China criticises US-UK trade deal, warning agreements shouldn't 'target or harm any third party'
China has criticised the United Kingdom's trade deal with the United States, saying that no agreement should "target or harm any third party", amid concerns the agreement could see Chinese products excluded from British supply chains.
Experts say Beijing's response indicates countries, including Australia, will have to strike a delicate balance between negotiating with the US on tariffs and keeping China on-side.
The first deal following US President Donald Trump's sweeping tariff regime saw levies dropped on key British goods including steel and cars.
However, the reduction was on the condition that the UK "meet US requirements" on supply chain security and ownership of certain facilities.
The Financial Times newspaper reported that UK officials confirmed the US intended to target China with those stipulations.
China's foreign ministry's spokesman Lin Jiang told a press conference on Wednesday that, "cooperation between countries should not target or harm any third party."
A UK government Department for Business and Trade spokesperson said "trade and investment with China remain important to the UK" and it would continue to engage with issues "in UK and global interests".
China expert at think-tank Chatham House, Dr Yu Jie, told the ABC Australia should note Beijing's response, as it considers what to do about the 10 per cent baseline tariff in place on Australian exports to the US.
"The business and economic connection between China and Australia is larger than the UK in terms of the variety of products, also in terms of the variety of imports and exports.
"The Australian government will probably have to weigh in on this more cautiously when they come to deal with Beijing and also Washington."
The UK has been balancing rebuilding relationships with the US, China and European Union after Brexit, while trying not to get any one off-side.
UK Chancellor Rachel Reeves visited Beijing earlier this year to restart economic and financial discussions that had stalled for years.
China is the UK's fifth-largest trading partner, with bilateral trade topping £98.4b ($203b) in 2024.
Dr Yu said the new British Labour government worked to reset relations with China since taking office, but the US trade deal made it more difficult to implement a consistent policy agenda with Beijing.
She said it remained to be seen how Beijing might respond against the UK, but it could involve import rules for certain British companies, similar to restrictions already in place on some US businesses.
Jeffrey Henderson, vice-chair of the China in Europe Research Network, said US clauses around supply chain security and provenance might signal how future trade deals with America will shape up.
He said China would be most concerned about its components being restricted into the British car market, which received a reprieve from the US tariff plan.
Britian also has a significant stake in the pharmaceutical market in the US, but that has limited input from China.
"The US government may be using the British trade deal as a demonstration, in other words, 'this is how we propose to proceed in the future, so those of you have a major Chinese presence in your supply chains, and whatever products you're sending to the United States, then beware,'" Professor Henderson said.
The professor emeritus at the University of Bristol said it was clear that China's reaction showed it was prepared to "retaliate" if its businesses were squeezed out of international supply chains.
The tensions over the trade deal came as China confirmed a pause on non-tariff measures against 17 American entities.
China's commerce ministry announced a 90-day pause on the US businesses placed on its unreliable entities list.
Foreign organisations on the list are barred from importing, exporting and investing in China.
Another 28 US businesses on China's export control list will also receive a 90-day reprieve.
The announcement comes after China reduced most tariffs on US goods to 10 per cent from 125 per cent, following a deal with the US.
America dropped its new levy on Chinese goods to 30 per cent, with the new tariff measures came into effect just after midnight on Wednesday in Washington, local time.
ABC/wires
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


SBS Australia
40 minutes ago
- SBS Australia
Anthony Albanese lands in Fiji for defence talks
Anthony Albanese lands in Fiji for defence talks Published 13 June 2025, 5:12 am Australia is preparing to ramp up its surveillance in Pacific Island waters, with a big spend on aerial patrols to help protect the world's largest tuna fisheries. The Prime Minister has landed in Fiji to make the announcement and hold talks with Fiji's Prime Minister on defence and security.


ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Planet America: Weekend Edition (Friday 13/6/2025)
Planet America NEW EPISODE Politics Talk & Interview Thought-Provoking Watch Article share options Share this on Facebook Twitter Send this by Email Copy link WhatsApp Messenger Coming to you from the Situation Room, John Barron and Chas Licciardello cut through the spin as they discuss the people, policies and politics from the week in Donald Trump's second term in the White House.

ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Judge in Wissam Haddad's trial asks if 'racist generalisations' vital to religious freedom
A judge has questioned why making alleged racist comments in a sermon is needed to freely exercise religion, on the final day of a Sydney preacher's racial discrimination trial. Wissam Haddad, an Islamic teacher, is being sued for comments that allegedly breached Commonwealth laws against offensive behaviour because of race. In a series of speeches in late 2023, Mr Haddad is alleged to have portrayed Jews as "wicked and scheming", people who "love money and wealth" and as "descendants of apes and pigs". Mr Haddad denies breaching racial discrimination legislation, rejects the imputations were conveyed in a "full and fair reading" of the speeches, and says his comments do not refer to Australian Jewish people. The case was brought principally by Peter Wertheim, co-chief executive of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry (ECAJ). After four days of hearings in the Federal Court, Justice Angus Stewart reserved his decision. Justice Stewart must now decide whether Mr Haddad's comments violated section 18C of the Racial Discrimination Act. He will assess whether the remarks were reasonably likely in all situations to "offend, insult, humiliate or intimate another … group of people" and were made "because of the race … of all the people in the group". Mr Haddad argues that, if his comments are found to have been unlawful, the act breaches the Australian Constitution, which prevents the making of laws that prohibit the "free exercise of any religion". During closing submissions on Friday, the judge asked Mr Haddad's barrister Andrew Boe why the preacher's comments about Jews were vital to free exercise of religion. "What is it that what was said in this case, that is necessary to the exercise of Islam, which doesn't seek to justify in Islamic texts, as I understand it, racist generalisations?" Justice Stewart asked. Mr Boe admitted his client "may be a very bad preacher" but said his evangelism was protected under the constitution. "He's trying to explain matters to people who are very faithful," Mr Boe said. "I think the phrase 'religious expression' must be read widely." Mr Haddad also argued section 18C would infringe the implied freedom of political communication under the constitution, if his speeches, which addressed the war in Gaza, were found to be unlawful. If Justice Stewart is persuaded of this argument, he would have to overrule his own conclusion in December that the law is valid in a case brought by Greens Senator Mehreen Faruqi against One Nation Senator Pauline Hanson. Peter Braham SC, for Mr Wertheim, has sought an injunction banning Mr Haddad from publicly saying anything about Jews that conveys the racist meanings alleged in the case. Mr Braham has also asked for orders to remove the impugned speeches from the internet and to publish a statement declaring the comments about Jews unlawful. "We're not seeking compensation in monetary form," he said. Outside court, Mr Haddad did not respond to questions about whether he would abide by any orders restricting his speech. His solicitor, Elias Tabchouri, said Mr Haddad would deal with the court's orders when they arrived. "We always respect the court's decision," he said.