Line 5, a Trump donor, is profiting off a pipeline deal threatening pollution
Donald Trump's administration is being accused by activists of a quid pro quo as it attempts to fast-track a controversial fossil fuel pipeline proposal in Michigan that would in part be built by a donor with deep financial ties to the president.
While Canadian oil giant Enbridge owns the Line 5 oil and gas pipeline that it is attempting to replace in the Great Lakes region, the contractor is Tim Barnard, who, along with his wife, gave $1m to Trump's campaign last year, Federal Election Commission records show.
Barnard's company, Barnard Construction, received more than $1bn to build parts of the border wall, and he is also a prolific Republican donor to state and national candidates and organizations.
Enbridge wants to replace the aging Line 5 that cuts across about 4.4 miles (7km) of seabed in the Great Lakes, which holds more than 90% of the nation's fresh water, and 21% of the world's fresh water.
The estimated $1.5bn replacement plan calls for building a tunnel underneath the Great Lakes, which opponents say puts the environment at high risk. They also questioned Barnard's ability to complete the highly complex project, citing a lack of experience and a history of wage violations.
'Such pay-to-play arrangements among the government and federal contractors are not unusual, but they are increasing in scope under a second Trump administration, and are highly unethical and corrupt the government contracting process,' said Craig Holman, a Capitol Hill lobbyist with Public Citizen, a non-profit that advocates for transparency.
'Contracts oftentimes are awarded based on large campaign donations rather than merit, and it effectively rigs the bidding process against businesses who either cannot afford making large campaign contributions or who refuse to pay to play for government contracts,' Holman said.
Barnard did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The Trump administration in late February moved to fast-track federal energy projects that include Line 5 by sidestepping the US Army Corps of Engineers' environmental review processes. The move was part of the 'energy emergency' he declared on his first day in office, which is viewed as dubious because energy production was already near record highs. Some allege it as a payback to oil industry donors who helped Trump get elected.
In addition to the $1m June 2024 donations, Barnard has given millions to Trump administration officials, Republican congressional committees, and other Republican candidates and groups. Among the recipients are secretary of state Marco Rubio, Vice-President JD Vance, former US House speaker Kevin McCarthy, and Texas governor Greg Abbott.
Barnard donated to Trump in 2016, and again in 2019 and 2020, just ahead and just after he received what some lawmakers and other contractors alleged was an illegal no-bid contract to build some of the border wall.
What began as an approximately $143m contract ballooned to more than $1bn in part through a loophole in the competitive bidding process, and critics questioned the spike – Barnard billed taxpayers for about $33m per mile of border wall built, while the government at the time was paying about $20m. Walls under previous administrations cost about $3m per mile, but were slightly smaller in scale.
Jack Reed, the Democratic senator of Rhode Island, at the time called for an investigation over the 'no-bid contract to an apparently politically connected, private contractor'.
Meanwhile, Barnard Construction has been sued for failure to pay its workers, and settled with the Tampa Bay Water board over shoddy design work on a concrete reservoir that began to crack, raising concern in Michigan about its ability to build a concrete tunnel. It also appears the company has no experience building the type of tunnel required for the pipeline underneath the lake, the project's opponents say.
'These are donors who got the contract to build the border wall and it seems like there also is an ulterior motive here – a conflict of interest,' said Levi Teitel, a spokesperson for Progress Michigan, which opposes Line 5. 'The fact that the state is even considering working with these contractors that have these shady track records is alarming.'
The pipeline currently transports about 540,000 barrels of oil and liquid natural gas daily across the Mackinac Straits, which connects Lake Michigan to Lake Huron between Michigan's upper and lower peninsulas. Environmental groups fear an anchor strike or powerful shifting currents that put enormous stress on the aging pipes and could trigger a disaster.
Enbridge's plans for the replacement line call for a utility tunnel to be dug out 100ft below the Mackinac Straits floor – a design Enbridge claims would protect it from anchors and other threats. Opponents note the tunnel would still be high risk because of the complexity in building it, and because it would be the highest pressure tunnel in the world, if completed.
Stiff political and legal opposition has for seven years held up the new pipeline, and is attempting to shut down the existing line. The Army Corps of Engineers' environmental review is viewed as one of opponents' best hopes for derailing the project because of the plan's clear risks.
Though no legal mechanism for removing Barnard from the project exists, opponents have called on the Michigan governor, Gretchen Whitmer, and her appointees on the Mackinac Straits Corridor Authority that oversees the project to sound the alarm about the apparent quid pro quo, and pressure Enbridge.
Whitmer has not publicly said she opposes Line 5, to the frustration of those battling it, said Sean McBrearty, a campaign coordinator with Oil and Water Don't Mix.
'They have the power to throw some daylight on the project for the public and they're not doing that,' McBrearty said. 'When it comes to this hare-brained scheme to build a tunnel through the most ecologically sensitive part of the Great Lakes, Whitmer is missing in action.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
UK economy contracted sharply in April after Trump's tariffs
The UK economy shrank more than expected in April as the worst of President Trump's tariffs hit, according to the latest official figures. The standard measure of economic output (GDP) contracted a sharp 0.3% in April, data from the Office for National Statistics (ONS) showed. During the month, Mr Trump's so-called "Liberation Day" applied steep tariffs to countries around the world and sparked a trade war with China, the world's second-largest economy. It's worse than expected by economists. This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly. Please refresh the page for the fullest version.
Times
an hour ago
- Times
US withdraws embassy staff as Israel ‘prepares strikes on Iran'
The United States is scaling down embassy staff in the Middle East amid reports that Israel is preparing an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities. The partial withdrawal was announced by President Trump, who said he was less confident now that negotiations with Iran would succeed. Non-essential staff at the American embassy in Iraq, which has come under attack by pro-Iranian militia in the past, have been ordered home, and military dependents in several neighbouring countries will be allowed to leave. 'They are being moved out because it could be a dangerous place, and we'll see what happens,' Trump told reporters. 'We've given notice to move out.' Pro-Iran militia in Iraq attacked the American embassy in Baghdad after a US drone strike killed the leading Iranian military commander, Qasem Soleimani, alongside an Iraqi militia leader as they left the Baghdad airport in January 2020.
Metro
an hour ago
- Metro
Does money seem to be the hardest word? Here's how to handle talking about it
When it comes to personal conversations, money is still one of the hardest topics to discuss with friends, partners and family. A new study from savings app Plum puts financial questions such as 'What is your salary?' and 'How much do you have in savings?' at the top of a list of most awkward questions to ask, while money topics such as debt and credit ratings take up four of the top 10 spots in 'conversation topics to avoid' – along with President Trump and Brexit. But while most of us steer clear of chatting about our finances, research from the Money and Pensions Service shows that those who can broach the subject end up better off. Money talkers make less risky decisions and feel less stressed, the study shows. 'Building money conversations into our everyday lives helps us to build financial confidence and resilience,' says Becky O'Connor, director of public affairs at PensionBee. So how can we have these money conversations profitably and securely? We asked the money experts for their top tips for various scenarios. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video We've all been there. A lovely meal out with friends can leave a nasty taste in the mouth when it comes to sharing the bill. Sometimes the most difficult conversations about money can be the smallest ones, says financial adviser Rebecca Penny, who runs Planit Financial. That includes conversations over splitting the bill over dinner if you have only had the starter and everyone else has splashed out on steak and lobster. Many of us stay silent as the bill arrives. The solution: tackle it one-on-one, says Rebecca, who believes a 'quiet word in the ear of the person organising the meal in advance can work wonders. If you really feel you can't have the conversation, she also suggests a non-talking strategy – just slipping to the bathroom close to the end of the meal and settling your part of the bill directly with the restaurant staff on the way back. Financial situations can make or break a relationship, whether at an early stage or later on, before you move in together. But sitting down to discuss salary, existing debts and your attitude towards spending and saving can seem excruciating, not to mention a bit of a passion killer. Money coach Lesley Thomas, who runs the Money Confidence Academy, says that it is natural to feel awkward about having this conversation. 'It can feel invasive or trigger shame or comparison,' she says. She adds that it's not a conversation to have on the first date, but also cautions those in new relationships not to wait too long. 'Timing matters,' she says. 'Wait until trust is being built, but don't wait too long, especially if the relationship is getting serious.' The solution: Get the tone right and use curiosity as a tool, says Lesley. 'Don't treat it like a test, treat it like shared data. You're not just asking, you're aligning values. Use curiosity, not interrogation.' Lesley also advises sharing your own situation first. 'I've got a student loan and a credit card I'm paying off slowly. How about you?' might be a fair opening gambit, she believes. If one of you is in financial difficulty, or times are tight, it can be hard to broach the subject even if you've been together for years. It's easy for it to lead to recriminations or regret and can make the problem worse, not better, if not well-tackled. 'You have every right to be upset but try not to let it derail your efforts to find a solution together,' says Sarah Coles, personal finance expert at DIY investment group Hargreaves Lansdown. 'There's nothing to be gained from a shouting match.' The solution: Find the right time. 'You can't rush some of these sensitive conversations, so find a time that works for you both,' says Sarah. She also suggests that running through the conversation in your head first can help with preparation. 'Consider how to introduce the subject thoughtfully and think about how they might feel and respond. Don't let this be an excuse for putting it off, but it can help to have plotted a way through the more difficult aspects of the conversation.' Above all, though, tell the whole truth, so that you don't have to have the conversation again with more resentment on both sides later. 'This is not the time to fudge the truth or hold things back,' she says. 'If it all emerges over time, they'll feel you weren't being honest, and it makes it much harder to help if they only have half the truth. It's not going to be pleasant but rip that plaster off.' Being on the same page with a potential flatmate is important early on, otherwise you'll be in for an awkward time with unpaid bills, empty fridges and a potentially trashed credit score. But if you're dealing with an acquaintance or someone you barely know, sorting out the ground rules can feel like a minefield. The solution: Polly Arrowsmith, accountant and cost of living specialist, suggests having this conversation when you sign the lease agreement, rather than waiting until it all goes wrong. 'While it may seem overkill, it is helpful to write down your agreements and sign and date them. 'Do this when everyone feels good about the flat share, and refer back to it if a disagreement happens,' she says. If someone is not paying their share, she suggests addressing it calmly. 'Talk with heart, and not anger. Listen to them,' she says. Conversations about money with ageing parents can also be a flashpoint, as there's not only care costs and inheritance to consider, but also who will manage their money if they cannot. Conversations at these ages might cover things like setting up a lasting power of attorney (LPA), both for finances and healthcare, to cover incapacity, as well as tricky discussions around wills, legacies and tax. Alex Gaita, financial planning director at Schroders Personal Wealth, says getting financial affairs in order in this way is 'something many of us put off'. 'It can be quite a difficult topic,' he says. More Trending The Solution: Shift to the positive. Focusing on the money negatives as families get older makes conversations hard to have. Alex says that when he shifts the conversation to differences that older people can make with their money in the future years, the talk lightens and families can get excited. 'When I speak to clients about how their money could help the next generation – from their children, even to their great-grandchildren's future – the conversation shifts. 'They start to think not just about what they've built, but about the legacy they want to leave.' View More » MORE: OCD left me convinced condoms didn't work — sex was terrifying MORE: 'Everyone asks what fragrance I'm wearing – it's this little-known niche perfume' MORE: Readers defend the government's U-turn on winter fuel payments Your free newsletter guide to the best London has on offer, from drinks deals to restaurant reviews.
