Ontario spending on homelessness 'stagnate' while problem worsens, new report says
The new data comes from the Maytree, a foundation committed to reducing poverty, which looked at publicly available spending figures on homelessness and contrasted them with recently released reports on the growing number of people experiencing homelessness in Ontario.
Government spending on low income housing and homelessness has remained largely unchanged over the last decade, even when adjusted for inflation, said Alexi White, Maytree's director of systems change.
"Spending has stagnated in real dollars," White said. "We really aren't spending any more than we were 10 years ago on housing and homelessness … We need a real plan, a real investment, a real time horizon, and a real goal that says we're going to solve this thing."
The report says that when adjusted for inflation, spending was around $1.3 billion in 2013-2014 and is estimated to come in under $1.5 billion in 2024-2025. The notable exception was spending during the first year of the pandemic, which shot up to over $2 billion in 2020-2021.
White says Maytree crunched the numbers during the provincial election in hopes of generating more debate over the worsening problem. Whoever forms the next provincial government must spend $11 billion over the next decade to dramatically increase the number of supportive and deeply affordable housing units, he said.
"More and more people are not only homeless, but are staying homeless for long periods of time," White said. "And that's really the canary in the coal mine (suggesting) that things are going to get a lot worse, really quickly."81,000 Ontarians homeless in 2024: report
Maytree says its report was compiled using the province's own financial data, analysis by Ontario's fiscal watchdog the Financial Accountability Office and a recent report on homelessness released by the Association of Municipalities of Ontario (AMO). That AMO study found that more than 81,000 people in Ontario were homeless last year, a number that's up 25 per cent over two years.
AMO, which represents 444 municipalities across the province, declined to comment on the issue during the election period, but last month said a different approach is needed to tackle the crisis, prioritizing housing solutions over temporary measures.
"We are at a real tipping point," said Robin Jones, AMO president and the mayor of Westport, north of Kingston. "Without concrete action it is only going to get worse."
White says the majority of the $11 billion needed over the next decade should be used to build affordable and supportive housing. The province shouldn't depend on the private sector to build market homes, hoping that it will free up space for more affordable housing, he said.
"The government should get back in the game of specifically funding the building of non-market housing," he said.
Ontario's four main party leaders all have plans to address homelessness. They are, from left: PC Leader Doug Ford, Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie, NDP Leader Marit Stiles and Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner. (CBC)
Parties pitch spending on housing, emergency shelters
Ontario's Progressive Conservative Party says it will spent $3 billion over the next three years on affordable housing, anti-homelessness and emergency shelter supports. PC Leader Doug Ford has defended his government's record on the issue, including a $44 million announcement in December aimed at clearing encampments and bolstering enforcement in community park spaces.
"I've got to keep telling you, there's never been more of an investment in homeless folks than what we've invested," Ford said at his campaign launch in early February.
All of the opposition parties have been critical of Ford's plan to crack down on encampments, accusing him of criminalizing homelessness and having no plan to provide addictions treatment.
Liberal Leader Bonnie Crombie has spoken often during the campaign of her own father, who experienced homelessness and died in a Toronto shelter. The party has not yet said what it would spend to address the issue, but has committed to building more housing and enhancing addictions services.
"It has to be affordable housing and it needs to be supportive housing for those individuals who are living on the streets, some of them facing some vast mental health challenges, some addiction issues," Crombie said during a campaign stop in Hamilton.
NDP Leader Marit Stiles announced a platform plank aimed at solving chronic homelessness. The party says it will build 60,000 new supportive housing units, upload all shelter costs from municipalities to the province, and provide more housing benefits that help people move out of shelters and into homes.
"Homelessness is about housing," she said. "So we need not only shelters in the immediate, but we actually need deeply affordable, permanently affordable solutions."
Green Party Leader Mike Schreiner has promised to build 310,000 affordable homes, including 60,000 permanent supportive homes. The party says that will cost taxpayers $2.75 billion over four years.
"We will address the deep unfairness in this province that over 81,000 people are experiencing homelessness by having government get back into building affordable and deeply affordable nonprofit cooperative supportive housing," Schreiner said at a campaign stop.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Fox News
9 hours ago
- Fox News
Fox News Poll: Voters support a third political party, but not if it's Elon Musk's
Elon Musk's talk of a third political party is an idea supported by more than half of voters in the latest Fox News national survey – as long as that party isn't linked to the billionaire. By an 11-point margin, more voters think it is a good idea rather than a bad one for there to be a third major party (53% vs. 42%). That's down from a 27-point spread in 2010, the most recent time Fox asked the question. Independents – by a 44-point margin and Democrats – by 20 points say a third party is a good idea while Republicans think it's a bad one by 9 points. The decline from 2010 is mostly because of a 22-point shift among Republicans, who were 13 points more likely to say it was a good idea (50%) than a bad one (37%) 15 years ago. "In 2010, anger and disappointment with both parties among some Republicans and independents fueled the tea party movement," says Republican pollster Daron Shaw, who helps conduct the Fox News survey with Democrat Chris Anderson. "This time around the disappointment and anger is coming from the Democrats." Voters draw the line, however, at a third party led by Musk. Most, 75%, say they are "not very" or "not at all" open to supporting a party created by the billionaire, while 22% say they are "extremely" or "very" open to it. Those most likely to back a Musk political party are men (31% extremely/very open), especially Republican men (41%), men under age 45 (38%), and White men without a college degree (36%). Independents (32% extremely/very open) and Republicans (31%) are roughly 20 points more likely than Democrats (11%) to support a Musk-run party. Some support for a third major party comes from voter dissatisfaction with both major parties, as 64% think the Democratic Party lacks a clear plan for dealing with the problems facing the country and 54% say the same about the GOP. The survey also asks voters to respond to a series of agree-disagree statements about third parties and finds they are equally likely to view them positively as negatively. For example, 6 in 10 voters agree third parties are desperately needed because the Democratic and Republican parties are failing to address voter concerns (61% agree), while another 6 in 10 think third-party candidates are just spoilers that distract from the two major parties (59%). Democrats (59% agree) and Republicans (66%) are more likely to agree third-party candidates are spoilers while independents feel the opposite (60% disagree). Majorities of independents (76% agree) and Democrats (67%) are in alignment on needing a new party, whereas Republicans are split (49% agree third parties are needed, 50% do not). About 4 voters in 10 feel third-party candidates tend to be less qualified than those from the two major parties (54% disagree). More Republicans (51% agree) than Democrats (41%) and independents (33%) think a third party is not suitable to run. Voters are more decisive when asked if the U.S. political system is rigged against third parties as 70% feel it is, including most Democrats (73%), Republicans (66%), and independents (76%). "The survey shows the dilemma for third parties in the U.S.," says Shaw. "Voters want another choice, but don't particularly like the options they've seen and are reluctant to back candidates they think are doomed." Conducted July 18-21, 2025, under the direction of Beacon Research (D) and Shaw & Company Research (R), this Fox News survey includes interviews with a sample of 1,000 registered voters randomly selected from a national voter file. Respondents spoke with live interviewers on landlines (114) and cellphones (636) or completed the survey online after receiving a text (250). Results based on the full sample have a margin of sampling error of ±3 percentage points. Sampling error for results among subgroups is higher. In addition to sampling error, question wording and order can influence results. Weights are generally applied to age, race, education, and area variables to ensure the demographics of respondents are representative of the registered voter population. Sources for developing weight targets include the American Community Survey, Fox News Voter Analysis and voter file data.


CNBC
17 hours ago
- CNBC
Walmart, MLS ink partnership to capitalize on growing U.S. soccer fandom
Walmart and Major League Soccer are teaming up in a multiyear partnership that will see the retailer establish a bigger foothold in the sport and its growing U.S. fanbase. Walmart will invest in MLS and become an official sponsor and partner of the league. Terms and the exact length of the partnership weren't disclosed. The partnership kicks off with the Leagues Cup, a tournament that begins Tuesday and culminates in a final match on Aug. 31. It features 18 MLS clubs competing against 18 teams from Mexico's Liga MX. "Walmart will be front and center for the highly anticipated tournament," said William White, Walmart's chief marketing officer. During the tournament and beyond, Walmart advertising will be featured across stadiums and other aspects of games, and soccer will be highlighted in its in-store and online shopping experiences. The tie-up comes at a pivotal moment for U.S. soccer as fans look ahead to the 2026 World Cup, which takes place next summer in North America and is expected to drum up new U.S. fans for the global sport. MLS is looking to capitalize on the fervor, just as its various sponsors are looking to do the same. "The lead-up to 2026 is a once-in-a-generational moment for soccer in North America. But for MLS, we've got to take a step back and think about the 30 years we've spent investing in communities across North America to really build sustained energy around the sport that's going to last well beyond the summer's event," said Carter Ladd, executive vice president and chief revenue officer at MLS. "I think we're going to see that momentum between now and next summer where the World Cup is really going to help prop up this partnership." MLS sponsorship revenue was up double digits compared with 2024 as of early May, CNBC reported earlier this year. Major consumer brands have been signing deals with MLS alongside growth in the league's ticket and merchandise sales, particularly since global superstar Lionel Messi joined the Miami club in 2023. However, White and Ladd said in an interview with CNBC the Walmart partnership extends beyond a pure sponsorship deal. While Walmart has already been an advertising partner of MLS, this is its first sponsorship deal with the league — and a first-of-it-kind partnership for both parties, they say. "We're thrilled to be an official MLS sponsor and engage with the league's fast-growing and culturally vibrant fan base," said White. "The fanbase is generally younger, more culturally diverse, and that is an audience that's really important to Walmart. It's a big part of our growing customer base." Nearly three-quarters of the MLS fanbase is made up of Gen Zers or millennials, and more than 30% is Hispanic, according to the league. MLS data shows it has the youngest fanbase compared with other professional men's leagues in North America, and more female fans than other professional men's leagues in the U.S. and Canada. The league's social media presence has been a sign of its growth among younger fans. Its digital audience surpassed 110 million total followers across league and club accounts on platforms including Instagram, TikTok and YouTube, according to the league. As part of the deal, MLS will launch a creator network through which influencers, designers, players and teams will deliver exclusive behind-the-scenes content for league platforms and highlight Walmart's involvement in the sport. In addition, beginning in 2026, the league and Walmart said they will add to the fan experience by building out programming around televised matches on Saturdays that includes more storytelling around games across MLS platforms. Further details will be shared at a later date on this aspect of the partnership. The destination for that content has yet to be developed, however. "It's going to be a new platform that we're going to be kicking off together in partnership with Walmart next year. And it's not going to show up in one place," Ladd said. "It's really going to be a very broad, comprehensive program that touches the community, touches retail and touches media." Walmart will also launch a soccer landing page on its website, called a "curated shopping hub," that will include all things related to the sport — from gear and equipment to tailgate and watch party items. The page will also highlight suppliers that make soccer-related products and could someday host exclusive merchandise.


Fox News
18 hours ago
- Fox News
Dept. of Education launches investigation into Duke University over alleged racial preferences
The Department of Education announced on Monday that it is launching an investigation into Duke University and Duke Law Journal over alleged racial biases in selecting new editors. The Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights (OCR) cited reports that the Law Journal circulated a packet to school "affinity groups" in 2024 regarding the application process to join the Journal in the new year. Each applicant was asked to write a 12-page memo analyzing an appellate court decision and a 500-word personal statement which would be judged on a points-based grading system along with their first-year GPA. However, applicants from these "affinity groups" were reportedly given the opportunity to receive extra points if their statements referenced their "race or ethnicity" and up to 10 points for describing how their "membership in an underrepresented group" promoted "diverse voices." The OCR believes that this action could be a potential violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. "If Duke illegally gives preferential treatment to law journal or medical school applicants based on those students' immutable characteristics, that is an affront not only to civil rights law, but to the meritocratic character of academic excellence," Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in a statement. "Blatantly discriminatory practices that are illegal under the Constitution, antidiscrimination law, and Supreme Court precedent have become all too common in our educational institutions. The Trump Administration will not allow them to continue." McMahon, along with Secretary of Health and Human Services Robert F. Kennedy Jr., sent a joint letter to Duke University requesting the school "review all policies and practices at Duke Health for the illegal use of race preferences, take immediate action to reform all of those that unlawfully take account of race or ethnicity to bestow benefits or advantages, and provide clear and verifiable assurances to the government that Duke's new policies will be implemented faithfully going forward—including by making all necessary organizational, leadership, and personnel changes to ensure the necessary reforms will be durable." The department is also requesting Duke University set up a "Merit and Civil Rights Committee" to help resolve further civil rights violations. Fox News Digital reached out to Duke University and Duke Law Journal for comment but did not immediately receive a response. Duke University has come under fire multiple times for racial preferences and pushes for diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) in the past year. Last year, Fox News Digital reported on a 2021 plan titled "Dismantling Racism and Advancing Equity, Diversity and Inclusion in the School of Medicine" for Duke Medical School. The guide called out standards such as dress codes, timeliness and individualism as examples of "White supremacy culture." Dr. Kendall Conger also told Fox News Digital in 2024 that he was fired from Duke University's health system after speaking against the university's pledge against racism, which called racism a "public health crisis." "It wasn't so much a pledge to better medicine, but a pledge to left-wing ideology. And so, I felt if I did not say anything, I was giving tacit approval to what was in the pledge," Conger said at the time.