Trump's missile announcement provides vital relief to Ukraine – but lack of stricter sanctions against Russia stings
The good news for Kyiv is familiar. Trump has permitted NATO's other members to buy American arms – a wide range of them, it seems. Included are the urgently needed Patriot interceptor missiles, and the batteries that fire them. Trump even suggested there were 17 hanging around to 'spare' in one NATO nation.
Whatever the precise reality of the arms package NATO eventually affords, it is exactly what Trump suggested at the weekend and exactly what Ukraine needs. The nightly barrage of Russian ballistic missiles can only be stopped by US Patriot missiles, and only the White House can authorize their supply. Ukraine was short of these, and other sophisticated American weapons that may not have been referenced by name and may be included in the deal. This is short-term, vital relief.
But the sting for Ukraine comes in what was not announced: Immediate secondary sanctions against customers of Russian energy, which could significantly empty Moscow's coffers. The scope of sanctions proposed by a bill in the US Senate – potentially 500% on all trade with those who buy Russian hydrocarbons – would have been devastating.
And those sanctions would hit China and India – the US's main rival and key ally respectively – at a time when oil prices are low, but trade turmoil is high. The damage to energy markets would have been palpable, and the US would also have been impacted by likely higher oil prices. But this comes with a significant delay, together with the somewhat toothless threat of sanctions against Russia itself (there is almost no trade to penalize).
Fifty days gives Vladimir Putin until September for Trump to change his mind, or for the Russian president's rumored summer offensive to alter the battlefield reality to the point where Putin is happy to seek a freeze in the conflict. It does create a window in which New Delhi and Beijing may seek to decouple from Russian energy – unlikely given their dependency and how complex that would be – or perhaps apply pressure on Moscow to end the war. That too is a tough ask for Beijing, whose officials have recently indicated they cannot see Moscow lose the conflict without risking the United States turning its full attention to its rivalry with China.
The deadline also shows Trump has yet to give up on the most elusive figment of his Ukraine policy: that the Kremlin actually wants peace, and has yet to be persuaded adequately into it. Trump again held out a deadline to push Russia into a deal. We have been here before, and Putin has let the ticking clock whizz past his ear.
Yet it is important to seize upon Trump's change in tone – mood music being perhaps the more enduring indication of White House policy than the specifics provided. There was a telling moment in which Trump stopped short of calling Putin an assassin, and painted an image of a White House where the first lady often reminds him of how violently Kyiv is hit by Russians drones and missiles.
The US president has swung wildly through all the seasons of Putin – his spring of hope that peace was possible, a brief summer of diplomacy in the Gulf and Istanbul, a fall of souring relations, and now, finally, the same winter of discontent that was President Joe Biden's default position. Yet after six months, in which, Russian diplomacy – its synthetic and performative nature, combined with cynical, maximalist demands – has flexed its muscles, Trump has still not given up on talking the Kremlin into voluntarily stopping its existential war of choice.
Trump has also shied away from some of the tougher options available to him. No new American money is going to Ukraine, and we heard nothing public about new capabilities being delivered either.
Trump's Ukraine policy is transformed in mood, perhaps, but retains key elements from its past. A desire for anyone but the US to foot the bill; deadlines for action, rather than immediate consequences for inaction; and a baffling belief the Kremlin wants peace.
Kyiv will be relieved immediately but may also soon feel a familiar sense of disappointment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil prices climb on US-EU trade optimism, Russian gasoline cuts
SINGAPORE (Reuters) -Oil prices rose on Friday, buoyed by optimism over a potential trade deal between the U.S. and the European Union and reports of Russian plans to restrict gasoline exports to most countries. Brent crude futures gained 17 cents, or 0.3%, to $69.35 a barrel by 0027 GMT. U.S. West Texas Intermediate crude futures climbed 15 cents, or 0.2%, to $66.18 per barrel. Oil settled 1% higher on Thursday, driven by media reports of expected cuts to Russian gasoline exports. This overshadowed news of Chevron Corp potentially securing U.S. approval to resume production in Venezuela. President Donald Trump's administration is preparing to allow limited oil operations in the sanctioned OPEC nation, the Wall Street Journal reported. U.S. crude inventory draws and hopes for a trade deal between the U.S. and the EU for lower tariffs were lifting futures, which fell earlier in the week over fears of a worsening global trade war. "I am encouraged by the way crude oil held and bounced away from the $65/64 support band this week, which keeps hopes intact of a rebound back towards $70," said Tony Sycamore, an analyst at IG. U.S. Energy Information Administration data on Wednesday showed crude inventories fell last week by 3.2 million barrels to 419 million barrels, far exceeding analysts' expectations in a Reuters poll for a 1.6 million-barrel draw. [EIA/S] Two European diplomats said on Wednesday that the EU and the U.S. were moving toward a trade deal that could include a 15% U.S. baseline tariff on EU imports and possible exemptions. That could pave the way for another major trade agreement following a deal with Japan. Investors will also be turning their focus to upcoming economic data next week from the world's top two economies and largest oil consumer - factory activity data from China and key U.S. indicators such as inflation, jobs and inventory data. "It is a big week next week data-wise," IG's Sycamore said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Miami Herald
3 minutes ago
- Miami Herald
ECB holds interest rates steady amid tariff uncertainty, Fed eyes similar path
Faced with tariffs and other geopolitical unknowns, the European Central Bank (ECB) on Thursday adopted a "wait-and-see" approach to interest rates. That's the same action the Federal Reserve has been undertaking, leaving President Donald Trump infuriated over the lack of U.S. rate cuts this year. Don't miss the move: Subscribe to TheStreet's free daily newsletter ECB President Christine Lagarde said the central bank held interest rates steady despite describing the economy as being in "a good place" and as "resilient.'' Inflation is "more uncertain than usual due to trade tensions,'' Lagarde said at a press conference following the ECB meeting. Related: Former Fed Chair sends stern message on economy, Fed Those trade tensions are also what some Fed watchers say will prompt the Federal Open Meeting Committee (FOMC) to keep the Federal Funds Rate steady at 4.25% to 4.50% July 29-30. But not all FOMC members are in agreement on this monetary policy action. Bloomber/Getty Images As expected, the European Central Bank left interest rates unchanged after cutting them eight times in a year. Inflation is currently at the 2% medium-term target. Last month, the ECB cut its policy rate to 2%, halving it from 4% a year earlier in that post-pandemic eurozone economy. With inflation expected to stay at the 2% rate, the ECB's policy-making Governing Council painted a balanced picture of the EU economy, with the near-term uncertainty over trade offset by future public investment. News reports had been indicating a possible deal based on a 15% tariff on U.S. imports of EU goods before the Aug. 1 deadline set by Trump. "We are attentive to where the negotiations are heading (but) we take the news one day at a time," Lagarde told the press conference. "The sooner this trade uncertainty is resolved, the less uncertainty we will have to deal with and that will be welcomed by many economic actors including ourselves,'' she said. Related: June inflation numbers reset Fed interest rate cut expectations Higher tariffs could be inflationary by disrupting existing supply chains or they could slow investment, growth and inflation. The ECB's policy-making Governing Council painted a balanced picture of the economy, with near-term uncertainty over trade offset by public investment further down the road. "Partly reflecting the Governing Council's past interest rate cuts, the economy has so far proven resilient overall in a challenging global environment," the ECB said in a press release. "At the same time, the environment remains exceptionally uncertain, especially because of trade disputes." Reports have suggested a possible deal based on a 15% tariff on U.S. imports of EU goods. Lagarde said the ECB remained in a "wait and watch" position regarding future interest rate decisions. The tariffs, announced on "Liberation Day'' in April, are the highest in nine decades, ranging from 10% to 50% on imported goods and services. More Economic Analysis: GOP plan to remove Fed Chair Powell escalatesFederal Reserve official gives green light to July rate cutTrump deflects reports on firing Fed Chair Powell 'soon'Former Federal Reserve official sends bold message on 'regime change' The Trump administration and its allies say the tariffs' impact will be transitory, meaning it will represent a one-time hit to prices but not multiply and ripple through permanently. Hence, Trump has demanded an interest rate cut as high as 3% starting with next week's FOMC meeting. The president has said the current interest rates are holding back the American economy from robust growth and hurting the wallets of Americans looking to buy a house or borrow money for other causes. The Fed's dual congressional mandate is to maintain 2% inflation and keep unemployment rates stable with steady GDP growth. It uses interest rates as a tool to manage monetary policy. The Federal Open Meeting Committee is the Fed's 12-member policymaking panel headed by Fed Chair Jerome Powell. The FOMC has been holding the Federal Funds Rate steady at 4.25% to 4.50% in anticipation of inflation bubbling up this summer and perhaps even this fall from Trump's tariffs and trade wars. The Federal Funds Rate is the price the Fed charges U.S. banks to borrow money overnight. This in turn sets the pace for short-term costs of borrowing money like credit cards and auto and student loans. The 10-year Treasury Bond yield is the benchmark for longer-term interest rates like the 30-year fixed mortgage, currently hovering around 6.8%. The market expectations for how the Fed will set rates in the future influences long-term rates. Trump's been calling Powell a rotating list of personal and professional vulgar names as well as threatening to fire him, which is likely illegal unless it can be found for cause. And while past tariffs in modern U.S. history have proven to shock prices in the short term, they also tend to settle back down over the long run, according to some economists. Federal Reserve Gov. Christopher Waller has said he is in favor of an interest rate cut next week. Both he and Powell are Trump appointees. "I believe we should cut the policy rate at our meeting in two weeks," Waller said in a speech in New York June 17. Related: JPMorgan drops blunt forecast on future interest rate cuts The Arena Media Brands, LLC THESTREET is a registered trademark of TheStreet, Inc.
USA Today
3 minutes ago
- USA Today
The details of Columbia's extraordinary $220 million deal with Trump
From academics to admissions, here's what the Ivy League school agreed to. WASHINGTON – Columbia University just inked a deal with President Donald Trump that's unlike any other in the history of American higher education. The 22-page agreement, meant to address accusations by Trump that Columbia has violated federal laws, is sweeping. Changes to admissions, academic departments, campus security and hiring are all hammered out in it. In return, the deal eases the extraordinary pressure the school has faced since March. Hundreds of millions of dollars in research funding will begin flowing again. Other federal probes, including ones that jeopardized the school's access to financial aid, will cease. For the first time, the accord sets a definitive price tag for a U.S. college to assuage the Trump administration, which has made no secret of its disdain for many universities, especially the richest and most selective ones. For Columbia, the cost of mollifying Trump was steep. Claire Shipman, the university's president, agreed the school would pay a $200 million fine to resolve funding disputes, plus an additional $21 million designated for university employees who said they'd faced discrimination or harm amid campus protests related to the Israel-Hamas war. Read more: How Columbia University became the epicenter of disagreement over the Israel-Hamas war Here are some of the details of the deal: "This was a really, really complex problem," Shipman told CNN the morning after she made the announcement. "I will argue over and over again that choosing to listen, choosing to try to solve the problem with everything that we had at stake is not capitulation." President Trump and Linda McMahon, his education secretary, have touted the agreement, saying it addresses years of conservative grievances with higher education – and offers a blueprint for future deals with campuses facing similar scrutiny. Read more: After $220 million Columbia deal, Trump promises more to come "Columbia's reforms are a roadmap for elite universities that wish to regain the confidence of the American public by renewing their commitment to truth-seeking, merit, and civil debate," McMahon said in a statement following the resolution. "I believe they will ripple across the higher education sector and change the course of campus culture for years to come." Zachary Schermele is an education reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach him by email at zschermele@ Follow him on X at @ZachSchermele and Bluesky at @ Veronica Bravo is USA TODAY's graphics art director
