N.H. Cold Case Unit asks public for help in solving brutal 1995 killing of Boston man
'The evidence at the scene, including ligatures and shell casings from a single firearm, suggested this was anything but random,' Formella said in a statement.
To this day, Lei's murder remains unsolved and the New Hampshire Cold Case Unit is appealing to anyone with knowledge about the murder to come forward.
'During the initial investigation, there were credible indications that people may have withheld information out of fear — fear of retaliation, fear of being associated with illegal gambling or gang activity, or fear of prosecution," Formella said in a statement Wednesday.
Get Starting Point
A guide through the most important stories of the morning, delivered Monday through Friday.
Enter Email
Sign Up
'Others may have worried that they wouldn't be believed, or that coming forward could jeopardize their safety or reputation. To those individuals: we are asking you to come forward now—anonymously, if necessary."
Advertisement
Anyone with information is asked to call the New Hampshire Cold Case Unit tip line at
Investigators from the New Hampshire Cold Case Unit, in partnership with the Salem Police Department and New Hampshire State Police, have been using modern forensic techniques and collaborating with law enforcement agencies in Massachusetts as they continue their probe, and they hope people will come forward with information that can help solve the case, Formella said.
Advertisement
'We believe there are still people out there who know what happened to Paul, or who heard something in the aftermath that could help,' Formella said. 'If you were part of Paul's world, knew him casually, or simply heard something—no matter how minor it seemed—your voice matters. The passage of time does not erase the need for justice. Even the smallest detail could be the key to finally solving this case.'
Formella emphasized that tips can be submitted anonymously.
'You do not need to reveal your identity to make a difference,' Formella said. 'Help us bring the truth to light. Help us deliver justice for Paul's family after three long decades.'
#mc_embed_signup{background:#fff; false;clear:left; font:14px Helvetica,Arial,sans-serif; width: 100%;}
/* Add your own Mailchimp form style overrides in your site stylesheet or in this style block.
We recommend moving this block and the preceding CSS link to the HEAD of your HTML file. */
Sign up for Cold Case Files emails:
*
indicates required
Email Address
*
First Name
Emily Sweeney can be reached at
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fox News
5 days ago
- Fox News
Epstein grand jury materials won't be released after federal judge denies DOJ request to unseal
A federal judge has denied the Justice Department's motion to unseal grand jury materials related to the sex trafficking cases against dead trafficker Jeffrey Epstein and his longtime lover and convicted accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell. In a 31-page opinion and order on the motion, U.S. District Judge Paul Engelmayer shot down the motion, finding the documents do not contain "significant, undisclosed information about [their] crimes, or the investigation into them." He wrote that only two "features" of the grand jury evidence were noteworthy, summarizing them in his decision: "First, the grand juries in this case were not used for investigative purposes," he wrote. "They did not hear testimony from any firsthand witness to any event at issue. They did not hear testimony from any victim, eyewitness, suspect, or even a records custodian. The grand juries met instead for the quotidian purpose of returning an indictment." The only witnesses were members of law enforcement, and each grand jury heard evidence only for one day, he wrote. "Second, the evidence put before the Maxwell grand juries is today, with only very minor exceptions, a matter of public record," Engelmayer continued. "The Government admitted as much." In addition to transcripts of grand jury testimony, the Justice Department also wanted to unseal additional evidence presented as exhibits to the grand jurors. They were expected to include more names than have been publicly associated with the latter in criminal and civil court proceedings. But Engelmayer denied the government's request for the exhibits, too. Read the judge's decision: "A member of the public familiar with the Maxwell trial record who reviewed the grand jury materials that the Government proposes to unseal would thus learn next to nothing new," he wrote. "The materials do not identify any person other than Epstein and Maxwell as having had sexual contact with a minor. They do not discuss or identify any client of Epstein's or Maxwell's. They do not reveal any heretofore unknown means or methods of Epstein's or Maxwell's crimes." They also do not shed any new light on the origin of Epstein's wealth, the circumstances of his death, or "the path of the Government's investigation," he added. The grand jury exhibits cannot be released without a court's permission, but federal prosecutors asked to have them unsealed due to intense public interest across the country. Details about what relationship, if any, the named individuals may have had with Epstein or Maxwell were not immediately clear. Prosecutors asked the court to give them until Thursday, Aug. 14, to notify anyone whose name would be unveiled. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence after she was convicted at trial in 2021 of helping her former lover, Epstein, traffic teen girls. She is appealing her conviction and has indicated in recent weeks that she is willing to sit for interviews with Congress and the Justice Department. Epstein died in a federal jail cell in 2019 before he faced trial himself. His official cause of death has been ruled a suicide, a conclusion rejected by his brother. This is a breaking news story. Check back with Fox News Digital for updates.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Testimony transcripts of Maxwell indictment will not be released
Transcripts of the secret grand jury testimony that led to the sex trafficking indictment of Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell, will not be released, a judge decided on Monday. Judge Paul A Engelmayer said in a written ruling that the government had suggested that the materials could be released publicly 'casually or promiscuously', which would risk 'unravelling the foundations of secrecy upon which the grand jury is premised' and eroding confidence by persons called to testify before future grand juries. 'And it is no answer to argue that releasing the grand jury materials, because they are redundant of the evidence at Maxwell's trial, would be innocuous. 'The same could be said for almost any grand jury testimony, by summary witnesses or others, given in support of charges that later proceeded to trial,' he added. Federal prosecutors had asked to unseal the documents, in an effort to calm a whirlpool of suspicions about what the government knows about Epstein, a well-connected financier who died behind bars while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Maxwell, his socialite ex-girlfriend, was later convicted of helping him prey on underage girls. It is unclear how much the transcripts would have revealed since the Justice Department has acknowledged that they contained no testimony from witnesses who were not members of law enforcement. Maxwell recently was interviewed by the Justice Department and was moved from a prison in Florida to a prison camp in Texas. Her attorney says she testified truthfully.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Judge denies request to unseal transcripts from grand jury that indicted Ghislaine Maxwell
NEW YORK (AP) — Transcripts of the secret grand jury testimony that led to the sex trafficking indictment of Jeffrey Epstein's former girlfriend, Ghislaine Maxwell won't be released, a judge decided Monday. Judge Paul A. Engelmayer said in a written ruling that the government had suggested that the materials could be released publicly 'casually or promiscuously,' which would risk 'unraveling the foundations of secrecy upon which the grand jury is premised' and eroding confidence by persons called to testify before future grand juries, 'And it is no answer to argue that releasing the grand jury materials, because they are redundant of the evidence at Maxwell's trial, would be innocuous. The same could be said for almost any grand jury testimony, by summary witnesses or others, given in support of charges that later proceeded to trial,' he added. Federal prosecutors had asked to unseal the documents, in an effort to calm a whirlpool of suspicions about what the government knows about Epstein, a well-connected financier who died behind bars while awaiting trial on sex trafficking charges. Maxwell, his socialite ex-girlfriend, was later convicted of helping him prey on underage girls. It's unclear how much the transcripts would have revealed since the Justice Department has acknowledged that they contained no testimony from witnesses who were not members of law enforcement. Maxwell recently was interviewed by the Justice Department and was moved from a prison in Florida to a prison camp in Texas. Her attorney says she testified truthfully. Prosecutors have said much of what was discussed behind the grand jury's closed doors ultimately became public at Maxwell's 2021 trial in 2021, in victims' civil lawsuits or in public statements from victims and witnesses. The only grand jury witnesses were law enforcement officers. The decision about the grand jury transcripts doesn't affect thousands of other pages that the government possesses but has declined to release. The Justice Department has said much of the material was court-sealed to protect victims and little of it would have come out if Epstein had gone to trial. Another federal judge still is weighing whether to release the transcripts from the grand jury testimony that led to Epstein's indictment. A federal judge in Florida declined to release grand jury documents from an investigation there in 2005 and 2007. Some Epstein victims supported releasing the grand jury transcripts with some redactions. Other accusers said the debate over the material was causing them anguish. Maxwell, who's appealing her conviction, opposed unsealing the documents. Her lawyers said she hasn't seen them but believed they were full of questionable statements that her defense had no opportunity to challenge. Solve the daily Crossword
