
Ukraine looks to jointly produce weapons with allies, while US halts some shipments
Those plans come at what appears to be a key point in the all-out war launched by Moscow nearly 3½ years ago. A renewed Russian push to capture more Ukrainian land has put Ukraine's short-handed defenses under severe strain, and Russian missiles and drones are battering Ukrainian cities. U.S.-led diplomatic efforts to find a peace settlement, meanwhile, have stalled.
As Washington has distanced itself under U.S. President Donald Trump from Ukraine's war efforts, a bigger onus has fallen on European countries to pressure Russia.
French President Emmanuel Macron and Russian President Vladimir Putin on Tuesday held their first direct telephone call in almost three years. Macron's office said that during their two-hour conversation, the French leader underlined France's 'unwavering support for Ukraine's sovereignty and territorial integrity' and called for a ceasefire.
Ukraine President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that officials are preparing with a sense of urgency for upcoming meetings with European Union countries and other partners to talk about cooperation in weapons manufacturing.
'One of the key topics will be weapons production – our joint investments, joint projects,' Zelenskyy said in his daily address on Tuesday evening.
Defense Minister Rustem Umerov announced that draft legislation on joint weapons production with international allies is expected to be put to a vote in the Ukrainian parliament later this month. The proposed laws were shown to national defense companies on Tuesday, Umerov said.
The program includes plans to create a special legal and tax framework to help Ukrainian defense manufacturers scale up and modernize production, including building new facilities at home and abroad, according to Umerov.
Earlier this week, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul said during a visit to Kyiv that Germany aims to help Ukraine manufacture more weapons more quickly. He was accompanied on the trip by German defense industry representatives.
The U.S. is halting some weapons deliveries to Ukraine out of concern that its own stockpiles have declined too far, officials said Tuesday. Certain munitions were longer-term commitments promised to Ukraine under the Biden administration, though the Defense Department didn't provide details on what specific weapons were being held back.
Ukraine's Foreign Ministry summoned the U.S. chargé d'affaires, John Hinkel, on Wednesday to discuss ongoing defense cooperation.
Deputy Foreign Minister Maryana Betsa thanked the U.S. for its continued support, but emphasized the 'critical importance' of maintaining previously allocated defense packages, especially for bolstering Ukraine's air defense.
Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said that the Pentagon's decision will help bring a settlement closer, because "the fewer weapons supplied to Ukraine, the closer the end of the (war) is.'
The United States has been Ukraine's biggest military backer since Russia launched its full-scale invasion of its neighbor on Feb. 24, 2022. Under Trump, there have been no new announcements of U.S. military or weapons aid to Ukraine.
Between March and April, the United States allocated no new aid to Ukraine, according to Germany's Kiel Institute, which tracks such support.
For the first time since June 2022, European countries surpassed the U.S. in total military aid, totaling 72 billion euros ($85 billion) compared with 65 billion euros ($77 billion) from the U.S., the institute said last month.
Washington's latest decision could remove some of the most formidable weapons in Ukraine's battlefield arsenal.
Analysts say Ukraine's European allies can fill some of the gaps and provide artillery systems. But they don't possess alternatives to the U.S.-made HIMARS missiles and air defense systems, especially Patriots, which are crucial to help defend Ukrainian cities from Russian air attacks.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
43 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'60 Minutes' Correspondents Sent a Letter to George Cheeks Demanding He Name Tanya Simon EP
Tanya Simon, the daughter of the late 60 Minutes correspondent Bob Simon, has been executive-producing the newsmagazine show on an interim basis since Bill Owens' shocking resignation. The current crop of 60 Minutes correspondents have been lobbying Paramount Global to make it official. On Friday, Oliver Darcy's Status newsletter reported that Lesley Stahl, Scott Pelley, Bill Whitaker, Anderson Cooper, Sharyn Alfonsi, Jon Wertheim and Cecilia Vega — the whole gang of 60 Minutes correspondents — collectively wrote and signed a letter in May urging Paramount co-CEO George Cheeks to officially name Simon as the show's executive producer. More from The Hollywood Reporter Bill Moyers, Longtime PBS and CBS Journalist and Documentarian, Dies at 91 Trump, Paramount Global Are in "Active Settlement Discussions" Over '60 Minutes' Lawsuit The Twilight of Evening News: Anchor Swaps, Trust Gaps and a Looming AI Threat Owens resigned as 60 Minutes EP in April in protest of what he believed to be a dwindling ability to independently control the show's editorial positions. In other words, Paramount corporate was getting in the way of their reporting. Owens' boss Wendy McMahon resigned as head of CBS News in May, citing similar reasons as Owens. Specifically, Owens and McMahon have taken issue with the way in which Paramount Global and its controlling company National Amusements Inc. (NAI) have handled a lawsuit by Donald Trump alleging 60 Minutes showed preferential treatment to his 2024 presidential-election opponent Kamala Harris. Paramount is in the final throes of a merger with Skydance, which requires federal regulatory approval. Shari Redstone controls Paramount Global — and thus has the final vote on any M&A activity — through her ownership of NAI. Tanya Simon began her career at 60 Minutes 1999 as an associate producer. She is beloved internally, not only because of the familial connection, but because of the respect she has earned over her 25-plus years at the newsmagazine. One staffer told the Status, 'The next E.P. has to be Tanya. There will be a revolt if it's not her.' Internally at 60 Minutes, staffers are already beginning to fret about the show's future under the new ownership, specifically whether the independence from the rest of CBS News that the show has historically enjoyed will continue, or if Skydance will have a heavier hand in directing the show's structure. Status reported earlier this week that Skydance chief David Ellison approached Bari Weiss to see if she was interested in a role at CBS post-merger. The Hollywood Reporter has not seen the reported letter; a spokesperson for 60 Minutes/CBS News did not immediately respond to our request for comment. A separate spokesperson for Paramount Global declined comment on this story. A spokesperson for Redstone did not immediately respond to our request for comment. Best of The Hollywood Reporter How the Warner Brothers Got Their Film Business Started Meet the World Builders: Hollywood's Top Physical Production Executives of 2023 Men in Blazers, Hollywood's Favorite Soccer Podcast, Aims for a Global Empire
Yahoo
44 minutes ago
- Yahoo
'Totally Unhinged': Trump Ripped After Bizarre Attack On Lawmaker's 'Ugly Face'
President Donald Trump on Wednesday launched a wild attack on Rep. Jamie Raskin (D-Md.), calling the lawmaker a 'DOPE,' TOTAL LOSER,' and a 'bad politician.' He also said Raskin has an 'ugly face.' Trump's tirade came shortly after Raskin appeared on MSNBC, where he spoke about a report indicating that the president wasn't aware that his signature 'big beautiful bill' would cut Medicaid until a Republican lawmaker pointed it out to him earlier in the day. Raskin said there's a lot of discussion on the floor of the House over just how much Trump knows about his own bill and whether he's 'out of it.' Yet most GOP lawmakers support the bill anyway, even those who aren't happy with it themselves. 'All of these people have gotten in line despite their own misgivings because Trump is leading the way ― but Trump might not even understand what's in the bill,' Raskin said. 'So it's a very dangerous moment when you think about what democracy is, and it doesn't speak well for what has become of the Republican Party.' Yet not everyone in the Republican caucus has backed the bill ― and as a key vote stalled late Wednesday, Trump attacked Raskin on Truth Social: Raskin brushed it off during an MSNBC interview. 'I suppose I don't mind being called a loser several times by Donald Trump given that he's our only president who has lost the popular vote for president in two different elections,' he told Lawrence O'Donnell. 'And the last time, when he lost by more than 7 million votes to Joe Biden, it upset him so much that he incited an insurrection against the Constitution, against his own vice president, and against the Congress of the United States.' He also had a response to Trump calling him 'ugly.' 'I suppose I don't like being called ugly by Donald Trump, but not everybody can live up to his exquisite levels of handsomeness and personal physical grace,' he said. Trump's critics on X also fired back at the president: Donald Trump lashes out at Congressman Jamie Raskin, calling him a 'dope,' a 'total loser,' and mocking his 'ugly face.'Totally unhinged — Republicans against Trump (@RpsAgainstTrump) July 3, 2025 Just a really disturbed person. Media has normalized his insanity to a ridiculous degree. This (and most of what he does) is not normal. healthy human behavior. — Centrism Fan Acct 🔹 (@Wilson__Valdez) July 3, 2025 Can you remember another time in modern American history where the president of the country attacked an opponent of his for his 'ugly face'? (Also, do you remember when Republicans with clutch their pearls about civility and etiquette?) — Mehdi Hasan (@mehdirhasan) July 3, 2025 MAGA is a movement by jerks, for jerks — Aaron Rupar (@atrupar) July 3, 2025 Trump is projecting — again. No world leader speaks about their own officials with such venom. His unhinged rants aren't strength, they're a warning isn't leadership. It's emotional instability wrapped in delusion. America deserves better. — Shahn Khalfan (@ShahnKhalfan) July 3, 2025 When you point your finger at someone else, you point three fingers at yourself. Jesus said to 'love your neighbor as yourself.' Hard, isn't it, Mr. President? Cong. Raskin is a Constitutional expert, the real reason you attack/resent him. @realDonaldTrumphttps:// — Representative Joy Garratt, NM HD29 (@joyousgarratt) July 3, 2025 .@RepRaskin is one of the smartest, kindest, most principled leaders we have - and he has continued to lead through some of the most profound loss a human being can endure. Unlike those who are clinging to cruelty, ego and self interest right now - he has never lost his compass. — Kyra Ellis-Moore (@KyraEllisMoore) July 3, 2025 'I love watching his ugly face.' - the president of the United States of America — Alex Jewell 🧢 (@bestfoodalex) July 3, 2025 The functional illiterate calls the constitutional scholar a dope. — Robert (@avjagfan) July 3, 2025 The walls are red with tomato based products. — The Dr. - ❤️'s Educated Women (@gatesisthedevil) July 3, 2025 Jamie Raskin would eat Donald Trump for lunch in a debate. Raskin is a constitutional lawyer who has taught constitutional law for over 25 years. — Denison Barb (@DenisonBarbs) July 3, 2025 Shame on republicans — On A Bender (@on_bender) July 3, 2025 Trump's tirade isn't just petty—it's part of a pattern. His rhetoric leans hard into violence, personal attacks, and sugar-coated distortions dressed up as 'truth.' Political scientists have tracked a sharp rise in his use of violent language over the years, often rivaling… — SleuthyFella (@SleuthyFella) July 3, 2025 — Tucker&Otis (@Tucker_and_Otis) July 3, 2025
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Everyone Is Absolutely Losing It Over This Republican Senator's Face After Voting For The "Big Beautiful Bill"
On Tuesday, after a long vote with JD Vance as the tiebreaker, the Senate passed Donald Trump's "Big Beautiful Bill." Now, the bill heads to the House, with Republicans trying to race to Trump's self-imposed July 4 deadline. Of the most notable in the proposal, the bill proposes sweeping tax cuts for businesses and the country's wealthiest Americans. To offset the lost revenue, the bill would slash funding for healthcare programs like Medicaid, potentially leaving up to 17 million Americans uninsured. The bill would also cut SNAP, the food aid program relied on by 40 million Americans, by about 20 percent; roll back clean energy initiatives and student loan relief; and increase spending on the military and deportations. According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the bill is projected to add at least $3.3 trillion to the national debt over the next decade. Related: Rep. Sen. Lisa Murkowski of Alaska cast the last "yes" vote before JD's tiebreaker, which she later called an "agonizing" decision. While Murkowski supported the tax cuts in the bill, she raised concerns about the spending cuts to Medicaid and SNAP food assistance. Nearly one-third of Alaskans depend on Medicaid, and food insecurity remains a problem as many communities are too remote, requiring food to be barged or flown in, an inaccessible and expensive process. To convince Murkowski, Republicans stuffed the bill with provisions specifically designed to help win over her vote, including doubling a fund to help rural hospitals from $25 billion to $50 billion over five years, exemptions on work requirements for food assistance, and a tax break for whalers. After the vote, an NBC News reporter asked Murkowski if she thought her vote was "a bailout for Alaska at the expense of the rest of the country." These words, the reporter said, were spoken by Republican Sen. Rand Paul. However, Murkowski quietly stared him down, seething. "Do I like this bill? No," she said, admitting, "Because I tried to take care of Alaska's interests. But I know that in many parts of the country, there are Americans that are not going to be advantaged by this bill." Lisa Murkowksi just admitted that Trump's bill will hurt people even after she voted for it 'I know that in many parts of the country, there are Americans that are not going to be advantaged by this bill.' The Republicans are spineless cowards. — Harry Sisson (@harryjsisson) July 1, 2025 Twitter: @harryjsisson Related: Murkowski was also seen looking in an image after the vote. Naturally, it's gone viral. "tfw you've just stripped healthcare from 17 million Americans and ensured the closure of rural hospitals," one wrote. Related: "if I send you this pic it means I've made yet another horrible decision and abandoned my standards and morals," another said. "She knows what she did," this viral tweet read. People also reacted to her calling the decision "agonizing." "That pain you feel is in your conscience," one wrote. Related: "'Agonizing' for Lisa Murkowski? 17 million Americans will lose health care as a result of her vote. Be so serious," said Arizona Rep. Yassamin Ansari. Everyone's pretty much asking the same thing: "Then why did you vote for it?" Welp, as the bill heads to the House to be deliberated and voted on, we will wait to see if it heads to Trump's desk to be signed into law. In the meantime, in the comments, let us know your thoughts about the bill, and if it passes, how it will impact you. Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News: