logo
Trump's tariffs leave a lot of losers, from Laos to Brazil. And there were no real winners

Trump's tariffs leave a lot of losers, from Laos to Brazil. And there were no real winners

WASHINGTON — President Trump's tariff onslaught this week left a lot of losers — from small, poor countries such as Laos and Algeria to wealthy U.S. trading partners such as Canada and Switzerland. They're now facing especially hefty export taxes — tariffs — on the products they export to the U.S. starting Thursday.
The closest thing to winners may be the countries that succumbed to Trump's demands — and avoided even more pain. But it's unclear whether anyone will be able to claim victory in the long run — even the United States, the intended beneficiary of Trump's protectionist policies.
'In many respects, everybody's a loser here,'' said Barry Appleton, co-director of the Center for International Law at the New York Law School.
Barely six months after he returned to the White House, Trump has demolished the old global economic order. Gone is one built on agreed-upon rules. In its place is a system in which Trump himself sets the rules, using America's enormous economic power to punish countries that won't agree to one-sided trade deals and extracting huge concessions from the ones that do.
'The biggest winner is Trump,' said Alan Wolff, a former U.S. trade official and deputy director-general at the World Trade Organization. 'He bet that he could get other countries to the table on the basis of threats, and he succeeded — dramatically.''
Everything goes back to what Trump calls 'Liberation Day'' — April 2 — when the president announced 'reciprocal'' taxes of up to 50% on imports from countries with which the United States ran trade deficits and 10% 'baseline'' taxes on almost everyone else.
He invoked a 1977 law to declare the trade deficit a national emergency that justified his sweeping import taxes. That allowed him to bypass Congress, which traditionally has had authority over taxes, including tariffs — all of which is now being challenged in court.
Trump retreated temporarily after April announcement triggered a rout in financial markets and suspended the reciprocal tariffs for 90 days to give countries a chance to negotiate.
Eventually some of them did, acceding to Trump's demands to pay what four months ago would have seemed unthinkably high tariffs to maintain their ability to sell to the vast American market.
The United Kingdom agreed to 10% tariffs on its exports to the United States — up from 1.3% before Trump amped up his trade war with the world. The U.S. demanded concessions even though it had run a trade surplus, not a deficit, with the U.K. for 19 straight years.
The European Union and Japan accepted U.S. tariffs of 15%. Those are much higher than the low-single-digit rates they paid last year, but lower than the tariffs he was threatening — 30% on the EU and 25% on Japan.
Also cutting deals with Trump and agreeing to hefty tariffs were Pakistan, South Korea, Vietnam, Indonesia and the Philippines.
Even countries that saw their tariffs lowered from April without reaching a deal are still paying much higher tariffs than before Trump took office. Angola's tariff, for instance, dropped to 15% from 32% in April, but in 2022 it was less than 1.5%.
And while the Trump administration cut Taiwan's tariff to 20% from 32% in April, the pain will still be felt by a U.S. ally that China claims as its territory.
'Twenty percent from the beginning has not been our goal. We hope that in further negotiations we will get a more beneficial and more reasonable tax rate,' Taiwan's President Lai Ching-te told reporters in Taipei on Friday.
Trump also agreed to reduce the tariff on the tiny southern African kingdom of Lesotho to 15% from the 50% he'd announced in April, but the damage may already have been done there.
Countries that didn't knuckle under — and those that found other ways to incur Trump's wrath — got hit harder.
Even some of the poor were not spared. Laos' annual economic output comes to $2,100 per person and Algeria's $5,600 — versus America's $75,000. Nonetheless, Laos got rocked with a 40% tariff and Algeria with a 30% levy.
Trump slammed Brazil with a 50% import tax largely because he didn't like the way it was treating former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, a close Trump ally who is facing trial for trying to overturn his electoral loss and inspiring a riot in the capital in 2023 — recalling Trump's role in the Jan. 6. insurrection two years earlier at the U.S. Capitol.
Never mind that the U.S. has exported more to Brazil than it's imported every year since 2007.
Trump's decision to plaster a 35% tariff on long-standing U.S. ally Canada was partly designed to threaten Ottawa for saying it would recognize a Palestinian state in light of the humanitarian crisis in the Gaza Strip. Trump is a staunch supporter of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu.
Switzerland was clobbered with a 39% import tax — even higher than the 31% Trump announced on April 2.
'The Swiss probably wish that they had camped in Washington'' to make a deal, said Wolff, now a senior fellow at the Peterson Institute for International Economics. 'They're clearly not at all happy.''
Fortunes may change if Trump's tariffs are upended in court. Five American businesses and 12 states are suing the president, arguing that his April 2 tariffs exceeded his authority under the 1977 law.
In May, the U.S. Court of International Trade, a specialized court in New York, agreed and blocked the tariffs, although the government was allowed to continue collecting them while its appeal wends its way through the legal system, and may end up at the Supreme Court. In a hearing Thursday, the judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit sounded skeptical about Trump's justifications for the tariffs.
'If [the tariffs] get struck down, then maybe Brazil's a winner and not a loser,'' Appleton said.
Trump portrays his tariffs as a tax on foreign countries. But they are actually paid by import companies in the U.S. who typically pass along the cost to their customers via higher prices. True, tariffs can hurt other countries by forcing their exporters to cut prices and sacrifice profits — or risk losing market share in the United States.
But economists at Goldman Sachs estimate that overseas exporters have absorbed just one-fifth of the rising costs from tariffs, while Americans and U.S. businesses have picked up the most of the tab.
Walmart, Procter & Gamble, Ford, Best Buy, Adidas, Nike, Mattel and Stanley Black & Decker have all raised prices due to U.S. tariffs.
'This is a consumption tax, so it disproportionately affects those who have lower incomes,' Appleton said. 'Sneakers, knapsacks ... your appliances are going to go up. Your TV and electronics are going to go up. Your video game devices, consoles are going to up because none of those are made in America.''
Trump's trade war has pushed the average U.S. tariff from 2.5% at the start of 2025 to 18.3% now, the highest since 1934, according to the Budget Lab at Yale University. And that will impose a $2,400 cost on the average household, the lab estimates.
'The U.S. consumer's a big loser,″ Wolff said.
Wiseman writes for the Associated Press. AP writer Christopher Rugaber contributed to this report.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NeuroScientific Biopharmaceuticals (ASX:NSB) jumps 14% this week, though earnings growth is still tracking behind one-year shareholder returns
NeuroScientific Biopharmaceuticals (ASX:NSB) jumps 14% this week, though earnings growth is still tracking behind one-year shareholder returns

Yahoo

time6 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NeuroScientific Biopharmaceuticals (ASX:NSB) jumps 14% this week, though earnings growth is still tracking behind one-year shareholder returns

While some are satisfied with an index fund, active investors aim to find truly magnificent investments on the stock market. When you buy and hold the right company, the returns can make a huge difference to both you and your family. For example, the NeuroScientific Biopharmaceuticals Limited (ASX:NSB) share price is up a whopping 576% in the last 1 year, a handsome return in a single year. Also pleasing for shareholders was the 410% gain in the last three months. The longer term returns have not been as good, with the stock price only 6.4% higher than it was three years ago. We love happy stories like this one. The company should be really proud of that performance! On the back of a solid 7-day performance, let's check what role the company's fundamentals have played in driving long term shareholder returns. Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. There is no denying that markets are sometimes efficient, but prices do not always reflect underlying business performance. One flawed but reasonable way to assess how sentiment around a company has changed is to compare the earnings per share (EPS) with the share price. During the last year NeuroScientific Biopharmaceuticals grew its earnings per share (EPS) by 54%. The share price gain of 576% certainly outpaced the EPS growth. So it's fair to assume the market has a higher opinion of the business than it a year ago. The fairly generous P/E ratio of 70.06 also points to this optimism. The graphic below depicts how EPS has changed over time (unveil the exact values by clicking on the image). This free interactive report on NeuroScientific Biopharmaceuticals' earnings, revenue and cash flow is a great place to start, if you want to investigate the stock further. A Different Perspective We're pleased to report that NeuroScientific Biopharmaceuticals shareholders have received a total shareholder return of 576% over one year. That's better than the annualised return of 1.2% over half a decade, implying that the company is doing better recently. Given the share price momentum remains strong, it might be worth taking a closer look at the stock, lest you miss an opportunity. I find it very interesting to look at share price over the long term as a proxy for business performance. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. To that end, you should learn about the 4 warning signs we've spotted with NeuroScientific Biopharmaceuticals (including 2 which are potentially serious) . For those who like to find winning investments this free list of undervalued companies with recent insider purchasing, could be just the ticket. Please note, the market returns quoted in this article reflect the market weighted average returns of stocks that currently trade on Australian exchanges. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

Trump signals break with Netanyahu on Gaza hunger crisis
Trump signals break with Netanyahu on Gaza hunger crisis

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump signals break with Netanyahu on Gaza hunger crisis

President Trump on Monday signaled a break with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on the unfolding humanitarian crisis in Gaza, where Trump acknowledged there was 'real starvation' happening. Trump told reporters during a meeting with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer that he did 'not particularly' agree with Netanyahu's claim that there was no starvation happening in Gaza, which has been devastated by Israel's war against Hamas. The president also said the U.S. would take a more active role in getting food into the region. Still, Trump has not gone as far as some European leaders in calling for the recognition of a Palestinian state. And he has largely stopped short of outright criticizing Israel for its role in preventing aid from getting to Palestinians. 'I mean, based on television, I would say not particularly because those children look very hungry,' Trump told reporters when asked about Netanyahu's claim. Starmer, standing beside Trump after the two greeted each other in Scotland, called the situation in Gaza, in which photos of malnourished children amid reports of 1 in 3 people going multiple days without eating show a crisis coming to a head, 'absolutely intolerable' and 'revolting.' Trump and his administration have been involved in ceasefire talks between Israel and Hamas, but so far no agreements have stuck. Trump recently put the blame on Hamas as the obstacle to a deal. But the president has also routinely shown frustration with Netanyahu, with their bond being tested before over the continued fighting with the two leaders' opposing assessments of starvation in the enclave as the latest example. 'He certainly seemed to have a different view of what's happening on the ground in Gaza with respect to starvation or massive hunger,' said Mona Yacoubian, director of the Middle East program at the Center for Strategic and International Studies. 'He also seemed to open the door for potential increase in funding or maybe a new approach,' Yacoubian added. 'But whether that actually translates into something is a whole other question because we've certainly seen the president state a position then within 24 hours take a completely different view.' Trump did succeed in getting Netanyahu to pull back fighter jets heading for Iran after he claimed success in a ceasefire between Israel and Iran. Trump also went around Netanyahu to free an American-Israeli hostage held by Hamas and came to a deal with the Houthis in Yemen to halt attacks on ships in the Red Sea. In May, Trump's ambassador to Israel, Mike Huckabee, announced the U.S. would take the lead in getting aid into Gaza amid an Israeli blockade. Israel came around in supporting the American-founded Gaza Humanitarian Foundation (GHF) as the sole distributor of aid in the strip. But the GHF has come under intense scrutiny as contributing to the chaos and instability around aid distribution: Hungry Palestinians report being shot at by the Israeli military, there are accusations that GHF contractors are using live ammunition, and the crowded and unsafe conditions have led to injuries and death. 'Since this GHF scheme began, public reports have found that more than 700 starving people have been killed and nearly 5,000 injured while desperately seeking food at or near often chaotic GHF distribution sites,' a group of Senate Democrats wrote Monday, calling for the administration to answer questions about the group's funding and operations. 'The U.S. government must stop facilitating the Gaza Humanitarian Foundation operations and use U.S. leverage to urge the Netanyahu government to revert to the UN-led mechanism, both for the safety and well-being of Palestinians in Gaza and to preserve humanitarian principles that have existed for decades.' Trump's criticism of the humanitarian situation in Gaza came after Israel announced over the weekend it would take more steps to improve Palestinians' access to food, responding to growing international outrage blaming Israel for the food crisis. Israel in March imposed a blockade on Gaza, blocking humanitarian supplies and other goods from getting into the strip. Still, Jerusalem focused blame on the United Nations and other international organizations as failing to pick up pallets of food and Hamas as bearing sole responsibility for the suffering in the strip. U.N. officials and aid organizations argue that food distribution efforts are too dangerous without meaningful coordination with Israel inside the strip. 'When bureaucratic and political hurdles are lifted, the humanitarian community has demonstrated it can deliver assistance at scale, in a dignified way, without diversion. During the ceasefire fire in earlier this year, we succeeded to reverse the deepening hunger,' Philippe Lazzarini, commissioner-general of UNRWA, the U.N. refugee agency for Palestinians, posted Friday on social platform X. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said Saturday it would begin airdrops of food, temporarily halt fighting and open up designated humanitarian corridors 'to enable the safe movement of UN convoys delivering food and medicine to the population.' 'We call on the UN and its affiliated organizations to cooperate with this IDF effort and cease forthwith its tendentious policy of boycotting any effort that reverses its traditional mechanism of allowing the massive diversion of aid into the hands of Hamas,' Israeli Ambassador to the U.S. Yechiel Leiter said in a statement Sunday. Trump last Friday largely did not engage with questions about the crisis playing out in Gaza, instead repeatedly blaming Hamas for peace talks faltering and suggesting Israel would have to 'finish the job.' But his tone changed Monday when he met with Starmer, who much more forcefully called the situation in Gaza 'absolutely intolerable.' Trump told reporters while sitting next to Starmer during a meeting that the U.S. would work to set up 'food centers' in Gaza. He did not provide specifics on whether the U.S. would be involved on the ground or if a third party organization would assist, but he indicated it would be a joint effort with other nations. 'I know your nation's joining us, and we have all of the European nations joining us, and others also called and they want to be helpful. So we're going to set up food centers and where the people can walk in and no boundaries. We're not going to have fences,' Trump said. 'It's going to be working with the United States. We'll be helping with the food … and we're going to bring it over there, and we're also going to make sure they don't have barriers stopping people,' Trump said when asked how the food centers would work. Pressed on whether Israel, which has placed restrictions on aid getting into Gaza for months, can do more to get food to Palestinians, Trump said he thought Israel 'can do a lot' before accusing Iran of derailing ceasefire talks despite his administration touting Tehran's weakening following attacks by Israel. Trump and Netanyahu have generally had a strong relationship despite the occasional hiccup. Trump has called for the corruption trial against Netanyahu to be canceled, while the Israeli leader presented Trump a letter nominating him for the Nobel Peace Prize during a recent White House visit. Swaths of the Republican Party are also staunchly pro-Israel, and it's unclear if there will be a sustained break between Trump and Netanyahu that would lead to a dramatic change in U.S. policy. But there are signs parts of Trump's base are growing frustrated with Israel, with the images coming out of Gaza adding to their calls for change. Theo Von, who hosts one of the most popular podcasts in the country and has hosted both Trump and Vice President Vance on his show, posted a plea on social media Sunday asking the president and other leaders to do more to get aid into Gaza. 'Children are starving to death!! We are America. This isnt about politics. This is about humanity,' Von posted on X. Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene (R-Ga.) on Sunday called the situation in Gaza 'horrific.' 'I can unequivocally say that what happened to innocent people in Israel on Oct 7th was horrific,' Greene posted on X, referring to the date of Hamas's deadly terrorist attacks against Israel in 2023. 'Just as I can unequivocally say that what has been happening to innocent people and children in Gaza is horrific,' she added. 'This war and humanitarian crisis must end!' Matt Gaetz, the former Republican congressman from Florida who withdrew as Trump's nominee for attorney general, on Friday hosted on his show on One America News Network an Israeli father of a hostage held by Hamas. The father was calling for the U.S. to condition aid to Israel to get to a ceasefire with Hamas and criticized Netanyahu as 'not acting in a responsible way' 'Incredible statement,' Gaetz wrote on X accompanying a clip of the interview. Gaetz had earlier criticized Israel for failing to investigate the death of an American Palestinian allegedly killed in a confrontation with Israeli settlers in the West Bank. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

Trump: Aug. 1 tariff deadline ‘stands strong'
Trump: Aug. 1 tariff deadline ‘stands strong'

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Trump: Aug. 1 tariff deadline ‘stands strong'

President Trump on Wednesday indicated there would be no extensions of the deadline at the end of the week, when steep tariffs are set to go into effect on many nations. 'The August first deadline is the August first deadline — It stands strong, and will not be extended. A big day for America!!!' Trump posted on Truth Social. Trump has issued letters to more than a dozen countries informing them of tariff rates they will face to export their goods into the United States beginning Aug. 1. Those include a 25 percent tariff on India, a 35 percent tariff on Bangladesh and a 50 percent tariff on Brazil, among others. The White House has struck deals with a handful of other countries to set lower tariff rates, including with Japan, the European Union, Indonesia and the United Kingdom. Critics have argued the details around those agreements are still scarce and have noted that the tariff rate those countries will pay, while lower than an initial threat, is still higher than it was before Trump took office. The timing and severity of tariffs on other nations have been shifting targets since Trump took office, after he vowed on the campaign trail to aggressively impose duties on imports. He has repeatedly threatened tariffs on other nations, only to back off or delay their imposition. The president on April 2 announced 'reciprocal' tariffs on dozens of other countries, using trade deficits to help calculate the tariff rate. But a week later, he lowered those rates to 10 percent for 90 days as markets reacted negatively, giving time for negotiations. The 90-day window was set to expire in early July, only for Trump to set a new deadline of Aug. 1. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store