Singapore's key exports rise 12.4% in April, significantly higher than forecast
SINGAPORE: Singapore's non-oil domestic exports (NODX) rose 12.4 per cent in April from the same month a year earlier, government data showed on Friday (May 16), well ahead of analyst estimates and a bright spot for an economy heavily exposed to global trade uncertainty.
The rise compared with a Reuters poll forecasting year-on-year growth of 4.3 per cent, and followed a 5.4 per cent rise in March.
Electronics exports grew 23.5 per cent year on year, almost double the 12.2 per cent growth in March. PCs, integrated circuits and disk media contributed the most to the expansion, according to data released by Enterprise Singapore.
Non-electronics exports grew 9.3 per cent in April, higher than the 3.7 per cent increase in March.
Among Singapore's top 10 markets, NODX expanded to all but two destinations.
Overall shipments to China fell by 17 per cent year-on-year in April compared with a 29.5 per cent drop in March.
NODX to Malaysia fell 1 per cent compared with a 12.4 per cent expansion in March.
Exports to the US showed moderated year-on-year growth of 1.2 per cent from the figure of 6.2 per cent in March, while exports to Indonesia surged 111.2 per cent compared with the figure of 62.9 per cent in March.
Exports to Taiwan, South Korea, Hong Kong, Thailand, Japan also increased in annual terms in April.
The outlook for Singapore remains uncertain as global trade is expected to slow under tariffs enacted by the United States.
Selena Ling, an economist at Singapore bank OCBC, said that April's high exports could be a sign of customers attempting to get ahead of any rise in global trade tensions, especially as the tariffs set by US President Donald Trump exempted electronics.
"With the 90-day suspension of the reciprocal tariffs and various ongoing trade negotiations, these few months could be a relief window where front-loading potentially continues until there is better clarity," she said.
"Something to watch is the softening of (non-oil domestic exports) to the US across both electronics and non-electronics."
As one of the world's most open economies, Singapore is often seen as a bellwether for global growth as its international trade dwarfs its domestic economy. Singapore announced an "economic resilience" task force last month to deal with the trade fallout and the government said it cannot rule out a recession.
It also downgraded its GDP forecast to 0 per cent to 2 per cent from 1 per cent to 3 per cent previously.
Details of the month-on-month seasonally adjusted change in exports were not included in EnterpriseSG's statement.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
31 minutes ago
- CNA
Commentary: Trump and Musk are fighting. It's difficult to pick a side
SINGAPORE: Once inseparable, United States President Donald Trump and the world's richest man, Elon Musk, are now locked in a very public - and very bitter - divorce. In a matter of days, Mr Musk torched Mr Trump's signature "big, beautiful" Bill, condemned his spending plans, threatened to form a new political party and even suggested the president be impeached. Mr Trump retaliated in kind. He called Mr Musk 'a big-time drug addict', threatened to cut his companies off from government contracts and warned of ' serious consequences ' if the billionaire were to finance Democratic Party candidates running against Republicans. "I have no intention of speaking to him," Mr Trump told NBC on Saturday (Jun 7), saying he believed their relationship was over. Unlike most public spats between public figures, this one offers no easy side to take. The two men are, in many ways, cut from the same cloth. They operate with little patience for deliberation and considerable appetite for the spotlight, and are accustomed to getting their own ways. A PERSONAL FIGHT WITH NATIONAL CONSEQUENCES The trouble with breakups is that any fallout doesn't stay between the warring parties. There's always collateral damage. For example, after Mr Trump threatened to pull government deals with Mr Musk's companies, Tesla shares tanked 14 per cent and lost US$150 billion in value. This very public falling-out carries risks for both men. For Mr Trump, the feud with Mr Musk marks the first major rift with a prominent adviser in his second term. It has shattered the 'bromance' that many assumed would continue and could fracture Mr Trump's support among tech leaders and wealthy donors. Mr Musk, who spent nearly US$300 million in last year's elections, was not only Mr Trump's richest backer, but also a key bridge to Silicon Valley. He helped connect Mr Trump to tech investors and gave the pro-business wing of the Republican Party reason to support the president. Now, Mr Musk's defection could undermine Republican unity on Capitol Hill. His vocal criticism of the debt impact has emboldened some Republican fiscal hawks to oppose Mr Trump's One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which passed the US House late last month. The Bill, which combines tax breaks, spending cuts, border security funding and other priorities, is the centrepiece of Mr Trump's domestic policy agenda. Critics, however, have said it could increase the deficit by as much as US$4 trillion over a decade. If it falters in the Senate due to Republican defections, it would be a significant blow to Mr Trump's legislative agenda. Moreover, Mr Musk's talk of a new centrist party and his massive online influence hint at a potential challenge to the two-party status quo, which should alarm Republican strategists. Although an actual third party is a long shot, even the suggestion feeds a narrative that Mr Trump's brand of Republicanism is alienating a segment of his base. A prolonged Trump-Musk feud could make it harder for Republicans to hold Congress in next year's midterms, given Mr Musk's financial clout and devoted following. FEUD SPREADS TO SPACE Mr Trump, for his part, appears eager to show he won't be dictated to by a billionaire ally. A White House official stressed that the administration is 'not beholden to Elon Musk on policy' and that by attacking the Bill, Mr Musk 'has clearly picked a side' against Mr Trump. In the short term, Mr Trump's hardline stance may shore up his image as a president who puts his agenda above any one person, even the world's richest man. His core base, many of whom harbour scepticism toward tech elites, might even cheer him for standing up to Mr Musk. However, Mr Trump's unpredictable retaliatory streak raises questions in Washington and on Wall Street. Would he really cut off federal contracts to SpaceX and Tesla to punish Mr Musk, even if it jeopardises US interests? NASA and the Pentagon rely heavily on SpaceX for America's spaceflight capabilities and military satellite launches. Pulling the plug on SpaceX partnerships could set back crucial programmes (like the International Space Station transport, Moon missions and defence satellite deployments) and force the government to scramble for alternatives. It's an open question how far Mr Trump is willing to go. Even some within Mr Trump's circle may urge caution, given the billions at stake and the fact that SpaceX's Dragon spacecraft is integral to US-led space efforts (NASA has invested roughly US$15 billion in SpaceX projects). So, while the president talks tough, cutting Mr Musk off is not without consequences. Rattled by Mr Musk's initial threat to retire the Dragon spacecraft, NASA and Pentagon officials have contacted at least three competitors - Rocket Lab, Stoke Space and Blue Origin - to assess their rocket development and availability for government missions, according to a report by the Washington Post over the weekend. CAN MUSK AFFORD TO ALIENATE WASHINGTON? For Mr Musk, this episode is a high-stakes gamble that could redefine his role in the tech and political ecosystems. On one hand, Mr Musk has rebranded himself as an independent voice, unafraid to challenge a president he once supported. This could salvage his reputation among moderates or Tesla customers who were uneasy with his closeness to Mr Trump. By distancing himself from Mr Trump, Mr Musk may refocus attention on his companies' innovations rather than partisan politics. He has already said he will curtail political spending going forward, signalling a retreat from the kingmaker role he played in 2024. On the other hand, Mr Musk is now on a collision course with the US government that could have serious business implications. If Mr Trump were to follow through on cancelling contracts, SpaceX stands to lose enormous revenue (an estimated US$22 billion in government deals is now at risk). Mr Musk must also consider the broader impact on Tesla, which until now has benefited from government electric vehicle (EV) incentives and a friendly regulatory environment. If Mr Trump now views Mr Musk as an adversary, Tesla could face a chillier reception in policy areas important to it (such as environmental credits, infrastructure support or foreign trade deals). AN EXPENSIVE BREAKUP What happens next is very much anyone's guess; it could well depend on what either man decides to post next. The Trump-Musk fallout has escalated from a policy disagreement into a personal and political reckoning. Mr Trump is defending his legislative legacy and asserting authority over a defiant former ally. Mr Musk is recasting himself as an independent visionary, willing to challenge power, but at the cost of political access. Whether this fades or hardens, the consequences will be felt well beyond Washington. Ben Chester Cheong is a law lecturer at the Singapore University of Social Sciences, and of counsel at RHTLaw Asia. He is a visiting fellow in law at the University of Reading, and a centre researcher at the University of Cambridge.
CNA
3 hours ago
- CNA
US and Chinese officials meet in London for pivotal trade talks
LONDON: Top US and Chinese officials were meeting in London on Monday (Jun 9) to try to defuse a trade dispute that has widened from tariffs to restrictions over rare earths, threatening a global supply chain shock and slower economic growth. On the first of likely two days of talks, officials from the two superpowers were meeting at the ornate Lancaster House to try to get back on track with a preliminary agreement struck last month in Geneva that had briefly lowered the temperature between Washington and Beijing. Since then, the US. has accused China of slow-walking on its commitments, particularly around rare earths shipments. White House economic adviser Kevin Hassett said on Monday that the US team wanted a handshake from China on rare earths after PresidentDonald Trump said Chinese President Xi Jinping had agreed to resume shipments in a rare call between the two presidents last week. "The purpose of the meeting today is to make sure that they're serious, but to literally get handshakes," Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, told CNBC in an interview. He said the US would expect export controls to be eased and rare earths released in volume immediately afterwards. The London talks, expected to continue into the evening on Monday, come at a crucial time for both economies, which are showing signs of strain from Trump's cascade of tariff orders since his return to the White House in January. Customs data showed that China's exports to the US plunged 34.5 per cent year-on-year in May in value terms, the sharpest drop since February 2020, when the outbreak of the COVID-19 pandemic upended global trade. In the US, business and household confidence has taken a pummeling, while first-quarter gross domestic product contracted due to a record surge in imports as Americans front-loaded purchases to beat anticipated price increases. But for now, the impact on inflation has been muted, and the jobs market has remained fairly resilient, though economists expect cracks to become more apparent over the summer. Attending the talks in London are US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick and US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer. The Chinese contingent led by Vice Premier He Lifeng includes Commerce Minister Wang Wentao and the ministry's chief trade negotiator, Li Chenggang. The inclusion of Lutnick, whose agency oversees export controls for the US, is one indication of how central rare earths have become, and some analysts saw it as a sign that Trump is willing to put recently imposed Commerce Department export restrictions on the table. China holds a near-monopoly on rare earth magnets, a crucial component in electric vehicle motors. Lutnick did not attend the Geneva talks at which the countries struck a 90-day deal to roll back some of the triple-digit tariffs they had placed on each other. POSITIVE CONCLUSION Trump and Xi spoke by phone last week, their first direct interaction since Trump's Jan 20 inauguration. During the call, Xi told Trump to back down from trade measures that roiled the global economy and warned him against threatening steps on Taiwan, according to a Chinese government summary. But Trump said on social media the talks focused primarily on trade led to "a very positive conclusion," setting the stage for Monday's meeting in the British capital. The next day, Trump said Xi had agreed to resume shipments to the US of rare earths minerals and magnets, and Reuters reported that China has granted temporary export licenses to rare-earth suppliers of the top three US automakers. EXPORT RESTRICTIONS IN FOCUS China's decision in April to suspend exports of a wide range of critical minerals and magnets upended the supply chains central to automakers, aerospace manufacturers, semiconductor companies and military contractors around the world. Kelly Ann Shaw, a former White House trade adviser during Trump's first term, said that the US was arguing that China's continued export control restrictions violated the agreement in Geneva to remove retaliatory measures. "What I expect to see announced in the next few hours is effectively a reaffirmation of China's commitment, plus some concessions on the US side, with respect to export controls measures over the past week or two," said Shaw, a trade partner at the Akin Gump law firm in Washington. But Shaw said she expected the US only to agree to lift some new export curbs, not longstanding ones such as for advanced artificial intelligence chips. Reuters reported on May 28 that the US ordered a halt to shipments of semiconductor design software and chemicals and aviation equipment, revoking export licenses that had been previously issued. White House spokeswoman Karoline Leavitt told the Fox News program "Sunday Morning Futures" that the US wanted the two sides to build on the progress made in Geneva in the hope they could move towards more comprehensive trade talks. The preliminary deal in Geneva sparked a global relief rally in stock markets, and US indexes that had been in or near bear market levels have recouped the lion's share of their losses. But Ian Bremmer, president of the Eurasia Group, said while a temporary truce was possible, there was little prospect for the bilateral relationship to become constructive given broader decoupling trends and continued US pressure on other countries to take China out of their supply chains. "Everyone around Trump is still hawkish, and so a breakthrough US-China trade deal is unlikely, especially in the context of other deals that are further along and prioritised," he said in an analyst note.
Independent Singapore
6 hours ago
- Independent Singapore
Singapore fund inflows rebound in 2024 at S$7.6B, up 167%
Photo: Freepik/freestockcenter SINGAPORE: Singapore's fund management industry rebounded in 2024, pulling in S$7.6 billion in total net inflows, up 167% from the S$2.85 billion recorded the year before. According to Singapore Business Review, citing the latest quarterly report from the Investment Management Association of Singapore (IMAS), net inflows in the fourth quarter of 2024 (Q4 2024) alone reached S$1.72 billion, led by fixed income and allocation funds at S$758.83 million and S$630.09 million, respectively. Money market funds, which had an inflow of S$1.5 billion in the previous quarter, followed with S$158.83 million. Equity funds also recorded inflows of S$171.83 million. Meanwhile, alternative assets, commodities, and convertibles posted minor outflows. In Singapore, global equity income funds saw the highest inflows, attracting S$91.83 million, followed by Singapore equity funds, which drew in S$78.82 million. In contrast, Asia-Pacific ex-Japan equity funds had the most outflows at S$121.85 million. Globally, fund flows were mixed. In Q4 2024, the US equity market drew US$145.6 billion in fresh inflows, driven mostly by large blend funds. In Europe, equity inflows reached €13.56 billion (S$19.66 billion). Meanwhile, China bucked the trend with ¥85.48 billion (S$761.7 million) pulled from equity funds in the same period. Fixed income stayed popular with investors globally. US fixed income brought in US$128.3 billion (S$165.2 billion), while Europe recorded €75.36 billion in net income inflows for Q4. In Asia, the city-state's fixed income segment pulled in S$758.83 million, led by global fixed income at S$415.82 million and Asia fixed income at S$278.79 million. /TISG Read also: Citi sees social finance funding in Asia growing 10% in 2025 as investor interest heats up
