Vat legal challenge could have wider implications
Court still to decide on constitutional validity of altering tax rates by 'announcement'.
The next crucial chapter in the value-added tax (Vat) case before the Western Cape High Court relates to the power given to the minister of finance to alter a tax rate by virtue of an announcement in the annual budget.
Political parties the DA and EFF challenge the constitutionality of Section 7(4) of the Vat Act. However, this case may even have wider implications since the Income Tax Act bestows a similar power on the minister of finance to alter other tax rates, including income tax, donations tax and dividend-withholding tax.
In 2022 Ben Cronin, lecturer at the University of Cape Town and advocate of the high court, in his thesis 'Law by decree: A critique of section 5(2) of the Income Tax Act' addressed the question of whether the power to 'alter a tax rate by announcement' infringes on the separation-of-powers doctrine and the Constitution.
This unique power has never been tested in court.
However, this specific power and Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's reliance on Section 7(4) of the Vat Act to raise the rate in his budget from 15% to 15.5% is now being challenged.
Section 7(4) of the Vat Act bestows the minister with the same powers as Section 5(2) of the Income Tax Act to increase the tax rate by way of an announcement in his annual budget.
The Western Cape High Court has suspended the Vat rate increase pending the passing of legislation regulating the rate or the final determination of Part B (of the applications) – whichever occurs first.
ALSO READ: Godongwana consents to court order against VAT increase
Constitutional validity
In Part B the DA asks the court to declare Section 7(4) of the Vat Act constitutionally invalid. The declaration should only be retrospective to 1 March 2025. It does not ask for full retrospectivity as that would undo the increase from 14% to 15% in 2018.
Two issues that came before the court when the DA, EFF, speaker of parliament, and the minister of finance presented their cases related to separation of power between the legislature and the executive, and public participation.
These issues were extensively dealt with in Cronin's thesis that questioned the delegation of power that allows the minister to increase tax rates in the Income Tax Act, 'whether income tax, donations tax, or dividends withholding tax'.
These taxes have all been amended subject to a ratification by parliament within 12 months.
This unique power given to the minister was first introduced in 2016 and has subsequently been substituted by Section 3 of the Taxation Laws Amendment Act of 2018.
'Section 5(2) of the Income Tax Act as it reads today, in fact, represents a dramatic departure from the pre-existing statutory regime which recognised the authority of Parliament to determine the income tax rate on an annual basis,' Cronin stated in his thesis.
An important question that he addressed is whether parliament could 'assign an inherently legislative power to a member of the executive – namely to make law'.
ALSO READ: Practical implications of reversing the 0.5% VAT increase – Sars
Delegation of power
Cronin quotes the Second Executive Council Judgment case before the Constitutional Court, where the court's position appeared to be that parliament simply cannot delegate its plenary function to make primary legislation.
There is scope for the delegation of secondary law-making powers to members of the executive, but in this regard the legislature must nevertheless jealously guard its exclusive legislative competence and can only justifiably delegate such secondary law-making powers within the context of clear legislative guidelines.
The 'outright assignment' of the power to announce new tax rates in Section 5(2) of the Income Tax Act is therefore incompatible with the application of the Separation of Powers Doctrine envisaged by the Constitutional Court.
Cronin added that when parliament purported to delegate the power to determine and amend the income tax rate in terms of Section 5(2), it was attempting to assign a power that 'exceeds the competence of Parliament itself'.
'The law-making process cannot be given effect to by mere fiat declarations and in its original or plenary form it certainty cannot be delegated away by Parliament,' he argued.
ALSO READ: Budget 3.0 not unexpected, possible decrease in social grant increase
Public participation
Cronin also noted in his thesis that parliament must create opportunities to comment and influence the final wording of legislation.
This is simply 'axiomatically not possible' where laws are amended by mere announcement by a member of the executive as is envisaged in Section 5(2) of the Income Tax Act.
He submitted that if the minister uses the section to 'unilaterally amend a standing law', he would be indirectly pulling the entire law-making process into the troubled waters of conflicting directly with the Constitution that requires public access to and involvement in the legislative processes of the National Assembly.
This article was republished from Moneyweb. Read the original here.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Maverick
9 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
The DA's employment equity case attempts to reverse transformation and entrench white minority privilege
The Democratic Alliance's (DA's) legal challenge to the Employment Equity Amendment Act (EEAA) is a thinly veiled attempt to reverse economic transformation and thereby entrench white minority privilege. The party's claim that its court action is in opposition to 'grand social engineering' rings hollow given the enduring legacy of apartheid's social and economic architecture. In truth, the DA's stance on EEAA is an ideological inheritance, a continuation of their historical resistance to redress; part of its raison d'être to fossilise colonial and apartheid racial and gender hierarchies. To appreciate this, let us briefly consider the Department of Employment and Labour's 24th Commission for Employment Equity (CEE) Annual Report (2023/24). It exposes the fiction that the private sector is a transformed happy terrain which the DA seeks to shield from the supposed 'interference' of the government. The report illustrates a country still struggling to shrug off the shadow of economic apartheid. For example, while the white population group constitutes 7.7% of the nation's economically active population (EAP), it nevertheless held 62.1% of top management level positions in 2023. Representing 2.6% of the EAP, South Africans of Indian descent held 11.6% of these posts. At 80.7% of EAP, black Africans hold 17.2% of top management roles, while coloureds, at 9% of the EAP, account for a paltry 6.1%. These disparities are neither natural nor God ordained; they are an outcome of Verwoerdian economic violence against Africans, coloureds and Indians. The CEE report also damningly notes that the majority of recruitment, promotion and skills-development opportunities at this highest echelon continue to flow to the white population group. This is not merit, it is the perpetuation of a boardroom order where white privilege remains the default. Conveyor belt of privilege The disparity reflected at top management cascades downwards to the senior management level where whites at 7.7% of EAP occupy 48.5% of positions, Indians who constitute 2.6% of EAP hold 12.4%, while black Africans hold 27.6% of positions despite being 80.7% of the population. The lion's share of opportunities still flows to those already at the top, which means that transformation is perpetually decked against a conveyor belt of privilege. The private sector emerges as the stronghold of this resistance. While the government has made commendable strides, achieving 74.7% black African representation at top management, the private sector languishes with a pitiful 14% black African representation at this level, effectively maintaining the apartheid-era status quo, where 65.1% of top posts are held by white individuals. Alongside racial disparities is gender inequality. Across all sectors, men dominate top management by more than two-and-a-half times females (roughly 73% male). While the government shows marginally better female representation at 35.4% in top leadership, the private sector registers 10% less, at 25.8%. This glass ceiling, often a result of old boys' clubs dressing up exclusion as 'culture fit', is an outcome of a patriarchal culture which compounds racial exclusion and puts paid to the mythology of a self-correcting market. Nowhere is this private-sector exceptionalism and entrenched bias more grotesque than in the DA-run Western Cape, their self-proclaimed bastion of good governance. There, white males alone occupy a staggering 57.2% of top management positions and 34.4% at senior management level. This is in a province where white people constitute only 17% of the population, compared with 42% coloured and 38% black African – who together form 80% of the residents. This is not a reflection of a 'dearth of qualified candidates'; it is a damning testament to a systemic racial and gender bias thriving under a political administration that pays lip service to equality while actively fighting the tools designed to achieve it. Coloured and black African professionals are corralled into the lower tiers by an exclusionary 'culture fit' that walks and quacks like 'job reservation' in post-apartheid South Africa. These are the gatekeepers making crucial investment and employment decisions and shaping institutional cultures that too often exclude black African, coloured and Indian talent. In its affidavit to the North Gauteng High Court, the DA wilfully misrepresents the amended Section 15A of the EEAA, which empowers the minister to set 'numerical targets', as a draconian imposition of immutable 'quotas'. Yet, the original Employment Equity Act (EEA), in Section 15(3), explicitly clarifies that affirmative action measures 'include preferential treatment and numerical goals, but exclude quotas'. The Constitution itself was drafted to smash apartheid's economic architecture, not to immortalise it, and the Employment Equity Act is one of our key demolition hammers. Transformation failure The current amendments provide a desperately needed impetus precisely because the 'context-sensitive employer-led plans' so cherished by the DA have demonstrably failed to achieve substantive transformation, as the CEE statistics brutally confirm. Furthermore, the Act is far from being the rigid cudgel the DA portrays. Section 15A (3) explicitly provides for nuanced, differentiated targets responsive to occupational levels, sub-sectors or regions. Critically, Section 42(4) explicitly permits any employer to 'raise any reasonable ground to justify its failure to comply'. The Act has consistently emphasised the appointment of 'suitably qualified' individuals. Nothing in the Act prohibits the appointment of a candidate from a non-designated group if a diligent, exhaustive search does not find a suitably qualified candidate from a designated group. In practice, the Act operates much like our critical-skills visa process – nuanced, consultative and always mindful of maintaining standards. This inherent flexibility exposes the DA's opposition as ideological warfare rather than a practical critique. Their true grievance is with the erosion of racial privilege. Qualified franchise, swart gevaar This position is not new for the DA. As recently as 1978, 47 years ago, the DA, then called the Progressive Party, championed a qualified franchise for black people over universal adult suffrage or 'one person, one vote'. Revealing – more than it concealed – its contempt for black people, this party, which claims liberal credentials, argued that black people needed to have attained a certain level of education and own property in order to vote. No doubt a strategy to manage the savages. After rebranding as the Democratic Party, it opposed the Labour Relations Act of 1995 and the original Employment Equity Act of 1998 on grounds that these laws offend against 'meritocracy'. You can accuse the DA as you will, but inconsistency in protecting white minority privilege cannot be one of its faults. The DA's dire prophecy that the Act will cripple investment or decimate employment is an old swart gevaar red herring pure and simple. After the original EEA took effect, between 2001 and 2007, South Africa's economy grew between 4.5%-5.5%, while unemployment dropped by 11%, proving that equity policies can coexist with economic expansion. The real drags on investment are challenges such as energy and logistics bottlenecks and crime, not the presence of black African women and men in the C-suite. By selectively championing Section 9(1) of the Constitution (equality) while ignoring the clear mandate of Section 9(2) – the solemn duty to enact measures that advance those historically disadvantaged by unfair discrimination – the DA reveals its true colours. It aligns itself with every white-supremacist argument ever used to defy meaningful change. This constitutional mandate demands decisive, active intervention, not passive hope or transformation on its terms – optional, non-binding and perpetually negotiable. No Bantustan boardrooms The EEAA, fortified by the undeniable truth of the CEE's findings, stands as an indispensable instrument in our protracted struggle to dismantle structural racism, unlock the full spectrum of South African talent and forge an inclusive economy – a boardroom that is not a Bantustan reflecting a 7% minority. We cannot allow the boardrooms of corporate South Africa to remain gated enclaves. The consequences for doing so would be more than symbolic. These are the individuals who shape investment decisions, workplace cultures and corporate governance. If they do not reflect our nation, neither will our economy. Besides, we can forget about social and political stability – something to which the DA either pays lip service or does not appreciate, or both. The DA has no history of genuinely advancing the interests of black people in general, Africans, coloureds and Indians in particular, in our country. Its historic positions are consistent with this latest offensive and an affront to the eradication of the legacy of colonialism and apartheid. South Africans must ask – whose freedom is advanced if the DA wins? Certainly not the coloured engineer passed over because she 'won't fit the culture'. Not the black African professional locked out of a training programme because the boardroom is 'already diverse enough'. The only winners would be those who mistake yesterday's privilege for today's right.
The Citizen
10 hours ago
- The Citizen
Thandiswa Mazwai says she would've accepted invite to national dialogue had Ramaphosa sent it
Thandiswa Mazwai's music often has social and political commentary On Tuesday, President Cyril Ramaphosa announced the date and names of those invited to the national dialogue, where some of the country's pressing issues will be discussed. 'There have been many of these over the years, and I have attended some,' Thandiswa Mazwai tells The Citizen. The renowned singer-songwriter says she wasn't invited by Ramaphosa, but says she would've accepted the invitation had it come. 'There is much to be legislated in our industry and much to be done to protect artist rights, livelihoods and dignity,' shared Thandiswa. ALSO READ: Ready to dazzle: Afro-soul singer Thandiswa Mazwai releases 'Sankofa' album Singing truth to power In the art and creative space, the president invited elders Dr John Kani and author and poet Gcina Mhlope. The dialogue has drawn mixed reactions throughout the country, with the Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) describing it as a 'meaningless publicity stunt by a limping president who is leading a limping former liberation movement'. Through her music, Mazwai has provided social and political commentary, often targeting those in power. Her song, Kunzima: dark side of the rainbow, is a perfect example of her sharp melodic criticism. 'Fools for leaders, their minds left destitute by greed, no souls to speak of, they cannot be redeemed, fiends for war…' Thandiswa sings on the song. The politically charged song is part of Thandiswa's Sankofa album, which was released just over a year ago. Thandiswa spoke to The Citizen ahead of her performance at the Lyric Theatre at Johannesburg's Gold Reef City, where she will celebrate a year of Sanfoka. 'This show will exclusively cover the music from Belede and Sankofa,' she shares. ALSO READ: 'I cannot believe it's been 20 years' – Thandiswa Mazwai on new album and 20 years of 'Zabalaza' A year of Sankofa Sankofa was released on 10 May 2024. Before its release, Thandiswa had last released a body of work in 2016 with Belede. Despite the long break between her albums, during which the world had changed, Thandiswa said she wasn't nervous about how her music would be received. 'Not at all,' she says. 'Even though I haven't released new music, I have been performing a lot, and the audience has been getting exposed to all the things I experiment with. Especially Jozi audiences, who can sometimes get impromptu rock performances or a set with a DJ.' She says the release of Zabalaza in 2004 taught her that people can grow with her sonically. 'Sankofa is a very layered and lush album, and I know there is an audience for that. It has also been very masterfully put together by all the musicians who were involved.' The word sankofa is derived from the Akan Tribe of Ghana, which can be translated into 'go back and get it'. The essence of the meaning symbolises going back in order to move forward. This was somewhat literal for Thandiswa, as she delved into the International Library of African Music (ILAM) at Rhodes University, an archive of African sounds. The launch of the album at Carnival City's Big Top Arena last year was more than a musical experience; it also offered itself as a safe space for black women in particular. Thandiswa's concerts inevitably become a place of healing, love and a safe space for her core fans – a significant part of that fandom is the queer community. She preceded the performance of her latest single, Kulungil, by sharing a bit about her past traumas − her backdrop was an old photo of a young Thandiswa in the rural Eastern Cape. She even revealed that on the day the photo was taken, she had experienced something traumatic. It was more than just a music show for black women. It was a safe space for them to be. Her performances at last year's Bushfire Festival and the Standard Bank Joy of Jazz were equally appreciated by a more diverse demographic. 'We have really enjoyed playing this music along with the rest of the discography around the world. It's always such a trip watching people sing new music back to you,' says Thandiswa with gratitude. ALSO READ: Collaborative Wouter Kellerman bags Grammy nomination as Thandiswa's 'Sankofa' misses out Awards and such Sankofa lost out on a Grammy nomination and also failed to win at the Metro Awards, where it was nominated in the Best Jazz category. 'I don't usually win awards,' Thandiswa says. 'I'm experimental, and awards require very constant ideas on what constitutes genre. For instance, Sankofa was nominated in the jazz category, but it really isn't jazz. It is a sound all on its own, and it definitely has jazz influences, but it also has deep Xhosa and Senegalese influences.' The Metro Award went to saxophonist and composer Linda Sikhakhane for iLandi, whom Thandiswa congratulated. The Grammy nomination, which saw Mzansi's Wouter Kellerman nominated and eventually win, is a lot trickier, where Academy members vote for entries in two rounds. 'This was our first attempt, and we enjoyed the experience, but I am acutely aware of the fact that we don't need these awards for validation,' she shares. 'So as long as it's all good fun and not a bar to measure our worth, it's all good.' Thandiswa has a wide range of fans, from the youthful ones who were aware of her performance on Tiny Desk and cheered her on, to the more senior ones who aren't able to navigate YouTube. 'It feels good to be seen. It feels good to be appreciated. It feels good to be affirmed and reminded that you are indeed doing what you were called to do.' NOW READ: Thandiswa Mazwai creates a safe space for black women at Carnival City
Eyewitness News
11 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Gauteng DA accuses provincial govt of failing to prioritise residents' safety
JOHANNESBURG - The Democratic Alliance (DA) has accused the Gauteng government of failing to prioritise the safety of residents in the province, citing that there are more than 100 unfilled vacancies for mechanics within the provincial police department. The party believes this has contributed to delays in the repair of South African Police Service (SAPS) vehicles, which often leads to a shortage of crime-fighting resources. DA's Shadow MEC of Gauteng Community Safety said this undermines crime prevention efforts. "This is unacceptable and shows that the Lesufi-led government is not prioritising the protection of the people of Gauteng or addressing unemployment. Many crimes could have been prevented if these positions had been filled, helping police combat crime by ensuring that vehicles are readily available for policing.' Meanwhile, in response to DA's questions, Premier Panyaza Lesufi wrote that the posts can only be filled by applicants who have the required skills and qualifications.
