Meta says will appeal 'unlawful' EU fine
The EU fined Meta in April over its "pay or consent" system because of how it said the company used personal data on Facebook and Instagram.
"This decision is both incorrect and unlawful, and we are appealing it," Meta vice president Tim Lamb said in a blog post published on Wednesday.
The fine against Meta concerned its "pay for privacy" system, which rights defenders have vehemently criticised in Europe after its introduction in November 2023.
It means users have to pay to avoid data collection, or agree to share their data with Facebook and Instagram to keep using the platforms for free.
The European Commission in April concluded Meta did not provide users with a less personalised but equivalent version of the platforms.
It also warned Meta faced potential daily penalties under the landmark Digital Markets Act (DMA) unless it complied with the law within 60 days.
That deadline ran out last week but the commission said on Wednesday that after receiving information from the company, it was assessing whether they are now complying.
Defending its system, Meta's Lamb pointed to an EU court ruling in 2023 that he said opened the way for subscriptions as a legally valid option.
"Yet the (April) decision ignores this ruling. Instead, it claims that the (top EU court's) crucial judgment is not relevant and incorrectly concludes that Meta's user choice does not comply with the DMA. This stance is perplexing," he wrote.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
17 minutes ago
- Time of India
Google makes new proposal to stave off EU antitrust fine
Google has proposed fresh changes to its search results in an attempt to fend off growing criticism from rivals, a week before a key meeting that could lead to yet another EU antitrust fine, according to a document seen by Reuters. The US tech giant has been under pressure after being hit in March with European Union antitrust charges of unfairly favouring its own services such as Google Shopping, Google Hotels and Google Flights over competitors. The company, owned by Alphabet, will meet its rivals and the European Commission to discuss its proposals during a July 7-8 workshop in Brussels, the document said. The EU's landmark Digital Markets Act, under which Google has been charged, sets out a list of dos and don'ts for Big Tech aimed at curbing their power and giving rivals more room to compete and consumers more choice. Last week, Google offered to create a box at the top of the search page for a so-called vertical search service (VSS) which would contain links to specialised search engines as well as to hotels, airlines, restaurants and transport services. The latest offer, called Option B, is an alternative to last week's proposal, according to a Google document sent by the Commission to involved parties and seen by Reuters. "Under 'Option B', whenever a VSS box is shown, Google will also show a box that includes free links to suppliers," the document said. The box for suppliers - in essence hotels, restaurants, airlines and travel services - would be below the VSS box, with Google organising the information about the suppliers. Option B "provides suppliers opportunities while not creating a box that can be characterised as a Google VSS", the document said. "We've made hundreds of alterations to our products as part of our DMA compliance," a Google spokesperson said. "While we strive for compliance, we remain genuinely concerned about some of the real world consequences of the DMA, which are leading to worse online products and experiences for Europeans." Google risks a fine as much as 10% of its global annual revenue if found in breach of the DMA.
Mint
an hour ago
- Mint
India well-placed to benefit from tariff-led trade shifts, says Moody's
New Delhi: India is well-positioned to benefit from a global realignment in trade and investment flows driven by shifting tariff regimes, and could outpace several Asia-Pacific (APAC) peers, Moody's Ratings said on Thursday. As multinationals reassess supply chains amid rising protectionism and evolving trade policies, India's relative tariff advantage may strengthen its appeal as an emerging global manufacturing hub, Moody's noted in its latest Sovereigns – Asia-Pacific Outlook. 'India may be subject to lower tariffs than many in APAC, which could help the economy attract further investment flows and support its development as a global manufacturing base. The signing of a free trade agreement with the UK in May and ongoing efforts to establish the same with the EU will further support such development,' the report said. Moody's pointed out that compared to countries like Cambodia and Vietnam, India is better placed to gain meaningfully from trade diversion and shifting capital flows—thanks to its scale, policy orientation, and improved market access through bilateral agreements. The recently concluded free trade agreement with the UK was highlighted as a key enabler of India's broader trade ambitions. Parallel efforts to negotiate a pact with the European Union are also expected to boost market access and strengthen investor confidence. However, Moody's cautioned that broader trends in global industrial policy could still temper the scale of these gains. 'The US' goal to reshore select manufacturing segments could challenge the extent to which India benefits,' the report said. The commentary comes at a time when India is accelerating its push to emerge as an alternative manufacturing base to China, supported by targeted policy incentives, supply chain development, and efforts to deepen trade integration with developed economies. To be sure, US President Donald Trump's 'reciprocal tariffs' policy—announced in April—aims to impose higher duties on countries that levy steeper tariffs on American goods, triggering a wave of global trade renegotiations. Under the plan, a broad 10% baseline tariff was introduced in April, with steeper rates imposed on countries such as China and Vietnam. A temporary 90-day pause was granted to allow for negotiations. Since then, the U.S. has revised trade deals with the UK, China, and most recently Vietnam, trimming their tariff exposure as it races to finalize more agreements before the July 9 deadline. Meanwhile, Washington and New Delhi are negotiating a trade agreement aimed at avoiding the steep duties lined up under Trump's plan.
NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
The Cost Of Carbon Credits And How They Can Fight Climate Change
Brussels: The European Commission has proposed an EU climate target for 2040 that allows countries to count carbon credits bought from developing nations towards the EU goal for the first time. Here's what that means, and why the EU move on Wednesday faced criticism from campaigners and some scientists. What Are Carbon Credits? Carbon credits, or offsets, involve funding projects that reduce CO2 emissions abroad in place of cuts to your own greenhouse gas emissions. Examples include forest restoration in Brazil, or converting a city's petrol buses to electric. The buyer counts "credits" for those emission reductions towards its climate goal, and the seller gets finance for their green project. Proponents say the system generates much-needed funding for CO2-cutting efforts in developing nations and lets countries work together to cut emissions around the world. However, the reputation of CO2 credits has been dented by a string of scandals in which credit-generating projects failed to deliver the climate benefits they claimed. Why Is The EU Buying Them? The European Commission proposed allowing up to 3 percentage points of the EU's 2040 target - to cut net emissions by 90% from 1990 levels - to be covered by carbon credits bought from other countries. The EU's existing climate targets require countries to meet the goals entirely by cutting emissions at home. The bloc's executive Commission said last year it hoped the EU could agree a 90% emissions-cutting target for 2040, with no mention of carbon credits. Tumultuous geopolitics and the economic challenges of European industries have since stoked political pushback, with governments from Germany to Poland demanding a softer target. In response, the Commission said it would add flexibilities, and landed on carbon credits as a way to retain a 90% emissions-cutting goal while reducing the domestic steps needed to reach it. EU countries and the European Parliament must negotiate and approve the goal. What Are The Risks? The EU plan was welcomed by countries including Germany, which had pushed to include carbon credits in the goal, and by carbon credit project developers as a boost for climate finance. But environmental campaigners said the EU was shirking domestic CO2-cutting efforts and warned against relying on cheap, low-value credits. The EU's climate science advisers had also opposed buying credits under the 2040 target, which they said would divert money from investments in local clean industries. The EU banned international credits from its own carbon market after a flood of cheap credits with weak environmental benefits contributed to a carbon price crash. To try to address the risks, the Commission said it would buy credits in line with a global market and rules for trading carbon credits which the U.N. is developing. These include quality standards aimed at avoiding the problems that unregulated credit trading has faced in recent years. Brussels will also propose rules next year on specific quality standards for the carbon credits the EU buys. How Much Will It Cost? The EU doesn't yet know. Carbon credit prices today can be as low as a few dollars per tonne of CO2, up to more than $100, depending on the project. EU emissions records suggest the bloc would need to buy at least 140 million tonnes of CO2 emissions to cover 3% of the 2040 target, roughly equivalent to the Netherlands' total emissions last year. One senior Commission official said the bloc was determined not to hoover up cheap junk credits. "I don't think that would have any additional value. The credits we see currently on voluntary carbon markets are very, very cheap, and that probably reflects a lack of high environmental integrity," the senior official said.
