logo
If people stopped having babies, how long would it be before humans were all gone?

If people stopped having babies, how long would it be before humans were all gone?

(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.)
If people stopped having babies, how long would it be before humans were all gone? – Jeffrey
Very few people live beyond a century. So, if no one had babies anymore, there would probably be no humans left on Earth within 100 years. But first, the population would shrink as older folks died and no one was being born.
Even if all births were to suddenly cease, this decline would start slowly.
Eventually there would not be enough young people coming of age to do essential work, causing societies throughout the world to quickly fall apart. Some of these breakdowns would be in humanity's ability to produce food, provide health care and do everything else we all rely on.
Food would become scarce even though there would be fewer people to feed.
As an anthropology professor who has spent his career studying human behavior, biology and cultures, I readily admit that this would not be a pretty picture. Eventually, civilization would crumble. It's likely that there would not be many people left within 70 or 80 years, rather than 100, due to shortages of food, clean water, prescription drugs and everything else that you can easily buy today and need to survive.
Sudden change could follow a catastrophe
To be sure, an abrupt halt in births is highly unlikely unless there's a global catastrophe. Here's one potential scenario, which writer Kurt Vonnegut explored in his novel 'Galapagos ': A highly contagious disease could render all people of reproductive age infertile – meaning that no one would be capable of having babies anymore.
Another possibility might be a nuclear war that no one survives – a topic that's been explored in many scary movies and books.
A lot of these works are science fiction involving a lot of space travel. Others seek to predict a less fanciful Earth-bound future where people can no longer reproduce easily, causing collective despair and the loss of personal freedom for those who are capable of having babies.
Two of my favorite books along these lines are ' The Handmaid's Tale,' by Canadian writer Margaret Atwood, and ' The Children of Men,' by British writer P.D. James. They are dystopian stories, meaning that they take place in an unpleasant future with a great deal of human suffering and disorder. And both have become the basis of television series and movies.
In the 1960s and 1970s, many people also worried that there would be too many people on Earth, which would cause different kinds of catastrophes. Those scenarios also became the focus of dystopian books and movies.
Heading toward 10 billion people
To be sure, the number of people in the world is still growing, even though the pace of that growth has slowed down. Experts who study population changes predict that the total will peak at 10 billion in the 2080s, up from 8 billion today and 4 billion in 1974.
The U.S. population currently stands at 342 million. That's about 200 million more people than were here when I was born in the 1930s. This is a lot of people, but both worldwide and in the U.S. these numbers could gradually fall if more people die than are born.
About 3.6 million babies were born in the U.S. in 2024, down from 4.1 million in 2004. Meanwhile, about 3.3 million people died in 2022, up from 2.4 million 20 years earlier.
One thing that will be important as these patterns change is whether there's a manageable balance between young people and older people. That's because the young often are the engine of society. They tend to be the ones to implement new ideas and produce everything we use.
Also, many older people need help from younger people with basic activities, like cooking and getting dressed. And a wide range of jobs are more appropriate for people under 65 rather than those who have reached the typical age for retirement.
Declining birth rates
In many countries, women are having fewer children throughout their reproductive lives than used to be the case. That reduction is the most stark in several countries, including India and South Korea.
The declines in birth rates occurring today are largely caused by people choosing not to have any children or as many as their parents did. That kind of population decline can be kept manageable through immigration from other countries, but cultural and political concerns often stop that from happening.
At the same time, many men are becoming less able to father children due to fertility problems. If that situation gets much worse, it could contribute to a steep decline in population.
Neanderthals went extinct
Our species, Homo sapiens, has been around for at least 200,000 years. That's a long time, but like all animals on Earth we are at risk of becoming extinct.
Consider what happened to the Neanderthals, a close relative of Homo sapiens. They first appeared at least 400,000 years ago. Our modern human ancestors overlapped for a while with the Neanderthals, who gradually declined to become extinct about 40,000 years ago.
Some scientists have found evidence that modern humans were more successful at reproducing our numbers than the Neanderthal people. This occurred when Homo sapiens became more successful at providing food for their families and also having more babies than the Neanderthals.
If humans were to go extinct, it could open up opportunities for other animals to flourish on Earth. On the other hand, it would be sad for humans to go away because we would lose all of the great achievements people have made, including in the arts and science.
In my view, we need to take certain steps to ensure that we have a long future on our own planet. These include controlling climate change and avoiding wars. Also, we need to appreciate the fact that having a wide array of animals and plants makes the planet healthy for all creatures, including our own species.
Hello, curious kids! Do you have a question you'd like an expert to answer? Ask an adult to send your question to CuriousKidsUS@theconversation.com. Please tell us your name, age and the city where you live.
And since curiosity has no age limit – adults, let us know what you're wondering, too. We won't be able to answer every question, but we will do our best.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

If people stopped having babies, how long would it be before humans were all gone?
If people stopped having babies, how long would it be before humans were all gone?

San Francisco Chronicle​

time5 hours ago

  • San Francisco Chronicle​

If people stopped having babies, how long would it be before humans were all gone?

(The Conversation is an independent and nonprofit source of news, analysis and commentary from academic experts.) If people stopped having babies, how long would it be before humans were all gone? – Jeffrey Very few people live beyond a century. So, if no one had babies anymore, there would probably be no humans left on Earth within 100 years. But first, the population would shrink as older folks died and no one was being born. Even if all births were to suddenly cease, this decline would start slowly. Eventually there would not be enough young people coming of age to do essential work, causing societies throughout the world to quickly fall apart. Some of these breakdowns would be in humanity's ability to produce food, provide health care and do everything else we all rely on. Food would become scarce even though there would be fewer people to feed. As an anthropology professor who has spent his career studying human behavior, biology and cultures, I readily admit that this would not be a pretty picture. Eventually, civilization would crumble. It's likely that there would not be many people left within 70 or 80 years, rather than 100, due to shortages of food, clean water, prescription drugs and everything else that you can easily buy today and need to survive. Sudden change could follow a catastrophe To be sure, an abrupt halt in births is highly unlikely unless there's a global catastrophe. Here's one potential scenario, which writer Kurt Vonnegut explored in his novel 'Galapagos ': A highly contagious disease could render all people of reproductive age infertile – meaning that no one would be capable of having babies anymore. Another possibility might be a nuclear war that no one survives – a topic that's been explored in many scary movies and books. A lot of these works are science fiction involving a lot of space travel. Others seek to predict a less fanciful Earth-bound future where people can no longer reproduce easily, causing collective despair and the loss of personal freedom for those who are capable of having babies. Two of my favorite books along these lines are ' The Handmaid's Tale,' by Canadian writer Margaret Atwood, and ' The Children of Men,' by British writer P.D. James. They are dystopian stories, meaning that they take place in an unpleasant future with a great deal of human suffering and disorder. And both have become the basis of television series and movies. In the 1960s and 1970s, many people also worried that there would be too many people on Earth, which would cause different kinds of catastrophes. Those scenarios also became the focus of dystopian books and movies. Heading toward 10 billion people To be sure, the number of people in the world is still growing, even though the pace of that growth has slowed down. Experts who study population changes predict that the total will peak at 10 billion in the 2080s, up from 8 billion today and 4 billion in 1974. The U.S. population currently stands at 342 million. That's about 200 million more people than were here when I was born in the 1930s. This is a lot of people, but both worldwide and in the U.S. these numbers could gradually fall if more people die than are born. About 3.6 million babies were born in the U.S. in 2024, down from 4.1 million in 2004. Meanwhile, about 3.3 million people died in 2022, up from 2.4 million 20 years earlier. One thing that will be important as these patterns change is whether there's a manageable balance between young people and older people. That's because the young often are the engine of society. They tend to be the ones to implement new ideas and produce everything we use. Also, many older people need help from younger people with basic activities, like cooking and getting dressed. And a wide range of jobs are more appropriate for people under 65 rather than those who have reached the typical age for retirement. Declining birth rates In many countries, women are having fewer children throughout their reproductive lives than used to be the case. That reduction is the most stark in several countries, including India and South Korea. The declines in birth rates occurring today are largely caused by people choosing not to have any children or as many as their parents did. That kind of population decline can be kept manageable through immigration from other countries, but cultural and political concerns often stop that from happening. At the same time, many men are becoming less able to father children due to fertility problems. If that situation gets much worse, it could contribute to a steep decline in population. Neanderthals went extinct Our species, Homo sapiens, has been around for at least 200,000 years. That's a long time, but like all animals on Earth we are at risk of becoming extinct. Consider what happened to the Neanderthals, a close relative of Homo sapiens. They first appeared at least 400,000 years ago. Our modern human ancestors overlapped for a while with the Neanderthals, who gradually declined to become extinct about 40,000 years ago. Some scientists have found evidence that modern humans were more successful at reproducing our numbers than the Neanderthal people. This occurred when Homo sapiens became more successful at providing food for their families and also having more babies than the Neanderthals. If humans were to go extinct, it could open up opportunities for other animals to flourish on Earth. On the other hand, it would be sad for humans to go away because we would lose all of the great achievements people have made, including in the arts and science. In my view, we need to take certain steps to ensure that we have a long future on our own planet. These include controlling climate change and avoiding wars. Also, we need to appreciate the fact that having a wide array of animals and plants makes the planet healthy for all creatures, including our own species. Hello, curious kids! Do you have a question you'd like an expert to answer? Ask an adult to send your question to CuriousKidsUS@ Please tell us your name, age and the city where you live. And since curiosity has no age limit – adults, let us know what you're wondering, too. We won't be able to answer every question, but we will do our best.

Semaine Québécoise de la Paternité - June 9-15 - Giving a voice to immigrant fathers
Semaine Québécoise de la Paternité - June 9-15 - Giving a voice to immigrant fathers

Yahoo

time8 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Semaine Québécoise de la Paternité - June 9-15 - Giving a voice to immigrant fathers

MONTREAL, June 9, 2025 /CNW/ - Difficulty in getting a decent job, adjusting to parenthood, family isolation – these are just a few of the many challenges facing immigrant fathers, whose immigration plans are often driven by the desire to offer their children and family a better future. To mark the Semaine Québécoise de la Paternité, Regroupement pour la Valorisation de la Paternité (RVP) is seeking to zero in on these challenges. With the support of a scientific committee, RVP analyzed data from the Québec Parenting Survey (QPS), a population-based survey conducted by the Institut de la statistique du Québec. Together with a close look at the results of several Quebec studies of immigrant fathers and their families, this brought to light four major issues: Immigrant fathers are better educated but poorer According to QPS data, 63% of immigrant fathers have a university degree, almost twice the proportion of Canadian-born fathers (34%), yet they are three times as likely to belong to a low-income household (26% of immigrant fathers, compared with 8% of Canadian-born fathers). "Access to employment to support the family is one of the most critical obstacles in their path, particularly in the first years as newcomers. Often, however, they suffer a loss of professional status, owing to the non-recognition of foreign credentials or the experience they gained in their home country, that forces them into precarious employment," stated Saïd Bergheul, a professor at Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue and a specialist in issues relating to immigrant fathers. Fathers derive greater satisfaction from their role as parents but experience greater parental stress Overall, 42% of immigrant fathers surveyed for the QPS reported a high level of satisfaction with their role as fathers, compared with 21% of Canadian-born fathers. However, more of them experience high parental stress (24% vs 20%). "For fathers, immigration often means new ways of looking after their children, but also the need to adapt their parenting practices. These fathers report greater involvement in their children's upbringing, as well as in helping them with schoolwork and their leisure and social activities. On the other hand, many fathers express incomprehension or fear about certain aspects of education in Quebec," explains Christine Gervais, a professor at Université du Québec en Outaouais and an immigration specialist. The people in their various circles are less available to help them Left without the support of their extended family back home, and often with a more limited social network, fathers and mothers from a migrant background often have to cope with a lack of support in their parenting role. Among the fathers who took part in the QPS, 59% said that the people in their various circles were not available to help them – a proportion twice as high as for Canadian-born fathers (28%). They have a stronger co-parenting relationship Compared with Canadian-born fathers, more immigrant fathers surveyed in the QPS reported high levels of support from their spouses (66% of immigrant fathers, compared with 51% of Canadian-born fathers). They are also more likely to say they are seldom or never criticized by their spouse (57% vs. 52%). "As a result of immigration, parents grow closer and feel that in the absence of their extended family they have to help each other get by. Many fathers thus become their spouse's main source of support during the transition to parenthood. They learn their new role with the help of their spouse," stated Christine Gervais. Welcoming and supporting immigrant fathers To better welcome and support immigrant fathers, RVP proposes the following: Provide better support for integrating immigrant fathers into their jobs, and help them to meet their family's basic needs; Support immigrant fathers in adapting to their role as fathers, and promote the father-child bond through appropriate interventions; Support the co-parenting relationship and its transformation, in particular by paying attention to each parent's specific circumstances; Help mitigate the effects of lack of support from extended family and friends by developing strategies with organizations that support immigrant families, including better promotion of and access to services and resources. "If immigrant fathers and their families are to find their place in our society, we must be sensitive to their realities and the very real challenges they face. The best way to do this is to give them their say and to listen to them attentively. They really have a lot to tell us, a big contribution to make," stated Raymond Villeneuve, executive director of Regroupement pour la Valorisation de la Paternité. What about the language question? According to EQP data, 85% of immigrant fathers in Quebec are able to carry on a conversation in French. However, 37% of them speak English and other languages at home, a proportion that increases to 45% for fathers who arrived in Canada less than 5 years ago. To meet the needs of immigrant fathers, it is important to take this reality into account. We invite you to consult the analysis and proposals document entitled Mieux comprendre la diversité des réalités des pères issus de l'immigration afin de mieux les soutenir et valoriser leur apport à la société québécoise. QPS highlights : About Regroupement pour la Valorisation de la Paternité RVP is a group of 250 organizations and individuals from all regions of Quebec whose mandate is to promote father engagement for the well-being of children, with a focus on family and with respect for gender equality. RVP's objective is to enable the integration of father-inclusive practices into family services and public policies in "For my kids and my family – building a hopeful future here"13th edition of the Semaine Québécoise de la Paternité The 13th edition of the Semaine Québécoise de la Paternité takes place June 9 to 15, 2025 on the theme "For my kids and my family – building a hopeful future here." The theme was developed based on what immigrant fathers themselves said as well as on the testimonies of people who work with them. It reflects the motivation of the vast majority of Quebec fathers of immigrant origin. The theme of SQP 2025 is to make Quebec society more aware of the realities experienced by immigrant fathers, so that collectively we can better help and support them. SOURCE Regroupement pour la Valorisation de la Paternité View original content:

Burial service to be held June 9 for Gravette WWII soldier killed in D-Day invasion
Burial service to be held June 9 for Gravette WWII soldier killed in D-Day invasion

Yahoo

time19 hours ago

  • Yahoo

Burial service to be held June 9 for Gravette WWII soldier killed in D-Day invasion

GRAVETTE, Ark. (KNWA/KFTA) — After more than 80 years, a Northwest Arkansan hero is returning home. Private Rodger Dean Andrews, a World War II soldier from Gravette, will be laid to rest with full military honors at 2:00 p.m. Monday, June 9, at Bethel Cemetery in Gravette, according to the Benton County Sheriff's Office (BSCO). His remains, recently identified after decades of uncertainty, will arrive in Northwest Arkansas the evening of Sunday, June 8 and be received by Epting Funeral Home in Bentonville. On Monday, the BCSO Motor Division will escort Private Andrews to his final resting place, joined by Military Honors and the Patriot Guard. The procession will depart Epting Funeral Home (709 N. Walton Blvd, Bentonville) at 1:15 p.m. and follow this route: South on N. Walton Blvd Right on SW 14th Street (Highway 102) Right on Highway 59 through Decatur Right on Bethel Road in Gravette Left into Bethel Cemetery 'Community members are encouraged to line the route and pay their respects to honor the life and service of Private Rodger Dean Andrews, a true American hero,' BSCO said in a Facebook post. HISTORY: Grant Hardin's 12-day escape joins the state's most infamous escapes The Defense POW/MIA Accounting Agency (DPAA) announced in a news release on October 2 that U.S. Army Private Rodger D. Andrews, 19, was accounted for on June 5. Andrews was assigned in June 1944 to Company C of the 37th Engineer Combat Battalion in the European Theater. On June 6, 1944, American, Canadian and British forces came ashore on the beaches of Normandy in France during Operation Overlord. The release said that at some point during the battle, Andrews was killed, but due to the chaos, it is not known what happened to him. Private Rodger Dean Andrews' remains were recovered after D-Day but went unidentified for decades. In 2014, his family requested renewed efforts. A belt with his initials helped prompt a review, and in 2019, the remains were exhumed. Scientists confirmed his identity through dental and anthropological analysis. A rosette will now mark his name at the Normandy American Cemetery. Governor Sarah Huckabee Sanders said during her remarks at the 2025 Memorial Day Observance at Camp Robinson in North Little Rock that U.S. Army Private Rodger D. Andrews, 18, will be laid to rest at a family plot on June 9, more than 81 years after his death. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store