What Are The Blue Lights On Some Florida Traffic Signals Used For?
These little blue lights are called confirmation lights, and they are designed to help law enforcement officers to see from any direction which lights are red. For example, if a driver is going south, but the cop is facing in another direction, the officer wouldn't be able to see whether the driver's light was red when they entered the intersection. This is because a blue confirmation light, which is only illuminated when the signal below it is red, can be seen from any direction.
There are a few potential benefits to installing these lights. For one thing, only one officer is needed to monitor an intersection instead of two. Additionally, it's less dangerous for police officers, since they can monitor entire intersections from a safe vantage point. Most importantly, it's hoped that an initial increase in citations will be a deterrent for drivers running red lights going forward.
Read more: These Are The Cars Our Readers Wish Would Depreciate Faster
Are The Blue Lights Working?
Florida isn't the only state where these lights have been installed. Cities in Colorado, South Dakota, and Kansas have also installed these blue indicators. In fact, the Minnesota Department of Transportation conducted a safety study in 2014 on the impact of confirmation lights in Florida. Shortly thereafter, the little blue lights started popping up in Minnesota towns like Blaine, Crystal, and Maplewood.
That study found that crashes caused by running red lights dropped by 33% after these confirmation lights were installed. Another study done by the Federal Highway Administration in 2017 stated that its results indicated "statistically significant crash reductions for most crash types". So, all signs seem to indicate the confirmation lights are working.
This is important because, while traffic fatalities from all types of car crashes dropped slightly last year, red light running is a significant cause of traffic fatalities in the U.S. According to the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), 1,086 people were killed and 136,000 were injured in 2023 in accidents that involved running of red lights. Pedestrians, bicyclists, and drivers and passengers in other vehicles made up half of the total fatalities.
Don't Get Caught Running A Red Light In Florida
What we really mean to say is don't run red lights, anywhere, regardless of your chance of getting caught. Running a red light can be fatal to you, your passengers, other drivers, and even pedestrians. That's not worth the couple of minutes you might save on your trip.
If that's not enough incentive to obey traffic signals, consider the penalties if you do get caught. In Florida, being caught on camera running a red light will cost you a $158 fine. Failure to pay will result in a Uniform Traffic Citation being issued, and you may then have to pay up to $500, including administrative costs and court fees.
However, if you are pulled over by an officer -- maybe one who saw the little blue confirmation light -- you're looking at upwards of $264, depending on the county, as well as points on your license. No matter how you look at it, there's no good reason to run a red light. So, drive safely and obey the traffic signals.
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
TRAFFIC ALERT: Semi truck on fire in St. Augustine stops traffic on I-95
UPDATE 10:08 a.m.: The left lane is the only one being blocked at the moment. END UPDATE A vehicle fire has shut down all northbound lanes of I-95 in St. Johns County, according to the Florida Highway Patrol. The fire was reported at 9:10 a.m. Tuesday. The incident is just south of the St. Augustine area. >>> STREAM ACTION NEWS JAX LIVE <<< Action News Jax spoke to St. Johns County Fire Rescue and they say it was a mechanical issue that made the truck catch on fire. Drivers are being urged to avoid the area and seek alternate routes as crews work to clear the scene. No injuries were reported. We'll update as more information becomes available. [DOWNLOAD: Free Action News Jax app for alerts as news breaks] [SIGN UP: Action News Jax Daily Headlines Newsletter] Click here to download the free Action News Jax news and weather apps, click here to download the Action News Jax Now app for your smart TV and click here to stream Action News Jax live. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Tesla Ordered to Pay in Fatal Autopilot Crash Case
Tesla (TSLA, Financials) has been found partly liable for a fatal 2019 crash in Key Largo, Florida, involving its Autopilot driver-assistance system the first major Autopilot case to reach trial. A Miami jury ruled the automaker must pay about $242.5 million in damages to the family of 22-year-old Naibel Benavides, who was killed, and survivor Dillon Angulo. Warning! GuruFocus has detected 7 Warning Signs with WBD. The damages include roughly $42.5 million in compensatory payments and $200 million in punitive damages assessed solely against Tesla. The jury found the company 33% responsible for the crash, in which a Tesla Model S accelerated through an intersection and struck the victims while Autopilot was engaged. Most lawsuits over Tesla's driver-assist technology have been settled quietly; this case went public, and the jury sided with the plaintiffs' argument that Tesla misled consumers by marketing Autopilot as safer than it was while allowing it to operate on roads it wasn't designed for. Tesla countered that the driver, George McGee, was distracted while retrieving his dropped phone and had overridden Autopilot by pressing the accelerator. The verdict matters now because it lands as Tesla pushes toward a launch of fully autonomous robotaxis, which are already under scrutiny for safety concerns. Regulators may view the ruling as a signal to tighten oversight of advanced driver-assistance systems. Investor reaction has been swift Tesla shares fell 1.8% Friday, deepening a 25% decline year to date, the steepest drop among megacap tech companies. It also comes as other countries, including Australia, pursue class-action suits over similar alleged flaws. The outcome could influence global regulatory frameworks for autonomous driving, forcing companies to reconcile innovation with safety before scaling deployments. Today's verdict is wrong, Tesla said in a statement, adding it plans to appeal and reiterating its position that the crash was caused by driver negligence. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration continues multiple investigations into Autopilot's performance and Tesla's claims about its capabilities. The ruling adds pressure on both Tesla and the broader autonomous vehicle industry to prove that technology billed as safer than human driving can deliver on its promises without compromising public safety. This article first appeared on GuruFocus. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data


Bloomberg
an hour ago
- Bloomberg
Cambridge is Getting Bumpier on Purpose
As federal funding and support for urban traffic safety become less available in the US, cities might consider a modest alternative: the speed hump. Cambridge, Massachusetts, for example, is installing speed humps for the first time as part of a pivot toward quicker fixes. The change comes after years of resident demand. Unlike other safety measures, speed humps often garner public support and tend to satisfy NIMBY sentiments by protecting residents without drastically altering the surroundings. And a modest decrease in speed can have an outsized impact on safety by both reducing crashes and making them less deadly, writes David Zipper. While they represent a rare win-win in policy, their adoption can face challenges in some cities. Today on CityLab: — Arvelisse Bonilla Ramos