logo
Is Austerity The Price Of  Defending Europe?

Is Austerity The Price Of Defending Europe?

Forbes20-03-2025
LIVERPOOL, ENGLAND - SEPTEMBER 25: Liz Kendall, Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, speaks ... [+] during the Labour Party Conference 2024 at ACC Liverpool on September 25, 2024 in Liverpool, England. This is Labour's first conference since they were returned as the governing party of The UK and Northern Ireland by voters in the July election, ending 14 years of Conservative rule. They won with a landslide majority of 172 seats, and 412 in total. (Photo by)
While Germany's Green party has ultimately consented to the increase in military and infrastructure spending, Germany has scope to add debt. Britain, France and Spain do not and as such policy debates in the major European countries are focusing again on fiscal reform. They are now part of a growing trend of European countries being forced int austerity, at a potentially very unpopular political cost.
In the UK, Labour is enacting deep cuts to disability payments – something unpopular with much of its party – but that will have a material impact on the UK's fiscal outlook. Since COVID disability insurance payouts have rocketed – owing to the ease of the appraisal process, the rise in mental disability in the post COVID period and the tendency of some to substitute disability social welfare for other formed of state aid (that have been cut back).
One in ten people of working age in the UK are claiming benefits. The rise in disability payouts has also skewed the UK labour market with of young workers opting out of the labour market and this has hurt growth and productivity. On Tuesday (18th) the UK's work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall, in a 'Pathways to Work' greenpaper, announced a series of measures that will make future disability payments harder to claim, soften conditions for those with severe physical disability and measures to incentivise people to return to work.
While the measures were criticised by charities and some on the left of Labour, they can be taken as evidence of Labour's determination to manage the budget and to bolster growth.
Also, In France the prime minister Francois Bayrou has recently re-opened the debate on the reform of pensions by having it analysed by a conclave of social partners (e.g. unions), but he has warned that the rise in the pension age from 62 to 64 will not be reversed. Pensions and social welfare costs are one of the largest drains on French government finances and an area where France is well ahead of its EU peers in terms of its generosity to its citizens.
Spain for its part is facing growing scrutiny over its relatively small level of defence spending (1.3% GDP) and poor combat readiness. Prime minister Pedro Sanchez has tried to bargain for cybersecurity spending, climate related spending and counter-terrorism to count as part of government sending but this has been rejected by EU partners. Sanchez has a very thin margin in parliament and will soon have to try to vote through a budget for 2025.
In summary, there is now a trend towards fiscal consolidation in the world economy and arguably a passage towards central banks as the underwriters of growth. In Europe the political euphoria around the Union's move to bolster its defences is giving way to reality around hard financial choices. In most European countries, politically unpopular fiscal questions will be revisited as we move through 2025.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Two Labour-run councils 'considering all options' to challenge migrant hotel use
Two Labour-run councils 'considering all options' to challenge migrant hotel use

Yahoo

time3 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Two Labour-run councils 'considering all options' to challenge migrant hotel use

Two Labour-run councils have said they are considering taking legal action to stop the use of hotels to house migrants in their areas after Epping council won a temporary injunction on Tuesday. The leaders of Wirral and Tamworth councils both say they are considering their legal options in the wake of the Epping case, citing similar concerns about the impact of the hotels on their local communities. Epping Forest District Council won an interim High Court injunction to stop migrants from being accommodated at The Bell Hotel, after arguing its owners did not have planning permission to use it to house migrants. Politics latest: In a statement, Paula Basnett, the Labour leader of Wirral council, said: "Like many other local authorities, we have concerns about the Home Office's practice of placing asylum seekers in hotels without consultation or regard to local planning requirements. "We are actively considering all options available to us to ensure that any use of hotels or other premises in Wirral is lawful and does not ride roughshod over planning regulations or the wishes of our communities. "Wirral has always been proud of its record in supporting families and those fleeing conflict, but it is unacceptable for the government to impose unsuitable, short-term arrangements that disrupt communities and bypass local decision-making. "If necessary, we will not hesitate to challenge such decisions in order to protect both residents and those seeking refuge." Carol Dean, the Labour leader of Tamworth Borough Council, said she understands the "strong feelings" of residents about the use of a local hotel to house asylum seekers, and that the council is "listening to their concerns and taking them seriously". She pointed out that under the national Labour government, the use of hotels has halved from 402 to 210, with the aim of stopping the use of any hotels by the end of this parliament. But she continued: "Following the temporary High Court injunction granted to Epping Forest District Council, we are closely monitoring developments and reviewing our legal position in light of this significant ruling." Cllr Dean added that they had previously explored their legal options to challenge the use of the hotel but decided against them, as temporary injunctions were not being upheld. However, the Epping ruling "represents a potentially important legal precedent", which is why they are "carefully assessing" its significance for Tamworth. "We fully recognise the UK government has a statutory duty to accommodate people seeking asylum. However, we have consistently maintained that the prolonged use of hotel accommodation may not represent the best approach - either for our local community or for the asylum seekers themselves," she said. "We will continue to work constructively with government departments and all relevant agencies while making sure the voice of our community is heard at the highest levels of government." Last night, Conservative-run Broxbourne Council also announced it was exploring its legal options, and the Reform UK leader of Kent County said she was writing to fellow leaders in Kent to explore whether they could potentially take legal action as well. Use of Epping hotel 'sidestepped public scrutiny' The prime minister and the home secretary are under huge pressure to clear the asylum backlog and stop using hotels across the country to house those waiting for their applications to be processed. Protests have sprung up at migrant hotels across the country. But The Bell Hotel in Epping became a focal point in recent weeks after an asylum seeker housed there was charged with sexually assaulting a 14-year-old girl. Epping Forest District Council sought an interim High Court injunction to stop migrants from being accommodated at the hotel, owned by Somani Hotels Limited, on the basis that using it for that purpose contravened local planning regulations. The interim injunction demanded that the hotel be cleared of its occupants within 14 days, but in his ruling on Tuesday, Mr Justice Eyre granted the temporary block, while extending the time limit by which it must stop housing asylum seekers to 12 September. Somani Hotels said it intended to appeal the decision, its barrister, Piers Riley-Smith, arguing it would set a precedent that could affect "the wider strategy" of housing asylum seekers in hotels. A government attempt to delay the application was rejected by the High Court judge earlier on Tuesday, Home Office barristers arguing the case had a "substantial impact" on the Home Secretary, Yvette Cooper, in performing her legal duties to asylum seekers. But Mr Justice Eyre dismissed the Home Office's bid, stating that the department's involvement was "not necessary". Read more: The judge said the hotel's owners "sidestepped the public scrutiny and explanation which would otherwise have taken place if an application for planning permission or for a certificate of lawful use had been made". He added: "It was also deliberately taking the chance that its understanding of the legal position was incorrect. This is a factor of particular weight in the circumstances of this case." Reacting to Tuesday's judgment, border security minister Dame Angela Eagle said the government will "continue working with local authorities and communities to address legitimate concerns". She added: "Our work continues to close all asylum hotels by the end of this parliament."

AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Saudi Arabian Insurance Company B.S.C. (c)
AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Saudi Arabian Insurance Company B.S.C. (c)

Business Wire

time5 minutes ago

  • Business Wire

AM Best Affirms Credit Ratings of Saudi Arabian Insurance Company B.S.C. (c)

LONDON--(BUSINESS WIRE)-- AM Best has affirmed the Financial Strength Rating of B+ (Good) and the Long-Term Issuer Credit Rating of 'bbb-' (Good) of Saudi Arabian Insurance Company B.S.C. (c) (Damana) (Bahrain). The outlook of these Credit Ratings (ratings) is stable. The ratings reflect Damana's balance sheet strength, which AM Best assesses as very strong, as well as its marginal operating performance, limited business profile and marginal enterprise risk management. The ratings also factor in the neutral impact from Damana's ultimate parent, Mawarid Holding Company. Damana's balance sheet strength assessment is underpinned by its risk-adjusted capitalisation, which was at the very strong level as at year-end 2023, as measured by Best's Capital Adequacy Ratio (BCAR). AM Best expects BCAR scores to have recovered substantially to the strongest level in 2024, and year-to-date 2025, following the disposal of a large equity holding. Damana's investment portfolio is now largely conservative and consists mostly of cash and deposits. An offsetting factor to the assessment is the company's reliance on reinsurance for high-value risks, which is a common trait in the region; however, credit risk is minimised by a panel of sound credit quality. Damana's operating performance is assessed as marginal. The company has struggled with negative underwriting results for several years due to high expenses arising from its operating model and substantially reduced business scale. Loss ratios have also been affected by material events, such as the COVID-19 pandemic and the 2024 Dubai floods. Year-on-year improvements in the expense ratio have led to reductions in combined ratios from their peak of 148% in 2021, though underwriting operations remain unprofitable. Over the medium term and as the business continues to grow into its expense base, underwriting results are expected to trend towards profitability. Investment returns supplement performance, with Damana generating solid returns from its conservatively invested portfolio. Damana has seen business volumes steadily increase year-on-year since it suffered a reduction of revenues in 2021, following regulatory restrictions imposed by the Central Bank of Bahrain on the company's operations within that country. AM Best expects this trend in revenue growth to continue into the next few years, supported by Damana's renewed focus on new lines of business beyond its core lines of motor and medical. This strategy does expose Damana to execution risk given the challenging and competitive conditions in its core markets of Bahrain, the United Arab Emirates, Oman and Kuwait. This press release relates to Credit Ratings that have been published on AM Best's website. For all rating information relating to the release and pertinent disclosures, including details of the office responsible for issuing each of the individual ratings referenced in this release, please see AM Best's Recent Rating Activity web page. For additional information regarding the use and limitations of Credit Rating opinions, please view Guide to Best's Credit Ratings. For information on the proper use of Best's Credit Ratings, Best's Performance Assessments, Best's Preliminary Credit Assessments and AM Best press releases, please view Guide to Proper Use of Best's Ratings & Assessments.

Avis Budget double-downgraded: 'Fundamentals don't support valuation'
Avis Budget double-downgraded: 'Fundamentals don't support valuation'

Yahoo

time5 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Avis Budget double-downgraded: 'Fundamentals don't support valuation'

-- Bank of America cut its rating for Avis Budget (NASDAQ:CAR) Group to Underperform from Buy in a note on Wednesday, warning that the company's fundamentals and industry backdrop do not justify its current share price. 'We think that CAR fundamentals and the macro environment don't support the current stock price, which significantly outperformed the market in June,' BofA analysts wrote in a note to clients. The firm lowered its price target to $113 for the stock, down from $120. BofA flagged 'pricing and demand pressures in the U.S. which negatively affects CAR's earnings power in 2H25/2026.' The analysts said a survey the bank conducted shows fewer consumers plan to increase travel spending in the next three months compared to 2024. 'This should translate into a soft pricing environment,' BofA wrote, adding that tariffs could further weaken demand in the second half. The bank acknowledged recent initiatives such as Avis First, aimed at the premium segment, and a fleet management partnership with Waymo. 'We see these developments as positives, and they speak to the fact that CAR is a strong operator. However, we don't expect these initiatives to have a significant effect on earnings in the near term,' the analysts said. Vehicle depreciation remains a swing factor. 'Although this is a potential tailwind, we believe that the effect may not be as large as thought,' BofA said, noting the current environment differs from the Covid period. The bank cut its 2025 and 2026 EBITDA estimates to $0.9 billion and $1.03 billion, respectively, and lowered its valuation multiple. 'We cut our PO to $113 from $120, valued on 7.5x EV/EBITDA 2026,' the analysts wrote Related articles Avis Budget double-downgraded: 'Fundamentals don't support valuation' If Powell goes, does Fed trust go with him? 7 Undervalued Stocks on the Rise With 50%+ Upside Potential

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store