logo
‘It's all people wanted to talk about': How Labour U-turned on winter fuel payment cut

‘It's all people wanted to talk about': How Labour U-turned on winter fuel payment cut

The Guardian21-05-2025

Rarely are British voters united by one issue, but Labour MPs returning to Westminster after the local election campaign this month all reported a single policy dominating all others: cuts to the winter fuel allowance.
'It is all people wanted to talk about on the doorstep,' said one. 'Some were upset about the coming cuts to disability benefits, some were exercised by immigration. But everyone was angry about winter fuel payments.'
And so when Keir Starmer confirmed on Wednesday his government would change the threshold at which the cuts bite, it should not have come as a surprise.
The U-turn, however, came after repeated claims by cabinet ministers that such a move would be unaffordable, and flat-out denials by Downing Street that it was on the cards – even after the Guardian revealed it was.
Rachel Reeves, the chancellor, announced the cuts last summer as a solution to what she said was a £22bn hole in the government's finances left by the last government.
Supporters say she had no option but to cut winter fuel payments because she needed savings that would be realised in that financial year, drastically limiting her options.
Critics, however, say she too quickly accepted the Treasury argument that winter fuel payments were unsustainable – an argument that previous chancellors, including George Osborne, the architect of austerity, have dismissed.
'The decision was taken by the Treasury,' said one former government aide. 'By the time Downing Street saw it, it had already been factored into the forecasts and it was too late to change it.'
For the best part of the next 12 months, ministers continued to insist they had no choice but to leave the cuts in place, even amid warnings they would lead to increased numbers of pensioners dying over the winter.
Senior Labour ministers warned No 10 privately that the policy was an electoral disaster. 'It comes up on the doorstep all the time. Winter fuel will lose us the next election, it was a terrible mistake. But it's probably too late for a U-turn now,' one cabinet minister lamented.
Other Labour figures were more direct. Eluned Morgan, the Welsh first minister, said she was 'losing patience' with UK Labour as she urged the government to think again.
A group of MPs from 'red wall' constituencies issued a joint statement. 'Responding to the issues raised by our constituents, including on winter fuel, isn't weak – it takes us to a position of strength,' it said.
With Labour's poll rating tumbling, and backbenchers furious not only about the winter fuel cuts but also planned cuts to disability benefits, Downing Street felt it had to move.
Not only were reports coming back from the local election campaign about anger on the doorstep, but Labour whips also wanted to offer backbenchers something before of a vote next month to approve the wider package of benefit cuts.
Officials commissioned polls and conducted focus groups on how a U-turn would be received by voters. Cabinet ministers such as the health secretary, Wes Streeting, admitted the government would have to find a way to respond to voters' anger.
The Guardian revealed more than two weeks ago that No 10 had begun discussing a reversal, and later that it was conducting research on how that might go down with the public, but Downing Street mounted an operation to shut down speculation.
The prime minister's official spokesperson continued to deny that it was being planned or would ever happen, telling reporters there would be 'no change' despite political and public pressure to do so.
Some officials now say they felt they had to deny the reports until a decision was made in order to protect the chancellor's authority. Others suggest that while there had been political discussions, the policy machine had not yet got up and running, and the denials softened once it was.
Eventually, Starmer accepted a change would have to be made, even if it damaged his chancellor and opened the door to further U-turns. But his announcement in the Commons on Wednesday left many details unclear.
The government will not say where the threshold might now be set, nor how much the policy might cost or where the money will be found. They will not say for certain whether they could eventually make a similar move on the two-child benefit cap – though officials point out that policy is much more popular with the public.
The biggest uncertainty is timing. Starmer said on Wednesday the full policy would be announced at this autumn's budget, but officials would not say whether it would be implemented in time for this winter.
Pensioners earning slightly over £11,500 a year therefore face an anxious wait until the budget – and ministers face a barrage of further questions in the months to come.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Reeves to say spending review will reflect ‘priorities of working people'
Reeves to say spending review will reflect ‘priorities of working people'

ITV News

time23 minutes ago

  • ITV News

Reeves to say spending review will reflect ‘priorities of working people'

Rachel Reeves will unveil her spending review on Wednesday, arguing that her priorities are 'the priorities of working people'. The Chancellor is expected to focus on 'Britain's renewal' as she sets out her spending plans for the coming years, with big increases for the NHS, defence and schools. Arguing that the Government is 'renewing Britain', she will acknowledge that 'too many people in too many parts of the country are yet to feel it'. She will say: 'This Government's task – my task – and the purpose of this spending review is to change that, to ensure that renewal is felt in people's everyday lives, their jobs, their communities.' Among the main announcements is expected to be a £30 billion increase in NHS funding, a rise of around 2.8% in real terms, along with an extra £4.5 billion for schools and a rise in defence spending to 2.5% of GDP. But Wednesday could present a tough prospect for other government as the Chancellor seeks to balance Labour's commitments on spending with her fiscal rules. The Institute for Fiscal Studies has already warned that any increase in NHS funding above 2.5% is likely to mean real-terms cuts for other departments, or further tax rises to come in the budget this autumn. This could mean a budgetary squeeze for areas such as local government, the justice system and the Home Office, despite reports that policing would receive an above-inflation settlement. The Chancellor has already insisted that her fiscal rules remain in place, along with Labour's manifesto commitment not to increase income tax, national insurance or VAT. She will say on Wednesday: 'I have made my choices. In place of chaos, I choose stability. In place of decline, I choose investment. In place of retreat, I choose national renewal. 'These are my choices. These are this Government's choices. These are the British people's choices.' Other announcements expected on Wednesday include £39 billion for social and affordable housing over the next decade as the Government aims to meet its target of building 1.5 million new homes by the next election. The Treasury said this would see annual investment in affordable housing rise to £4 billion by 2029/30, almost double the average of £2.3 billion between 2021 and 2026. The additional spending has been welcomed by homelessness charities, with Crisis calling it 'a determined political signal that housing really matters' and Shelter describing the move as 'a watershed moment in tackling the housing emergency'. The Chancellor has also already announced some £15.6 billion of spending on public transport in England's city regions, and £16.7 billion for nuclear power projects, the bulk of which will fund the new Sizewell C plant in Suffolk. There is also expected to be an extension of the £3 bus fare cap until March 2027 and an extra £445 million for upgrading Welsh railways. But one of the big losers from the spending review could be London, which is not expected to receive funding for any significant infrastructure projects or powers to introduce a tourist levy – both key requests from Mayor Sir Sadiq Khan.

Ban 'no ball games' signs to get children off devices, play experts say
Ban 'no ball games' signs to get children off devices, play experts say

BBC News

time23 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Ban 'no ball games' signs to get children off devices, play experts say

Play experts want to ban "no ball games" signs and protect playtime during school breaks, to reduce the time children spend on are being forced "indoors on to digital devices", according to the Raising the Nation Play Commission, whose year-long inquiry calls for an end to "anti-play culture".It warns outdoor play in England has declined by 50% in a generation because of streets dominated by traffic, fear about crime and "public spaces where young people are not welcome".The government says it is working with experts to develop a framework to improve access to activities outside of school. The report is calling for a national Play Strategy for England and has made a number of recommendations including:A national ban on "no ball games" signsUpdating planning policy to require developers to consult with children on all new developmentsGovernment guidance protecting play at break time and lunchtime in schools and banning practices like withdrawing playtime for poor behaviourOpening up school playgrounds to the community outside of school hoursRaising the digital age of consent to 16 and a ban on phones in schoolsChair of the commission, Paul Lindley, says in England "we've made it incredibly hard for children to play"."Creating truly playful communities is not just about better street design, traffic management, and reduced crime, but also about a reversal of the growing culture of intolerance towards children playing."In London, there are more than 7,000 signs limiting play for more than half a million children, according to the councils are beginning to remove signs amid concerns that children are exercising less. For Samantha and her four-year-old son Chester, who live in Blackpool, having a playground far away from traffic is vital."It's free," she says and it's somewhere her son can play without having to worry "about someone coming to tell him he can't"."A lot of children are growing up and don't have the opportunity to be able to go to other places or travel, so having somewhere close to home, that is free, is so important."More than 400 playgrounds closed in England from 2012 to 2022 and annual park budgets have fallen, the report Better Start, which helps families with young children like Chester, has been working to transform the city's less used parks and green spaces over the last ten years."It is so important for families to have safe spaces to play. Families identify with the park. They feel a sense of ownership and they feel like it belongs to them," director Clare Law explains. And there are calls for changes in schools 1995, break times in schools were around 23 minutes longer for young children than they are now, the report found. The commission wants to see playtime during breaks and lunchtime at St Ambrose Catholic Academy in Liverpool are guaranteed an hour's quality play every Tracy Moorcroft says it is a massive part of the school day."If they are building, we see them as future architects, if they're in the kitchen, could they be the next future chef? We try to link their play with aspirations for later in life."But Ms Moorcroft is less convinced about the idea of having "always-active uniforms" which have already been introduced in some says the school has "very high standards" for the uniform, as the children are being prepared for life beyond the get to wear their PE kit some days and wear wellies and coats so they can go outside regardless of the weather. General Secretary of the Association of School and College Leaders, Pepe Di'Iasio agrees that playtime has been squeezed "by the drive to improve academic outcomes", but cautioned against an "overly prescriptive approach to play" as this may impact on other areas of the Wales and Scotland have already made it a legal requirement for local authorities to ensure enough opportunities for children to commission in England is calling for a national play strategy with an annual budget of £125m, led by a minister with a responsibility for Anne Longfield from the Centre for Young Lives think tank, who worked on the report, said it should provide a "blueprint for how we can get children playing again and also tackle the scourge of addictive doom-scrolling".A government spokesperson said its Plan for Change was "setting young people up to achieve and thrive – both inside and outside the classroom", and that it is investing in grassroots sports facilities and in a programme to help turn "grey school spaces green". "From July, new rules under the Online Safety Act will require social media platforms to protect children in the UK from seeing harmful content online," the spokesperson reporting by Hayley Clarke and Rahib Khan

Starmer and Reynolds meet US commerce secretary in push to implement trade deal
Starmer and Reynolds meet US commerce secretary in push to implement trade deal

Glasgow Times

time28 minutes ago

  • Glasgow Times

Starmer and Reynolds meet US commerce secretary in push to implement trade deal

The Prime Minister dropped in on a meeting between Howard Lutnick and Business Secretary Jonathan Reynolds in Downing Street on Tuesday. Mr Lutnick was in London for talks with China on resolving the trade war between Washington and Beijing, and Mr Reynolds took the opportunity to meet him in person to push for the UK-US trade deal announced last month to be implemented as soon as possible. The meeting follows talks between the Business Secretary and US trade representative Jamieson Greer in Paris last week. Under the terms of the agreement announced by Sir Keir and Donald Trump, the US will implement import quotas that will effectively eliminate tariffs on British steel and cut the levy on vehicles to 10%. But the deal has yet to be implemented and tariffs on both steel and cars remain at 25%, although the UK has been spared the increase on steel duties to 50% that Mr Trump imposed on the rest of the world last week. In a post on social media, Mr Reynolds said he had discussed 'progress on our trade deal – including UK autos and steel' with Mr Lutnick. UK officials remain hopeful that the deal will be implemented soon, but Tuesday's meeting does not appear to have moved the issue beyond both sides agreeing the need to move quickly. Speaking in the Commons last week, Sir Keir said he was 'very confident' that tariffs would come down in line with the deal 'within a very short time'. Implementing the deal will require the UK to pass legislation, likely to involve regulations rather than a full Act of Parliament, while the US will also need to create a legal mechanism to bring steel and vehicle quotas into effect.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store