How shipping in the EU is driving the rapid loss of Arctic sea ice
Black carbon emissions from European shipping in the Arctic have been significantly underestimated, a new study suggests.
Produced by the incomplete combustion of fuels in ship engines, black carbon is contributing to the rapid loss of Arctic sea ice.
Previous reports have only focused on vessels flying EU flags, overlooking the impact of ships travelling to and from EU ports.
'Our findings show that ships connected to EU trade, regardless of their flag, are major drivers of black carbon pollution in the Arctic,' says Liudmila Osipova, senior researcher at the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), and lead author of its new study.
'Recognising these emissions in future policies could help the EU better align its climate goals with its real footprint in the Arctic.'
As Arctic shipping activity increases, so too are the associated black carbon (BC) emissions.
Between 2015 and 2021, BC emissions in the International Maritime Organisation (IMO)'s definition of the Arctic nearly doubled, according to the study.
In the more broadly defined Geographic Arctic, shipping emitted 1.5 kilotonnes (kt) of BC and 12 kt of CO₂ in 2021. About a quarter of these emissions occurred within the IMO definition of the Arctic, indicating a strong growth in BC emissions in the polar area, from 193 tonnes in 2015 to 413 tonnes six years later.
This growth trend is concerning, since one tonne of black carbon has a global warming effect equivalent to 900 tonnes of CO₂, as it absorbs more heat in the atmosphere.
BC's impact is particularly pronounced in the Arctic. When the sooty particles settle on snow or ice, they reduce the albedo of these surfaces, meaning they reflect less light and so melt faster.
This compounds the climate challenges in a region which is already heating up three to four times faster than the global average.
Despite its potent climate and health impacts - it is linked to lung cancer, respiratory illness, and cardiopulmonary disease - BC remains one of the most unregulated short-lived climate and air pollutants.
Brussels typically only accounts for the emissions from its EU-flagged ships in the Arctic. To give a truer picture of the pollution over which the bloc has control, ICCT has also totted up BC and CO₂ from EU-regulated ships, which answer to the EU Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) system as they voyage between EU ports.
These vessels are the bigger polluters, it found. BC and CO₂ emissions from EU-regulated ships of at least 5,000 gross tonnage were nearly double those from EU-flagged ships in the IMO Arctic in 2021.
That year, nearly three-quarters of the ships operating in the Geographic Arctic and half of those in the IMO Arctic were navigating to or from EU ports.
To address a significant gap in its maritime regulation, the researchers say that EU policymakers could include BC among the pollutants measured and reported within the bloc's MRV system.
Beyond improved emissions tracking, there are various ways to reduce BC emissions, such as incentivising ships to use distillate instead of residual fuel, and encouraging the installation of diesel particulate filters on board.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
2 days ago
- Euronews
How shipping in the EU is driving the rapid loss of Arctic sea ice
Black carbon emissions from European shipping in the Arctic have been significantly underestimated, a new study suggests. Produced by the incomplete combustion of fuels in ship engines, black carbon is contributing to the rapid loss of Arctic sea ice. Previous reports have only focused on vessels flying EU flags, overlooking the impact of ships travelling to and from EU ports. 'Our findings show that ships connected to EU trade, regardless of their flag, are major drivers of black carbon pollution in the Arctic,' says Liudmila Osipova, senior researcher at the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT), and lead author of its new study. 'Recognising these emissions in future policies could help the EU better align its climate goals with its real footprint in the Arctic.' As Arctic shipping activity increases, so too are the associated black carbon (BC) emissions. Between 2015 and 2021, BC emissions in the International Maritime Organisation (IMO)'s definition of the Arctic nearly doubled, according to the study. In the more broadly defined Geographic Arctic, shipping emitted 1.5 kilotonnes (kt) of BC and 12 kt of CO₂ in 2021. About a quarter of these emissions occurred within the IMO definition of the Arctic, indicating a strong growth in BC emissions in the polar area, from 193 tonnes in 2015 to 413 tonnes six years later. This growth trend is concerning, since one tonne of black carbon has a global warming effect equivalent to 900 tonnes of CO₂, as it absorbs more heat in the atmosphere. BC's impact is particularly pronounced in the Arctic. When the sooty particles settle on snow or ice, they reduce the albedo of these surfaces, meaning they reflect less light and so melt faster. This compounds the climate challenges in a region which is already heating up three to four times faster than the global average. Despite its potent climate and health impacts - it is linked to lung cancer, respiratory illness, and cardiopulmonary disease - BC remains one of the most unregulated short-lived climate and air pollutants. Brussels typically only accounts for the emissions from its EU-flagged ships in the Arctic. To give a truer picture of the pollution over which the bloc has control, ICCT has also totted up BC and CO₂ from EU-regulated ships, which answer to the EU Monitoring, Reporting, and Verification (MRV) system as they voyage between EU ports. These vessels are the bigger polluters, it found. BC and CO₂ emissions from EU-regulated ships of at least 5,000 gross tonnage were nearly double those from EU-flagged ships in the IMO Arctic in 2021. That year, nearly three-quarters of the ships operating in the Geographic Arctic and half of those in the IMO Arctic were navigating to or from EU ports. To address a significant gap in its maritime regulation, the researchers say that EU policymakers could include BC among the pollutants measured and reported within the bloc's MRV system. Beyond improved emissions tracking, there are various ways to reduce BC emissions, such as incentivising ships to use distillate instead of residual fuel, and encouraging the installation of diesel particulate filters on board.
Euronews
3 days ago
- Euronews
EU Commission in a hurry on super-computing quantum strategy
The European Commission is planning to present a strategy on quantum earlier than expected in June this year in a bid to boost uptake of the technology considered capable of leading to breakthroughs in medicines and finance. The Commission began consulting on a plan early last month and originally intended to launch the strategy in the third quarter of the year. The proposal will aim to reinforce Europe's tech sovereignty and economic security in quantum technologies, including computing and communication. It is expected to call for member state cooperation to fully implement the European Declaration on Quantum Technologies, which was signed last spring. It will also call for alignment of major research and development programmes and pool resources to avoid fragmentation and duplication, and collectively build pan-European quantum infrastructures, such as for quantum chip manufacturing and specialised platforms for computing and ensure a stable supply of critical components. 'The EU is strong in early-stage research but often struggles with scaling up, commercialisation and global outreach,' the Commission said when garnering feedback. In addition, it said that the EU lacks industrial capacity in key areas, such as the production of quantum processors and other hardware components. 'This technological dependence raises sovereignty concerns, particularly regarding supply chain vulnerabilities. Without a robust industrial base, the EU risks remaining dependent on non-EU providers for critical components.' In her confirmation hearing, the EU's Tech Commissioner, Henna Virkkunen, pledged to introduce a new strategy to boost the technology. Her mission letter, drafted by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, said that the EU should intensify efforts and investment 'concerning the next wave of 'frontier technologies', including quantum computing.' The Draghi report on competitiveness, which came out late last year, also said that quantum computing will have a foundational role in next-generation digital frameworks, with major economic and security implications. It could contribute up to €850 billion to the EU economy in the next 15-30 years, his report claimed.
Euronews
20-05-2025
- Euronews
Can the EU do enough to attract scientists to work in its countries?
The European Commission this month pledged a new package of €500 million for the period 2025-2027, part of which will be specifically earmarked for research projects with industrial applications. President Ursula von der Leyen said the bloc needs to "stand for science" in a speech at the Sorbonne University in Paris, adding that it's 'the fuel for growth and progress' but 'is being questioned in today's world". US government budget cuts are seen as an opportunity to attract such talent to Europe, as Ekaterina Zaharieva, European Commissioner for start-ups, research and innovation, acknowledged. "In Europe, we do things differently. We don't tell researchers how and what to research. We respect their freedom to research and they are welcome in Europe," Zaharieva told Euronews. A new European Research Area Act is intended to entrench freedom of scientific research into law. "In Germany, for example, academic and research freedom are considered fundamental rights and are already enshrined in the German constitution," explains Amandine Hess, who covered the announcement for Euronews. A new seven-year grant will provide researchers with long-term career prospects and researchers who move to Europe will receive a supplement on top of the grant (the amount will be doubled this year). But the bureaucracy that scientists face when applying for grants and the difficulties faced by institutions with limited budgets show that the EU is far from delivering on its promises. "We are really very focused on reducing bureaucracy, reducing reporting demands and focusing on how to make the program more accessible to smaller research organisations, to smaller companies, which will save applicants time and money," said the European Commissioner, referring to Horizon Europe, the EU's main funding programme for research and innovation. Horizon Europe has a budget of €93 billion within the EU's seven-year rolling budget. But member states are responsible for national investment, and there are significant disparities: Belgium spends 3.4% of its GDP, while Romania only 0.4%. In total, the EU spends 2.2% of its GDP on research and the Commission has set a target of 3% by 2030. But even that figure is well below that of other advanced regions, such as the United States at 3.5% and Japan at 3.3%. Scientists fear that the research will not be sufficiently funded within the next rolling budget. 'Public funds will never be enough. So what the Commission is working on is how to get more private sector investment in research innovation,' Zaharieva argued. 'But what we are lagging behind is really in transferring this knowledge to the market, which is what the Competitiveness Fund is all about. The Research Framework is in our treaties, but the connection with competitiveness is really crucial for the implementation,"she claimed. Watch the video here! Journalist: Isabel Marques da Silva Content production: Pilar Montero López Video production: Zacharia Vigneron Graphism: Loredana Dumitru Editorial coordination: Ana Lázaro Bosch and Jeremy Fleming-Jones The European Union intends to forge ahead with a new package of sanctions against Russia to exert greater pressure on Vladimir Putin to accept a 30-day unconditional ceasefire in Ukraine, despite the United States not doing so at this stage. But the sanctions face an uphill struggle to be approved due to Hungary's steadfast opposition and lack of coordination with Washington. The course of action envisioned by Brussels includes tightening the price cap on Russian crude oil, which might be virtually impossible to achieve without the US joining in. "An 18th package is being prepared with further hard-hitting sanctions," Ursula von der Leyen, the president of the European Commission, said on Tuesday after holding a phone call with Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. "It's time to intensify the pressure on Russia to bring about the ceasefire," she added. High Representative Kaja Kallas admitted the unanimous agreement would be "difficult" to find among member states but said the challenge should not deter the bloc from moving forward. "I do not think we have a choice. We need to put more pressure," said Kallas, arriving at a meeting of foreign affairs ministers in Brussels. "We want to see those consequences also from the US side. We really haven't seen the pressure on Russia from these talks." Following a two-hour phone call between Trump and Putin on Monday, the American president announced that Russia and Ukraine would "immediately start negotiations toward a ceasefire and, more importantly, an end to the war." The conditions for such a ceasefire, he said, would be "negotiated between the two parties, as it can only be". "Let the process begin!" he said on social media. Putin, for his part, said Russia would work with Ukraine on a "memorandum" about the terms of a "possible ceasefire for a certain period of time". The truce, though, would be contingent upon whether "appropriate agreements are reached", he noted. The Russian leader continues to drag his feet on accepting Trump's proposal for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire, which Ukraine and European allies have firmly backed as a necessary prelude to in-depth negotiations. Despite the rebuff, Trump later told reporters he would not impose fresh sanctions against the Kremlin, hoping the latest phone call would lead to tangible progress. "I think there's a chance of getting something done, and if you do that, you could also make it much worse. But there could be a time where that's going to happen," he said. White House officials had previously been threatening to tighten the screws on the Russian economy to force the Kremlin into a temporary truce. "What I can tell you is the sanctions were very ineffective during the Biden administration because they kept them low because they were afraid of pushing up domestic oil prices," Scott Bessent, the US Secretary of the Treasury, said on Sunday. The gap in thinking between the US and the EU was laid bare after the phone call that Trump held with European leaders. "Europe will increase pressure on Moscow through sanctions. This is what we agreed on with POTUS after his conversation with Putin," said German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Zelenskyy, who was also part of the call, said that "if the Russians are not ready to stop the killings, there must be stronger sanctions". The European Commission is currently designing what is expected to be the 18th package of sanctions on Russia since February 2022, targeting the banking sector, the Nord Stream pipelines and more vessels from the so-called "shadow fleet". Von der Leyen has also suggested lowering the price cap on Russian crude oil, which the G7 established in late 2022 at $60 per barrel. The cap has remained untouched since then, even if Moscow has continued to trade well above the mark. Bringing down the $60 price tag to further squeeze the Kremlin's revenues will necessitate an agreement with the White House and other G7 partners. Trump's decision not to proceed with further sanctions at this stage risks derailing the review, which has been supported by Kyiv, the Nordics and the Baltics. "We'll see whether that can be really (done) in the form of a G7 joint measure or not," said Paula Pinho, the Commission's chief spokesperson. Another point that separates transatlantic allies is their vision for the day after the war. In his read-out, Trump expressed his desire to resume economic relations with Russia, something that could happen once sanctions are lifted. "There is a tremendous opportunity for Russia to create massive amounts of jobs and wealth," he said. By contrast, the EU has consistently said sanctions would be removed only after Russia withdraws its military forces from Ukrainian territory and a lasting peace has been achieved. Moreover, the majority of member states agree that Russia's frozen assets, worth €210 billion, should remain paralysed until Moscow pays for war reparations. Earlier this month, the Commission presented an ambitious roadmap to phase out all imports of Russian energy by the end of 2027 – a huge diminution of trade.
