Mother of Southport victim praises ‘inspiring' blood donors
The mother of Southport attack victim Elsie Dot Stancombe has praised 'inspiring' blood donors during a drive in the seaside town.
Almost 100 people donated blood at the session at St John Stone Church in Southport on Saturday.
Seven-year-old Elsie was one of three girls murdered in the Southport mass stabbing attack at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class last summer.
Her parents, Jenni and Dave Stancombe, worked with NHS Blood and Transplant to organise the blood donation event through Elsie's Story, the charity they founded in her memory.
Among the NHS Blood and Transplant staff supporting the session were two members of the transport team based at the Liverpool blood centre who responded to the Southport attack.
Ms Stancombe said she wanted Elsie's Story to 'create a legacy of love and hope' in her daughter's name.
She added: 'Although the outcome for Elsie was tragically different, we know that blood transfusions were crucial for many of those injured that day.
'NHS Blood and Transplant made 10 emergency deliveries of blood to hospitals treating the casualties and that quick response meant the lifesaving blood was available for everyone who needed it.
'For some people here today, giving blood is their way of repaying those whose donations were so vital that day.'
Ms Stancombe added: 'We want Southport to be renowned for the warmth and generosity of its amazing community, not for the events of that day.
'Today has been a wonderful example of that.
'The atmosphere was so uplifting and inspiring and we are grateful to all the donors and staff for their support.'
Stephen Kuypers and Dave Oxton were among a team of drivers on shift the day of the Southport attacks who made 10 emergency blue-light deliveries of blood supplies in three hours to four hospitals, including Alder Hey Children's Hospital.
Blue lights are only used when a hospital requests blood products they urgently need for a specific patient or incident, NHS Blood and Transplant said.
If a patient's blood type is unknown, they can safely be given O negative blood, which makes it vital in emergencies.
Mr Kuypers said: 'On that dreadful day last July, I took the phone call from our hospital services team informing us of a major incident and instructing us to prepare for emergency deliveries.
'At the height of the response we were making three blue light deliveries an hour, which is extremely rare. I delivered two urgent orders to Alder Hey and Aintree hospitals.
'Hospital colleagues later told us that the quick response of the Liverpool transport team helped ensure that the patients received the best possible care.
'The was a very rewarding message to receive and it meant a lot to the team who all pulled together and put in extra hours that day to ensure all the deliveries were covered.'
NHS Blood and Transplant chief executive Dr Jo Farrar said: 'It is wonderful to see how many people have been inspired by Elsie's Story to give blood, and we are thankful to Elsie's brave parents Jenni and Dave for their incredible support.
'Because each donation can help up to three adults or six children, 300 lives or more will be saved and improved in Elsie's memory.
'A constant supply of blood is needed every day to help patients receiving treatment for conditions like cancer, sickle cell or giving birth as well as being prepared for unexpected emergencies and incidents, just like that dreadful day last July.'
NHS Blood and Transplant said it was appealing to blood and platelet donors across England to help fill tens of thousands of appointments at town and city donor centres over the coming days and weeks.
There are concerns that four bank holidays falling in six weeks could 'push blood supplies to critical levels' as donations often drop over bank holiday weekends.
The NHS is appealing for more O negative donations in particular, the blood type needed in emergencies.
NHS Blood and Transplant issued an amber alert in July 2024, which remains in place in England, due to a severe shortage of O negative blood triggered by the cyber-attack on London hospitals last year.
The attack meant major London hospitals could not cross match blood so the hospitals could only use O negative.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
BBC News
an hour ago
- BBC News
New Cambridge centre specialises in children with bowel diseases
A new centre focused on improving the lives of children with inflammatory bowel diseases has opened in Cambridge. The Cambridge Centre for Children's Gut Health will see cutting-edge research from scientists at the University of Cambridge, including the study of "mini-guts".The mini organs are created from the cells donated by children, which allow scientists to study the bowel diseases and identify potential new treatments. Matt Zilbauer, director of the centre, said children and young people were "enthusiastic" about helping to better understand their conditions. Professor Zilbauer, who is also a consultant at Addenbrooke's Hospital, hoped the new centre would help identify ways of personalising also wanted it to give children access to the latest drugs, clinical trials and outstanding clinical care. Their study of mini-guts with a team at the Cambridge Stem Cell Institute, showed DNA changes may play an important role in Crohn's publishing their study, the team recruited a further 500 patients and generated nearly 1,000 organoids. "To study these diseases, we need our children and young people to donate a few extra tissue cells when we're investigating their condition," he said. "We couldn't do our research without their help."The children are amazing – they're all really keen to help us and to contribute to finding new treatments, even when they know these treatments may not benefit them directly."The centre will also have a psychiatric Glemas, research nurse and patient engagement lead at Cambridge University Hospitals, said: "Inflammatory bowel diseases are lifelong conditions with no cure. "It's really tough for the children and young people we see, so it's important that we look after every aspect of their health. By looking after their mental health alongside their physical health, we hope to make their lives easier." Follow Cambridgeshire news on BBC Sounds, Facebook, Instagram and X.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
Wes Streeting: ‘I won't shrink away from opening NHS to private sector'
Wes Streeting has said he will not rule out leaning more heavily on the private sector to cut NHS backlogs. The Health Secretary said he 'refused to be bound by outdated ideological battles', saying using independent hospitals to provide taxpayer-funded care did not contradict the principles of the health service. Writing for The Telegraph, below, he said he would fight for the future of the NHS, warning of a 'national emergency' facing the country. He made the comments as new figures showed that almost 1.4 million people have had private care on the NHS since Labour won the election. They include more than 500,000 patients – more than the population of Liverpool – who have received such treatment since an agreement to 'turbocharge' such efforts was published in January. The deal with the independent sector, announced by Sir Keir Starmer, offers vacant private care appointments to NHS patients while keeping treatment free at the point of use. Officials have pushed the services particularly in parts of the country that have some of the longest waits and lowest levels of private healthcare uptake. The biggest surge in the use of the private sector by the NHS came in the North East and Yorkshire, followed by the South East and North West. Mr Streeting, a survivor of kidney cancer, said the NHS saved his life and he is now fighting to make sure it is there for others. He said: 'Millions are waiting in limbo for treatment that could transform their lives. 'Behind the staggering six million people on waiting lists are real human stories. Parents missing work to care for children in pain. Grandparents unable to play with grandchildren. People forced to take sick days that threaten their livelihoods. This isn't just a statistic – it's a national emergency. 'That's why I refuse to be bound by outdated ideological battles when confronting this crisis. My priority is simple. And in my effort to get there, I won't shrink away from using the independent sector to get NHS patients seen faster.' On Wednesday, the NHS was declared 'the big winner' from the Government's spending review, with a record cash injection of £29 billion a year. Mr Streeting stressed: 'Money alone won't fix this. We need reform too.' The Government is expected to go further in its use of the private sector, as it prepares to draw up a 10-year plan for the NHS, which promises three major shifts – from hospital to community, from analogue to digital and from treating sickness to prevention. Mr Streeting said it was 'nonsense' to suggest that using the private sector was at odds with NHS principles. 'What contradicts NHS principles is letting people suffer unnecessarily when capacity exists to treat them. The treatment remains free at the point of use – that's what matters,' he said. The Health Secretary said it was 'ambitious but essential' that the NHS meets its target of ensuring that 92 per cent of patients wait no longer than 18 weeks from referral to treatment. It has not been achieved since 2015. The independent sector agreement, launched in January this year, is part of an NHS Elective Reform Plan to clear waiting backlogs, especially in the most challenged specialities. 'Going further than New Labour' Before the election, Mr Streeting said a new Labour government would 'go further than New Labour ever did' in use of the private sector for NHS patients. 'If you want to understand my appetite for reform, think New Labour on steroids,' he said in a speech in May 2024. Tony Blair's New Labour government funded a network of 30 private clinics carrying out operations and tests for NHS patients between 2003 and 2010. It also introduced patient choice, allowing patients to opt for care in a private hospital. However, the drive divided the Labour party and lost momentum. Polling from YouGov shows strong support for the Independent Sector agreement, with 70 per cent of the public showing strong support for the NHS using the private sector to clear the backlog. The most common procedures delivered through the independent sector are ophthalmology (23.8 per cent of all treatments), trauma and orthopaedics (20.9 per cent) and dermatology (14.9 per cent). Mark Cubbon, the director of elective care, cancer and diagnostics at NHS England, said: 'Independent sector providers play an important role in supporting NHS efforts to get patients the care they need quicker, with the latest figures showing record numbers of treatments are being carried out. 'NHS use of the private sector has risen significantly since 2021, and our new partnership agreement will help us go even further to widen access to treatment for thousands of patients.' 'Pivotal role in NHS's recovery' David Hare, the chief executive of the Independent Healthcare Providers Network said: 'These figures demonstrate that independent providers are playing a pivotal role in the NHS's elective recovery, helping ensure patients can get the treatment they need – all free at the point of use and paid for at NHS prices. 'But with so much more still to do to once again meet the NHS's 18-week target by March 2029, it's vital that local NHS areas build on this progress and ensure that they make full use of existing and potential capacity in the sector to give patients greater choice and access to the care they need.' Rachel Power, the chief executive of the Patients Association, welcomed the announcement. She said: 'Patients waiting for treatment tell us they feel like their lives are on hold, while facing real hardship, uncertainty and pain.' Analysis from the Independent Health Providers Network has shown that 96 per cent of people in England live within 30 minutes' driving distance of an independent provider that delivers NHS treatment. Using private help contradicts NHS principles? What nonsense By Wes Streeting I know what it's like to sit in a doctor's office and hear the word 'cancer'. The gut punch. The fear. The questions about what happens next – and crucially, how quickly. Yet millions are waiting in limbo for treatment that could transform their lives. Behind the staggering six million people on waiting lists are real human stories. Parents missing work to care for children in pain. Grandparents unable to play with grandchildren. People forced to take sick days that threaten their livelihoods. This isn't just a statistic – it's a national emergency. That's why I refuse to be bound by outdated ideological battles when confronting this crisis. My priority is simple. And in my effort to get there, I won't shrink away from using the independent sector to get NHS patients seen faster. Between January and April alone, over 500,000 people received vital treatments through our partnership with independent healthcare providers – the equivalent of treating the entire population of Liverpool in just four months. These aren't abstract numbers. They're people getting life-changing hip replacements, knee surgeries and cancer treatments. Some ask whether using private capacity contradicts NHS principles. Nonsense. What contradicts NHS principles is letting people suffer unnecessarily when capacity exists to treat them. The treatment remains free at the point of use – that's what matters. The independent healthcare sector won't affect this principle, and so it would be foolish to turn it away when we so desperately need it in certain specialities. But at the same time, we must see it for what it is. The spending review has delivered proper investment in our NHS with nearly £29 billion in additional funding. But money alone won't fix this. We need reform too. The results of our Plan for Change are already showing. Waiting lists have fallen to their lowest level in two years, marking the first April drop since 2008. We're finally heading in the right direction to creating an NHS Fit for Future. Our Plan for Change sets out the clear milestone: meeting the NHS standard where 92 per cent of patients wait no longer than 18 weeks from referral to treatment. It's ambitious but essential. Cancer taught me that time is precious. When you're waiting for treatment, every day matters. That's why I won't waste a single day, or a single available appointment slot, in our mission to give patients the care they deserve. The NHS saved my life. Now I'm fighting to ensure it's there – on time – to save yours.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
My mother-in-law is still driving despite a near miss. How can we stop her?
My mother-in-law is still driving. After a near miss a few months ago, we told her she was no longer to drive with our children in her car, and we were grateful that she immediately agreed – but also puzzled that she didn't consider stopping altogether. A year ago she developed cataracts and was told to stop driving. She coped well, using her free bus pass and walking, which she doesn't mind doing and knows is good for her health. However, when the cataract had been treated, the doctor told her she could drive again. Recently, her car insurance was renewed, and she paid a hefty sum that we felt would have been better spent on taxis. All her life my mother-in-law has been 'useful', and she is very proud that her four children have grown up to also be kind, helpful people. She continues to drive because it is useful, and she offers lifts to elderly friends which we fear is an accident waiting to happen. I love her dearly and would hate her to come to any harm. We live slightly farther away than her other children, who help her the most with finances and some practical things. We realise that if she stopped driving she might need more help, which we don't have the capacity to provide. However, we feel the risks to herself and the community outweigh any inconvenience to the wider family. Please give us a script we can use to express ourselves in a new way. Her other children continue to be dismissive of our concerns, and I don't know what to say to convince her that it's her turn to be looked after and chauffeured about by others. This has become an increasingly common problem. I remember some years ago, talking to psychotherapist Chris Mills about a friend's mum who had dementia and was no longer safe to drive. He said something I never forgot: 'If we were talking about a gun, no one would hesitate over taking it off her. Yet a car can also kill.' So I went to Mills again with your letter. 'Your request for a 'script' is the easy bit,' he said 'as it doesn't sound as if you've yet said to your mother-in-law words to the effect of, 'We don't believe your driving is safe any more, and we'd like you to give up your car now and use other ways of getting around, before someone gets hurt.' It is absolutely your business to say this, because it is your own concerns that you're reporting.' Realising you are at the stage of life where you can no longer do things is a huge deal. So you're right to tread carefully. I would stress how much you care about her and the help she is still able to give you. 'But,' continued Mills, 'before going ahead with this, I'm not clear why you are taking this on, rather than your husband – why you have written this letter, not him. He is her son and his siblings' brother. There is usually someone in the family who is the 'canary' and sees things before others can. But might you run the risk of being cast as the over-fussy interfering in-law?' Sign up to Inside Saturday The only way to get a look behind the scenes of the Saturday magazine. Sign up to get the inside story from our top writers as well as all the must-read articles and columns, delivered to your inbox every weekend. after newsletter promotion Mills suggests your husband could contact her GP to request a reassessment of her driving ability. 'There's no guarantee that your mother-in-law or your husband's siblings will approve of any of this, but that shouldn't prevent him from doing what he believes is the right thing – ie in the absence of his mother's agreement, ensuring that the decision about her potentially dangerous driving is passed to the relevant authority.' In England and Wales, the DVLA issues licences and can revoke them or ask for medical confirmation that someone is fit to drive. You can also report your concerns to the DVLA via their website. Remember that this will be about so much more than just driving, so please reassure your mother-in-law about how much she is still needed. Every week, Annalisa Barbieri addresses a personal problem sent in by a reader. If you would like advice from Annalisa, please send your problem to Annalisa regrets she cannot enter into personal correspondence. Submissions are subject to our terms and conditions. The latest series of Annalisa's podcast is available here. Comments on this piece are pre-moderated to ensure the discussion remains on the topics raised by the article. Please be aware that there may be a short delay in comments appearing on the site.
