
Why more grandparents are tearing up the inheritance rulebook
Grandparents are tearing up the inheritance rulebook, choosing to skip a generation and pass wealth straight to their grandchildren.
'People are living longer and dying later, their children are further on in life and usually broadly financially sorted, so don't actually need the money,' says Ian Dyall, of the wealth manager Evelyn.
'Meanwhile, their grandchildren have university debt, are trying to get on the housing ladder and don't have the same pensions. Giving them a financial start in life has more of an impact.'
One in four people over 50 have given substantial cash gifts to family in the last five years, according to the SunLife Life Well Spent report, and 36pc of over 70s. The average amount given is £20,021.
And while children are still the beneficiaries of many gifts, grandchildren are increasingly feeling the benefits of the great wealth transfer.
Some 22pc of over 50s, and 34pc of over 70s, have given large cash gifts to their grandchildren. These included money for a special occasion such as a birthday or Christmas (40pc), to put towards tuition fees (38pc) or to help after the birth of a baby (27pc).
Financial gifts are expected to further snowball after the Chancellor Rachel Reeves announced in her maiden Budget that pensions will be liable for inheritance tax from April 2027.
Savers who had previously planned to leave their pots untouched to pass on to loved ones are now having to consider the best way to spend their money.
'My children don't need any gifts'
Blair Hilton is building a nest egg for each of his five grandchildren.
Hilton, 80, who lives in Thornby, near Liverpool, has a monthly income of about £4,000 after tax from his state pension and a defined benefit pension from his career as a civil servant.
He has set up a bare trust for each of his grandchildren, aged one to 14, and splits any excess money each month, after his bills are paid, between them.
'I didn't discuss it with my children before setting up the trusts, the idea came up when I was talking to my financial adviser, ' says Hilton.
'But when I mentioned it to my children, they seemed happy with the arrangement and thought it was sensible.'
His children will inherit an equal share of his house, worth about £400,000.
'They have their own homes and are working, so they're not in need of any gifts,' he says. 'And while the money is going to my grandchildren, I still expect it to benefit my children because it will go towards university fees that they might otherwise have had to pay.'
Individuals can give away up to £3,000 a year, and this falls immediately outside an estate for inheritance tax purposes, plus as many gifts of up to £250 as you like, as long as they go to people who do not benefit from your main gifting allowance.
But larger sums are subject to inheritance tax unless the donor lives for seven years after making the gift.
Under the surplus income rule, you can give away excess cash inheritance tax-free as long as it does not impact your standard of living.
This must be regular income from certain sources such as employment, rent, pensions or dividends (it can't come from savings) – the donor must keep good records and show a regular pattern of gifts. But it is an underused strategy – only 430 families claimed this exemption in 2022-23, according to official figures.
'When you look at the inheritance tax rules, it is hard to give money away when you don't know how long you will live, so this seemed like a far better option,' says Hilton.
He is single and wants to reduce his wealth so that his family are not left with a large inheritance tax bill after he dies. He has made gifts to family in the past 10 years, but is conscious of the seven-year rule.
'Tax efficiency is the main reason I'm doing it. In the past I have given money away, but it is hard when you don't know how long you will live,' he says.
'I want to get my assets down to the £325,000 threshold, but the amount you can give away per year is fairly limited.'
Hilton invests the money for his grandchildren through his wealth manager, Bestinvest, in the Evelyn Growth Fund Clean, which invests in a portfolio of other funds with the aim of achieving long-term growth. Top holdings include Evenlode Global Income, Fundsmith Equity and Invesco Physical Gold ETC.
It can also be more tax efficient to give money to grandchildren, says Chris Etherington, from the accountancy firm RSM.
'Parents who invest money for their children, other than through a junior Isa, are taxed on any gains above £100. This does not happen when you give money to a grandchild.'
The best strategy depends on individual family circumstances. Etherington gave the example of one recent client with two children, one a high earner and one a lower earner.
'They will leave money to the lower earning child, but skip the high earner and instead pass money to his daughter,' he said.
Far from creating a family drama, Dyall says that parents getting 'skipped over' are often happy for their own children to inherit. In some cases, parents who inherit money use a deed of variation to alter the will and redirect money to their own children.
'I don't need a lump sum'
Cara Sayer has asked for any inheritance she might receive to be left to her daughter Holly, 17.
'I've got my own house, a business that is doing really well, and I'm building a nest egg with my pension – so I don't need a lump sum, ' said Sayer, 53, who founded the baby products company SnoozeShade.
Sayer, who is single, is frustrated that it is harder for those who are not married to pass on money. Under the current rules, a married couple can potentially pass on £1m tax-free between them (as long as their estate is worth less than £2m) – but for a single person, that threshold is just £500,000.
Sayer has asked her mother, Mary, 79, to consider Holly next time she updates her will. She hopes that Holly would use a lump sum to buy a first property.
'She already received a small inheritance and used it to buy her first car, so she would be under strict instructions about what it could be used for – and I like to think that if I did need the money, she would help me.'
She adds: 'Ultimately it's up to my mum, and no one should be told what to do with their own money, but I think we should give more thought to the tradition of just passing everything straight to your children and whether it will actually benefit them as much as you think.'
Avoiding a dispute
But matters of inheritance can be fraught. Some 18pc of people have had a dispute within their family about inheritance, according to a survey of 2,000 adults by Canada Life. It found that 10pc of those aged 55 to 64 were relying on an inheritance from their parents to fund their own retirement.
Yet under English law, individuals are free to leave their money to whoever they choose, says Dyall, meaning that some adult children could be left disappointed.
'We had one case where money had been left to a child under age 18 and the parent was named as trustee, and we were not convinced the money was being used for the child's benefit,' he recalls.
Grandparents concerned about their wishes being carried out could find that giving money away during your lifetime tends to be less contentious, he adds.
An alternative option is to write a discretionary trust, where you can provide a letter of wishes for the trustee, who can be a trusted friend or relative, or a professional, instructing them to prioritise whoever needs the money most.
Dyall adds: 'My advice would be to have the conversation with your children first. Explain that it is not that you don't love them, but that the money could cause them potential tax problems and is likely to benefit the grandchildren more.
'If you don't want to have that talk, then consider writing a letter alongside your will to explain your rationale.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
18 minutes ago
- The Independent
Comedian hits out at London's E-bike licensing creating ‘Checkpoint Charlies'
Conflicting council decisions on electric bike licensing have created a "Checkpoint Charlie" situation near London bridges, according to comedian Dara O Briain. The Irish stand-up highlighted the issue of e-bikes "stacking up" at river crossings between the boroughs of Hounslow and Richmond in west London. Hounslow has granted permission for Forest and Voi's e-bikes to operate within its boundaries, while Richmond has licensed rival company Lime. This disparity means riders face a "patchwork of boundaries", preventing seamless travel across boroughs. Lime, one of the rental companies, has urged councils to collaborate to resolve the issue. The latter said it has agreed to a request by Hounslow for its bikes' electric motors to cut out if riders enter the borough. This causes the bikes to become heavy to ride, resulting in many users ending their trips. The PA news agency saw about 30 bikes near the southern entrance to Chiswick Bridge on Monday night. Some were parked appropriately to the side of pavements, but others had been thrown in bushes or tipped over. O Briain, 53, likened the issue to the Checkpoint Charlie border crossing point between East and West Berlin during the Cold War. In a post on social media platform X, he wrote: 'Hounslow Council have banned Lime bikes, and licensed Forest and Voi; neighbouring Richmond has licensed Lime and banned the others. 'So every bridge is Checkpoint Charlie, with loads of Lime bikes parked on one side and loads of Forest and Voi on the other. Top work everyone!' Richard Dilks, chief executive of shared transport charity CoMoUK, said: 'This rather bizarre set of circumstances is an unfortunate outcome of the current situation in London, where regulation of bike sharing schemes is decided at borough level.' He said the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill going through Parliament could make Transport for London the capital's licensing authority for rental e-bikes, enabling a 'more coherent pan-London approach' to be designed. A spokesperson for Lime said the existing scenario is 'frustrating for riders'. She said: 'We've already been contacted by many of them who are disappointed at the new rules. 'They should not have to experience London as a patchwork of boundaries. 'We want to see councils work together so that residents can travel seamlessly across boroughs, without having to stop at borders.' Alex Berwin, head of policy at Forest, said the issue is 'exactly why we have been calling for a pan-London approach to regulation'. He went on: 'We need a single regulatory framework, one enforcement model and one operational rulebook across the capital, whilst ensuring services support the local needs of each borough.' A Voi spokesperson said its users are 'free to cycle across borough boundaries, but parking must be in designated bays within participating areas'. He added: 'We're working with local leaders and TfL towards a London-wide scheme to make cross-borough journeys simpler.' Rental e-bike companies say they encourage people to switch from cars to a more sustainable form of travel, but there have been long-standing concerns about users blocking pavements with the bikes after they finish their rides. A spokesperson for Hounslow Council said: 'The issue of neighbouring boroughs having different e-bike operators is not unique to Hounslow. This is an issue at many boundaries wherever there is a change in operator. E-bike service areas are dynamic, with boroughs deciding to review operators at different points. 'We recognise that a borough-by-borough approach can be confusing for users and we continue to work closely with Transport for London and neighbouring boroughs to make the case to the Department for Transport for a pan-London approach. In the meantime, we are bringing in new measures to ensure e-bikes are better managed when left at the end of a journey.'


BBC News
19 minutes ago
- BBC News
Isak, Newcastle and Liverpool - what's going on?
Nineteen days. That's how long it has been since Liverpool's £110m bid for Newcastle striker Alexander Isak was then, there have been no further it hasn't stopped the future of the 25-year-old Sweden striker being the biggest talking point of the summer Liverpool bid again? Will he rejoin first-team training in the meantime? What happens if a deal is not completed by the 1 September deadline day?BBC Sport has spoken to a number of sources in an attempt to get the latest on these questions and what might happen next. Why haven't Liverpool made another bid for Isak? To explain this we need to look at Newcastle's transfers so a frustrating summer window, their business has started to pick signed midfielder Jacob Ramsey from Aston Villa for £40m on Sunday, after securing AC Milan defender Malick Thiaw for a reported £34.6m earlier in the added to July's £55m signing of Nottingham Forest winger Anthony Elanga and the loan signing of England goalkeeper Aaron Ramsdale early in there is one glaring omission. None of these are strikers - and they really needed one before Isak's future was thrown into question after the departure of Callum have told BBC Sport one reason there hasn't yet been a follow-up bid is that any move would be reliant on Newcastle getting two strikers through have maintained publicly that Isak isn't for sale, but Liverpool know they are looking for two strikers for a reason. When - or perhaps if - Newcastle do, Liverpool are expected to ramp up their interest with another bid. Sources say the next offer will be a minimum £120m. At the moment, though, it's a waiting game. What is happening with Newcastle's own striker hunt? So that focuses the mind on to Newcastle's striker Howe made no bones about it at the weekend."It's not like we are looking at any other area," the Newcastle head coach said following his side's goalless draw against Aston Villa on securing a replacement for Wilson has proved challenging enough - let alone a second additional remain interested in Yoane Wissa but have not yet met Brentford's asking price of in excess of £ DR Congo forward, who was left out of the squad for Sunday's 3-1 loss at Nottingham Forest, wants to join Jorgen Strand Larsen is among a small number of centre-forwards on Newcastle's radar, Wolves do not want to lose only completed a permanent move to Molineux last month after a successful loan spell in which he scored 14 goals in the Premier club have already let Matheus Cunha and Rayan Ait-Nouri go this and Wissa illustrate the difficulty Newcastle face, at this stage of the window, to convince a side to part with another key fell to Anthony Gordon to lead the line on the opening day and, as it stands, it would be a surprise if the winger did not start up top against Liverpool on Monday night. Why have Newcastle found it hard to close some deals? After missing out on a number of targets this summer, it felt like there had been a shift in momentum in the last week after completed moves for Thiaw and don't forget Newcastle have seen top targets like Hugo Ekitike, Benjamin Sesko and Joao Pedro move elsewhere this strikers ended up at Liverpool, Manchester United and Chelsea respectively and as well as facing intense competition from such clubs, there are other factors at replacing Wilson, for centre-forwards want minutes so there were not necessarily a queue of quality frontmen lining up to play a supporting role before Isak stopped training with the goalscorers are may be in a much stronger financial position this summer after substantial historic losses dropped out of the club's new three-year Profit and Sustainability Rules (PSR) they still have to be smart to sign what those behind the scenes call the "right" is not a long list of targets and Newcastle have found that when one coveted striker has potentially become available this summer, his price has then gone pressing the need, in the final throes of the window, Newcastle are wary of overpaying given the knock-on effect such a splurge could have on the club's ability to strengthen in subsequent windows. If Isak doesn't move, can he be reintegrated into the fold? That remains a big 'if', of has been consistent in his messaging throughout this saga: the door remains open to the Newcastle head coach stressed what happens next is down to the striker, who continues to train away from the certainly felt a long way back for Isak on Saturday after the away end called the Swede "greedy" following the goalless draw against Aston time is against Isak if he is to get a move to Liverpool, particularly when there are few realistic options left on the market who would be capable of stepping up for Chaudhuri, the chief intelligence officer of Twenty First Group, who previously worked with clubs like Newcastle and Tottenham, has noticed a "greater interest in top-class strikers" compared to years gone by."Globally, there have been seven centre forwards moving for 50m euros or more this window, compared to two in 2024, six in 2023, and five in 2022," he said. "But clubs should probably temper expectations as to their impact. Of the 19 strikers signed by Premier League clubs for 50m euros or more before this season, perhaps, only Haaland and Isak can be considered unqualified successes."No wonder Howe has maintained that the door is to, somehow, reintegrate Isak may yet prove one of Newcastle's better options - and that is saying something.


Edinburgh Reporter
20 minutes ago
- Edinburgh Reporter
The Evolution of the UK National Lottery Over the Past 30 Years
Now a cornerstone of public funding in the UK, the National Lottery has grown into one of the most influential state-backed initiatives of its kind. With billions directed towards community projects, sport, the arts and national heritage, it plays a vital role in shaping everyday life across the country. However, the concept behind it is far from modern. Long before the first modern ticket was sold in the official launch of how we see operations today, lotteries had been woven into the nation's history. They have evolved through centuries of change to become the far-reaching institution it is today. Photo by Alejandro Garay on Unsplash Early Lotteries and Origins The first official lottery in Britain dates back to 1569, when Queen Elizabeth I established a scheme to raise funds for the repair of ports and other public infrastructure. Tickets were sold across the country and offered both cash prizes and a range of different goods. The draw itself was conducted in London, at St. Paul's Cathedral, attracting considerable interest and set the groundwork for future public lotteries of a similar kind. Despite Queen Elizabeth's fundamental starting point, the popularity and legality of lotteries ebbed and flowed due to moral, political, and economic debates that meant they were not always welcomed or consistent in different periods of time. However, by the early 20th century, a more regulated, widespread use of lotteries in the United Kingdom was in place. Local lotteries were legalised in 1934, and further acts in 1956 and 1976 expanded their scope, enabling charitable bodies and community groups to use them as tools for fundraising. Establishment of the Modern National Lottery The idea of a UK-wide, government-licensed lottery was formally revived under Prime Minister John Major's Conservative government. With the passing of the National Lottery Act in 1993, the stage was set for a centralised lottery operated under a government-awarded franchise. The intention was twofold – to offer a popular, nationwide game of chance, and to raise substantial money for public good without increasing taxes. Following a competitive tender, the inaugural ten-year licence was granted to the Camelot Group. This then led up to 19 November 1994, the first draw of the National Lottery, and it was broadcast live on BBC One. It was hosted by Noel Edmonds and Anthea Turner and attracted more than 22 million viewers, a record for the time. Seven lucky ticket holders shared a jackpot of nearly £5.9 million. The launch exceeded expectations, combining entertainment with real-life impact. It quickly became a national talking point, and by the end of the 1990s, the National Lottery had cemented its place as a regular household pastime. Expansion and Milestones from 1994 to 2024 The decades that followed saw both consistent participation and major expansion. New games were introduced that transcended the original Lotto format, such as Thunderball in 1999, which presented players with more frequent opportunities to win smaller, fixed prizes. In 2004, the UK joined other European nations in creating the EuroMillions draw, with even larger jackpots that captured international attention. The evolution didn't stop at new games, though. Over time, the National Lottery adjusted ticket prices, altered prize distributions, and introduced new mechanisms such as the Millionaire Raffle and the addition of Lotto HotPicks. Jackpots also became subject to rollover caps, helping to maintain fairness and avoid runaway prize funds. Technology also played a growing role. The shift to digital platforms meant that players could buy tickets, check results, and even set up subscriptions without visiting a retailer. This transition to lotto online gave the lottery a broader reach, making it accessible and more convenient for different demographics to play while also appealing to growing tech-savvy audiences. While the system was not without occasional hiccups, including a rare technical malfunction in 2015 that delayed a live draw, the National Lottery has built a strong reputation for reliability and integrity. Over its first 30 years, it distributed over £95 billion in prize money and created more than 7,400 millionaires across the United Kingdom. The lottery has also delivered upwards of £50 billion to good causes, funding thousands of projects in sectors including sport, arts and entertainment, community infrastructure, and national heritage. Cultural Significance and Community Impact Linking into the previously mentioned good causes, it has helped build stadiums, save historic buildings, support film production, and back Olympic dreams. The 2012 London Olympics, for example, were heavily supported by lottery funding, not only in terms of venue construction, but also in developing athletes who went on to win medals. Across the UK, millions have benefited from projects that would not have been possible without National Lottery funding. One of the best-known celebrations of its impact is National Lottery Open Week, an annual event allowing free or discounted access to hundreds of venues and organisations that have received funding. Museums, castles, wildlife parks, and cultural centres participate, giving the public tangible evidence of where ticket money has been invested. The Transition to Allwyn and a New Era A major development occurred in February 2024, when Allwyn Entertainment UK Limited became the official operator of the National Lottery under a new ten-year licence running until January 2034. The change marked a significant moment in the lottery's evolution. For the first time, the licence was awarded based not only on operational capability, but also on a promise to maximise returns for good causes through innovation and efficiency. The transition to Allwyn ushered in the most ambitious modernisation project since the lottery's foundation. In the summer of 2025, the company began a sweeping upgrade of the National Lottery's infrastructure. This included replacing over 40,000 retail terminals, updating software systems, and improving customer-facing digital services to offer a more streamlined and responsive user experience. Allwyn's objective is to increase the average weekly return to good causes from £30 million to £60 million by the end of the licence period. The new operator has also promised to deepen support for the ever-increasing interest in women's sport and improve the accessibility of its games for underrepresented communities. Ultimately, the modern National Lottery is designed to reflect the way people live today. Players can check results on mobile apps, watch draws live from their devices, and purchase tickets on the go. The focus has shifted to delivering both entertainment and impact with greater transparency and efficiency than ever before. Looking Ahead The National Lottery has always faced challenges, and as it embarks on its fourth decade of existence, considerations of changes in public gambling behaviour remain key to ensuring responsible play in a growing digital world. However, its core mission remains the same: to raise money for good causes and offer players the chance to dream. It is a rare institution that can say it has helped fund both gold medal wins and village hall refurbishments, supported theatre companies and wildlife trusts, and produced thousands of winners along the way. Like this: Like Related