logo
Asset Management vs. Wealth Management

Asset Management vs. Wealth Management

What is asset management?
Asset or investment management focuses primarily on maintaining your portfolio, according to Jaime Eckels, a CFP (certified financial planner) and partner at Plante Moran Wealth Management.
'Asset management is really about the portfolio and what's in it,' Eckels says. 'How much of the portfolio is stocks and bonds? Do you add real estate exposure with a real estate investment trust? Portfolio management is also about when to buy and sell.'
Additionally, asset management heavily emphasizes returns, although portfolio results tend to be mixed, says Michael Finke, Ph.D., a CFP and professor of wealth management at the American College of Financial Services.
'The traditional consumer looking for an asset manager is looking for someone to help them pick investments,' Finke says. 'While asset management can be part of an overall wealth management strategy, just relying on picking investments doesn't add a lot of value to a client hoping for an overall strategy to build and effectively manage their wealth.'
What is wealth management?
Rather than focusing solely on portfolio performance, wealth management offers a more holistic approach to building and managing wealth.
'Wealth management recognizes that each household has its unique characteristics and different goals for how to use that wealth,' Finke says. 'It's about helping clients identify their values and putting together a plan that takes into account taxes, education savings, charitable giving, estate planning and other important aspects of their financial life.'
Eckels adds that wealth management is about using your assets to paint a more comprehensive financial picture.
'Wealth management is about more than returns,' Eckels says. 'Instead of just looking at maximizing portfolio performance, you're also figuring out how your assets can help you send the kids to school and retire comfortably, while getting help with tax optimization strategies.'
Key differences between asset management and wealth management
Both Eckels and Finke say that asset management falls under the umbrella of wealth management.
'Asset management has a narrow focus, and it's a piece of the broad wealth management puzzle,' Eckels says. 'A wealth manager can help you with portfolio management as they provide planning services.'
Finke says that, overall, the financial professional industry is shifting toward an emphasis on wealth management.
'Managing investments has really become commoditized. You can use a robo advisor to put together an internationally diversified and automatically managed portfolio for less than 10 basis points across the board,' or 0.10 percentage points, Finke notes. 'The real value of wealth management is in the strategy that goes into building a comprehensive financial plan and then helping the client manage the assets so they can reach their goals.'
Which service is right for you?
To decide whether asset management or wealth management makes sense for you, start by reviewing your objectives.
'If you have a plan and you're comfortable with how you're handling the rest of your finances, and you're looking for someone to manage your portfolio only, an asset manager might make sense,' Eckels says. 'However, if you need more guidance as well as other services, a wealth manager might be a good choice.'
Finke adds that a CFP designation is a good credential to look for. However, he also suggests looking for someone with credentials that indicate a knowledge of planning and potentially additional education tailored to wealth management.
'Don't fall into the trap of [focusing too much on] whether you want a financial advisor who can tell you whether Tesla is a good stock,' Finke continues. 'The research shows the real value comes from having an advisor who understands your goals and has the ability, knowledge and experience to help you reach them.'
Finally, Eckels recommends understanding what services you're getting and whether they make sense for the price you're paying. When choosing a financial advisor, it's important to set expectations so you get a good value.
For example, some asset managers charge based on the number of transactions they complete on your behalf, or they might receive commissions for buying certain funds for your portfolio. That doesn't mean that your portfolio won't see good returns, Eckels says, but it does raise questions about conflicts of interest.
'Understand the services offered and the payment structure. Many wealth managers base their fees on assets under management [AUM], especially if they are helping you manage your portfolio,' Eckels says. 'However, you often get access to planning services, including a team that can help with estate, tax, charitable giving and education planning on top of financial planning and asset management when you choose a wealth manager that uses an AUM model. Some asset managers use an AUM model, but all you get is portfolio management and no other services.'
FAQ
Can I use both asset and wealth management services simultaneously?
Yes, asset management is considered a facet of wealth management. If you have a wealth manager, you likely also have asset management services included.
Are asset managers held to fiduciary standards?
Not always. Some asset managers are only required to recommend products and services that are suitable for a client, even if they aren't the best possible. A fiduciary financial advisor is required to act in your best interest and must disclose conflicts of interest.
How do fee structures differ between asset and wealth managers?
Like most financial advisors and professionals, there are different fee structures that both asset and wealth managers can use. Many asset and wealth managers use an AUM model, but there might be other structures. Asset managers in particular might integrate a transaction model or commission model into their pay structure. Some asset managers receive salaries and bonuses based on portfolio performance.
What qualifications should I look for in a financial advisor?
Consider looking for someone who has extensive experience and education in the specific financial areas you need help with. Find out what characteristics other clients have and look for a financial advisor who helps people in similar situations.
How do asset and wealth management services integrate with tax and estate planning?
Wealth managers are more likely to consider the tax and estate planning implications of the assets held and the types of accounts used. Asset managers are generally more focused on generating returns than on tax implications or estate planning services.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Poll: 14% of Americans would consider supporting Elon Musk's America Party
Poll: 14% of Americans would consider supporting Elon Musk's America Party

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Poll: 14% of Americans would consider supporting Elon Musk's America Party

In contrast, 55% say they would not consider supporting Musk's party. On July 4, Tesla CEO Elon Musk asked his followers on X — the social media platform he owns — whether he should 'create' something called the America Party to give them 'independence' from the country's 'two-party (some would say uniparty) system.' More than 1.2 million users responded to Musk's snap poll: 65% said yes; 35% said no. 'By a factor of 2 to 1, you want a new political party and you shall have it!' Musk vowed the following day. Since then, however, Musk hasn't taken any visible steps to deliver on his promise. A new Yahoo/YouGov survey — which captures a representative sample of the U.S. population, in contrast to informal social media polls — suggests possible challenges ahead: Just 14% of Americans say they would be open to 'supporting a third party created by Musk.' In contrast, 55% say they would not consider supporting Musk's party. Why Musk wants a new party The survey of 1,729 U.S. adults, which was conducted from July 24 to July 28, comes a little more than a month after Musk and President Trump had a public falling-out over Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' Trump claimed that Musk was 'upset' about 'losing his EV mandate' (the $7,500 federal tax credit that has made buying or leasing electric vehicles such as Teslas more attractive and affordable for consumers). Musk insisted he was concerned only with the legislation's effect on federal spending — namely, initial estimates that showed it would 'massively increase the already gigantic budget deficit ... and burden America citizens with crushingly unsustainable debt,' as he wrote on X. 'I'm sorry, but I just can't stand it anymore,' Musk continued. 'This massive, outrageous, pork-filled Congressional spending bill is a disgusting abomination. Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' When a revised version of Trump's bill passed the Senate in early July with a $3.3 trillion deficit projection, Musk unveiled his America Party idea. 'When it comes to bankrupting our country with waste & graft, we live in a one-party system, not a democracy,' Musk wrote on X. 'Today, the America Party is formed to give you back your freedom.' People don't love the 2-party system Americans aren't opposed to having alternatives at the ballot box — in theory. The new Yahoo/YouGov poll finds that more of them approve (39%) than disapprove (28%) of the concept of creating a 'third major U.S. political party to compete with the Democratic Party and the Republican Party'; 33% say they are not sure. Naturally, the idea of creating a third party is more popular with Americans who already identify as independents (56%) than with those who identify as Democrats (34%) or Republicans (32%). But the two parties themselves aren't especially well liked either. Majorities see both unfavorably (55% for the GOP, 56% for the Dems) rather than favorably (38% for the GOP, 36% for the Dems). And when respondents are asked how well each major party represents their views, more than half say 'not very well' or 'not at all' for both the Democrats (51%) and the Republicans (52%). Yet the overlap between these two categories — individuals who say they don't like either party — is relatively small, which may pose difficulties for Musk. About a quarter (22%) have an unfavorable view of both the Republicans and the Democrats, and fewer (18%) say neither side represents their views 'very well' or 'at all.' Musk keeps getting less popular In the Yahoo/YouGov poll conducted immediately after Trump won reelection last November, Musk earned a net positive rating (49% favorable, 39% unfavorable). That made him the most popular of the eight incoming Trump Cabinet members and senior advisers respondents were asked to appraise. Yet by April 2025 — following several months as the leader of Trump's Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) — Musk's ratings had flipped to 39% favorable, 55% unfavorable. Today, he is further underwater (32% favorable, 59% unfavorable). Musk is currently seen in a negative light by a clear majority of Democrats (9% favorable, 88% unfavorable) and nearly two-thirds of independents (30% favorable, 64% unfavorable). He still gets a net positive rating from a majority of Republicans (59% favorable, 30% unfavorable), but their enthusiasm has cooled; while 52% of Republicans saw Musk 'very favorably' last November, only 17% now feel that way about him. Since March, the number of Americans who think Musk is 'mostly trying to help the country' has fallen from 36% to 23%, whereas the number who think he is 'mostly trying to help himself' has risen from 52% to 56%. The share of Republicans who think Musk is mostly trying to help the country, meanwhile, has declined by 30 points — from 73% to 43%. The proposed policy focus of Musk's America Party — stopping the federal government from 'bankrupting our country with waste & graft,' as he put it — isn't people's top priority either. Asked what they would want a 'third major political party' to 'focus mostly on,' 26% of Americans said 'cutting government spending.' Significantly more (46%) said 'other issues.' __________________ The Yahoo survey was conducted by YouGov using a nationally representative sample of 1,729 U.S. adults interviewed online from July 24 to July 28, 2025. The sample was weighted according to gender, age, race, education, 2024 election turnout and presidential vote, party identification and current voter registration status. Demographic weighting targets come from the 2019 American Community Survey. Party identification is weighted to the estimated distribution at the time of the election (31% Democratic, 32% Republican). Respondents were selected from YouGov's opt-in panel to be representative of all U.S. adults. The margin of error is approximately 3.1%.

Dissenting Fed officials tie votes to labor market concerns
Dissenting Fed officials tie votes to labor market concerns

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Dissenting Fed officials tie votes to labor market concerns

By Michael S. Derby (Reuters) -The two Federal Reserve governors who favored an interest rate cut at the U.S. central bank's policy meeting this week said on Friday they did so largely due to rising concerns about the job market, amid expectations that any price increases related to trade tariffs will not lead to lasting price pressures. "With economic growth slowing this year and signs of a less dynamic labor market, I saw it as appropriate to begin gradually moving our moderately restrictive policy stance toward a neutral setting," Vice Chair for Supervision Michelle Bowman said in a statement. "In my view, this action would have proactively hedged against a further weakening in the economy and the risk of damage to the labor market," she said. Governor Christopher Waller said in a separate statement that "with underlying inflation near target and the upside risks to inflation limited, we should not wait until the labor market deteriorates before we cut the policy rate." Waller said the job market is nearing stall speed and the Fed's rate target should be closer to its neutral level. Waller said of the Fed's broader approach to monetary policy right now that "I believe that the wait and see approach is overly cautious, and, in my opinion, does not properly balance the risks to the outlook and could lead to policy falling behind the curve." The policymakers weighed in after casting dissenting votes against the Federal Open Market Committee's decision on Wednesday to hold its benchmark interest rate in the 4.25%-4.50% range. The dissents marked the first time that many governors had opposed the Fed's consensus view since late 1993. Comments made by Waller and Bowman going into the meeting had led many observers to expect their dissents. Waller has been most explicit in arguing for lower rates, saying the risks are rising for the job market while tariff-related inflation increases are likely to be a one-time shift the Fed could ignore. Bowman also expressed skepticism that tariffs would cause sustained inflation problems. The dissents also garnered interest because of the broader political currents buffeting the Fed. President Donald Trump has been pushing aggressively for rate cuts, excoriating Fed Chair Jerome Powell for failing to heed the White House's demands. Waller, who noted last month that his view was not "political" is widely considered to be in the running to succeed Powell when his term expires next May. Bowman, who was recently elevated to the Fed's bank overseer role by Trump, had previously been on the more hawkish end of the monetary policy spectrum, having dissented last fall in favor of a smaller rate cut than what the Fed delivered. Nodding toward the potential ambitions of the dissenters, Michael Feroli, chief U.S. economist at JP Morgan, described their votes on Wednesday as "two job applications attached" to the FOMC statement, even as he noted, "we don't read too much into these dissents for the future direction of policy." 'GOOD MEETING' As for the rest of the Fed's policymakers, they voted in favor of holding rates steady because even as some risks to the outlook are emerging, they are still wary of what Trump's tariffs will do to price pressures. "The economy is in a solid position" and "for the time being, we're well positioned to learn more about the likely course of the economy and the evolving balance of risks before adjusting our policy stance," Powell said at a press conference on Wednesday after the end of the Fed's two-day policy meeting. Powell appeared to see no downsides to the dissents. He described the FOMC gathering as a "good meeting" and added, "what you want from everybody, and also from a dissenter, is a clear explanation of what your thinking is and what are the arguments you're making ... We had that today." Powell did not indicate whether the dissenters had moved the consensus. "We haven't made any decisions about September. We'll be monitoring all the incoming data and asking ourselves whether the federal funds rate is in the right place." The Fed's next policy meeting is scheduled for September 16-17.

Bridger Aerospace Announces Schedule for its Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Release and Conference Call
Bridger Aerospace Announces Schedule for its Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Release and Conference Call

Yahoo

time21 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Bridger Aerospace Announces Schedule for its Second Quarter 2025 Earnings Release and Conference Call

Announces Participation in Upcoming Canaccord Conference BELGRADE, Mont., Aug. 01, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. ('Bridger' or 'Bridger Aerospace'), (NASDAQ: BAER, BAERW), one of the nation's largest aerial firefighting companies, today announced that it will release financial results for the second quarter ended June 30, 2025 on Thursday, August 7, 2025, after the market close. Management will conduct an investor conference call on Thursday, August 7 at 5:00 p.m. Eastern Time (3:00 p.m. Mountain Time) to discuss these results and the business outlook. Interested parties can access the conference call by dialing 833-316-1983 or 785-838-9310. The conference call will also be broadcast live on the Investor Relations section of our website at An audio replay will be available through August 14, 2025, by calling 844-512-2921 or 412-317-6671 and using the passcode 11159552. The replay will also be accessible at Upcoming Canaccord Conference The Company also announced that management is scheduled to participate in the Canaccord Genuity Annual Growth Conference on August 12th in Boston. Management is scheduled to present at 9:00 a.m. Eastern Time. A live and archived webcast of the fireside chat will be accessible from the Investors section of the Bridger Aerospace website at Investors interested in participating should contact Bridger Aerospace Investor Relations or their Canaccord representative. About Bridger Aerospace Based in Belgrade, Montana, Bridger Aerospace Group Holdings, Inc. is one of the nation's largest aerial firefighting companies. Bridger provides aerial firefighting and wildfire management services to federal and state government agencies, including the United States Forest Service, across the nation, as well as internationally. More information about Bridger Aerospace is available at Investor Contacts Alison Ziegler Darrow Associates 201-220-2678 aziegler@ in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store