Muslim man has no right to refuse wife's demand for khula divorce: Telangana High Court
Telangana High Court on Tuesday ruled that a Muslim man has no right to refuse his wife's demand for khula (wife-initiated divorce) and that the court's only role is limited to recognising the termination of marriage, making it binding on both parties. Khula is recognised in Islamic law as a contractual dissolution of marriage initiated by the wife, typically involving compensation to the husband, often by returning the dower (mehr) and settling the matter privately by consulting a mufti.
A bench of Justices Moushumi Bhattacharya and B R Madhusudhan Rao delivered the judgment on a man's petition challenging a family court order that dismissed his demand declaring the khula nama (divorce certificate) issued to him as null and void.
The matter pertains to a khula nama issued in October 2020 by a mufti, a professor of Islamic studies, a professor of Arabic and the imam of a mosque. The couple had been married since 2012 and in 2017, on being assaulted by the husband and hospitalised, the wife sought a khula divorce. The husband refused to attend reconciliation meetings and thereafter in 2020 approached a family court, questioning the authority of the mufti in issuing the khula nama. The family court dismissed the petition in February 2024.
Drawing extensively from relevant Quranic verses, Hadith literature, and prior judicial precedents, the judgment clarified the rights and procedures regarding khula. Referring to various court judgments on approaches undertaken in the case of a khula divorce, the division bench stated in the order: 'Khula is a no-fault divorce initiated by the Muslim wife. Upon a demand for Khula, the husband does not have the option to refuse the demand save and except to negotiate the return of the dower (Mehr) or a part thereof. The husband, however, does not have the right to refuse Khula merely because the wife declines to return the dower or a part of it.'
'Khula is, therefore, a non-confrontational form of divorce and one which is privately settled after the parties have made an attempt to preserve the marriage,' the order further said.
'Approaching a Mufti for a Khulanama is not compulsory and does not reinforce the Khula as the Fatwa/advisory decision given by a Mufti is not legally enforceable in a Court of law. The aggrieved party/husband may approach a Court/Qazi for adjudication on the status of the marriage consequent upon the wife seeking the Khula. The Court/Qazi is required to pronounce its view, which becomes a binding judgment on the status of the marriage. The judgment/qaza pronounced by the Court is binding on the parties,' the order added.
Advocate Mubasher Hussain Ansari, who represented the wife, said the most remarkable aspect of the judgment is that since the element of husband's concurrence is unnecessary for a khula divorce, there is no need for family courts to conduct a full-fledged trial.
'Once the wife makes a demand for khula, all that is required for the court is to pronounce khula. The wife is not required to prove or plead why she wants divorce. Earlier, it was taking six to eight years for the court to pronounce judgments in khula cases and there are thousands of such cases before the court in Telangana,' Ansari added.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
6 hours ago
- Indian Express
Muslim man has no right to refuse wife's demand for khula divorce: Telangana High Court
Telangana High Court on Tuesday ruled that a Muslim man has no right to refuse his wife's demand for khula (wife-initiated divorce) and that the court's only role is limited to recognising the termination of marriage, making it binding on both parties. Khula is recognised in Islamic law as a contractual dissolution of marriage initiated by the wife, typically involving compensation to the husband, often by returning the dower (mehr) and settling the matter privately by consulting a mufti. A bench of Justices Moushumi Bhattacharya and B R Madhusudhan Rao delivered the judgment on a man's petition challenging a family court order that dismissed his demand declaring the khula nama (divorce certificate) issued to him as null and void. The matter pertains to a khula nama issued in October 2020 by a mufti, a professor of Islamic studies, a professor of Arabic and the imam of a mosque. The couple had been married since 2012 and in 2017, on being assaulted by the husband and hospitalised, the wife sought a khula divorce. The husband refused to attend reconciliation meetings and thereafter in 2020 approached a family court, questioning the authority of the mufti in issuing the khula nama. The family court dismissed the petition in February 2024. Drawing extensively from relevant Quranic verses, Hadith literature, and prior judicial precedents, the judgment clarified the rights and procedures regarding khula. Referring to various court judgments on approaches undertaken in the case of a khula divorce, the division bench stated in the order: 'Khula is a no-fault divorce initiated by the Muslim wife. Upon a demand for Khula, the husband does not have the option to refuse the demand save and except to negotiate the return of the dower (Mehr) or a part thereof. The husband, however, does not have the right to refuse Khula merely because the wife declines to return the dower or a part of it.' 'Khula is, therefore, a non-confrontational form of divorce and one which is privately settled after the parties have made an attempt to preserve the marriage,' the order further said. 'Approaching a Mufti for a Khulanama is not compulsory and does not reinforce the Khula as the Fatwa/advisory decision given by a Mufti is not legally enforceable in a Court of law. The aggrieved party/husband may approach a Court/Qazi for adjudication on the status of the marriage consequent upon the wife seeking the Khula. The Court/Qazi is required to pronounce its view, which becomes a binding judgment on the status of the marriage. The judgment/qaza pronounced by the Court is binding on the parties,' the order added. Advocate Mubasher Hussain Ansari, who represented the wife, said the most remarkable aspect of the judgment is that since the element of husband's concurrence is unnecessary for a khula divorce, there is no need for family courts to conduct a full-fledged trial. 'Once the wife makes a demand for khula, all that is required for the court is to pronounce khula. The wife is not required to prove or plead why she wants divorce. Earlier, it was taking six to eight years for the court to pronounce judgments in khula cases and there are thousands of such cases before the court in Telangana,' Ansari added.
Hindustan Times
7 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Bengal school ends practice of separately serving mid-day meals to Hindu, Muslim students
KOLKATA: A primary school in West Bengal's East Burdwan district on Wednesday ended an old practice to separately cook and serve mid-day meals to the school's Hindu and Muslim students, officials said.. Dhanu Bibi, one of the cooks who was assigned for Muslim students, said she cooked in one section of the kitchen while the other cook used the adjacent portion. (Sourced) Tapas Ghosh, headmaster of the Kishoriganj Manmohanpur Primary School, said he learnt about the practice when he joined the school in 2024. 'I tried to stop this, but as it was a sensitive issue, I didn't want to do it forcefully or rush through. But it was always on my mind that this practice has to end,' Ghosh said. The school in East Burdwan district's Kalna region has about 70 students in classes one to five. Over the years, a one-foot-high wall had been built in the kitchen to mark the area to be used by the Hindu and Muslim cooks. The school also had to hire two cooks - one from each community - instead of one. It is not clear when the practice started. Or the circumstances that led to the practice of engaging separate cooks and utensils for the children of the two communities. Dhanu Bibi, one of the cooks who was assigned for Muslim students, said she cooked in one section of the kitchen while the other cook used the adjacent portion. Sonali Majumdar, the second cook, told reporters that Tapas Ghosh had tried once earlier to stop the practice but hadn't succeeded. 'But today it has become possible. It feels nice to see that children are having their food together,' Majumdar said. On Wednesday, the school authorities held a meeting with parents of the students, which was attended by officials from the local police station, block administration and the panchayat. Everyone agreed to implement the change. And for the first time in many years, the meal was cooked using the same utensils. The students sat and had their meal together. Ghosh said he was happy that he could stop it. 'I never wanted the children to sit and eat separately just because they come from different communities. I wanted the school to develop and do better,' he said. Kalna sub-divisional officer (SDO) Shubham Aggarwal said they had conducted an inspection on Tuesday after learning about the practice. 'A meeting was held on Wednesday. The local administration and the police were also present. All the students sat together and had their meal,' he said. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) said there was a standard operating procedure for cooking mid-day meals in schools. 'But I have heard that in some schools, particularly in some minority-dominated areas, parents of kids have demanded that halal meat be served. In a bid to avoid any controversy, some schools have stopped serving chicken,' Suvendu Adhikari told reporters. TMC spokesperson Jay Prakash Majumdar said, 'The BJP has started poisoning the minds of every citizen, including kids, and creating a communal divide. Local BJP leaders are doing this. They are pressuring schools to introduce such divisions'.
Hans India
10 hours ago
- Hans India
Muharram 2025: The Start of the Islamic New Year and a Time of Peace
Muharram is the first month of the Islamic year. It starts on June 27, 2025, when the new moon is seen. This day is also the start of the Islamic New Year. Muharram is an important month for Muslims. It is a time for peace, prayer, and remembering important things from the past. During this month, fighting is not allowed. The month is mostly known for remembering Imam Hussain, who was the grandson of Prophet Muhammad. He died in a battle called Karbala. Imam Hussain stood up for truth and fairness. His death shows courage and sacrifice. What people do in Muharram:
