‘All Crew Muslim': Ships sailing through Red Sea look to dodge Houthi attacks with messages
The Red Sea is a critical waterway for oil and commodities but traffic has dropped sharply since Houthi attacks off Yemen's coast began in November 2023 in what the Iran-aligned group said was in solidarity with Palestinians in the Gaza war.
The group sank two ships this week after months of calm and its leader Abdul Malik al-Houthi reiterated there would be no passage for any company transporting goods connected to Israel.
In recent days more ships sailing through the southern Red Sea and the narrow Bab al-Mandab strait have added messages to their AIS public tracking profiles that can be seen when clicking on a vessel.
Messages have included referring to an all-Chinese crew and management, and flagging the presence of armed guards on board.
"All Crew Muslim," read one message, while others made clear the ships had no connection to Israel, according to MarineTraffic and LSEG ship-tracking AIS data.
Maritime security sources said this was a sign of growing desperation to avoid attack by Houthi commandos or deadly drones - but they also thought it was unlikely to make any difference.
Houthi intelligence preparation was "much deeper and forward-leaning", one source said.
Vessels in the broader fleets of both ships attacked and sunk by the Houthis this week had made calls to Israeli ports in the past year, shipping analysis showed.
Maritime security sources said even though shipping companies must step up due diligence on any tangential link to Israel before sailing through the Red Sea, the risk of attack was still high.
In March 2024, the Houthis hit the Chinese-operated tanker Huang Pu with ballistic missiles despite previously saying they would not attack Chinese vessels, the US Central Command said.
The Houthis have also targeted vessels trading with Russia.
"Despite declared ceasefires, areas such as the Red Sea and Bab al-Mandab Strait remain designated high-risk by underwriters," insurance broker Aon said in a report this week.
"Ongoing monitoring and adaptive security measures are essential for ship operators."
The insurance cost of shipping goods through the Red Sea has more than doubled since this week's attacks, with some underwriters pausing cover for some voyages.
The number of daily sailings through the strait, at the southern tip of the Red Sea and a gateway to the Gulf of Aden, was 35 vessels on July 10, 32 vessels on July 9, down from 43 on July 1, Lloyd's List Intelligence data showed.
That compares with a daily average of 79 sailings in October 2023, before Houthi attacks began.
"Seafarers are the backbone of global trade, keeping countries supplied with food, fuel and medicine. They should not have to risk their lives to do their job," the UK-based Seafarers' Charity said this week.
(Reporting by Jonathan Saul, additional reporting by Renee Maltezou, editing by Andrew Cawthorne)
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Indian Express
9 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Is India stepping in to China's maritime backyard? The answer is complex
Last week, India and the Philippines undertook a joint naval exercise in the West Philippine Sea — waters that fall within the broader South China Sea and are claimed by China. Though widely reported as a first, this wasn't the maiden India-Philippines patrol in the region; the two navies last conducted joint drills in the West Philippine Sea in 2021. Extensively covered in the international press, the latest exercise came on the eve of Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr's state visit to India, lending the event added political weight. To some observers, the move suggests a meaningful evolution of India's maritime posture. New Delhi has long avoided entanglement in Southeast Asia's territorial disputes. Despite its support for freedom of navigation in the regional littorals, India's naval engagement there has remained measured and largely symbolic. But as proponents of Indian force projection in the Indo-Pacific see it, last week's engagement suggests more than a subtle shift in Indian strategy — an indication of growing resolve in New Delhi to operate in Beijing's strategic backyard. Yet, it is plausible that this is not a geopolitical escalation by India. The exercise could well have been part of a routine overseas deployment to the Western Pacific — a gesture of solidarity rather than a major recalibration of maritime strategy. To start, the initiative appears driven not by India but by the Philippines. Facing mounting pressure from Beijing in its maritime backyard, Manila has, in recent years, deepened security ties with the United States, Japan, Australia, and France. Bringing India into the fold appears intended not so much to challenge China frontally, but rather as part of a broader hedging strategy to deter growing Chinese assertiveness in the South China Sea. This interpretation aligns with the official Philippine framing of the exercise. In an interaction with the press last week, Philippine Armed Forces Chief General Romeo Brawner described the joint sail as a step toward deterrence, citing the need for coalition-building with friendly nations to uphold the maritime order. While Manila has ramped up joint patrols with the United States and other partners, its rationale for naval engagement with India seems somewhat different. India is not a treaty ally; it neither stations forces in Southeast Asia nor seeks to contain China in the Western Pacific. For Manila, cooperation with India is valuable because it signals support for Philippine sovereignty beyond its traditional alliances. While China's maritime disagreements extend across the region — from Vietnam and Malaysia to Brunei and Taiwan — its friction with the Philippines is particularly fraught. Beijing views Manila's efforts to internationalise the South China Sea dispute, particularly its hosting of US forces under the Enhanced Defense Cooperation Agreement, as deliberately provocative. Even Manila's recent decision to sign a defence pact with Lithuania, ostensibly to 'build a coalition against aggression,' was viewed in Beijing as an affront. Not surprisingly, Chinese ships reportedly shadowed Indian and Philippine warships last week, although no untoward incident occurred. Crucially, India approaches the region with a different calculus. As a proponent of a rules-based maritime order, New Delhi has consistently advocated freedom of navigation and peaceful resolution of disputes in the South China Sea. Indian planners recognise the importance of presence, but deployments are still carefully calibrated, emphasising partnership over provocation. This reflects a clear strain of geopolitical pragmatism. New Delhi realises it is not a party to the regional disputes and avoids involvement in matters that do not directly affect its strategic interests. While Indian policymakers acknowledge China's propensity for coercive behaviour, they also recognise its significant military edge in the region. Indian naval strategists understand that the People's Liberation Army Navy has developed formidable infrastructure on artificial islands and exercises effective control over key waterways. They know Beijing retains the capacity to impose costs on foreign navies operating in contested spaces. Importantly, India and China have long sought to preserve a delicate balance in the Indo-Pacific. While rivalry persists — particularly along the Himalayan frontier and in the Indian Ocean — the two Asian powers have steered clear of actions in the maritime commons that could be construed as overt containment. The calculus is straightforward: by avoiding military posturing in each other's near seas, both sides aim to keep their red lines intact. That logic has broadly held for the past decade, even as Chinese presence in the Indian Ocean has steadily expanded. Beijing's growing footprint west of Malacca is a concern, but not yet a crisis. Crucially, China has refrained from challenging India in South Asia, where New Delhi's strategic equities are strongest and its deterrent posture most credible. Meanwhile, India's defence relationship with the Philippines has grown significantly — most visibly through the sale of BrahMos supersonic cruise missiles — even as New Delhi has been careful to project itself as a credible security partner, not a China antagonist. With a substantial share of Indian trade passing through the Malacca Strait, New Delhi has largely framed its presence in terms of economics, connectivity, and regional goodwill. To be sure, should China cross certain thresholds — say, by militarising the Andaman Sea or establishing permanent military facilities in the Indian Ocean — India would almost certainly revisit its South China Sea posture. Until then, however, a strategic shift east of Malacca remains unlikely. The recent sail with the Philippines is best seen as a gesture: One that signals India's interest in regional stability and support for a partner under pressure, without upending its longstanding policy of cautious engagement in the South China Sea. It is a diplomatic message wrapped in maritime symbolism — a demonstration of solidarity, not a sabre rattled in warning. The writer is a retired naval officer and former Head of the maritime policy initiative at ORF, New Delhi


Time of India
18 minutes ago
- Time of India
Gary Bettman and Matthew Tkachuk join Donald Trump's presidential sports council as NHL's diversity promises face backlash
Gary Bettman and Matthew Tkachuk join Donald Trump's presidential sports council as NHL's diversity promises face backlashn(Image via Getty) Gary Bettman and Matthew Tkachuk have surprised many by agreeing to serve on US president Donald Trump's sports council. On July 30, 2025, the White House in Washington, D.C., announced that NHL Commissioner Gary Bettman and Florida Panthers captain Matthew Tkachuk would advise the president on sports policy. The council will focus on restoring tradition in college athletics and other national sports issues. The move raises questions because the NHL has championed inclusion and diversity. Why would league leaders team up with a group known for opposing policies that protect minority and LGBTQ+ athletes? Fans wonder what this means for hockey's promise of respect and fairness. Gary Bettman joins Donald Trump's council while NHL talks inclusion Commissioner Gary Bettman wrote in the NHL's first diversity and inclusion report on October 20, 2022, from the league office in New York that diverse voices help the sport grow. He said, 'Diverse representation within inclusive environments is proven to advance innovation, creativity, and decision-making.' The report showed NHL staff were about 84 percent white and 93 percent straight. In February 2023, during the All-Star Game in Sunrise, Florida, the league planned a career fair to hire people from different communities; the event was canceled after the Florida governor called it unfair. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Gold Loan At 82.5 Paisa* Per Month / Pay Just 82.5 paisa* per monthly Interest Manappuram Finance Learn More Undo In June 2023, Gary Bettman removed Pride jerseys that some players refused to wear, calling the debate 'a distraction.' Some teams held talks with local groups to explain the report. These moves left fans asking if the league truly values inclusion. Matthew Tkachuk and Gary Bettman face criticism for supporting anti-LGBTQ+ views Matthew Tkachuk will join meetings at the White House to talk about sports and college rules. Matthew Tkachuk said, 'I look forward to sharing ideas,' in a statement on July 31, 2025. His choice to join a council that plans to keep transgender women out of women's sports troubles many fans. The NCAA says there are fewer than ten transgender athletes in college sports. Also Read: Matthew Tkachuk and Wayne Gretzky team up with Donald Trump to revive iconic Presidential Fitness Test for youth Harrison Browne, the first transgender player in professional hockey, told The Guardian on August 2, 2025, that he felt hurt by Bettman and Tkachuk's decision. Browne wrote in The Walrus in April 2025 that giving trans athletes locker-room options shows respect. He said, 'Seeing Bettman and Tkachuk join a council targeting marginalized communities is deeply disturbing and a step back for hockey.' However, now Gary Bettman runs the chance of making hockey seem dangerous for LGBTQ+ players and spectators by collaborating with Donald Trump, who is renowned for supporting anti-trans legislation. On August 1, many fans turned to social media to voice their unhappiness using the hashtag #FairPlayForAll. This demonstrates that sports and politics combine in manners that might cause confusion. Catch Rani Rampal's inspiring story on Game On, Episode 4. Watch Here!


Indian Express
31 minutes ago
- Indian Express
India doesn't need more linguistic nationalism — it needs scalable AI-powered classrooms
Sridhar Vembu, co-founder of Zoho, has been calling for Indians to work in native languages, claiming India's talent, including in tech, is held back by linguistic barriers. '95 per cent of Indians are not fluent in English,' he states. The case for linguistic confidence has merit, but Vembu's myopic argument stems from nationalistic sentiment rather than the path to opportunity. An innovator is gate-keeping AI's capacity to immediately and affordably overcome all language challenges. When leaders with the means to effect on-ground change tell students they don't need to learn English or gain foreign degrees, they omit to mention that both are what got them a seat at the negotiating table of the $4.9 trillion global tech industry. It is not that our students have an inherent inability to learn, but that our techno-educational pipeline cannot teach them. They have not been provided with credible, available, and meritorious learning opportunities. In the 2009 Programme for International Student Assessment (which tests & ranks global education systems), India ranked 72nd out of 73. By boycotting subsequent assessments, we abdicated accountability that undermines showy calls for AI-driven reform. Claiming students don't need the positioning resurrects feudal structures that keep the oppressed reliant on those who do have the currency and negotiability of a global lingua franca. India faces a staggering teacher shortage of approximately 1.5 million educators, leading to overcrowded classrooms; 1.2 lakh schools operate with a single teacher, 89 per cent located in rural areas. Tech leaders citing China's linguistic nationalism forget it has a single script with idiomatic dialect variations. Government-funded scholarships enable their students to conduct research overseas and repatriate their learnings. India has 780 languages and 68 scripts. China has over $1 billion invested in AI education, with 99 per cent of Chinese university faculty and students now using AI tools, 60 per cent frequently. Through the USA's robust public library system, internet access, laptops, sometimes even MacBooks, are made accessible. Instead of enabling such innovations, our techbros are caught in nationalistic debates rich with excuses. Today, what matters more than anything is how we leverage AI immediately. India's Sarvam AI models process code-mixed content in 10 languages with 97 per cent accuracy, including the open-source Shuka v1 audio model. Its content can reflect real-world Indian language usage, handle complex educational terminology, and run efficiently on edge devices, including smartphones. Sarvam is already tasked with building India's sovereign foundational model under the IndiaAI Mission. Organisations like Rocket Learning are already using AI in childhood education, with 75 per cent of children becoming school-ready, while the AICTE's 'Anuvadini' tool supports 22 regional languages. Such progress removes needless linguistic divisiveness. Integrating multiple emergent open-access agentic technologies can transform our education systems overnight with political will and industry focus. There is no longer any excuse for not implementing widespread education reform. From public information messaging to highly specialised technical education, it is possible to customise lessons, automate recursive testing, standardise grading and disseminate it widely. All any village in India needs is electricity, wifi and a smartphone. Regionality is a cocoon of caste and class divisions. AI disrupts this. Real-time translation capabilities offer learners multilingual capacity, and the artificial scarcity of access disappears. Just as English historically offered a neutral modality, thousands of Indians took to the binary coding language precisely because it enabled them to adopt a vocabulary that was mathematically impersonal and logically freeing. Such neutrality is what enables unprecedented social mobility. India needs hypermobility, not hyperregionality. We need to eliminate the false choice between cultural authenticity and educational advancement. AI-powered Intelligent Interactive Teaching Systems (IITS) can personalise learning, generate educational content, and eliminate knowledge gaps dynamically. UNICEF India's research confirms that AI-powered tools can adapt to each child's pace regardless of linguistic background. Unlike human teachers, AI systems can also work 24/7 and reach remote villages with a consistent quality for India's 1.5 million schools. While 60 per cent of school children in India cannot access online learning, mobile penetration is fast-paced: 58 per cent of higher-class students have smartphone access. This creates the opportunity for leapfrogging traditional educational infrastructure. The National Education Policy 2020 explicitly calls for AI integration at all educational levels. What we lack is the urgency to deploy at scale, and what we are getting are excuses galore. India can chuck the outdated Government-school model and switch to a digital library model. Equipped with internet and wifi, students of all ages can teach themselves with pre-loaded modules. An 80-year-old housewife, a 40-year-old farmer or a 20-year-old mechanic can go back to 'school' at any time of day and grab opportunities they never had. AI can provide feedback in real-time, freeing limited human teachers to mentor. India's youth don't need to be told what they don't need to learn or be advised to stay in their villages by those who had the choices to learn, leave, grow, and return. The power brokers who gained influence through access to knowledge don't get to construct barriers to prevent others from following suit. Critics cite infrastructure, data privacy, and implementation challenges. These are the problems to solve while deploying, not reasons to delay deployment. The question is no longer whether AI will transform Indian education, but whether we will act swiftly enough to push enough of our populace through on the momentum of this age, before they get left behind. Das is a Mysuru-based author, therapist, independent AI researcher & co-founder of Project Shunyata, a group that examines AI through the lens of Buddhist Philosophy