logo
Whitmer says she won't run for president. Democrats better hope she's joking.

Whitmer says she won't run for president. Democrats better hope she's joking.

USA Today14 hours ago

For nearly as long as she's been governor, Gretchen Whitmer has been considered a presidential hopeful. And for nearly as long as she's been considered a presidential hopeful, Michigan's governor has been telling anybody who'd listen that she's actually not.
When an interviewer at a Detroit Economic Club forum in April asked Whitmer what she's looking forward to in 2026, when she's term-limited out of office, the governor didn't miss a beat: "Retiring."
Democrats better hope Whitmer was joking, because she may be the party's best hope of reclaiming the White House in 2028.
Why Whitmer and not Buttigieg, Shapiro or Beshear?
We could talk here about the other guys likely to seek the 2028 Democratic presidential nomination, a list that includes, at minimum:
Need a break? Play the USA TODAY Daily Crossword Puzzle.
Former Secretary of Transportation Pete Buttigieg
California Gov. Gavin Newsom
Illinois Gov. JB Pritzker
Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro
Colorado Gov. Jared Polis
Kentucky Gov. Andy Beshear
And it will surely grow over the next three years.
But I think it's a better idea to talk about Whitmer.
She's a successful purple-state governor (a recent Impact Research poll puts her approval rating at a whopping 63%) with decades of legislative, policymaking and executive experience. She speaks with intelligence and sensitivity on subjects from manufacturing to motherhood. She's got a knack for focusing on substantive issues that offer common ground, like funding our schools and fixing our roads.
At 53, she's youthful and energetic ‒ but seasoned and experienced ‒ in a party with a surfeit of octogenarians, and she's a woman in a party whose voters, at times, seem disinclined toward white male candidates, at least at the state and congressional levels.
Whitmer is an effective advocate for the causes she champions, and, as a mom who seemed to effortlessly balance raising two daughters, now grown, and leading the 10th most populous state in the nation, she's an aspirational figure for thousands of Michigan women who can't remember if they put money in their kid's school lunch account. (OK, it's me. I'm Michigan women.)
Whitmer was elected and reelected by wide margins, and her approval rating has never dipped below 50%, which is, in these sorry times, a real achievement.
"She is a superb retail politician, and a really unique one," said pollster Richard Czuba of the Glengariff Group. "You watch her work a rope line, and she makes everyone feel seen. And she comes from a state that's a must-win for a Democrat."
American voters like centrists – and Whitmer does what voters expect
There's no denying that her willingness to work with President Donald Trump has disappointed some Democrats who would prefer blanket opposition to hopeful collaboration.
That centrist thing, Czuba said, is really only a problem for the far flanks of both parties ‒ and they're not the swing voters who decide elections, in Michigan or in the United States.
"We did this question last year: Should an elected official cross party lines and negotiate with the other party to get something done, or should elected officials stick to the party's position and stand up for it?" said Czuba, of a survey of likely voters for the Detroit Regional Chamber ahead of the 2024 Mackinac Policy Conference. "It was 70% to 19%."
The 19%, he said, were on the far right and the far left.
"She's doing exactly what most voters expect of their leaders," Czuba said. "The governor understands the middle in a way that few people understand independent, centrist voters. That's one of her strengths. She pays attention to the center. In a purple state like Michigan, if you don't, you lose. That's how Democrats can win nationally.
"They need to pay attention to the center, because if you don't, you lose."
Gretchen Whitmer doesn't start fights, but she can finish them
This is who Whitmer has always been.
Her political sensibility is best described as "cheerfully determined,' and if there were an Olympic event in keeping your cool, this lady would hold the gold medal.
As late as January 2018, powerful Democratic men – including Detroit Mayor Mike Duggan – were working to replace Whitmer on the Democratic gubernatorial ballot. Her response?
"I'm staying focused on running a campaign that can win, so we can get Michigan back to being a state our kids will stay in when they graduate," Whitmer told me that year. "I'm eager to build the coalition. … I'm eager to work with anyone who wants to solve problems."
In 2019, when then-Senate Majority Leader Mike Shirkey, a Republican, called her "batshit crazy" to a crowd of supporters, or said in 2021 that he and the GOP legislature had "spanked" Whitmer "hard" on the budget and appointments, the governor wasn't mad, just disappointed: "I think that we deserve better, frankly, but I'm not going to spend my energy there because I've got a lot of important things that I'm working on that the people of our state need us to be all-successful on."
In her most recent State of the State address, with Republicans back at the helm of the House of Representatives, Whitmer stayed on collaborative message: 'I took an oath to serve the people of Michigan ‒ all the people. That's my commitment to you no matter who is in the White House or on the other side of the table in Lansing. Yes, I do hope to find common ground with President Trump and work with the Democratic Senate and Republican House on our shared priorities.'
Whitmer doesn't start fights, but she's not a pushover. During the COVID-19 pandemic, she went toe-to-toe with Trump, who dubbed her "that woman from Michigan," and in 2022 she led the charge to enshrine reproductive rights in the state constitution after Roe v. Wade was overturned.
She's a staunch supporter of civil rights, women's rights and LBGTQ+ rights, and she has made it clear that won't change.
What does Whitmer's 'folder incident' at the White House mean?
The Econ Club interview last month came on the heels of a rough week for Michigan's governor.
A meeting with Trump, set to discuss a new fighter mission for Selfridge Air Force Base and invasive Asian carp in the Great Lakes, had taken a turn: After exchanging pleasant remarks with Whitmer and Michigan's Republican House Speaker Matt Hall, a wave of cameras poured into the Oval Office as Trump signed two executive orders authorizing politically motivated investigations of staffers who served in his first term.
An uncomfortable Whitmer edged away from the action, at one point holding a folder in front of her face as a photographer snapped a picture. The image, published on April 12 by The New York Times, reverberated through the political world. ("What was going through my mind at that moment?" she said to the Econ Club interviewer. "'I don't want my picture taken.'")
I got dozens of texts the day the picture published, mostly from political insiders who saw The Folder Incident as Whitmer's Howard Dean scream. (Which, of course, is not actually what ended 2004 candidate Dean's presidential ambitions ... but we're still talking about it, 21 years later.)
As the story unfolded, some of the Democratic insiders and national pundits who had been enamored with the notion of Whitmer as a presidential contender soured on the governor. The honeymoon, it seemed, was over.
I didn't feel so great about The Folder Incident myself. It was unpleasant to watch a strong female governor treated that way, and the image, I thought, would reverberate.
But outside the political bubble, it was a different story.
When I floated the suggestion that this might tank Whitmer's presidential future past a friend who's not knee-deep in politics, my friend was skeptical. "Hmm. I guess we'll see. The 2028 election is a long way away," she said. "Some people will just see it as, 'I have nothing to do with this.'"
My friend isn't alone. In an Epic-MRA poll conducted between April 28 through May 3 – after the Oval Office meeting – 52% of Michiganders said they approved of Whitmer's performance as governor, consistent with previous polls. In the same survey, just 41% said the same of Trump.
A few weeks later, that new fighter mission at Selfridge Whitmer went to the White House to discuss – it happened.
Democrats need to reconnect with voters
Most folks in jobs like mine have responded to Whitmer's repeated assertions that she's into the job she has, not the one everyone thinks she wants, with mild eye-rolling to outright scoffing.
But I believe her. When Whitmer says she's not running in 2028, it doesn't sound coy. It's been a punishing seven years, complete with a pandemic and a murder/kidnapping plot that an astounding number of people somehow see as a punchline or a put-up, and it's easy to imagine that she's ready for a break.
Still, if I were a Democratic strategist, I'd be wondering whether I could persuade Whitmer to change her mind.
Democrats want to win, but winning elections isn't just about numbers on the board. Voters are people, people whose lives are affected by who sits in the governor's mansion, or in the Oval Office.
What Democrats need is to reconnect with voters, and Whitmer is among the few Democrats willing – or able – to give the party what it needs.
Nancy Kaffer is the editorial page editor of the Detroit Free Press, where this column originally appeared. Contact her atnkaffer@freepress.com.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Hegseth brings warfighter mentality to media relations
Hegseth brings warfighter mentality to media relations

The Hill

time18 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Hegseth brings warfighter mentality to media relations

The Defense Department's relationship with reporters has gone from bad to worse following a string of missives from Secretary Pete Hegseth and his office aimed at controlling the Pentagon press corps. Hegseth's war on the media includes taking desks away from legacy outlets, locking the doors to one of the few places reporters have access to the internet in the Pentagon, and restricting their movement within the building. Compounding the breakdown in media relations is a staffing shortage in the Pentagon's public affairs shop, with at least 12 officials in the office reportedly leaving in recent weeks. The office officially held 32 people at the start of the year. That has left one of the government's largest agencies often unresponsive amid a steady stream of scandals and public relations snafus, though it maintains an active 'DOD Rapid Response' account on X, which posted on Saturday, 'we will always deliver on our promise of transparency.' The Pentagon did not respond to a request for comment on this article. Hegseth often talks about bringing a warfighter mentality to the Pentagon. His hostile approach to the media comes at the detriment of the American public, said Jonathan Katz, senior director for the Anti-Corruption, Democracy and Security Project at the Brookings Institution. 'Americans need to understand what's happening in the Department of Defense because it's critical to U.S. national security and to their everyday lives,' Katz told The Hill. 'Right now it looks like the Pentagon, led by Mr. Hegseth, is doing everything it can do to not share critical information with the public. That is problematic.' Since the start of President Trump's second term, the Defense Department has transformed how it typically engages with the press, largely shunning traditional media. Chief Pentagon spokesperson and senior adviser Sean Parnell has briefed the press on camera once since taking on the role in February, and Hegseth has yet to address reporters in the DOD briefing room. When Hegseth does address the media, it's mostly from the White House alongside Trump or while he is traveling. But he has shaped how he is covered on those trips by limiting the number of reporters that come with him — on some trips hand-picking those from more right-leaning outlets that skew toward favorable coverage of the department. When Hegseth traveled to Guantanamo Bay in late February, he took just one reporter, his former colleague, Fox News host Laura Ingraham. Hegseth and Parnell have instead put out near-weekly 'situation reports,' video updates from the Pentagon that espouse positive headlines and commitments to 'transparency.' The DOD Rapid Response X account both plays up positive news about Hegseth and denigrates news stories and reporters that show him in a negative light. Alex Wagner, a former Pentagon official turned public affairs professor at Syracuse University, said the channeling of all communication into 'easily retweeted videos that are highly scripted without any chance for questions' undermines servicemembers and confidence that defense leaders have their best interests at heart. 'It's absolutely critical that the people who are serving and sacrificing and their families understand not only what is happening to service members and their dependents, but also why it's happening,' Wagner told The Hill. 'I'm just surprised President Trump and his team are allowing it, given their repeated affirmations that they are running the most transparent administration in history,' he added, pointing to the contrast with the White House and State Department, where officials regularly brief the media. Things are only getting worse for the Pentagon press corps. Just working in the building has become arduous for many outlets after Hegseth's office in early February took away the desks of eight legacy media outlets: NBC News, the New York Times, NPR, Politico, CNN, The Washington Post, The Hill and War Zone. The reporters had to vacate their spaces for outlets more sympathetic to the Trump administration, including One America News Network, the New York Post, Breitbart News, Newsmax, the Washington Examiner, the Daily Caller and the Free Press. DOD called the shifts a 'media rotation program,' but the move was bashed by the Pentagon Press Association, which called it 'unreasonable.' Later that same month, the Pentagon banned reporters from the press briefing room unless officials were holding a briefing — which has only happened once in more than five months. This barred media from one of the few places in the building that had access to wifi to file stories. And last month, after a string of embarrassing headlines for Hegseth, including that he mishandled sensitive information in March when he relayed over Signal detailed plans to strike Houthi militants in Yemen — to a group chat that included a journalist — the Pentagon barred reporters from freely walking certain areas of the building. Areas off limits now include Hegseth's office spaces and the Joint Staff office spaces 'without an official approval and escort from the Office of the Assistant to the Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs,' according to a May 23 memo signed by the Pentagon chief. The decision limits press access to hallways they have historically had access to under past Republican and Democratic presidential administrations, with Parnell on X calling the restrictions 'pragmatic changes to protect operational security.' It also eliminates 'the media's freedom to freely access press officers for the military services who are specifically hired to respond to press queries,' the Pentagon Press Association said in a statement. The group further called the restrictions 'a direct attack on the freedom of the press and America's right to know what its military is doing.' The National Press Club urged DOD to reverse course, as 'restricting access doesn't protect national security. It undermines public trust,' the organization's President Mike Balsamo said in a statement. And a third press group, Military Reporters & Editors, said it was 'deeply troubled' by the restrictions, the likes of which hadn't been seen before at the Pentagon. 'This isn't meant to protect the republic, it is designed to impose a chill,' the organization said in a statement. 'It is a disservice to the American public, troops, veterans and families who rely on a dedicated free press to shine the light on matters of vital interest.' Further limitations are likely coming, with Hegseth's memo alluding to reporters having to soon sign a pledge to protect sensitive military information or risk losing their press badge. 'It's as if there's a separate standard for transparency and accountability that the Pentagon is not upholding under Secretary Hegseth that they're asking others to uphold,' said Katz. 'This is disconcerting for the American public that relies on the media to understand in a transparent, accountable way what the Pentagon is doing. And right now, Americans are losing faith that one of the most important national security institutions is not being truthful,' he added.

In photos: Trump deploys National Guard to LA as ICE protests enter 3rd day
In photos: Trump deploys National Guard to LA as ICE protests enter 3rd day

Axios

time21 minutes ago

  • Axios

In photos: Trump deploys National Guard to LA as ICE protests enter 3rd day

There were tense scenes in Los Angeles after President Trump deployed 2,000 National Guard troops to the city as fiery protests against federal immigration raids flared for a third day in California. The big picture: California's Democratic leaders criticized said the action would only escalate tensions that have already seen authorities deploy tear gas during face-offs with protesters. Trump told reporters Sunday he'll "send whatever we need to make sure there's law and order."

Bernie Sanders urges Democrats not to work with ‘right-wing extremist' Musk after Trump fallout
Bernie Sanders urges Democrats not to work with ‘right-wing extremist' Musk after Trump fallout

Fox News

time23 minutes ago

  • Fox News

Bernie Sanders urges Democrats not to work with ‘right-wing extremist' Musk after Trump fallout

Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., ruled out the idea that Democrats should work with Elon Musk after his explosive falling out with President Donald Trump, labeling the Tesla CEO a "right-wing extremist." Musk said that he "strongly supported Obama" but felt that the modern Democratic Party had been "hijacked by extremists" in an April 2022 post on X. "Musk has evolved over the years. My understanding is he actually voted for Obama in 2008. But over the years, he has developed into a right-wing extremist," Sanders told CNN "State of the Union" host Dana Bash after she asked if Democrats should work with the tech billionaire after his "breakup" with Trump. Sanders dismissed the idea out of hand and said Trump and Musk's drama was further proof that the United States was devolving into an oligarchic society. The self-proclaimed democratic socialist dismissed the episode as a fight among oligarchs, and slammed it as an "embarrassment" to people who believe in democracy and the rule of law. "Musk said to Trump, 'hey listen, I spent $270 million to get you elected. I bought you the presidency because we have a corrupt campaign finance system and billionaires can do that.' And Trump said, 'well, I gave you the right to run the government for three or four months, but I don't like the guy you want to run NASA, and we're going to get rid of him' and Musk got upset," Sanders said. Musk endorsed Trump after he survived his assassination attempt in Butler, Pennsylvania, and subsequently served as one of his top surrogates and spent hundreds of millions of dollars to get him elected. Trump selected Musk to serve as head of the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) and tasked him with cutting waste, fraud and abuse from the federal bureaucracy. Musk's tenure at DOGE was tumultuous. Although he found billions of dollars in spending cuts, his reductions in federal outlays fell far short of the trillion dollars he promised. Backlash to Musk's work within the administration caused his businesses to suffer. Trump and Musk's relationship took a turn for the worse after the president withdrew Musk-ally Jared Isaacman's nomination to lead NASA. Musk proceeded to trash the "big beautiful bill" Trump is trying to get through Congress, claiming Trump only won because he donated $270 million to aid his campaign and alleging, without proof, that the president is featured in the so-called Epstein files in an X post he subsequently deleted. Trump warned that Musk will have to face "very serious consequences" if he funds Democratic candidates as a result of their rupture. When asked by Bash if he feels that Musk is correct in claiming that Trump only won because of Musk's money, Sanders responded affirmatively.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store