that can be a grueling race too. Both of the parks regularly host Disney races where you, along with thousands of other runners and Disney fans, can participate in distance runs through the most iconic theme parks in the world, complete with entertainment and characters along the course. Writer Megan duBois has run more than 50 runDisney races. Megan duBois I've completed 54 races with runDisney, from 5Ks to 'challenges,' in which I completed multiple race distances in one weekend. There's nothing like crossing the finish line, seeing Mickey and Minnie Mouse cheering you on, and knowing your body can do hard things. If you're thinking about shaking up your next trip to Walt Disney World in Orlando, Florida, or Disneyland in Anaheim, California, by participating in one of the extremely popular races, there are some things you need to know. Keep reading to learn more about runDisney, including what types of races you can participate in, how to register, and what exactly race entry covers. Where are runDisney races held? There are four themed runDisney race weekends at Disney World. The season begins in October with the Disney Wine & Dine Half Marathon Weekend, followed by the Walt Disney World Marathon Weekend in January, the Disney Princess Half Marathon Weekend in February, and concludes with the runDisney Springtime Surprise Weekend in April. My favorite race at Disney World is the runDisney Springtime Surprise Weekend, where the themes change every year. One year, I participated in throwback races, complete with a duo 5K and scavenger hunt through Disney's Animal Kingdom and a 10-miler themed to the Tower of Terror attraction, and another, I raced in a Guardians of the Galaxy—themed 5K. At the Disneyland Resort, there are currently two race weekends: the Disneyland Halloween Half Marathon Weekend in September and the Disneyland Half Marathon Weekend in January. Sadly, after the 2026 Disneyland Half Marathon Weekend, runDisney races at the Disneyland Resort will be paused due to construction projects for upcoming expansions. RunDisney also hosts virtual races, which runners can complete at home, with medals shipped to your doorstep. These include the runDisney Virtual Love on the Run 14-miler in spring and the runDisney Virtual Series in summer. The medals are an enticing enough reason to sign up for a Disney race. Aiden Craver What distances are available for each in-person race weekend? At Walt Disney World, the Disney Wine & Dine and Disney Princess Half Marathon Weekends offer you the chance to participate in a 5K, 10K, and half marathon. The Walt Disney World Marathon Weekend adds a full marathon to the mix. The runDisney Springtime Surprise Weekend offers a 5K, 10K, and 10-miler.