There's a hidden rule that all life on Earth must follow, research claims
If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission.
Life on Earth is complex and hard to understand, but new research may have finally given us a much-needed glimpse into the patterns that life follows as it spreads across our planet. According to a new study published in Nature Ecology & Evolution, researchers believe life has a hidden rule that it has to follow, and the signs of that rule can be found in every bioregion across our planet.
This rule, the researchers claim in their new paper, could help us explain why no matter how different every environment on our planet is, every bioregion seems to follow the same design. It could also help us better understand how the ecosystems around the world respond to environmental changes like global warming.
Today's Top Deals
Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales
Best Ring Video Doorbell deals
Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98
Just looking at life on Earth as a whole, it's easy to see the oceans and other natural barriers as end points for the patterns that drive life. However, researchers say they have found evidence of life's hidden rule in multiple regions, no matter how far apart they are. No matter what the region is, or what the environment is, they say that life always follows the same pattern.
For starters, life seems to radiate from a single core area in each bioregion. Then, other parts of life like animals or plants will spread out from that core. Some thrive while others don't. It seems, the researchers write, that these core areas provide the optimal conditions needed for species to survive and diversify. From there, the rest of the region's biodiversity radiates outward.
This new research supports previous findings that small areas play a disproportionate ecological role in sustaining the biodiversity found in different bioregions. It also could help us with conservation efforts, which often require finding the best place to put a species so it can thrive under human protection. Additionally, this evidence seems to show that life's hidden rule is indeed true.
It plays into a previous theory that there are plausible mechanisms that drive the patterns life follows. While we might not know exactly how life on Earth started, we're slowly learning more about how it grew to be the massive, global phenomenon that it is today.
More Top Deals
Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free
See the
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Can a Laser Replace MRI Scans? One Bold Experiment Says Yes
In a discovery that could reshape how we view and understand the human brain, researchers have successfully passed a laser beam through an entire human head. While it may sound like science fiction, this quiet milestone could pave the way for faster, cheaper, and noninvasive brain scans. The work comes from a team at the University of Glasgow, who set out to push the limits of functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS). This technology already offers a portable, low-cost way to monitor brain activity, but until now, it's only been able to peek a few centimeters beneath the skull. For anything deeper, expensive MRI machines have been the standard. That may be about to change. By boosting the power of the laser (within safe limits) and improving the light-collection setup, scientists managed to transmit photons from one side of the skull to the other. It worked on just one out of eight participants—a bald man with fair skin—but it proved something previously thought impossible: a beam of light can travel through the entire human head. The implications are huge. If refined, this technology could close the gap between inexpensive tools like EEG and high-resolution, high-cost MRI scans. In the future, diagnosing strokes, brain injuries, or tumors might not require hospital-grade equipment—just a small, light-based scanner. What made this breakthrough even more compelling was the way the light traveled. Instead of bouncing randomly through the skull, photons followed predictable paths, especially through more transparent areas like cerebrospinal fluid. That opens the door to more targeted imaging, where specific brain regions could be scanned with precision. To validate the experiment, researchers used 3D head models to predict photon movement and then compared the results to actual light data. The results aligned, adding credibility to what may one day be a revolutionary shift in brain imaging. It's early days. Scanning took 30 minutes, and the conditions were highly specific. But it's a proof of concept with massive potential. For now, it's just one beam of light. In the future, it could be the foundation of a global leap in how doctors see the a Laser Replace MRI Scans? One Bold Experiment Says Yes first appeared on Men's Journal on Jun 22, 2025
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Removing CO2 from the ocean could have a negative impact, scientists warn
If you purchase an independently reviewed product or service through a link on our website, BGR may receive an affiliate commission. We're losing our fight to control climate change, which has led a lot of scientists to look for new ways to combat the consistently rising global temperatures. While we've come up with a few different solutions to try, many come with additional problems. Now researchers have discovered that one of the most widely discussed solutions, marine carbon dioxide removal (mCDR), could actually make things much worse by lowering the ocean's oxygen levels. The idea behind mCDR is to try to make our oceans more effective at storing carbon dioxide. Currently, our oceans are the planet's largest carbon sink, estimated to hold around a quarter of human-made CO2 emissions. As such, many believe the ocean could be key to turning the tide in our fight against human-driven climate change. But there's a major problem. Today's Top Deals Best deals: Tech, laptops, TVs, and more sales Best Ring Video Doorbell deals Memorial Day security camera deals: Reolink's unbeatable sale has prices from $29.98 Our oceans are already suffering due to the ongoing changes in our planet's environment. For one, the oxygen levels in the ocean are dropping significantly. Additionally, a large percentage of the ocean is losing access to sunlight, driving lower oxygen levels throughout. As the oceans grow warmer, scientists warn that the deeper parts of our oceans will become much less efficient at circulating oxygen. This will affect marine ecosystems across the world, driving lower oxygen levels and less marine diversity. While we have ideas to slow this warming, what if those plans would actually make things worse? That's the question behind new research published in Environmental Research Letters. The team of researchers behind the study looked at several different mCDR methods, and found that many of them could actually make things worse. We've come up with a number of different ways to slow warming in the oceans. While this might stop sea levels from rising, most would involve some kind of biomass production, which would lead to sinking biomasses in the ocean. This, the researchers warn, would have unintended impacts on the ocean's oxygen levels. One method is to essentially fertilize the ocean by adding nutrients like iron to help stimulate phytoplankton like the ones seen in the image above. These blooms can then soak up more carbon dioxide. While these plants would sink and carry the carbon to the bottom of the ocean, they'd eventually consume oxygen as they decayed. Using simulations, the researchers looked at how 100 years of continuous fertilization would affect the ocean's oxygen levels. They found that over 100 years, the ocean would lose around three percent of its oxygen capacity across the globe. That's more than double the loss being caused by global warming alone. Further, they found that some areas beneath the fertilized zones could actually drop by over 50 micromoles, changes that would even exceed the deoxygenation of the ocean seen under high-emission climate scenarios. This new research just shows that while we might have good ideas about how to help the climate, not all of those are going to help the ocean. Our goal, as humans trying to help our planet, should be to find the best way to do that without hurting it more. And so far, it looks like most methods of mCDR would hurt more than help in the long run. Time to go back to the drawing board, I guess. More Top Deals Amazon gift card deals, offers & coupons 2025: Get $2,000+ free See the
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Elon Musk promises more risky launches after sixth Starship failure
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. This article was originally published at The Conversation. The publication contributed the article to Expert Voices: Op-Ed & Insights. This was the ninth test flight for the rocket, and the third catastrophic failure in a row, just this year. Is this what we should expect from the very ship some are counting on to take humans further than we've ever been in the solar system? Or does this failure point to deeper concerns within the broader program? A decade of development The Starship program from Elon Musk's space technology company, SpaceX, has been in development for more than a decade now and has undergone many iterations in its overall design and goals. The Starship concept is based upon the SpaceX Raptor engines to be used in a multistage system. In a multistage rocket system, there are often two or three separate blocks with their own engine and fuel reserves. These are particularly important for leaving Earth's orbit and travelling to the Moon, Mars and beyond. With Starship, the key factor is the ability to land and reuse vast amounts of the rocket stages again and again. The company's Falcon 9 vehicles, which used this model, were fantastically successful. Initial tests of Starship began in 2018 with two low-altitude flights showing early success. Subsequent flights have faced numerous challenges with now four complete failures, two partial failures and three successes overall. Just two days ago, during the latest failed attempt, I watched alongside more than 200 other space industry experts at the Australian Space Summit in Sydney. Broadcast live on a giant screen, the launch generated an excited buzz – which soon turned to reserved murmurs. Of course, designing and launching rockets is hard, and failures are to be expected. However, a third catastrophic failure within six months demands a pause for reflection. On this particular test flight, as Starship positioned itself for atmospheric re-entry, one of its 13 engines failed to ignite. Shortly after, a booster appeared to explode, leading to a complete loss of control. The rocket ultimately broke apart over the Indian Ocean, which tonnes of debris will now call home. Polluting Earth in pursuit of space We don't know the exact financial cost of each test flight. But Musk has previously said it is about US$50–100 million. The exact environmental cost of the Starship program – and its repeated failures – is even harder to quantify. For example, a failed test flight in 2023 left the town of Port Isabel, Texas, which is located beside the launch site, shaking and covered in a thick cloud of dirt. Debris from the exploded rocket smashed cars. Residents told the New York Times they were terrified. They also had to clean up the mess from the flight. Then, in September 2024, SpaceX was fined by the US Environmental Protection Agency and the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality for 14 separate incidents since 2022 where the launch facilities discharged polluted water into Texas waterways. Musk denied these claims. That same month, the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) proposed a fine of US$633,009 in civil penalties should be issued to SpaceX. This was on the grounds of using an unapproved launch control room and other violations during 2023. Musk denied these claims too and threatened to countersue the FAA for 'regulatory overreach'. It's unclear if this suit was ever filed. Two other failed launches in January and March this year also rained rocket debris over the Caribbean, and disrupted hundreds of commercial flights, including 80 which needed to be diverted and more than 400 requiring delayed takeoff to ensure they were entering safe air space. Success of different space programs Until last year, the FAA allowed SpaceX to try up to five Starship launches a year. This month, the figure was increased to 25. A lot can go wrong during a launch of a vehicle to space. And there is a long way to go until we can properly judge whether Starship successfully meets its mission goals. We can, however, look at past programs to understand typical success rates seen across different rocketry programs. The Saturn V rocket, the workhorse of the Apollo era, had a total of 13 launches, with only one partial failure. It underwent three full ground tests before flight. SpaceX's own Falcon 9 rocket, has had more than 478 successful launches, only two in flight failures, one partial failure and one pre-flight destruction. The Antares rocket, by Orbital Sciences Corporation (later Orbital ATK and Northrop Grumman) launched a total of 18 times, with one failure. The Soyuz rocket, originally a Soviet expendable carrier rocket designed in the 1960s, launched a total of 32 times, with two failures. RELATED STORIES — 'Starship in space': See amazing photos from SpaceX megarocket's Flight 9 test mission —FAA requires SpaceX to investigate Starship Flight 9 mishap — SpaceX reveals why its Starship Flight 8 Ship exploded, failure traced to 'flash' in rocket's engines No sign of caution Of course, we can't fairly compare all other rockets with the Starship. Its goals are certainly novel as a reusable heavy-class rocket. But this latest failure does raise some questions. Will the Starship program ever see success – and if so when? And what are the limits of our tolerance as a society to the pollution of Earth in the pursuit of the goal to space? For a rocketry program that's moving so fast, developing novel and complex technology, and experiencing several repeated failures, many people might expect caution from now on. Musk, however, has other plans. Shortly after the most recent Starship failure, he announced on X (formerly Twitter), that the next test flights would occur at a faster pace: one every three to four weeks. This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
