EPA to rollback 'forever chemical' rule, extend timelines
forever chemicals
" known as PFAS found in many household items, but will maintain current limits on two of these chemicals, it announced on Wednesday.
Dubbed "forever chemicals" because they do not easily break down in the human body or environment, PFAS are found in hundreds of consumer and commercial products, including non-stick pans, cosmetics, firefighting foams and stain-resistant clothing.
The rule finalized last year by the EPA under the Biden administration had set limits for five individual PFAS chemicals: PFOA, PFOS, PFNA, PFHxS, and HFPO-DA.
It gave all public water systems three years to complete monitoring for these chemicals and required them to inform the public of the level of PFAS measured in their drinking water.
In cases where PFAS chemicals are found at levels that exceed the standards, the water systems were required to install systems to reduce PFAS in their drinking water by 2029.
Under the new proposal under President Donald Trump, the EPA would allow drinking water systems more time to develop plans for addressing PFOA and PFOS and extend the compliance date for those two PFAS chemicals to 2031.
It would also rescind the regulations and reconsider the regulatory determinations for the other three PFAS chemicals.
EPA plans to issue a proposed rule this fall and finalize it by spring 2026.
"This will support water systems across the country, including small systems in rural communities, as they work to address these contaminants," EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin said in a statement. "EPA will also continue to use its regulatory and enforcement tools to hold polluters accountable."
Separately, the state of New Jersey on Tuesday announced what it called the largest statewide PFAS settlement of $450 million in the state's history with chemicals producer 3M.
The EPA also announced on Wednesday it will launch a campaign called PFAS OUT to connect with every public water utility known to need capital improvements to address PFAS in their system.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
21 minutes ago
- Business Standard
BPCL buys 10 mn barrels of US crude oil through five-month tender
India's state-run Bharat Petroleum Corp has awarded a five-month tender for 10 million barrels of U.S. oil to European trader Glencore, two people with knowledge of the matter said, aiding India's efforts to deepen energy ties with Washington. India, the world's third-largest oil importer, is increasing imports from the United States as negotiations for a bilateral trade agreement continue. Under the deal, Glencore will deliver 2 million barrels of WTI Midland crude per month from November to March to the Indian refiner, the sources said, doubling the volume BPCL imported under its previous tender. Indian refiners and traders do not comment on oil trade issues citing confidentiality. The increased imports are expected to support India's efforts to narrow its trade surplus with the U.S., which stood at $45.7 billion last year. Trade tensions between India and the United States have escalated sharply in the last few weeks, with U.S. President Donald Trump imposing a 25% tariff on Indian goods starting August 7 and threatening similar measures over the Asian country's continued purchases of Russian oil. During Prime Minister Narendra Modi's visit to Washington in February, India pledged to raise U.S. energy purchases from $10 billion to $25 billion, with both nations targeting $500 billion in bilateral trade by 2030. Indian refiners have already increased imports of U.S. oil from the spot markets on improved arbitrage economics of sending Atlantic Basin grades to Asia. Refiners also plan to raise imports of cooking gas from the U.S. from 2026, while the federal government is looking at eliminating import tax on propane and liquefied natural gas purchases from the U.S. (Reporting by Nidhi Verma; Editing by Tomasz Janowski and Rachna Uppal)
India.com
21 minutes ago
- India.com
32,000 US soldiers, including Marine Corps, US Army...: Why Trump-Putin meeting is taking place at Elmendorf-Richardson base? It was built in...
(File) Trump-Putin meeting: The entire world is eagerly awaiting the outcome of a critical summit between US President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin as the meeting is likely to decide whether there will be a ceasefire deal in the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war, and what concessions both sides would be willing to give. Where is Trump-Putin meeting taking place? The key Trump-Putin summit will take place Friday at the Elmendorf-Richardson base, a snow-covered US military base in Alaska, which played a vital role during the Cold War era. According to media reports, the Elmendorf-Richardson base, located near Anchorage, Alaska's largest city, is home to more than 32,000 military personnel and their families, including personnel from the US Army, US Navy, US Air Force, the Marine Corps, as well as the US National Guard and Reserve Forces. What makes the Alaska base so special? The Elmendorf-Richardson base in Alaska has a rich history, and played an important role in US' defense against the erstwhile Soviet Union during the Cold War era. The White House was initially hesitant to place a Russian leader at a strategic US military base, but had limited options, as the Elmendorf-Richardson base is the only military installation in Alaska that can be locked down to the security level required for such a critical meeting. The base is essentially an impregnable fortress guarded by thousands of US soldiers and advanced weapons systems, including air defense networks. The Trump-Putin meeting will be the second instance when a foreign leader has visited the installation for a meeting with the US President. In 1971, then US President Nixon held a historic 30-minute meeting with Emperor Hirohito of Japan at the snowy base, which is surrounded by wild fauna like grizzly bears, moose and wolves. When was the base built? The Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson (JBER) was officially established in 2010, when Elmendorf Air Force Base and Fort Richardson were merged together to build a joint base. However, installation has a much longer history with Fort Richardson being established in 1940, while construction of the Elmendorf Field, later renamed as Elmendorf Air Force Base, also began in the same year.
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
Melania Trump slaps Hunter Biden with $1 billion threat over explosive Epstein allegations - here's what he said
Melania Trump has taken legal action against Hunter Biden : After Hunter Biden made shocking comments linking Melania Trump to Jeffrey Epstein , she took strong legal action against him. The first lady's lawyers have made a formal request for an apology and retraction, saying that a lawsuit for more than $1 billion in damages could follow. The controversy has gotten a lot of people talking and started up old arguments about the power and dangers of public statements when they are in the political spotlight. Melania Trump wants Hunter Biden to take back what he said about Jeffrey Epstein introducing her to Donald Trump. Her lawyers say the claims are "false, defamatory, and extremely damaging," and they warn that she could be sued for $1 billion. Biden's inaction has worsened the public and legal battle over reputations and political stories, as per a report by Fox News. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Gold Is Surging in 2025 — Smart Traders Are Already In IC Markets Learn More Undo What did Hunter Biden say about Melania Trump? Hunter Biden talked to journalist Andrew Callaghan in early August and said that Jeffrey Epstein was the one who introduced Melania Trump to Donald Trump. Biden said that Michael Wolff, a writer known for his controversial and often disputed political writings, gave him this information. ALSO READ: Betrayal? Outrage erupts as Trump reportedly makes secret Alaska natural resource offer to Putin Live Events Biden talked about what he thought were "wide and deep" ties between the Trumps and Epstein during the interview. These comments quickly spread online, gaining traction on social media and being repeated in many news stories. Melania Trump's legal team quickly responded with anger, as per a report by The AP News. What has Melania Trump done legally? On August 6, lawyer Alejandro Brito, who was representing the first lady, sent a letter to Biden and his lawyer Abbe Lowell that was very strong. Brito asked for an immediate retraction, a public apology, and the removal of the statements from all platforms in the letter. ALSO READ: Orca attack mystery: What really happened to marine trainer Jessica Radcliffe The letter says that Biden is spreading false information that came from Wolff's reporting, which has since been retracted. Brito said that these kinds of comments have caused "overwhelming financial and reputational harm" to Mrs. Trump and warned that if they don't stop, they will be sued for more than $1 billion in damages. Earlier in August, the former first son stated in the "Hunter Biden Returns" video interview that "Epstein introduced Melania to Trump." The connections are really deep and extensive. Biden additionally stated that "Jeffrey Epstein introduced Melania, and that's how Melania and the first lady and the President met," as quoted in a report by Fox News. Brito also told Biden to keep all evidence, such as emails and records about Melania Trump, and stressed that destroying or changing materials could have serious legal consequences, as per a report by Fox News. Why is this argument getting so much attention? There are a few reasons why this legal case has gotten a lot of attention. First, it involves two well-known political families that are already under a lot of media attention. Second, the claim brings up the very controversial and sensitive subject of Jeffrey Epstein's network. ALSO READ: Microsoft eyes remote work crackdown, office return could be imminent - here's what it means for staff Sources close to Melania Trump's team say that Biden has also missed the August 7 deadline to retract. These sources say that Biden's camp leaked the demand letter to a reporter, which they see as a sign that they are worried about being held responsible. A Little Background on the Claims The statement in question comes from journalist Michael Wolff, who has made similar claims in the past. The Daily Beast published Wolff's claims, but after Melania Trump's lawyers sent them a cease-and-desist letter, they apologized to her and took down the article. After getting a legal complaint from Trump's lawyers, political strategist James Carville also apologized on the air and took down related content. What's Next? Melania Trump's team looks ready to move forward with a lawsuit because Biden has not yet met their demands. If the case goes to court, it could test the limits of U.S. law when it comes to defaming public figures, which is a very high bar. The situation is still not resolved, and it could have legal and political effects that go beyond the people involved. The first lady says that her autobiography, Melania, tells the true story of how she met Donald Trump: at a 1998 New York Fashion Week party with modeling agent Paolo Zampolli. FAQs What has Melania Trump accused Hunter Biden of? She claims Biden made false and damaging remarks about her and Jeffrey Epstein, which harmed her reputation. What action has Melania Trump threatened? Her lawyers have threatened a $1 billion lawsuit if Biden does not retract and apologize.
