logo
FBI Told to Flag Mentions of Trump in Epstein Files, Dem Senator Says

FBI Told to Flag Mentions of Trump in Epstein Files, Dem Senator Says

Yahoo21-07-2025
Dick Durbin is leading the Senate Judiciary Committee in an effort to receive more transparency regarding the Trump administration's handling of the Epstein files, particularly an order from Attorney General Pam Bondi for FBI agents to 'flag' any mention they made of President Trump.
In a letter addressed to Bondi on Friday, Durbin wrote: 'According to information my office received, you then pressured the FBI to put approximately 1,000 personnel in its Information Management Division (IMD), including the Record/Information Dissemination Section (RIDS), which handles all requests submitted by the public under the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) and Privacy Act, on 24-hour shifts to review approximately 100,000 Epstein-related records in order to produce more documents that could then be released on an arbitrarily short deadline.'
'My office was told that these personnel were instructed to 'flag' any records in which President Trump was mentioned,' he added.
There was likely something for those agents to flag, given Trump's well-documented relationship with the defamed sex trafficker. There's the 2002 New York magazine quote where Trump referred to Epstein, his friend of '15 years,' as a 'terrific guy' who liked women 'on the younger side.' And there was the recent Wall Street Journal report that showed Trump writing a strange birthday message to Epstein in 2006, with the closing line 'may every day be another wonderful secret.'
But what else was flagged under Bondi's watch, and what happened to it? Durbin's report asks just that:
Why were personnel told to flag records in which President Trump was mentioned?
1. Please list all political appointees and senior DOJ officials involved in the decision to flag records in which President Trump was mentioned.
2. What happened to the records mentioning President Trump once they were flagged?
Trump's rollout of the Epstein files has been so disorderly that it has Democrats and the most hardcore MAGA loyalists asking the exact same question: What is the truth about Epstein?
The due date for Durbin and the committee's request is August 1. Trump and Bondi have yet to comment.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'TOO ANGRY, TOO STUPID': Trump bashes Fed Chair Powell in latest tirade after central bank leaves interest rates unchanged
'TOO ANGRY, TOO STUPID': Trump bashes Fed Chair Powell in latest tirade after central bank leaves interest rates unchanged

Yahoo

time14 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

'TOO ANGRY, TOO STUPID': Trump bashes Fed Chair Powell in latest tirade after central bank leaves interest rates unchanged

President Trump escalated his criticism of Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell a day after the central bank kept rates on hold, saying in a social media post that Powell is "TOO ANGRY, TOO STUPID, & TOO POLITICAL" to have his job. "He is costing our Country TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS, in addition to one of the most incompetent, or corrupt, renovations of a building(s) in the history of construction! Put another way,'Too Late' is a TOTAL LOSER, and our Country is paying the price!" The new attack on Thursday morning followed the fifth consecutive meeting where the Fed decided to leave rates unchanged, defying Trump's repeated calls for a cut. Two Fed governors dissented and argued for a quarter percentage point reduction, the first time two Fed governors have done so at a policy meeting since 1993. Powell at a press conference Wednesday did not budge from his view that more time is needed to assess the impact of Trump's tariffs on inflation and the economy, saying that there is still a "a long way to go' to figure that out and "you have to think of this as still quite early days." He also declined to say whether a cut was on the table for the Fed's next meeting in September and made it clear that inflation was still a concern as the Fed balances its dual mandate of stable prices and maximum employment. "In the end, there should be no doubt that we will do what we need to do to keep inflation under control." A new reading on inflation is due out Thursday. Traders narrowed the odds of a cut in September after Powell spoke Wednesday, lowering them to 40%. Trump on Wednesday said he does expect a cut at the next meeting, telling reporters before the Wednesday rate hold was announced that "I hear they're going to do it in September." The decision to keep rates on hold was expected to increase tensions with Trump, who has also in recent weeks been invoking a $2.5 billion renovation of the Fed's headquarters as a way to question the chair's management of the institution. Trump played down his displeasure with the Fed chair during a visit to the construction project last week, saying of firing Powell: "To do that is a big move, and I just don't think it's necessary." Asked last Thursday what might lead him to back off the barrage of critiques that Trump has been leveling against Powell for weeks, the president said, "I'd love him to lower interest rates," before patting Powell on the back. But today Trump turned back to a harsher view of the Fed chair in a new social media post. "Jerome 'Too Late' Powell has done it again!!! He is TOO LATE, and actually, TOO ANGRY, TOO STUPID, & TOO POLITICAL, to have the job of Fed Chair." At his press conference Wednesday afternoon, Powell declined to comment in detail on the president's critiques. He said the president's recent visit was an honor and defended central bank independence. He said any rate cuts this fall will depend on "the totality of the evidence" as part of his message that inflation remains above target and that his goal is to ensure that short-term price hikes from tariffs don't become long-term problems. "We're going to be looking at a lot of data" between now and the next meeting, Powell said. "We'll see where that takes us." Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio

Letters to the Editor: Criticism of Israel on college campuses isn't inherently antisemitic
Letters to the Editor: Criticism of Israel on college campuses isn't inherently antisemitic

Los Angeles Times

time15 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Letters to the Editor: Criticism of Israel on college campuses isn't inherently antisemitic

To the editor: The U.S. government has pressured Columbia University to pay fines and introduce controversial policies because of what it labels antisemitism ('Columbia genocide scholar may leave over new definition of antisemitism. She's not alone,' July 28). But criticism of the Israeli government's policies, and of the country itself, is not a reflection of antisemitism, just as criticism of the United States and its Republican-majority government and its policies is not anti-Christian. Both countries allow dissent, and we have witnessed massive protests against both governments by citizens of all stripes. Two things can be true at once. Hamas militants committed heinous crimes in Israel on Oct. 7, 2023, while Israel is arguably committing crimes against humanity in Gaza. There is more than enough criticism to go around of atrocities committed by both Hamas and Israel. Feelings are running high on both sides, but students should not be suspended or expelled from universities for peacefully demonstrating against the Israeli government. As distasteful and disgusting as some statements have been, the 1st Amendment to the Constitution protects freedom of speech. Yet, the Trump administration's policies and actions are repressive to basic freedoms. It has taken one side, Israel's, while scapegoating the other. Richard Z. Fond, Sherman Oaks .. To the editor: Marianne Hirsch, daughter of Holocaust survivors and Columbia scholar, correctly opposed President Trump's inclusion of criticism of Israel in defining antisemitism. Thousands of Jews worldwide are anti-Zionist (as in, disapproving of Israel's occupation of Palestinian-sought territories) and we can rest assured they're likely not antisemitic. With Columbia University's suspension or expulsion of nearly 80 students who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations, we may reasonably fear that President Trump is steadily marching toward making pro-Palestinian or anti-Zionist protest or commentary a detainable offense for any citizen. Phil Barnes, San Pedro .. To the editor: The federal shakedown of universities continues. Cornell, Harvard — and now the White House extortion ring has come for the West Coast ('UCLA violated Jewish students' civil rights with 'deliberate indifference,' feds say,' July 29). The government wants to suppress free speech and student protests. It wants to intimidate the faculty's teaching and writing. Instead of opening young minds to opposing views and critical thinking, it wants to impose a government group-think mentality and stifle free expression. Blackmailers are never satisfied. They return at the slightest perceived infraction. Don't let the Trump administration hit the mute button in higher education. Donna Sloan, Los Angeles .. To the editor: One would have thought the Democrats would have been the defenders of the 1964 Civil Rights Act that makes it illegal to discriminate against race, color or religion, whether in the workplace or on school campuses. Not so. It took the Republicans to take action against antisemitism on college campuses. While Democrats took the 'see no evil, hear no evil, speak no evil' stance against antisemitism, Republicans are actually doing something about it. Neil Snow, Manhattan Beach .. To the editor: How truly sad to see the Department of Justice leveling such charges against my alma mater. Former UCLA Chancellor Gene D. Block's attempts to control the chaotic situation may have not worked as successfully as hoped, but to assert that the situation was due to antisemitic bias on the part of the campus administration seems like a ridiculous stretch. Noel Johnson, Glendale

Trump lashes out at Powell over rate decision with stream of insults
Trump lashes out at Powell over rate decision with stream of insults

Axios

time15 minutes ago

  • Axios

Trump lashes out at Powell over rate decision with stream of insults

President Trump on Thursday unleashed a fiery reaction after the Federal Reserve held interest rates steady, blasting Fed chair Jerome Powell with a stream of insults and suggesting corruption in the renovation of the central bank's headquarters. Why it matters: Trump's rage at the Fed's resistance to cut rates has twice taken him to the verge of trying to fire Powell, both times scaring markets and raising concerns about the central bank's independence. Driving the news: The Fed left interest rates unchanged Wednesday, keeping them in a range of 4.25% to 4.5% and suggesting caution on any further cuts this year. Trump has repeatedly insisted rates should be lower, down to 1% or less. What they're saying: "He is TOO LATE, and actually, TOO ANGRY, TOO STUPID, & TOO POLITICAL, to have the job of Fed Chair," Trump said in a Truth Social post. "He is costing our Country TRILLIONS OF DOLLARS, in addition to one of the most incompetent, or corrupt, renovations of a building(s) in the history of construction!" Powell has taken little public notice of Trump's long series of personal insults, and repeatedly insisted he was focused on doing his job. Flashback: Earlier this month, the administration set up the issue of cost overruns in the $2.5 billion headquarters renovation project as a possible pretext to firing Powell for cause.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store