Judge says he was unfair to law firm in HR companies ‘spy' case
Mr Justice Brian Cregan said he had reflected on what he had said in relation to the letter written by Hayes LLP on behalf of Deel Inc. The US-headquartered HR software firm is being sued by rival Rippling, also US headquartered, who employed global payroll manager Keith O'Brien until his espionage activities on behalf of Deel were discovered.
Mr O'Brien, of Balrothery, north Dublin, admitted being paid €5,500 a month by Deel and has been co-operating with Rippling having expressed regret for his 'participation in this espionage'. He is a defendant in the Rippling case against Deel and others but no reliefs are being sought against him.
Mr O'Brien brought his own case alleging intimidation and harassment from surveillance of him and his family by what were initially only 'persons unknown' but later private investigation firms of Mark Murran, also known as Rock Investigations, and Cliona Woods of Gotham Services became the defendants.
READ MORE
They strongly deny any overt surveillance or claims of harassment and intimidation.
During the hearing of applications related to Mr O'Brien's case, the court heard that before he brought legal proceedings his lawyers wrote to Hayes solicitors requesting the surveillance stop.
Hayes responded with a letter saying its client (Deel) had 'no knowledge' of surveillance being carried out by two cars alleged to have followed and surveilled Mr O'Brien.
One of the cars later turned out to be completely innocent while the other was driven by Mark Murran, the court heard.
Mr Justice Cregan expressed concern that officers of the court (Hayes) had written a letter which was either a 'blatant lie or a misrepresentation'.
It had also made him briefly question whether he could rely on another Hayes letter in another case he was dealing with but he did accept that letter.
Paul Gardiner SC, instructed by Hayes for Deel, objected to the judge's description in a case in which fair procedures had yet to be gone through.
He said it was unfair to Hayes.
Mr Gardiner also said the letter was true at the time and while it turned out to be incorrect because discreet surveillance was commissioned by Deel, when written it was believed to be correct.
The judge said he wanted an explanation from Hayes via an affidavit.
On Thursday, Michael Cush SC said he was representing Hayes in relation to the judge's request and he was looking for the matter to be dealt with as soon as possible.
Mr Justice Cregan said Mr Cush's application was very timely because he had been reflecting on this matter and Mr Gardiner's comments about him being unfair.
He said he was concerned about the Hayes letter but it was written on instructions from the client and it was an issue for Deel rather than Hayes. 'So I had in fact been unfair,' he said.
He had been mulling over the matter and was considering asking the court registrar to write to Hayes as to whether the firm could write another letter 'and that would be a solution'.
Mr Cush said that was very gracious of the judge but he would first have to take instructions. Hayes was concerned at the publicity the judge's comment attracted and they were hopeful that showing the letter was written on instructions would also attract some publicity.
The judge said he would be prepared to deal with the matter on Friday. He was concerned about the administration of justice aspect of the matter (as Mr O'Brien will be a witness in the Rippling case).
He felt the matter might be dealt with by a letter from Hayes correcting the record but he would leave that to be dealt with on Friday.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Times
7 hours ago
- Irish Times
The Irish Times view on infrastructure delivery: radical solutions are needed
The Government has promised to accelerate the delivery of infrastructure in Ireland as a vital element of its revised National Development Plan, which outlines State investment spending up to 2030. How to achieve this is the question. Reform in the way State cash is allocated is one change which we are told is already in train. And the new Planning Act may also help. But more will be needed. To help plan this, Minister for Public Expenditure, Jack Chamber, has appointed the Accelerating Infrastructure Taskforce , chaired by Sean O'Driscoll, the former chief executive of Glen Dimplex, to advise on how to proceed. Following the receipt of a report drawn up by his Department reflecting the views of interests involved in infrastructure delivery, the taskforce is getting to work. The analysis is clear enough. Infrastructure and housing projects are mired in regulations and increasingly threatened by judicial review. This has led the administrative and regulatory system to take an overly-cautious approach – in part for fear of not ticking all the boxes and facing legal challenges. Beyond that, there have been clear issues in terms of project planning and oversight, of which the National Children's Hospital is just one example. Finding the solutions is not straightforward, but there are a few guiding principles which the taskforce needs to abide by. READ MORE The first is a recognition that the whole system is now dysfunctional. The wider national interest is taking second place to that of objectors. A balance is needed, for sure, but as of now the impact of the system of regulation and previous legal decisions is to cause endless delay and uncertainty. A State in which it takes seven years to deliver an electricity substation is not an efficient one. The second and related imperative for the group is the need to be radical. Fiddling around at the edges will achieve little. Addressing some of the key issues is not straightforward in a common law system and the committee will need to consider to what extent legislation can help , particularly relating to major national projects. But these projects are so central to people's lives and to economic progress that delays are hugely costly. Ireland is, for example, judged as the slowest county in the EU for consents for renewable energy projects. Again, it is a question of balance. The third job for the taskforce will be to ruffle feathers - it needs to be unpopular. As it is composed of private and public sector appointees, consensus may not be easy. But successive governments, departments, State agencies, regulators , the legal system– and the private sector – have all come up short. Failures need to be called out. With billions extra to be spent in the years ahead , Ireland needs to recognise its shortcomings honestly and then address them .
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
Jump in unemployment dismissed as ‘statistical noise' by Davy
The rise in Ireland's unemployment rate has been dismissed by Davy stockbrokers as 'statistical noise'. The stockbroker also insisted the economy remained close to full employment . The State's jobless rate climbed to 4.9 per cent in July, up from 4.6 per cent and the highest rate in more than three years, according to figures published last week by the Central Statistics Office (CSO). The increase comes amid warnings about a potential slowdown triggered by US tariffs . READ MORE The upward revisions, flagged by the CSO, represent 'a mainly statistical aspect of the estimation process rather than providing any real-economy signal that Ireland's labour market conditions have worsened in 2025,' Davy chief economist Kevin Timoney said. He noted that the figures incorporated the latest Labour Force Survey, which has not yet been published, and included a new category of unemployment assistance (jobseekers' pay-related benefit) for the first time. 'Combined, these factors help to explain the higher unemployment rate estimate, and we expect this will unwind further into [the second half of the year],' Mr Timoney said. 'An alternative explanation is that high economic policy uncertainty in Ireland and abroad as a result of tariffs has resulted in an increase in the unemployment rate,' he said. 'However, we think the statistical factors noted above are more likely to explain the increase,' he added, noting that labour demand in the Irish economy remained strong. [ Unemployment climbs to highest rate in more than three years Opens in new window ] The State's jobless rate is now the highest rate in more than three years, according to Central Statistics Office figures. Photograph: Getty Images In its report, Davy also blamed softer-than-expected income tax receipts in the latest exchequer returns on 'slowing wage growth in high-earning sectors (which contribute the bulk of income tax receipts)'. The CSO will publish monthly payroll data on Friday. These are based on real-time Revenue data and are considered one of the more accurate barometers of the Irish labour market. Separately, European Central Bank officials are now expected to wait until December to deliver their next interest-rate cut in what is likely to be the final move in the cycle, according to a Bloomberg survey. Economists have pushed back expectations for another reduction in borrowing costs by three months, compared to a survey conducted in July. With the deposit rate then landing at 1.75 per cent, they see it remaining there for nine to 10 months before a pickup in demand will likely force them to reverse course. Waiting until the final meeting of 2025 would give ECB policymakers the luxury of more time to assess the impact of trade disruption caused by US President Donald Trump. By December, policymakers will have seen how the economy performed in the third quarter, offering a clearer picture of underlying momentum after distortions caused by attempts to front-run US tariffs earlier in the year. – additional reporting by Bloomberg
Irish Times
8 hours ago
- Irish Times
Founder of breast cancer clothing firm wins €85k after salary stopped
The founder of a clothing line for breast cancer patients has won nearly €85,000 after a tribunal ruled she was constructively dismissed by having her salary stopped last year. Ciara Donlan secured the sum after pursuing a series of employment rights complaints against Theya Healthcare Ltd, a brand she established a decade ago, following what she termed an 'aggressive takeover' in 2023. The company was not represented when the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) heard her complaints under the Unfair Dismissals Act 1977, the Payment of Wages Act 1991 and the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1994 in June this year. Ms Donlan, representing herself before the employment tribunal, said the company had been profitable when a liquidation was triggered by 'an aggressive takeover attempt by two angel investors' in January 2023. READ MORE She said that key assets of the brand were bought by members of a family involved in manufacturing medical garments in China, the Gallaghers, who offered her a job as CEO with a 40 per cent shareholding in a new entity, Theya Healthcare Ltd. The €110,000-a-year pay deal she had was altered to €90,000 in salary plus €20,000 in expenses paid 'off the books', she said. The remaining 60 per cent of the business was to be held by Anne Sweeney, the wife of businessman Joseph Gallagher, she said. Ms Donlan said that when she looked for a contract for the CEO role, Mr Gallagher 'dismissed the need for one'. She said that despite assurances from the Gallagher family that production of Theya's product line at their factories in China would be a priority, there were 'persistent delays' which hit customer relations and 'disrupted the sales pipeline'. She said her efforts to co-ordinate manufacturing through the family 'proved unreliable', with her queries 'often met with vague or evasive responses'. 'These difficulties made effective management of the business nearly impossible,' Ms Donlon said. The adjudicator, Breiffni O'Neill, noted Ms Donlan's evidence that 'tensions' worsened in early September 2024 when Ms Donlon's monthly expenses were not paid. Ms Donlon's case was that the company's financial director informed her this was because she had been 'instructed not to release the payment' by the respondent. The complainant said she considered quitting at that stage, but stayed on 'out of loyalty to the customer base' and other commitments. Ms Donlan's evidence was that having been left short by €2,500 in August, she was told around September 20th 2024 that she would not be receiving her scheduled salary payment on September 26th. Mr O'Neill noted in his decision that the evidence before him was that there had been an instruction given not to pay Ms Donlan her salary due in September 2024 while the company 'continued to pay other staff'. There was 'no lawful justification or mutual agreement' to hold back or suspend her pay, he wrote, calling this 'a fundamental repudiation of the contract by the respondent'. He concluded on this basis that Ms Donlan was constructively dismissed and awarded her nine months' pay for her losses, a sum of €67,500. He directed the payment of a further €10,000 to Ms Donlon for her unpaid salary under the Payment of Wages Act 1991. Mr O'Neill also awarded the complainant €6,923, a sum of one month's wages, as compensation for the failure to provide Ms Donlan with a contract of employment in breach of the Terms of Employment (Information) Act 1991. He noted that he was giving the 'maximum allowable award' for this breach, as he considered the 'complete failure to issue a statement of terms and conditions of employment' to be 'more serious' than providing an incomplete or incorrect one. The total awarded to Ms Donlan in the case was €84,423.
