Telegram's Pavel Durov says French spy chief asked him to ban conservative Romanian voices
Pavel Durov, the founder of the Telegram messaging app, has accused the head of France's foreign intelligence agency Nicolas Lerner of asking him to ban Romanian conservative voices ahead of the country's elections, adding he refused the request.
Russian-born Durov is currently under judicial supervision in France, holed up in Paris' glitzy Crillon hotel after being placed under formal investigation for alleged organised crime on Telegram.
He said it was there that Lerner, who leads the DGSE foreign spy agency, approached him.
"This spring at the Salon des Batailles in the Hôtel de Crillon, Nicolas Lerner, head of French intelligence, asked me to ban conservative voices in Romania ahead of elections. I refused," Durov wrote on X late on Sunday.
"We didn't block protesters in Russia, Belarus, or Iran. We won't start doing it in Europe."
The centrist mayor of Bucharest, Nicusor Dan, won Romania's presidential election on Sunday in a shock upset over George Simion, a hard-right, nationalist rival who had pledged to adopt a path inspired by U.S. President Donald Trump's politics.
The Romanian result was a relief for centrist policymakers in Brussels where there is concern that popular anger with mainstream elites over migration and cost of living pressures could bolster support for far-right parties and erode unity on the continent over how to deal with Russia.
France's DGSE said in a statement its officials had indeed met with Durov various times over the years "to firmly remind him of his company's responsibilities, and his own personally, in preventing terrorist and child pornography threats."
However, the DGSE "vigorously refutes the allegations that requests to ban accounts related to any electoral process were made on these occasions," it said.
Durov's accusation was reposted on X by U.S. billionaire Elon Musk, one of various powerful figures on the U.S. right who have accused European nations of suppressing far-right voices.
"Wow," Musk wrote.
Durov had earlier on Sunday said he had refused a request by a Western government to silence conservative voices ahead of the Romania run-off vote.
"Telegram will not restrict the freedoms of Romanian users or block their political channels," Durov said, adding an emoji of a baguette that implied it was France.
The French foreign ministry denied any such interference and called on all to "exercise responsibility and respect for Romanian democracy."
The arrest of Durov last year ignited a debate about free speech online. Musk, who criticised the arrest of Durov, is also being probed by French prosecutors over alleged algorithmic bias on X.
Musk has used X to personally support right-wing parties and causes in countries including Germany and Britain, leading to concerns about undue foreign interference.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
‘Please come back and walk the floor…: 'Elon Musk returns to his tech empire, as workers and investors demand answers
Elon Musk returns to his tech empire, as workers and investors demand answers Elon Musk has reemerged at the helm of his sprawling tech empire after months spent in Washington as the head of the Department of Government Efficiency ( DOGE ) under President Donald Trump. Once the face of futuristic innovation, Musk became entangled in politics, leading to growing concerns over his prolonged absence from companies like Tesla , SpaceX , xAI, and X (formerly Twitter). Now back in his factories and data centers, Musk dons his old 'Occupy Mars' T-shirt—but questions remain: is he too late to repair the damage? Elon Musk's dual identity: From business titan to political power player During his political stint, Musk was a close ally of President Trump, often referred to as his 'first buddy.' He played a central role in executing controversial budget cuts and regulatory rollbacks, especially those affecting green energy. While these moves served the administration's agenda, they alienated many of Musk's core supporters and business partners, especially in the electric vehicle (EV) market. Tesla takes a hit: Plunging sales and public backlash by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo Musk's political presence coincided with a major downturn for Tesla. As government subsidies for EVs came under threat and Trump imposed new tariffs, Tesla's stock value dropped by roughly 14%, wiping out around $180 billion in market capitalization. Dealerships became protest sites, and morale across the company fell sharply. SpaceX faces internal strain amid CEO's absence SpaceX, once energized by Musk's constant presence and visionary leadership, has struggled in his absence. Employees reported declining morale, with one former mechanic posting publicly: 'Your presence used to drive a fire in the team… Please come back and walk the floor.' Despite two Starship test launches during his time away, employee sentiment suggested that motivation had diminished without Musk at the helm. Musk's sparse engagement with Tesla operations Musk reportedly visited Tesla's Palo Alto office just days before an earnings call, asking questions about Trump's tariffs—despite the policies being announced months earlier. Internally, executives were concerned about Musk's declining engagement, with some meetings attended by phone and others missed entirely. A board member allegedly stepped in to fill leadership gaps, according to insiders. AI and xAI: The only active focus during Musk's political phase While Tesla and SpaceX suffered from lack of attention, Musk remained active with xAI, his artificial intelligence company. He heavily promoted its chatbot, Grok, posting frequently on X. In March 2025, Musk merged X and xAI, forming a mega tech entity valued at $113 billion, according to internal documents tied to an upcoming tender offer. Telegram partnership sparks confusion and power play Last month, Musk and Telegram's founder Pavel Durov teased a partnership that would bring Grok to Telegram's billion+ users. However, Musk later contradicted the announcement, stating: 'No deal has been signed.' This public contradiction hinted at internal misalignment and reaffirmed that Musk still holds the final word in his empire—even if communication is murky. Leadership vacuum: Workers, investors demand more than symbolism As Musk posted selfies from SpaceX's control room and claimed to be sleeping in factory floors again, employees and investors began demanding more than photo ops. Public posts and internal sources alike indicate a desire for Musk to be truly present—leading strategy, boosting morale, and navigating global economic pressures. Also read | Airtel recharge plans | Jio recharge plans | BSNL recharge plans AI Masterclass for Students. Upskill Young Ones Today!– Join Now
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Russia's death toll nears a million in its deadliest war since WWII and there's no end in sight yet
Russia is on track to surpass one million troop casualties in its full-scale war on Ukraine by the summer of 2025. That's according to a new study from the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), a leading think tank in Washington, DC. The report puts the number of Russian killed and wounded at around 950,000 to date, with an estimated 250,000 confirmed dead. If the current pace of fighting continues, the one million mark could be reached in a matter of weeks. 'No Soviet or Russian war since World War II has even come close to Ukraine in terms of fatality rate,' the CSIS report stated. Analysts called the casualty toll 'a stunning and grisly milestone' and a clear sign of 'Putin's blatant disregard for his soldiers.' Play Video Pause Skip Backward Skip Forward Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration 0:00 Loaded : 0% 0:00 Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 1x Playback Rate Chapters Chapters Descriptions descriptions off , selected Captions captions settings , opens captions settings dialog captions off , selected Audio Track default , selected Picture-in-Picture Fullscreen This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Text Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Caption Area Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Opacity Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Drop shadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Russian deaths mount, but gains do not The scale of losses far outweighs Russia's territorial gains. Since the February 2022 invasion, Russia has captured only 12% of Ukrainian territory. Of the 19% it now holds, 7% was already under Russian or proxy control before the war began, including Crimea and parts of Donbas. The CSIS says Russia's advances since January 2024 amount to a mere 1% of Ukrainian territory. In some areas, the pace has slowed to 50 metres per day — slower than the infamous Somme offensive in World War I. Live Events 'Russia has largely failed to achieve its primary objectives and has suffered high costs,' the report said. Moscow's 'meat grinder' tactics The war has devolved into trench-based attrition. Kyiv has fortified its lines with defences and mines, while Moscow has resorted to what analysts describe as 'meat grinder' assaults — sending waves of troops into heavily defended positions for minor gains. British and U.S. intelligence agencies have estimated that Russia is losing around 1,000 soldiers a day, either killed or wounded. These figures align with the CSIS report. To maintain manpower, the Kremlin has pulled prisoners from jails and recruited heavily in poorer, remote regions of Russia, often offering lucrative pay to lure soldiers. 'Putin likely considers these types of soldiers more expendable and less likely to undermine his domestic support base,' the CSIS noted. Ukrainian casualties also high Ukraine has paid a steep price too. The CSIS estimates Kyiv has suffered nearly 400,000 casualties, with between 60,000 and 100,000 of those killed. Given Ukraine's population is a quarter the size of Russia's, the losses have had a deep impact. Despite this, Ukraine's military has been more effective in conserving its resources. The report says Ukraine has kept its equipment losses to a fraction of Russia's, and has slowed the Russian offensive to a near-halt. Russia-Ukraine War: Cost in machines and men The material losses for Russia are staggering. Since January 2024 alone, it has lost: 1,900 tanks 3,100 infantry fighting vehicles 1,150 armoured fighting vehicles 300 self-propelled artillery systems 'Russia has lost substantial quantities of equipment across the land, air, and sea domains, highlighting the sharp matériel toll of its attrition campaign,' the report stated. Ukraine, meanwhile, has struck deep into Russian-held territory. In its recent 'Spider Web' drone operation, Ukraine claimed to have damaged or destroyed 41 aircraft and inflicted up to $7 billion in damage across five Russian airbases. The strikes reached as far as 4,000 miles into Russian territory. Political cost and strategic deadlock Despite heavy losses, Russia continues to enjoy the battlefield initiative. Yet, progress is slow and strategic gains have plateaued. 'Few opportunities for decisive breakthroughs' remain, the report said. Putin has avoided recruiting from Russia's wealthy urban centres. Instead, he has leaned on rural regions and allied forces. Over 10,000 North Korean troops have joined Russian ranks, and convicts have been released in exchange for military service. Meanwhile, Moscow's dependence on China has deepened. Cut off from Western markets, Russia now leans heavily on Beijing for military supplies, consumer goods, and energy exports — shifting the balance of the partnership. Analysts say Russia has lost strategic autonomy and become a 'subservient partner' to China. The CSIS warns that the war's 'blood cost' is Putin's key vulnerability. Without a course correction, Russia could find its military capability deteriorating rapidly. 'For Putin, the war is such a disaster, and the Russian military has reached a point where from sometime this summer, its capability is all downhill: less armour, less ammunition, less resources, less motivation,' Richard Dearlove, former head of Britain's MI6, told NBC News in April. 'But Putin doesn't have a reverse gear on his policy.' The outlook depends not only on Russian endurance, but also on the West. If U.S. support wavers — as it briefly did under President Donald Trump earlier this year — the balance could tip. The CSIS report argues that Russia's best hope is not on the battlefield, but in the possibility that Washington might 'walk away from the conflict.' So far, diplomacy has failed to gain traction. Talks in Istanbul, mediated by the U.S., have stalled. Russia demands full Ukrainian surrender. Kyiv says any deal requiring capitulation is unacceptable. For now, the war grinds on — slowly, painfully, and at immense cost.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
an hour ago
- First Post
Operation Spider Web hands Ukraine ‘cards' to play with at negotiation table
With Operation Spider Web, Ukraine has played its cards and acquired a seat at the negotiating table with a position of relative strength. President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has also punctured the myth of Russian invincibility and called out Vladimir Putin's bluff of imminent victory and nuclear rhetoric. read more Months after US President Donald Trump berated him at the White House for not having any cards, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy played his cards on Sunday. In an audacious attack with no precedent in the world, Ukraine struck five airbases and possibly a submarine base as well across the length and breadth of Russia — including in the far-off Siberia. With 117 drones, Ukraine destroyed nearly a third of Russia's long-range, nuclear-capable bombers and airborne early warning and command (AEWAC) fleets. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With Operation Spider Web, Ukraine reminded the world that the war is far from being decided and Ukraine is far from being defeated. In the David versus Goliath face-off, Ukraine has shown it has mastered asymmetric warfare and has the ability to impose costs despite its adversary having superiority in every domain. Even though Trump has for months parroted Russian talking points that Ukraine is on the brink of defeat, the situation on the ground is a stalemate at best and, at worst, costs far outweigh the benefits for Russia. Neither side currently holds a decisive upper hand in the battlefield and Russia's incremental gains and Ukraine's resilient defence signal not victory, but a prolonged stalemate, says Shreya Sinha, a European affairs scholar at Vivekananda International Foundation (VIF). Facts in face: Russia has gained just 1 per cent of Ukrainian territory since January 2024. Zelenskyy destroys Russian invincibility — and asserts Ukraine's resilience For months, visuals of Ukrainian neighbourhoods in Russian airstrikes and the sting of betrayal as the principal ally, the United States, appeared to switch allegiance to the adversary, had dominated the news cycle. But that was until Sunday. Since Sunday, have dominated the news cycle as well as deliberations of strategists across the world as Ukraine ushered the world into a new age of modern warfare with the attack. Suddenly, Russia is no longer as invincible as Vladimir Putin had been portraying and not as victorious as Trump had been saying. 'Ukraine's drone strikes have communicated the nation's resilience and innovation, challenging assumptions about asymmetry in capability. In a non-kinetic warfare paradigm, Ukraine has not only held ground but also reinvented itself as a formidable actor in drone-based hybrid warfare, shaping perceptions globally,' says Sinha, an Associate Fellow of European studies at the Delhi-based think tank VIF. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The Ukrainian drone attacks on Russian airbases and the destruction of several nuclear-capable intercontinental bombers is among the most audacious covert ops in military history. Some of the images, shown here, reveals the damage. Ukraine claims 40 aircraft destroyed.… — Vishnu Som (@VishnuNDTV) June 4, 2025 To be sure, Russia was never close to an overwhelming victory despite what the propagandists said as every gain came at a very high cost. Consider these facts: Russia has lost its Black Sea fleet to the extent that it is essentially inoperable and has also lost a third of its long-range bomber aircraft and nearly half of its AWAC fleet. It has suffered around 1 million troop casualties . Ukraine has also assassinated some top generals. Despite outnumbering and outgunning Ukraine, Russia has suffered disproportionately higher losses and it needs to be asked whether such losses are worth the gains, says Swasti Rao, a scholar of geopolitics at Jindal School of International Affairs (JSIA). STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Rao pointed out that even though Russia controls a fifth of Ukrainian territory, a large chunk of it was captured with the annexation of Crimea in 2014 and subsequent insurgency in eastern Ukraine before 2022. As per the Institute for the Study of War (ISW), Russia currently controls around 19 per cent of Ukrainian territory — around 4-5 per cent was captured with the annexation of Crimea in 2014, around 2-3 per cent was captured by pro-Russia insurgents in eastern Ukraine during 2014-22, and Russia has captured just 12 per cent in the full-scale war since 2022. Rao says that the way Ukraine dealt a blow worth $7-8 billion to Russia with drones worth just a few million dollars at most tells the entire cost versus benefit story of the war. More than weapons, Ukraine lacks soldiers, but, with innovation in drone warfare, Ukraine has compensated its low numbers to a great extent, says Rao, an associate professor at JISA and a non-resident fellow at Eastern Circles think tank. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'The situation now is that the war is costing Russia much more than it's costing Ukraine in all domains — equipment, money, and reputation. As a result of the war, Russia has become dependent on China for the sustenance of its war and economy. For a superpower to become a junior partner of a rising power is a major loss of reputation,' says Rao Ukraine seeks strength at negotiation table With the drone attack, Zelenskyy has aimed for many birds with one stone. Besides securing a tactical edge with the attacks and reminding the world that the war is nowhere near its conclusion and that Ukraine does hold cards, Zelenskyy's biggest accomplishment is, in the words of Rao, the confirmation of a seat at the negotiating table. 'Ukraine sought, and successfully acquired, a relative position of strength in ongoing negotiations with these strikes. The final outcome of the war is unlikely to change in the sense that Ukraine is unlikely to get Russia-occupied territories back, but such military successes strengthens its hands in talks and securing better terms, such as increased say in talks and perhaps negotiating security guarantees,' says Rao. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Such a situation is a far cry from the situation just a few months back when Trump had said that Ukraine having a seat at the table in decisions about the end of the war was not a must. While Russia has acquired a position of relative strength, Russia has lost some leverage and Ukraine has called out Putin's bluff to a great extent. Rao tells Firstpost, 'Despite such a large military and famed intelligence apparatus, Ukraine has called out Russia's bluff again and again. Ukraine has assassinated Russian generals at the time and place of its choosing. Ukraine has sunk prized Russian ships. Now, Ukraine has destroyed some of the most valued Russian Air Force planes. As Russia has lost a face in all domains, ranging from border security and foreign intelligence to domestic security and base security, its leverage in talks has also been affected.' While Putin has vowed to retaliate and maintained his stand in his latest telephonic conversation with US President Donald Trump, if Ukraine manages to hold onto advantages gained through the recent drone attacks, it can secure a deal that addresses its concerns better, suggests Rao. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD For Ukraine, full-scale concessions are simply not on the table anymore and Ukraine is set to push for its terms more forcefully, says Sinha of VIF. 'It's now certain that Ukraine will not sign a deal that legitimises recent Russian gains, such as in Novopil in Donetsk, Vodolahy in Sumy, or Bilohorivka in Luhansk. These are not just pieces of land, but they are proof that this war is still very much ongoing, to which Ukraine has given its all. Any future peace deal would likely hinge on international security guarantees and a long-term roadmap to reconstruction and political stability,' says Sinha. As for the immediate future, even though Putin's supporters have called for a nuclear attack on Ukraine and some have suggested that Putin could launch a new offensive with unprecedented fury, neither is likely — even as Putin has vowed retaliation. For many weeks, Russia has been launching hundreds of drones and missiles on a near-daily basis, so the increase of scale would not mean much for Ukraine. As for the nuclear attack, there is consensus that it is a red line that the international community, including China, would allow Putin to cross. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD At multiple points in the war, China, the principal ally of Russia, and India, which has functioned as a backchannel on occasions, made it clear to Putin that nuclear weapons were off the table come what may. As for a ground offensive, Russia may not be in a position to launch it anytime soon without a fresh mobilisation of its troops as it faces resource crunch for such a massive offensive in Ukraine, says Kseniya Kirillova, a Russia analyst at Washington DC-based think tank Jamestown Foundation. More than Ukraine's attacks, the question of a new offensive would be decided by internal stability in Russia, says Kirillova. 'It appears that Putin is reluctant to declare such a mobilisation and is instead interested in a temporary pause. New aggression could emerge if the war in Ukraine stalls and Putin concludes that propaganda alone is no longer sufficient to maintain regime stability. However, if Europe demonstrates a credible readiness to defend itself, this would serve as an effective deterrent. It is important to remember that it is weakness, not strength, that provokes Putin,' says Kirillova
