Camden County commissioner creates fundraiser to pay for his criminal defense
Ozarks First Investigates confirmed that Skelton started the fundraiser himself, as the website states.
As our investigative team previously reported, Skelton is charged with two felonies and one misdemeanor over accusations he removed a License Plate Reader camera on Highway 54 in Camden County after the county commission banned LPR Cameras, more commonly known as Flock Cameras.
However, the county's ordinance banning Flock Cameras did not apply to cameras placed on state-operated highways like Highway 54.
Camden County officials have long been at odds over the use of the surveillance technology. Skelton has been outspoken about his opposition to Flock Cameras, citing privacy concerns. However, the Camden County Sheriff's Office supports these cameras to help track down criminal suspects.
'Although I believe I could justify using taxpayer dollars for my defense, I also believe it would be best NOT to ask the taxpayers to fund my defense because I know some of them do not believe in what I have done,' Skelton wrote in the description for the fundraiser.
The fundraising goal for his legal defense fund is set at $50,000.
Camden County administrators have not responded to our requests asking whether Skelton will maintain his role as presiding commissioner in light of the criminal charges he faces.
The initial court appearance is set for April 11 at 9 a.m. in Camden County.
If you have a story you'd like Ozarks First Investigates to look into, email Investigates@OzarksFirst.com or call our tip line at 417-295-TIPS.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 days ago
- Yahoo
Privacy in New Jersey: What the law says about security cameras, video recordings & audio
Many homeowners like to take precautions when it comes to protecting their property. This may include alarm systems, video doorbells and, for some, even security cameras. But with security cameras come consistent recording, and the occasional debate over what exactly can be recorded. South Jersey headlines: Memorial march for Camden woman whose life of accomplishment was cut short by tragedy While rules around this vary state by state, New Jersey's laws about recording others may help answer some of your questions around your neighbor's security cameras. Can my neighbors record me? The short answer is yes. New Jersey does not have any specific laws that prohibit general video recordings. But there are some nuances that come into play when discussing what specifically the camera is recording. Can my neighbors point cameras at my house? In New Jersey, video recording laws prohibit cameras directed at or in places where a person has reasonable expectation of privacy. For a house, prohibited areas for cameras to be pointed to would be a neighbors' bathroom, bedroom, or any locations where they would likely be viewed in full or partial nudity. Decisions on locations is oftentimes operated on a case-by-case matter as several factors are considered. As an example, recording a neighbor in the car on the street may not be illegal, but if that neighbor is parked in their home's garage, there could be a reasonable expectation of privacy. High school football: Football 2025: Check out all of our content for the South Jersey high school season Can my neighbors record my conversations? New Jersey follows a 'one-party consent' law when it comes to recording conversations. The law states that it is legal to record a conversation as long as at least one party involved in the conversation consents to it. In other words, you can legally record a conversation if you are part of it or if you obtain consent to someone who is a part of it. You cannot record a conversation that you aren't part of or don't gain consent to. If a neighbor is recording your private conversations, they can face legal trouble. State laws note that purposely intercepting or planning to intercept any private conversations is considered a third-degree crime. Risha Inaganti writes about trending topics across South Jersey for the Courier-Post. If you have a story she should tell, email her at rinaganti@ Subscribe to stay up to date on the news you need. This article originally appeared on Cherry Hill Courier-Post: Can neighbors record my property in New Jersey? Is NJ a 2-party state? Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Groups demand that Denver's Flock license plate cameras be turned off
DENVER (KDVR) — There is a growing controversy surrounding the use of automatic license plate reading cameras in Denver. They are also known as Flock cameras, which law enforcement uses in a number of crime-fighting tactics. Denver voted to not extend its Flock camera contract: Are ICE access concerns valid? Some groups are claiming the cameras' databases are being used to help U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement officers track undocumented immigrants. The American Civil Liberties Union is among the organizations that want Denver to stop using the cameras. 'Flock databases, and their sharing capabilities create the potential for local law enforcement agencies to be violating state law when they are sharing their databases openly with other agencies and other jurisdictions outside of the state of Colorado for immigration enforcement purposes,' ACLU Denver Public Policy Director Anaya Robinson said. 'Flock, effectively, is creating a nationwide surveillance system,' Robinson added. There are 17 civil rights and advocacy organizations that said the Denver Police Department's Flock camera data logs had been searched more than 1,400 times for ICE since June 2024. DPD said Monday, once it realized searches had been conducted by other law enforcement agencies with ICE, DPD turned off those agencies' ability to search Denver's flock data. Mayoral spokesman Jon Ewing said the city had no knowledge of the city's cameras being used to track undocumented immigrants. 'We use these cameras for people who commit crimes. We're not talking about civil immigration enforcement. It is not permissible under Colorado law or local law to do the job of civil immigration enforcement,' Ewing said. DOJ sues Colorado, Denver for so-called 'sanctuary laws' 'DPD continues working to address community concerns about the Flock ALPR (automated license plate recognition) program. DPD will continue using our Flock ALPR system because of its demonstrated impact in helping to solve crimes and hold offenders accountable. DPD is not aware of any misuse of its data,' a spokesperson for the Denver Police Department's Media Relations Units said. The concerned groups, though, say they will continue their push to have the cameras turned off. Robison said the organizations are willing to have conversations with Denver about the future use of the camera system. Mayor Mike Johnston's office says it's setting up a task force to address community concerns. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. Solve the daily Crossword
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Drivers warned against 'brief lapses' as mobile and seatbelt cameras dish out $423 fines
Authorities have issued a reminder to Aussies that mobile and seatbelt detection cameras are in force and catching out drivers breaking the law, with motorists copping fines for "brief lapses" while driving. The renewed message comes as the AI-powered cameras have been enforcing road rules in New South Wales for over a year, with Western Australia in a trial period of similar technology before enforcement begins later this year. Leading traffic lawyer Hayder Shkara told Yahoo News that his practice has seen an "uptick in inquiries" for his legal services since enforcement began. "Drivers are shocked at the precision of the technology and what the law actually is," Hayder, principal lawyer at Justice Family Lawyers, said. He warned that he's seeing cases catch out "more than just the obvious offenders". "Many clients are being fined for brief lapses, like adjusting a GPS or changing the music," he said. "I recall one passenger who was shocked that a seatbelt had to be worn in a particular way, saying that they had been wearing it around their body for years because it was uncomfortable having it strapped across the shoulder." Authorities across the country face an uphill battle in turning the tide on dangerous driving, with nationwide road tolls the highest they've been in 15 years. In NSW, cameras have checked 140 million cars, with 99 per cent of drivers and passengers doing the right thing. But of the approximate 75,000 caught out, 88 per cent of fines were related to incorrect seatbelt use. Last year, 34 people died on NSW roads while not wearing a seatbelt. This year, another 11 lives have been lost. According to Transport NSW, wearing a seatbelt correctly doubles the chances of surviving a crash and reduces the risk of serious injury. Last month, the Minns Government called on NSW drivers to follow the law and wear their seatbelts properly 🚗 Council's plan for new driver charge as Aussie tourist town being 'loved to death' 😳 Ominous message taped to 4WD next to remote Aussie highway reveals sad reality 🙌 'Amazing' change on notorious stretch of highway as new AI camera trialled Can I get out of a mobile or seatbelt fine? In NSW, each offence attracts a $423 fine and three demerit points, or six during double demerit periods. The fine has increased from $410 since the start of the new financial year. But according to Shkara, the high-definition quality of images makes getting out of fines a "tough battle" unless there has been a genuine error or "exceptional circumstance". "In terms of contesting, success really hinges on the specifics," he explained. "That said, we've had a few wins where the images were ambiguous. "Even a momentary lapse can lead to a fine, and with seatbelt detection now part of the mix, it's worth double-checking everything before you hit the road." How do mobile and seatbelt detection cameras work? The cameras operate by capturing images of passing cars, which are reviewed by AI software. Images that show an offence, such as a seatbelt worn incorrectly, are then verified by a person. Photos that don't show an offence are permanently deleted within an hour, NSW road safety explained. Those caught breaking the law are fined. "Whether you're the driver or the passenger, make sure you've always got your seatbelt on correctly," the authority said. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.
