Carney to meet Inuit leaders to discuss Bill C-5
Mr. Carney will co-chair the Inuit-Crown Partnership Committee, which includes Inuit leadership and federal ministers and meets regularly to discuss key issues. Along with the controversial Bill C-5, the committee is expected to discuss Arctic sovereignty and security, as well as housing and infrastructure.
The summit, where Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami president Natan Obed is the other co-chair, is the second of three meetings Mr. Carney promised on Bill C-5. Part of the legislation allows the federal cabinet to deem projects to be of national interest and then exempt them from various laws in order to speed up approvals and construction.
Indigenous communities have voiced concerns about the law, saying they are not against development but are concerned the legislation may impact their treaty rights. The government says Indigenous groups who may be affected by proposed projects will be fully consulted at key stages.
Thursday's meeting will be relatively small. The committee makeup varies, but tends to have fewer than 20 people, compared with the hundreds who attended the First Nations meeting last week. As well, the four Inuit regions in Canada have all signed comprehensive land-claim agreements, known as modern treaties.
Why First Nations are clashing with Ontario and Ottawa over bills aimed at speeding up megaprojects
The third meeting, with Métis, will take place on Aug. 7, according to the Métis National Council.
Inuvialuit Regional Corporation chair and chief executive Duane Ningaqsiq Smith, who represents Inuit living in the Inuvialuit Settlement Region of the Northwest Territories and Yukon, said he wants to hear what Mr. Carney has to say about the implementation of Bill C-5, including how he plans to work with Indigenous governments.
There are already specific processes in place under his modern treaty for aspects such as procurement, he said, where the organization is working with various federal departments. Mr. Smith said he would like to see those processes enhanced.
'It's their treaty just as much as it is ours, so they have an obligation to live up to it and implement accordingly,' he said in an interview. 'I can't speak for the other regions, but for my region, we're prepared to hear the Prime Minister out in regards to how they would look to begin to implement that act and work proactively with us.'
Mr. Smith said his region is looking to recognize the potential opportunities of Bill C-5, while also respecting Inuit rights. His organization is building a gas plant and developing a local well, which he said would provide energy security for the region. It may not meet the national-interest level, he said, but he wants to speak to Mr. Carney about it.
Overall, Mr. Smith said he is 'cautiously optimistic' about the meeting. It's a chance to raise concerns about various issues, including gaps in basic services such as internet and health care.
Professor Gary Wilson, chair of the political science department at the University of Northern British Columbia, said it will probably be easier for the federal government to manage its relationship with Inuit as a whole on Bill C-5, compared with First Nations, given there are fewer people involved.
Inuit also tend to be more united, Prof. Wilson said in an interview, while First Nations have a lot of diverse views.
Opinion: Mark Carney's 'build, baby, build' aspirations face a challenge from Indigenous leaders
Unlike First Nations, all of the Inuit regions have signed modern treaties, he added, which provide more certainty over land use and economic development. For example, treaties include different categories of land that come with different rights, he said.
While there are still issues around the government not respecting the treaties, policy disagreements and addressing past wrongs, Prof. Wilson said he thinks relations between Inuit and the federal government have been better since the creation of the Inuit-Crown Partnership Committee in 2017.
'I get the sense that Inuit are anxious to work with the government,' he said.
Mr. Obed told senators in June that Bill C-5 risks creating the conditions for treaties to be infringed upon. He urged Parliament to take its time with the legislation, but it was passed in under a month.
'It creates the possibility of national interest projects ending up before the courts, with litigation causing significant delays in the national interest projects moving forward,' he said.
Given that, Bill C-5 'may end up creating instability and ultimately undermining investor confidence, slowing the pace of investment needed in Inuit Nunangat,' he said, referring to the Inuit homeland.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Vancouver Sun
15 minutes ago
- Vancouver Sun
Duelling B.C. letters to Mark Carney on housing expose stark clashes
A clash of values is on stark display in two different letters that B.C. property developers and a group of Metro Vancouver housing experts have sent to Prime Minister Mark Carney. The major B.C. real-estate developers, facing a cyclical downturn in construction, this week delivered a coordinated statement to Ottawa and the provinces declaring they have an urgent need for more foreign investors in Canadian housing. Their letter came a week after a group of 27 well-known Metro Vancouver scholars, retired city planners, urbanists, developers and architects sent an open letter to Carney and federal Housing Minister Gregor Robertson urging the opposite. Stay on top of the latest real estate news and home design trends. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder. The next issue of Westcoast Homes will soon be in your inbox. Please try again Interested in more newsletters? Browse here. 'Do not reintroduce foreign capital or investor demand to reflate prices artificially,' said the group of veteran B.C. housing experts. 'The current market correction presents an opportunity — not a threat,' the specialists wrote. 'Governments should not bail out speculative housing development models, but instead use this moment to invest in non-market housing, preserve existing affordability and ensure that public subsidies serve long-term public outcomes.' In contrast, the developers spelled out how foreign investment has long been crucial to B.C. residential construction — largely because it has provided the capital to start large condo projects, particularly hundreds of high-rises. The developers' letter, signed by companies such as Westbank, Wesbuild, Edgar, Amacon, Cressey and Polygon, readily acknowledges the importance of a financial mechanism that many B.C. developers have long tried to keep quiet: That many of their building projects have relied heavily on investors, domestic and especially foreign. In the past, many B.C. developers, condo marketers and their allies have accused scholars and others who cite evidence of significant foreign capital in the province's urban real-estate of being racist and xenophobic . Robertson, when he was mayor of Vancouver, once made such an allegation against Prof. Andy Yan , head of SFU's City Program, who is one of the signatories to last week's letter to Carney, which was copied to B.C. Housing Minister Christine Boyle and Vancouver Mayor Ken Sim. However, now that B.C. developers are struggling with moderately slipping prices — and dealing with how the federal, B.C. and Ontario governments earlier imposed legislation to reduce foreign ownership — the industry is being more direct about how it has long needed offshore financing for its projects, often of the luxury variety. 'New condo development requires presales to meet financing thresholds, part of which relies on investor-focused buyers,' said the developers' letter, which is titled 'open' despite being watermarked with the word 'confidential'. 'In the absence of foreign investors, fewer projects will meet presale financing thresholds, suppressing supply delivery, which serves no one in a housing crisis as projects will not start.' The B.C. developers, whose message is supported by real-estate players in Toronto, say that if something doesn't change, housing supply will continue its slowdown. They argue that will mean, down the road, prices will again start to rise. The open letter from the more than two dozen housing experts — including UBC's David Ley, Patrick Condon and Penny Gurstein, as well as eight retired planners for Vancouver and Burnaby — takes a dramatically different approach to foreign investment, housing supply and related issues. In addition to urging Ottawa and provincial governments to retain restrictions on offshore capital in housing, the specialists argue that governments' aggressive efforts to greatly expand supply will not ease Canada's severe housing affordability crisis. Although prices are moderately easing, the benchmark cost of a dwelling in Greater Vancouver remains stuck at about $1.2 million, while in Metro Toronto it is about $1.1 million. The independent housing experts say such unaffordability levels, among the worst in the world, continue even while housing supply has 'increased significantly in cities like Vancouver, where housing starts have outpaced population growth for decades, yet prices remain disconnected from incomes.' Many of the letter's signatories have argued in recent years that inappropriate, non-family housing is often getting built, particularly tiny units that are mostly attractive to investors, foreign and domestic — that is, people who plan to rent them out rather than actually live in them. Developers, aided by city councils, are often 'building the wrong kinds of housing, in the wrong places, for the wrong reason,' says the experts' open letter. That includes hundreds of new Metro Vancouver residential towers, which they say the industry and governments should not so heavily emphasize. 'Towers have their place, particularly in transit-rich areas, but they are not always the best form.' Increasing housing density alone is insufficient to produce affordability, say the experts. 'Without addressing land value inflation, financial speculation and tenure security, supply-side interventions risk worsening the very crisis they aim to solve.' On a positive note, the authors urge federal, provincial and civic governments to retain and strengthen some policies that have proved effective. 'Recent short-term rental regulations, adjusted immigration targets and demand-side measures have already helped reduce pressure on rents.' Here are four more recommendations from the group of experts, some of which go against the desires of developers: • 'Do not use public funds to bail out over-leveraged speculative developments.' • Avoid tearing down existing rental buildings, to replace them with more expensive dwellings. 'Preserve existing affordability, and build new homes that serve real people, not just markets.' • Return to policies of 'growth pays for growth.' Governments should again demand developers provide significant infrastructure and amenities in exchange for construction approvals. 'The costs of growth should not be downloaded to municipalities, ie. local taxpayers.' • Prioritize federal funds and grants for co-ops, land trusts and non-profit housing. Other signatories to the open letter to the prime minister include: Larry Beasley, Vancouver's former co-chief planner; Christina DeMarco, former lead planner for Metro Vancouver regional district; Ralph Segal, former chief urban designer for Vancouver; architect David Wong, previously with the City of Vancouver; retired architect Barbara Gordon, former director of planning for UBC; and one-time developers Michael Geller and Arny Wise. dtodd@ Following is the open letter from 27 well-known Metro Vancouver scholars, retired city planners, urbanists, developers and architects sent to Prime Minister Carney and Housing Minister Gregor Robertson: Page two of the open letter signed by 27 well-known Metro Vancouver scholars, retired city planners, urbanists, developers and architects sent to Prime Minister Carney and Housing Minister Gregor Robertson. Page three of an open letter signed by 27 well-known Metro Vancouver scholars, retired city planners, urbanists, developers and architects sent to Prime Minister Carney and Housing Minister Gregor Robertson.


Toronto Sun
15 minutes ago
- Toronto Sun
VARNER: Rush to recognize Palestinian state is strategic disaster in the making
Recognizing a Palestinian state today is not the establishment of a peaceful, sovereign neighbour — it is enabling an Iranian forward base. Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney (R), flanked by Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Anita Anand, speaks during a press conference after a Cabinet meeting to discuss both trade negotiations with the US and the situation in the Middle East, at the National Press Theatre in Ottawa on July 30, 2025. Photo by DAVE CHAN / AFP via Getty Images The push by Western and Arab governments to unilaterally recognize a Palestinian state may be framed as a diplomatic breakthrough — but in truth, it is a reckless gambit that risks triggering the next regional war. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and across Canada. Unlimited online access to articles from across Canada with one account. Get exclusive access to the Toronto Sun ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition that you can share, download and comment on. Enjoy insights and behind-the-scenes analysis from our award-winning journalists. Support local journalists and the next generation of journalists. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Don't have an account? Create Account Canada, much of the Western world, and key Arab states are falling over themselves to recognize an independent Palestinian state, with France and Saudi Arabia having championed an international conference to fast-track recognition. Seventeen states including Canada agreed to recognize Palestine as a sovereign state. On Wednesday, Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Canada would recognize an independent Palestinian State in September if the Palestinian Authority Undertook key reforms. But let us not rewrite history. The Palestinians have been offered statehood repeatedly — by the British in 1936, again in 1938, through the UN partition plan of 1947-48, at Camp David in 2000 by U.S. President Bill Clinton, and in 2008 by U.S. President Barack Obama, including a capital in East Jerusalem. Each time, the offers were flatly rejected. Not because they were insufficient — but because they required the Palestinians to accept the existence of a Jewish state alongside them. Your noon-hour look at what's happening in Toronto and beyond. By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The truth is that every offer failed on the same point: Palestinian leadership and their Arab patrons have never truly supported a two-state solution. Their non-negotiable position remains the erasure of Israel. Yes, the Palestinian Authority (PA) maintains a bureaucratic façade of statehood. But in practical terms, Mahmoud Abbas' regime exists only because of Israeli intelligence support, the IDF's containment of Hamas, and the steady drip of foreign aid. Abbas has held onto the presidency since 2005 — an unprecedented 20-year 'four-year term' — not through democratic legitimacy but by blocking elections. Why? Because, were a vote held today, Hamas would win handily. Indeed, Abbas already lost the 2006 parliamentary elections. Hamas did not just win in Gaza — they won the West Bank as well. In the aftermath, Hamas seized Gaza in a violent coup and purged Fatah. The only reason the West Bank did not follow is because Israel intervened to prop up Abbas. The fiction of Abbas as the legitimate Palestinian leader continues not because he commands the respect of his people, but because the world has no better alternative. Hamas certainly does not recognize him — and would almost certainly assassinate him if given the chance, as they've attempted in the past. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The Palestinians, particularly Hamas and their Iranian patrons, do not seek peace through borders. They seek victory through elimination. The 'solution' they envision is not two states living side-by-side — it is a single Palestinian-Islamist entity from the river to the sea, built on the ashes of Israel. Look at the map. Israel is already surrounded by Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ) in Gaza, Hezbollah to the north in Lebanon, Islamist militias operating in Syria, the Houthis in Yemen, and Iran, the architect and financier of all of them. Israel is in an ongoing war with this network — a war that intensified with the Oct. 7, 2023 Hamas massacre and has not abated since. The Israeli military is stretched, the Iron Dome is tested daily, and civilian centres remain under threat from drone and rocket attacks. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. Read More Recognizing a Palestinian state today is not the establishment of a peaceful, sovereign neighbour — it is enabling an Iranian forward base. In a heartbeat, Hamas would consolidate power. That government would be Islamist, militant, and hostile. It would welcome IRGC trainers, missiles, jihadis, and terror commanders to Israel's very doorstep. The consequences would be catastrophic. It would not be peace. It would be war — pre-positioned, well-armed, and backed by Tehran. October 7th would become a footnote in comparison. The Kingdom of Jordan — long despised by the IRGC — would likely collapse under Iranian pressure. The Hashemite regime would fall. And the region would ignite in flames. This is not speculation. It is the security reality known intimately in Jerusalem, Washington, and yes — Tehran. To recognize a Palestinian state today is not to plant the seeds of peace — it is to light the fuse beneath an Israeli-Iranian powder keg. — Joseph B. Varner is a senior fellow at the Macdonald Laurier Institute Celebrity Toronto & GTA Canada Sunshine Girls Canada


CTV News
44 minutes ago
- CTV News
‘Hard for us to make a trade deal': Trump on Canada recognizing a Palestinian state
Prime Minister Mark Carney says Canada will recognize the state of Palestine at the next session of the United Nations General Assembly in September. On the eve of his latest tariff deadline, U.S. President Donald Trump says Canada's decision to recognize a Palestinian state will hurt the urgent trade talks underway between the two countries. 'Wow! Canada has just announced that it is backing statehood for Palestine. That will make it very hard for us to make a Trade Deal with them,' he wrote in a post to Truth Social published overnight Thursday. Trump Truth Social Canada Palestine U.S. President Donald Trump says Canada recognizing statehood of Palestine makes it 'very hard' for two sides to reach trade deal. (Truth Social screenshot) Canada and the United States have been negotiating a deal since shortly after Trump took office this year, when the U.S. president imposed a slate of sweeping tariffs on imported goods that rapidly developed into a global trade war. In the months since, governments in both countries have imposed an ever-shifting array of tariffs and other trade restrictions on one another. Most recently, Trump has threatened new tariffs of 35 per cent unless Canada reaches a trade deal by Friday. Throughout the trade war, Trump has repeatedly adjusted the timing of tariffs on Canada and other countries, including substantial delays, but earlier this week, U.S. Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick said there would be 'no extensions, no more grace periods' on the deadline, this time around. "Aug. 1, the tariffs are set. They'll go into place. Customs will start collecting the money, and off we go,' he said. Two-state solution Trump's social media post comes hours after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced Canada would formally acknowledge an independent state of Palestine. 'Canada has long been committed to a two-state solution – an independent, viable, and sovereign Palestinian state living side by side with the State of Israel in peace and security," Carney wrote in a statement Wednesday. 'For decades, it was hoped that this outcome would be achieved as part of a peace process built around a negotiated settlement between the Israeli government and the Palestinian Authority. Regrettably, this approach is no longer tenable.' Canada is the latest western ally in recent days to announce intentions to recognize Palestinian statehood, joining France and the United Kingdom. Earlier this year, U.S. ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee spoke out against recognition, describing a United Nations initiative to revive work toward a two-state solution as 'incredibly inappropriate when Israel is in the midst of a war.' 'If France is really so determined to see a Palestinian state, I've got a suggestion for them – carve out a piece of the French Riviera and create a Palestinian state,' Huckabee said. 'They are welcome to do that.' This is a developing story. More details to come… With files from Tammy Ibrahimpour, The Associated Press and AFP