New home GST rebate will cost $1.9B, PBO report says
OTTAWA — Giving new homeowners a break will cost the government billions, a new report from Canada's fiscal watchdog says.
The report released Wednesday by the office of Parliamentary Budget Officer Yves Giroux says the key election pledge from Prime Minister Mark Carney offering new homebuyers full GST rebates on new homes valued under $1 million, and partial rebates for homes up to $1.5 million, will cost $1.9 billion over six years.
'Across its term, we project that the proposed rebate will provide rebates for about 71,711 purchases of new homes by first-time homebuyers purchasing homes valued under $1.5 million,' the report stated.
'This represents a subsidy averaging $26,832 for 4.8% of housing completions over this period.'
Carney's election promise, adapted from proposed policies touted by the Conservatives during this year's federal election campaign, is part of the government's plan to temper Canada's ongoing cost-of-living and affordability crisis.
GST relief on new homes could save 1st-time buyers up to $240 on mortgages: Report
Liberals vow to cut GST for first-time homebuyers purchasing homes for $1M or less
Bill C-4, the legislation intended to enact this policy, passed first reading in the House of Commons last Thursday.
Based on current trends and available home sales data, the report estimates the legislation will provide rebates for a little under 72,000 new homes valued under $1.5 million, representing an average subsidy of $26,832.
Over the program's six years, the report estimates about 1.5 million homes and apartments will be completed, of which 836,000 will end up in the ownership, condo and co-op markets.
Of those, the report estimates 407,948 will be purchased as primary residences, 81,146 of which will be eligible first-time homebuyers, and 77,253 will be under the $1.5-million value threshold.
A report issued last week by Desjardins Economics suggested the rebate could save new homebuyers up to $240 on their monthly mortgage payments on an all-in, tax-included price of a $1-million home, with a slightly smaller down payment.
bpassifiume@postmedia.com X: @bryanpassifiume
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Buzz Feed
2 hours ago
- Buzz Feed
Conservative Ideal America Video Goes Viral
If there's one thing conservatives love to do, it's making American cities feel like dangerous, scary trash heaps that are constantly burning to the ground. To them, New York is unlivable, Minneapolis was a war zone, and now, all eyes are on Los Angeles — a city Donald Trump claims was "once great" but is now being "invaded" by "illegal aliens and criminals." As someone who actually lives in LA, I can tell you that narrative is completely detached from reality. First of all, LA wasn't "once great" — it's always been great, and it's always been an immigrant city, which, contrary to conservative panic, isn't a flaw. It's the foundation. The name is LOS ANGELES, remember? Second of all, the city isn't under "attack" by "criminals and illegal aliens" — fear-mongering buzzwords the right loves to throw around to paint a false picture of chaos. Quite the opposite, actually. In truth, LA is hurting not because of its people, but because ICE is barging into homes and workplaces. The fear here isn't coming from the streets. It's coming from our own federal government. People have been protesting peacefully. Things didn't escalate until Trump sent in 4,000 National Guard troops and 700 Marines. Yesterday, a coworker told me what's usually a 12-minute drive home downtown took him half an hour because the National Guard, not protesters or even local police, were standing around clogging the streets. Even Gov. Gavin Newsom called the move "reckless," "pointless," and "disrespectful to our troops" in a post on X. "This isn't about public safety. It's about stroking a dangerous President's ego," he said. And yet, conservative media keeps pretending the city is being overrun by "insurrectionist mobs" (lest we forget who actually did storm the Capitol). Most people are still just trying to live their lives — working, commuting, taking care of their families — but now under the added weight of fear, anger, and disruption. The protests are mostly peaceful and, relative to the size of LA, contained. Genuinely, I don't think people realize how big this damn city is. It is not the same. Alas, this brings me to everyone's not-so-favorite conservative grifter: Charlie Kirk, who tried to contrast the moment by posting a clip of a "small town" set to the country song "Small Town USA." He wrote, "I wonder why America's small towns are so placid, lovely, and orderly. It's a total mystery." In the clip, a girl proudly shows off her idyllic idea of "small" town Americana. She shows us a covered porch with an American flag: A parade with American flag-waving locals: Cops on horseback: A pickup truck strolling by: A tractor strolling by: And, naturally, racks of American flag merch. She also takes us to a farmer's market. A lake house (with, you guessed it, more American flags). And a beach-themed bar. You get the picture: "placid," patriotic, white. As someone from Michigan myself, I instantly recognized the town; it's Rockford, MI, a wealthy suburb just outside Grand Rapids, the second largest city in the state. And many others did too, pointing out another crucial detail about this "lovely" little town: it voted blue in the last two presidential elections. "I love how every time these LARPers post 'small town' and 'real American' content to contrast with L.A. its always affluent suburbs that vote Democratic," one viral tweet said. Another pointed out: "because this town voted for harris by a 52–45 margin." Note: The Kent County margin was 52-46, rounded. Even former Republican Rep. Justin Amash weighed in: "This is Rockford, Michigan, which is a suburb of Grand Rapids, and part of the congressional district I represented. Rockford voted for Biden over Trump in 2020 and Harris over Trump in 2024. I didn't vote for any of those candidates. Just reporting the facts." Another person also remarked the absurdity of calling the area a "small town": "I love the framing of Rockford being a small town lol. 3rd biggest high school in GR and is essentially an annex of the city. But tractor on street." "This is clearly not a small town, which would be obvious if you'd ever spent time in one," another added. And while the county has recently leaned blue, it's still very white — Kent County is 72% white, compared to the national average of 58%. That might explain why Charlie Kirk was drawn to the video in the first place, which, notably, featured almost no Black or brown people. "So what Charlie Kirk is implying here is that small American towns are nice because there are no brown people," one person tweeted. "They don't even hide the blatant racism anymore," added another. All in all, this tweet may have said it best: "People who live in small towns are scared of cities, and people who live in cities are scared of small towns. People who have lived in both are only scared of small towns." As someone who's lived in both small towns (in Michigan too!) and now Los Angeles, I can't say I disagree. But, as always, let me know your thoughts in the comments.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Thursday's Mini-Report, 6.12.25
Today's edition of quick hits. * The latest on the Air India crash: 'Rescue workers in India were searching for survivors Thursday after a plane carrying 242 people crashed shortly after takeoff into a building where medical students were sitting down to lunch. The police commissioner for the city of Ahmedabad said none of those aboard the London-bound Air India plane survived the crash. But local media reported that one man was able to escape the airliner alive.' * I ran out of time before I could write about this: 'The Republican-led House voted 214-212 on Thursday to pass a proposal from President Donald Trump to cancel $9.4 billion in previously approved federal funding. The 'rescissions' package would claw back $8.3 billion for foreign aid and $1.1 billion for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, which provides funding to NPR and PBS.' * At the White House: 'President Donald Trump signed three resolutions on Thursday barring California from mandating electric vehicle sales and setting tailpipe emissions standards designed to galvanize the transition away from combustion engines.' * A victim of Trump's trade policies: 'A key supplier to Nissan and Jeep owner Stellantis filed for bankruptcy protection, marking one of the first big companies to collapse under the weight of the Trump administration's tariffs.' * Imagine that: 'Protests against immigration raids in Los Angeles have triggered a flood of falsehoods and conspiracy theories online, and Russia has sought to exploit and amplify them, experts say.' * A 'review' worth watching closely: 'The Trump administration is reviewing whether a deal to equip Australia with nuclear submarines is 'aligned with the president's America First agenda,' sowing doubt on the future of a landmark agreement meant to counter China's rise in the Asia Pacific.' * I'm not an attorney, but at face value, it looks to me as if the officers have a strong case: 'Two police officers who defended the Capitol during the Jan. 6, 2021 attack filed a federal civil lawsuit, asking a judge to order the hanging of a plaque to honor police heroes who protected the Capitol, lawmakers and staff from rioters.' * Important research: 'States with permissive gun laws experienced a rise in pediatric deaths from firearm injuries between 2011 and 2023, whereas states with stricter laws did not. That's according to a new study published in JAMA Pediatrics.' * Conservatives are against boycotts, except when they're not: 'Some supporters of President Donald Trump are calling for a Walmart boycott after an heiress to the nation's largest retailer took out an ad in the New York Times to promote a protest of the president's policies.' See you tomorrow. This article was originally published on
Hamilton Spectator
3 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Canada's wildfire season on track to be the second worst on record
OTTAWA—The 2025 wildfire season is on track to be Canada's second-worst on record, federal officials said Thursday, as hundreds of fires burn across Ontario and Western Canada and smoke blankets some urban centres. Approximately 3.7 million hectares of land have burned so far in Canada, only second at this point of the wildfire season to the devastating 2023 fires during which 15 million hectares were ravaged and more than 200,000 Canadians were forced to flee. Current forecasts expect higher-than-normal temperatures across the country and a 'hot and dry' summer. The highest wildfire risk remains in Western and Northern Canada. 'We are clearly experiencing and maybe in store for a challenging year, but I would hesitate drawing too many comparisons to 2023 at this point,' Michael Norton, director general at Natural Resources Canada's northern forestry centre, told reporters. That's because a 'slight downturn' in fire activity is expected this month, and drought conditions were worse and several large fires happened at the same time that year. Ottawa has so far received three requests for federal assistance, two in Manitoba and one in Ontario, as Prime Minister Mark Carney last Sunday deployed Canadian Armed Forces aircraft and personnel to help emergency personnel in the northwest of the province. Around 500 international forest firefighters have come from the U.S. and Australia, and more than 100 more are coming from Costa Rica. Still, long-debated plans for a national emergency response agency or wildfire firefighting service do not appear to be in sight, with federal officials saying Thursday the matter was still being considered. 'One of the things that we want to make sure is that we don't end up spending a lot of time and effort duplicating services that are already available and that already work very well,' Emergency Preparedness Minister Eleanor Olszewski told reporters during a news conference on the wildfire situation. The update comes as Canada prepares to host international leaders, including U.S. President Donald Trump, for the G7 Summit in Kananaskis, Alta. this weekend. Wildfires are expected to be one of several subjects discussed at the summit. Olszewski told reporters that G7 countries have already agreed in principle to a 'wildfire charter' that would include an international agreement on how wildfires should be dealt with globally. Federal cabinet ministers also faced several questions about the Carney government's decision to try to cut short debate and pass Bill C-5, its legislation that would give the government new powers to evade existing laws and regulations to fast-track 'nation-building' development projects, through the House of Commons by the end of next week. The Carney government on Thursday put forward a motion that would only give one day of hearings from civil society groups, stakeholders and experts next week, many of which have raised concerns about Indigenous consultation and environmental protections.
