
This might be the real reason Joel Engardio is facing recall in the S.F.'s Sunset District
'When we moved here, it was the cheap seats,' Parke, 74, a retiree, told me recently. 'There were tattoo parlors and massage parlors and all kinds of crap out here.'
Parke grew to love the sleepy neighborhood and, after a few years of renting, bought a home in the Outer Sunset, where he and his wife still live today.
Like Parke, families seeking to buy relatively affordable single-family homes and a quieter lifestyle have flocked to the Sunset for decades — first, large numbers of Irish and Italian immigrants, then Asian Americans, primarily Chinese, who are now about half of the district's residents.
These days, things are neither affordable nor particularly sleepy. The neighborhood is changing.
Like the rest of San Francisco, housing prices have skyrocketed in the Sunset. Some of the seedy shops Parke remembers have been replaced by yoga studios, cafes with pour-over coffee and cocktail lounges.
And Supervisor Joel Engardio, who represents the Sunset, is facing a recall vote in September, primarily for championing Proposition K, which closed the Great Highway for an oceanfront park that is attracting thousands of outsiders to the neighborhood.
Mayor Daniel Lurie's recently released rezoning plan would allow taller housing throughout the neighborhood and could further upend the suburban feel of the Sunset.
All of this worries Parke, who doesn't want the Outer Sunset to transform from 'a family place into some kind of a Miami Beach on the West Coast.'
'If we keep building up and up in the Sunset, well, there goes that quality of life that we worked so hard for,' Parke said.
There are no plans for Miami Beach-style skyscrapers in the Sunset. But Parke is not alone in his perception and false assumptions about what could happen.
This is important because while the recall fight over the closure of the Great Highway to cars is ostensibly about traffic, it's hard not to think broader anxiety over what the future holds for the Sunset is also in play.
'I think it's just a lack of voice and lack of agency that folks have' over decisions in the neighborhood, said Lily Wong, director of the Sunset Chinese Cultural District, when I asked her about feedback she's heard from the community. (Full disclosure: My wife, Ramie Dare, serves on the board of Wah Mei School, the fiscal sponsor for the cultural district.)
Arguably, that sentiment helped tank the reelection of former Supervisor Gordon Mar, who lost a close race to Engardio three years ago. During the campaign, Mar was anonymously branded a 'communist pedophile' in part for helping to push through the Sunset's first affordable housing project in decades.
Engardio campaigned for office on a vision for San Francisco to be more like Paris ― buildings with housing and shops of six stories or so on corner lots and high-traffic corridors everywhere in the city, including the Sunset.
It's an idyllic vision, but 'taller' and 'denser' are fighting words in San Francisco, and not everyone shares Engardio's or Lurie's ideas for housing.
The six-story and eight-story buildings that the rezoning plan calls for would 'feel very out of character' for the Sunset — even on transit corridors — said Albert Chow, president of People of Parkside Sunset, an association representing about 100 businesses on Taraval Street, when I asked him what he thought of the mayor's proposal.
Chow said he prefers smaller projects and worries new development could disrupt 'why people like the neighborhood' — the predominance of single-family homes.
'I like to say that San Francisco is the most progressive city that hates change,' Engardio told me recently when we discussed the future of the Sunset. He said he supports the mayor's rezoning.
'There will always be people opposed to new things or new housing. I think the mayor's housing plan is very pragmatic and reasonable because it's focusing housing on areas where it makes the most sense.'
What's pragmatic to Engardio, however, isn't jiving these days with many of his constituents like Chow, an outspoken supporter of the recall who opposed Prop K.
I'm an Outer Sunset resident who supported Prop K. In the long run, I believe Sunset Dunes park will benefit the Sunset and the city. And so will rezoning to allow more homes. There's been almost no new housing in Sunset and other western neighborhoods since the 1960s.
Anytime denser housing can be built near major commercial and public transportation routes, it makes sense for everyone; it puts people into homes, creates economic activity and ideally gets some drivers out of their cars.
Denser housing in Sunset is going to be a tough sell. But even Chow concedes the neighborhood has to 'take our share of the burden' for building housing in the city.
'The needs of the many outweigh the needs of the few,' he said, borrowing a quote from Spock of 'Star Trek.'
Rezoning could be the first step in a decades-long process. Change is coming. Spock's Vulcan philosophy is something good to keep in mind during this transformation.
The Sunset should never become Miami Beach. But it can't stay frozen in time, either, if the city is going to 'live long and prosper.'
Harry Mok is an assistant editor, editorial board member and columnist for the Opinion section.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Upturn
44 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
Top stocks to watch on brokerages, August 4: ITC, Tata Steel, Delhivery, Godrej Properties, UPL, Federal Bank, PB Fintech and more
Several key companies are in focus today as leading brokerages released their latest research reports, commenting on earnings, margins, and operational trends. Here's a detailed look at the top stock ideas and outlooks: ITC share Brokerages remain largely positive on ITC following its Q1FY26 results. CITI (Buy, TP ₹500): Revenue grew 21% YoY, driven by the agri segment. Cigarette revenue rose 8% YoY, with an estimated 7% volume growth. FMCG showed growth improvement, though paperboard remained under pressure. Goldman Sachs (Buy, TP ₹490): Results were in line; cigarette growth solid with margin recovery likely in H2. Macquarie (Outperform, TP ₹500): 6.5% volume growth in cigarettes helped offset input cost pressure. Positive on margin recovery in 4QFY26. HSBC (Buy, TP ₹510): Revenue beat by 10%, though EBITDA missed by 3%. Core segments performed in line. Lowered FY26–28e EPS by 2–3%. Jefferies (Buy, TP ₹535): Cigarette volumes rose >6%, but margins declined. Overall EBITDA grew 3%, slightly below estimates. Morgan Stanley (Overweight, TP ₹500): Cigarette and FMCG revenue trends positive. Paper business weak but likely bottomed. Tata Steel share Jefferies (Buy, TP ₹200): Q1 EBITDA grew 11% YoY and beat estimates. While 2Q margins may compress due to lower steel prices, signs of recovery from higher Chinese export prices are emerging. Thermax share Jefferies (Buy, TP ₹4,500): Revenue miss in Q1, but EBITDA margin improved 162 bps YoY. Bio-CNG drag in FY25 is expected to subside, helping margin expansion in FY26. Godrej Properties share Views remain mixed post Q1 results: Jefferies (Buy, TP ₹3,000): Pre-sales fell 18% YoY, but management remains confident. Strong launch pipeline. Nomura (Reduce, TP ₹1,900): Expects FY26 sales to miss guidance. Concerns over growth strategy, equity dilution, and valuation premium. Morgan Stanley (Equal-weight, TP ₹2,400): Q1 pre-sales in line, but collection dropped 47% QoQ. D/E ratio rose. Tata Power share CLSA (Underperform, TP ₹351): Weakness in Indonesian coal, RE IPP business, and Tata Projects hurt core profitability. Solar EPC & module business was the only bright spot. UPL share HSBC (Buy, TP ₹775): Q1 was muted but recovery and deleveraging underway. Kotak Institutional Equities (Sell, TP ₹520): Gross margins improved, but long-term gains uncertain amid demand softness and intense competition. Delhivery share Goldman Sachs (Neutral, TP ₹375): E-commerce volumes grew but realization declined. Profit aided by treasury gains. Kotak Institutional Equities (Buy, TP ₹500): Strong PBT growth despite challenges. Continued scale-up in express parcel. Jefferies (Underperform, TP ₹350): EBITDA miss due to timing issues in Ecom Express volume. Industry shift to insourcing remains a headwind. Federal Bank share Brokerages split on Federal Bank's Q1 print: Morgan Stanley (Underweight, TP ₹165): Slippages increased due to MFI stress. RoA may moderate. CLSA (Outperform, TP ₹230): PAT beat, but credit costs 70% above estimates. Other income and opex helped. Nuvama (Buy, TP ₹230): NIM and slippages worsened; expects elevated credit costs in Q2, then easing. PB Fintech share HSBC (Buy, TP ₹2,250): Beat estimates on margin uplift in new segments, though core business saw margin compression. Jefferies (Buy, TP ₹2,100): Adj. EBITDA rose 80%. Sees healthy growth and valuation support from strong cash flows. LIC Housing Finance share Morgan Stanley (Underweight, TP ₹480): NIM declined, credit costs slightly higher. Franchise weakening; outlook remains subdued. MCX share Morgan Stanley (Underweight, TP ₹5,750): Core EBITDA missed due to higher employee costs. Transaction revenue falling; valuation seen as expensive. Adani Power share Jefferies (Buy, TP ₹690): EBITDA missed by 2%, capacity expansion plans intact. Acquired 600MW Vidarbha unit in July. Adani Enterprises share Jefferies (Buy, TP ₹3,000): EBITDA fell 12–13% YoY/QoQ due to legacy businesses. PAT down 50%. Retains FY27/28 outlook despite Q1 miss. Disclaimer: This article is based on brokerage reports and is for informational purposes only. It does not constitute a recommendation or investment advice. Investors should consult their financial advisors before making investment decisions. Ahmedabad Plane Crash News desk at


CNBC
3 hours ago
- CNBC
CNBC Daily Open: There's no return policy for jobs numbers
After U.S. jobs figures for May and June were revised significantly downward by the Bureau of Labor Statistics — slashing a combined 258,000 from previous figures — President Donald Trump, imputing political bias and data manipulation to BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer, revised her employment status to "terminated." Government officials from both sides of the political aisle had plenty to say about that. "Bottom line, Trump wants to cook the books," said Ron Wyden, the top Democrat on the Senate Finance Committee. Meanwhile, Republican Senator Rand Paul told NBC News that "you can't really make the numbers different or better by firing the people doing the counting." The move, indeed, does have a whiff of the Chinese government, in August 2023, stopping the release of youth unemployment rates because they were spiking to record highs. (Beijing resumed disseminating the data in January 2024.) A falling tree makes a sound, regardless of whether there's anyone around to hear it. Terminating the person who reports that noise won't suck sound waves back into a vacuum either. Markets, too, were vocal in their response to Trump's firing of McEntarfer as well as the dismal jobs report. On Friday, the three major U.S. indexes had their worst day in months, a sharp turn from the week prior, which saw consecutive days of record highs for the S&P 500 and Nasdaq Composite. This changes the calculus. With new tariffs due to take effect Aug. 7 — which could further slow hiring in the U.S. because of increased costs and uncertainties for companies — both the economy and markets might weaken further. Then it becomes a matter of whether the "TACO trade" — "Trump Always Chickens Out" — will, in the words of The Terminator, be appear in the U.S. jobs market. Nonfarm payrolls in July grew 73,000, lower than the Dow Jones estimate of a 100,000 gain. Unemployment edged up 10 basis points to 4.2%. June and May's jobs numbers were revised dramatically lower. Trump fires commissioner of labor statistics after jobs report. In a Truth Social post, the U.S. president accused BLS Commissioner Erika McEntarfer of being a political appointee who "faked the Jobs Numbers before the Election" and providing inaccurate data. Stocks suffer their worst day in months. On Friday, the S&P 500 lost 1.6%, its worst day since May 21, breaking a 26-day streak when the index's moves remained within a 1% range. The pan-European Stoxx 600 index fell 1.89%, its biggest drop since April. Berkshire Hathaway's operating profit drops. Year over year, Warren Buffet's conglomerate experienced a 4% drop in second-quarter earnings to $11.16 billion. Berkshire warned of Trump's tariffs and their impact on its businesses. [PRO] August is historically the second worst month for the S&P 500. That's according to the Stock Trader's Almanac, which tracks data back to 1988. Tariff developments and AI-related earnings during the week will give a sign of whether history will repeat itself. Switzerland's tariff shock: The 39% U.S. hit no one saw coming The U.S.' imposition of a 39% tariff rate on Switzerland's came as a shock to the Alpine nation. Indications in the Swiss press had been that the country was close to negotiating an outline deal similar to those struck by the European Union, the U.K. and Japan, which set baseline tariffs between 10% and 15%. Instead, it has received one of the highest rates of any country. That is a significant blow, with the U.S. accounting for around a sixth of Switzerland's total exports.

3 hours ago
China rejects US demands to stop buying Russian, Iranian oil
WASHINGTON -- U.S. and Chinese officials may be able to settle many of their differences to reach a trade deal and avert punishing tariffs, but they remain far apart on one issue: the U.S. demand that China stop purchasing oil from Iran and Russia. 'China will always ensure its energy supply in ways that serve our national interests,' China's Foreign Ministry posted on X on Wednesday following two days of trade negotiations in Stockholm, responding to the U.S. threat of a 100% tariff. 'Coercion and pressuring will not achieve anything. China will firmly defend its sovereignty, security and development interests," the ministry said. The response is notable at a time when both Beijing and Washington are signaling optimism and goodwill about reaching a deal to keep commercial ties between the world's two largest economies stable — after climbing down from sky-high tariffs and harsh trade restrictions. It underscores China's confidence in playing hardball when dealing with the Trump administration, especially when trade is linked to its energy and foreign policies. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent, emerging from the talks, told reporters that when it comes to Russian oil purchases, the "Chinese take their sovereignty very seriously.' 'We don't want to impede on their sovereignty, so they would like to pay a 100% tariff," Bessent said. On Thursday, he called the Chinese 'tough' negotiators, but said China's pushback hasn't stalled the negotiations. 'I believe that we have the makings of a deal,' Bessent told CNBC. Gabriel Wildau, managing director of the consultancy Teneo, said he doubts President Donald Trump would actually deploy the 100% tariff. 'Realizing those threats would derail all the recent progress and probably kill any chance' for Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping to announce a trade deal if they should meet this fall, Wildau said. In seeking to restrict oil sales by Russia and Iran, a major source of revenue for both countries, the U.S. wants to reduce the funding available for their militaries, as Moscow pursues its war against Ukraine and Tehran funds militant groups across the Middle East. When Trump unveiled a sweeping plan for tariffs on dozens of countries in April, China was the only country that retaliated. It refused to give in to U.S. pressure. 'If the U.S. is bent on imposing tariffs, China will fight to the end, and this is China's consistent official stance,' said Tu Xinquan, director of the China Institute for WTO Studies at the University of International Business and Economics in Beijing. WTO is the acronym for the World Trade Organization. Negotiating tactics aside, China may also suspect that the U.S. won't follow through on its threat, questioning the importance Trump places on countering Russia, Tu said. Scott Kennedy, senior adviser and trustee chair in Chinese Business and Economics at the Center for Strategic and International Studies in Washington, said Beijing is unlikely to change its posture when it sees inconsistencies in U.S. foreign policy goals toward Russia and Iran, whereas Beijing's policy support for Moscow is consistent and clear. It's also possible that Beijing may want to use it as another negotiating tool to extract more concessions from Trump, Kennedy said. Danny Russel, a distinguished fellow at the Asia Society Policy Institute, said Beijing now sees itself as 'the one holding the cards in its struggle with Washington." He said Trump has made it clear he wants a 'headline-grabbing deal' with Xi, 'so rejecting a U.S. demand to stop buying oil from Iran or Russia is probably not seen as a deal‑breaker, even if it generates friction and a delay." Continuing to buy oil from Russia preserves Xi's 'strategic solidarity' with Russian President Vladimir Putin and significantly reduces the economic costs for China, Russel said. 'Beijing simply can't afford to walk away from the oil from Russia and Iran," he said. 'It's too important a strategic energy supply, and Beijing is buying it at fire‑sale prices.' A 2024 report by the U.S. Energy Information Administration estimates that roughly 80% to 90% of the oil exported by Iran went to China. The Chinese economy benefits from the more than 1 million barrels of Iranian oil it imports per day. After the Iranian parliament floated a plan to shut down the Strait of Hormuz in June following U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities, China spoke out against closing the critical oil transit route. China also is an important customer for Russia, but is second to India in buying Russian seaborne crude oil exports. In April, Chinese imports of Russian oil rose 20% over the previous month to more than 1.3 million barrels per day, according to the KSE Institute, an analytical center at the Kyiv School of Economics. This past week, Trump said the U.S. will impose a 25% tariff on goods from India, plus an additional import tax because of India's purchasing of Russian oil. India's Foreign Ministry said Friday its relationship with Russia was 'steady and time-tested." Stephen Miller, White House deputy chief of staff and a top policy adviser, said Trump has been clear that it is 'not acceptable' for India to continue financing the Ukraine war by purchasing oil from Russia. 'People will be shocked to learn that India is basically tied with China in purchasing Russian oil,' Miller said on Fox News Channel's 'Sunday Morning Futures.' He said the U.S. needs 'to get real about dealing with the financing of this war.' Sen. Lindsey Graham, a Republican from South Carolina, is pushing for sanctions and tariffs on Russia and its financial backers. In April, he introduced a bill that would authorize the president to impose tariffs as high as 500% not only on Russia but on any country that 'knowingly' buys oil, uranium, natural gas, petroleum products or petrochemical products from Russia. "The purpose of this legislation is to break the cycle of China — a communist dictatorship — buying oil below market price from Putin's Russia, which empowers his war machine to kill innocent Ukrainian civilians,' Graham said in a June statement. The bill has 84 co-sponsors in the 100-seat Senate. A corresponding House version has been introduced, also with bipartisan support. Republicans say they stand ready to move on the sanctions legislation if Trump asks them to do so, but the bill is on hold for now.