logo
Bill Moyers, the former White House press secretary turned acclaimed TV journalist, dead at 91

Bill Moyers, the former White House press secretary turned acclaimed TV journalist, dead at 91

NEW YORK (AP) — Bill Moyers, the former White House press secretary who became one of television's most honored journalists, masterfully using a visual medium to illuminate a world of ideas, died Thursday at age 91.
Moyer died in a New York City hospital, according to longtime friend Tom Johnson, the former CEO of CNN and an assistant to Moyers during Lyndon B. Johnson's administration. Moyers' son William said his fatehr died at Memorial Sloan Kettering in New York after a 'long illness.'
Moyer's career ranged from youthful Baptist minister to deputy director of the Peace Corps, from Johnson's press secretary to newspaper publisher, senior news analyst for 'The CBS Evening News' and chief correspondent for 'CBS Reports.'
But it was for public television that Moyers produced some of TV's most cerebral and provocative series. In hundreds of hours of PBS programs, he proved at home with subjects ranging from government corruption to modern dance, from drug addiction to media consolidation, from religion to environmental abuse.
In 1988, Moyers produced 'The Secret Government' about the Iran-Contra scandal during the Reagan administration and simultaneously published a book under the same name. Around that time, he galvanized viewers with 'Joseph Campbell and the Power of Myth,' a series of six one-hour interviews with the prominent religious scholar. The accompanying book became a best-seller.
His televised chats with poet Robert Bly almost single-handedly launched the 1990s Men's Movement, and his 1993 series 'Healing and the Mind' had a profound impact on the medical community and on medical education.
In a medium that supposedly abhors 'talking heads' — shots of subject and interviewer talking — Moyers came to specialize in just that. He once explained why: 'The question is, are the talking heads thinking minds and thinking people? Are they interesting to watch? I think the most fascinating production value is the human face.'
(Softly) speaking truth to power
Demonstrating what someone called 'a soft, probing style' in the native Texas accent he never lost, Moyers was a humanist who investigated the world with a calm, reasoned perspective, whatever the subject.
From some quarters, he was blasted as a liberal thanks to his links with Johnson and public television, as well as his no-holds-barred approach to investigative journalism. It was a label he didn't necessarily deny.
'I'm an old-fashion liberal when it comes to being open and being interested in other people's ideas,' he said during a 2004 radio interview. But Moyers preferred to term himself a 'citizen journalist' operating independently, outside the establishment.
Public television (and his self-financed production company) gave him free rein to throw 'the conversation of democracy open to all comers,' he said in a 2007 interview with The Associated Press.
'I think my peers in commercial television are talented and devoted journalists,' he said another time, 'but they've chosen to work in a corporate mainstream that trims their talent to fit the corporate nature of American life. And you do not get rewarded for telling the hard truths about America in a profit-seeking environment.'
Over the years, Moyers was showered with honors, including more than 30 Emmys, 11 George Foster Peabody awards, three George Polks and, twice, the Alfred I. duPont-Columbia University Gold Baton Award for career excellence in broadcast journalism. In 1995, he was inducted into the Television Hall of Fame.
From sports to sports writing
Born in Hugo, Oklahoma, on June 5, 1934, Billy Don Moyers was the son of a dirt farmer-truck driver who soon moved his family to Marshall, Texas. High school led him into journalism.
'I wanted to play football, but I was too small. But I found that by writing sports in the school newspaper, the players were always waiting around at the newsstand to see what I wrote,' he recalled.
He worked for the Marshall News Messenger at age 16. Deciding that Bill Moyers was a more appropriate byline for a sportswriter, he dropped the 'y' from his name.
He graduated from the University of Texas and earned a master's in divinity from Southwestern Baptist Theological Seminary. He was ordained and preached part time at two churches but later decided his call to the ministry 'was a wrong number.'
His relationship with Johnson began when he was in college; he wrote the then-senator offering to work in his 1954 re-election campaign. Johnson was impressed and hired him for a summer job. He was back in Johnson's employ as a personal assistant in the early 1960s and for two years, he worked at the Peace Corps, eventually becoming deputy director.
On the day John F. Kennedy was assassinated in Dallas, Moyers was in Austin helping with the presidential trip. He flew back to Washington on Air Force One with newly sworn-in President Johnson, for whom he held various jobs over the ensuing years, including press secretary.
Moyers' stint as presidential press secretary was marked by efforts to mend the deteriorating relationship between Johnson and the media. But the Vietnam war took its toll and Moyers resigned in December 1966.
Of his departure from the White House, he wrote later, 'We had become a war government, not a reform government, and there was no creative role left for me under those circumstances.'
He conceded that he may have been 'too zealous in my defense of our policies' and said he regretted criticizing journalists such as Pulitzer Prize-winner Peter Arnett, then a special correspondent with the AP, and CBS's Morley Safer for their war coverage.
A long run on television
In 1967, Moyers became publisher of Long Island-based Newsday and concentrated on adding news analyses, investigative pieces and lively features. Within three years, the suburban daily had won two Pulitzers. He left the paper in 1970 after the ownership changed. That summer, he traveled 13,000 miles around the country and wrote a best-selling account of his odyssey: 'Listening to America: a Traveler Rediscovers His Country.'
His next venture was in public television and he won critical acclaim for 'Bill Moyers Journal,' a series in which interviews ranged from Gunnar Myrdal, the Swedish economist, to poet Maya Angelou. He was chief correspondent of 'CBS Reports' from 1976 to 1978, went back to PBS for three years, and then was senior news analyst for CBS from 1981 to 1986.
When CBS cut back on documentaries, he returned to PBS for much less money. 'If you have a skill that you can fold with your tent and go wherever you feel you have to go, you can follow your heart's desire,' he once said.
Monday Mornings
The latest local business news and a lookahead to the coming week.
Then in 1986, he and his wife, Judith Davidson Moyers, became their own bosses by forming Public Affairs Television, an independent shop that has not only produced programs such as the 10-hour 'In Search of the Constitution,' but also paid for them through its own fundraising efforts.
His projects in the 21st century included 'Now,' a weekly PBS public affairs program; a new edition of 'Bill Moyers Journal' and a podcast covering racism, voting rights and the rise of Donald Trump, among other subjects.
Moyers married Judith Davidson, a college classmate, in 1954, and they raised three children, among them the author Suzanne Moyers and author-TV producer William Cope Moyers. Judith eventually became her husband's partner, creative collaborator and president of their production company.
___
AP writer Dave Bauder and Former Associated Press writer Robert Monroe contributed to this report. Moore retired from the AP in 2017.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Iranian-Canadians gripped with fear and uncertainty trying to reach family after U.S., Israeli attacks
Iranian-Canadians gripped with fear and uncertainty trying to reach family after U.S., Israeli attacks

Globe and Mail

time10 minutes ago

  • Globe and Mail

Iranian-Canadians gripped with fear and uncertainty trying to reach family after U.S., Israeli attacks

Saeed Abdollahi had just returned to his Calgary home after work when a friend phoned with the news that U.S. air strikes had targeted his hometown of Isfahan, in central Iran. His heart sank; this was the moment he had feared. The 31-year-old architect turned on the television, desperate for more information from news channels. He frantically tapped out messages to family and friends in Iran, knowing that a near-complete internet blackout meant they wouldn't be received. The government has said it ordered the shutdown because of cybersecurity concerns. Mr. Abdollahi tried calling, but got no answer – he hoped because it was the middle of the night in Iran. 'I was kind of having this nightmare that it is possible to lose my whole family and everybody that I know from home at the same time,' he said in an interview. 'It was hard times. I can't even describe that.' Unease spreads through Iranian-Canadian communities after U.S. strikes The U.S. air strikes on Iran's Fordow, Natanz and Isfahan nuclear sites followed more than a week of attacks by Israel on Iran. The fallout of the conflict has reverberated thousands of kilometres away, including to the Iranian diaspora in Canada who have watched and worried from afar. Mr. Abdollahi, who moved to Canada in 2021 to complete his master's degree, had been on edge throughout the escalation of the long-simmering conflict. After warnings of an imminent offensive by Israel aimed at Iran's nuclear program and military targets, some family members had fled Tehran to seek safety in Isfahan, only for it, too, to be targeted a week later. Mr. Abdollahi would learn a short time later that his family and friends were safe. But the anxiety of an uncertain future remains. 'I keep following the news, the experts on the situation. But even they don't know what's going to happen,' he said. 'The uncertainty is going to remain. My friends and family over there have the same feeling, that it's not over yet.' A timeline of the Israel-Iran conflict and tensions between the two countries Amir Samani moved to Canada at age 12, which was difficult, but he has grown up to understand why his parents left Iran in 2012. The country requires young men to serve in the military – one of the reasons Mr. Samani's last visit was as a teenager. When missiles first struck Iran weeks ago, most of his family left Tehran and took refuge in safer, more rural areas of the country. Mr. Samani's grandmother, who can't travel, stayed behind with his uncle in the city. Not everyone could leave areas targeted by Israeli forces. Many Iranians live in densely populated cities such as Tehran, and residents have work, school and familial responsibilities, said Mr. Samani, who works for a creative agency in Vancouver. Mr. Samani still can't clearly communicate with his family because of sporadic internet outages. He stays in touch through his cousin, who accesses the internet via a VPN, a method he says is uncommon in Iran because it's expensive and requires bypassing firewalls. 'There's a bottleneck on information to a point that locals have a tough time communicating, even by phone calls or lines, because everything's been outed,' Mr. Samani said. Canadians fleeing war in Iran face obstacles in absence of diplomatic ties Sanaz Safa's mother had travelled to Iran shortly before Israel's strikes on the country to visit her ailing mother. After Israel launched its offensive and Iran closed its airspace, Ms. Safa's mother told her daughter in a short phone call that her return flights were cancelled, but that she was not worried. 'And then after that, there was no communication at all,' said Ms. Safa, a medical esthetician in Vancouver. 'There was no internet, there was nothing. I tried to call direct with my own phone, and there was no connection at all.' In a vacuum of information, Ms. Safa feared the worst. Her mind went to 2019, when Iranian authorities shut down internet access during widespread protests to quell information sharing and hide the killing of hundreds of protesters by the country's security forces. 'I was really worried because when government disconnects the internet, that means that they are doing something to the people,' she said. 'I was worried they would do something to civilians and blame it on Israel or the U.S.' Ms. Safa heard from her mother about a week later, when internet connectivity improved. With her mother expected to fly out of Tehran in coming days, and most of their family now living in Europe, Ms. Safa says her thoughts are now with the people of Iran.

The Iran, Israel and U.S. conflict, explained
The Iran, Israel and U.S. conflict, explained

CBC

time36 minutes ago

  • CBC

The Iran, Israel and U.S. conflict, explained

Ceasefire between countries is fragile but holding ⭐️HERE'S WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW⭐️ Israel attacked nuclear facilities in Iran with missiles on June 13. Iran has retaliated with its own strikes, and people on both sides have been killed. On June 21, the United States joined the fighting and bombed a nuclear facility in Iran. Israel and the U.S. said they attacked because Iran is close to building nuclear weapons, which Iran denies. A ceasefire deal reached on June 23 is shaky but appears to be holding. Read on to find out why experts are concerned. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ For almost two weeks, Israel and Iran — two countries in the Middle East — have been at war. It started when Israel said it fired missiles into Iran on June 13 to destroy its nuclear facilities. These are places where a metal called uranium is enriched and turned into a concentrated energy source that could be used to create nuclear weapons, the world's most powerful bombs. Israel said it attacked out of fear that Iran would create those weapons. Iran denies this, saying their nuclear program is for peaceful purposes, like generating power. On June 21, the U.S. got involved by bombing three nuclear sites in Iran. Iran later fired missiles at a U.S. military base in Qatar. A few days later the three countries agreed to a ceasefire, which appears to be holding for now. The conflict in the Middle East as of November 2024 What's a nuclear weapon? You may be wondering— what exactly is a nuclear weapon? Where did they come from, who has them, and why are they such a threat? Read this explainer on nuclear weapons — it may help you better understand the rest of this article and how we got here. Why did Israel attack Iran? Iran's leadership has long called for the destruction of Israel. There's been tension between Iran and Israel for many years, and they've exchanged fire as recently as 2024, though that escalation didn't last long. But on June 13, it once again came to a head. Israel claimed that Iran was very close to making nuclear weapons which could be used against Israel. Israel is widely believed to have its own nuclear weapons, but has denied this. 'In recent months, Iran has taken steps it has never taken before to weaponize this enriched uranium,' said Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu following the initial attack. But was their attack justified? Some have criticized Israel for acting without enough proof. 'There was no evidence that Iran was about to attack Israel,' Mira Sucharov, professor of political science at Carleton University in Ottawa, Ontario, told CBC Kids News. A recent report from the International Atomic Energy Agency — which monitors nuclear programs around the globe — concluded that Iran likely does not currently have nuclear weapons. But they also concluded Iran is likely hiding parts of its nuclear program from inspectors. They also said Iran isn't following all of the rules that many countries around the world have agreed to that prevent the development of more nuclear weapons. Iranian missiles are seen over Israel on June 13. At least 28 Israelis have been killed and more than a thousand wounded, according to Israel's Health Ministry. Still, Sucharov said Israel may have broken international laws that require a country to provide clear evidence of a threat before attacking another country. Others think it was justified regardless. 'Some think Israel's attack was ethical, that they are protecting themselves and protecting the world from a future Iranian nuclear threat,' said Sucharov. Why did the U.S. get involved? Some of Iran's nuclear facilities were buried deep underground, and Israel didn't have the weapons to destroy them. But the U.S. — their close ally — has those weapons. The U.S. has expressed worry about Iran obtaining nuclear weapons for years. 'The U.S. has said for 20 years they could possibly bomb Iran, but no president has ever done so. Here, Trump saw an opportunity,' said Christian Leuprecht, a military expert and professor of political science at Queen's University in Kingston, Ontario. U.S. President Donald Trump said U.S. strikes were necessary to destroy Iran's progress in building a nuclear weapon. (Image credit:) Leuprecht said that opportunity presented itself after Israel weakened Iran over the past year through, among other factors, dismantling some of Iran's key allys. Trump has been negotiating with Iran this year to sign a deal that would limit Iran's nuclear programs in exchange for the U.S. lifting sanctions. Sanctions are penalties that can cost a country lots of money and have weakened Iran's economy. But those negotiations haven't been successful. Leuprecht said Trump may have bombed Iran's nuclear facilities to force them back to negotiations, this time with less leverage. That said, Iran has insisted it will not give up its nuclear program. Despite U.S. strikes hitting three Iranian nuclear sites, it's not clear how much their overall nuclear program has been set back. What's happening now? On Monday, Iran launched attacks on U.S. bases in the Middle Eastern countries of Qatar and Iraq. Early Tuesday morning, Trump announced that the U.S. and Israel had reached a ceasefire deal with Iran. Later that day however, Israel and Iran accused one another of breaking the ceasefire through missile strikes. On Wednesday, the ceasefire appeared to be holding and Trump said that U.S. and Iranian officials would reenter talks next week. Have more questions? Want to tell us how we're doing? Use the 'send us feedback' link below. ⬇️⬇️⬇️ With files from The Associated Press and Reuters

How Donald Trump finally learned to love NATO — for now
How Donald Trump finally learned to love NATO — for now

Vancouver Sun

time2 hours ago

  • Vancouver Sun

How Donald Trump finally learned to love NATO — for now

WASHINGTON — It will go down as the summit where U.S. President Donald Trump learned to stop worrying and love NATO. Trump revelled in gushing praise from leaders in The Hague — including being called 'daddy' by alliance chief Mark Rutte — and a pledge to boost defense spending as he had demanded. But it went further than just lapping up flattery. Trump also spoke of what sounded like an almost religious conversion to NATO, after years of bashing other members as freeloaders and threatening to leave. 'I came here because it was something I'm supposed to be doing, but I left here a little bit differently,' Trump said at his closing press conference on Wednesday. Start your day with a roundup of B.C.-focused news and opinion. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Sunrise will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'I watched the heads of these countries get up, and the love and the passion that they showed for their country was unbelievable. I've never seen quite anything like it. 'It was really moving to see it.' A day after returning to the White House, Trump still sounded uncharacteristically touchy-feely about his time with his 31 NATO counterparts. 'A wonderful day with incredible and caring Leaders,' he posted on his Truth Social platform on Thursday. Turnaround It was a remarkable turnaround from the US president's first term. Trump repeatedly berated allies as not paying up and threatened to pull the United States out of NATO as part of his wider disdain for international institutions and alliances. At his first summit in 2017 in Brussels, Trump memorably shoved aside Montenegro's prime minister Dusko Markovic as he made his way to the front of the stage. A year later Trump publicly lambasted Germany and privately talked about wanting to quit. But this time NATO leaders had carefully choreographed the trip. They massaged the numbers to give Trump the defense spending deal he craved. And while Trump headed to the summit dropping F-bombs in frustration at a shaky Iran-Israel ceasefire, NATO leaders love-bombed him from the moment he arrived. The Netherlands put him up overnight in the Dutch king's royal palace and gave him a royal dinner and breakfast — 'beautiful,' according to Trump — while NATO organizers kept the summit deliberately short. Frederick Kempe, the chief executive officer of the Atlantic Council, said Trump had 'waxed poetic' about NATO in a way he had never done before. 'Trump — the vilifier of European deadbeats on defense and crusader against allies for what he sees as unfair trade practices — sounded like an altered man,' he said in a commentary. 'Daddy's Home' The question now is what it means for NATO when the alliance's priorities end up guided by one man. The final summit statement's language on Russia's invasion of Ukraine was watered down from previous years. It also made no mention of Ukraine's push to join NATO. Reporters were not allowed into Trump's meeting with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky. The move was partly because of their Oval Office bust-up in February, but it also deprived Zelensky of the set-piece he had craved. 'The biggest loser was Ukraine,' said Ed Arnold of the Royal United Services Institute in London. Trump also hinted at what lies in store for any backsliders on the defense spending pledge, threatening to make Spain 'pay' on trade over its resistance to commit to the new target. As with any relationship, the pressure will now be on NATO to keep up the first flush of love over the three summits that are due to take place over the rest of Trump's second term. 'The real worry is that NATO will be unable to keep up the hype,' said Arnold. For now, though, Trump and his administration seem to be content. As he arrived back in Washington, the White House posted a video of summit highlights, with the caption: 'Daddy's Home.' Our website is the place for the latest breaking news, exclusive scoops, longreads and provocative commentary. Please bookmark and sign up for our daily newsletter, Posted, here .

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store