
New report accuses China of ‘indoctrinating' Tibetan children in boarding schools
The Tibet Action Institute (TAI) in its recent report has accused the Chinese government of using Tibetan children as a means to aggressively and forcibly assimilate Tibetans, threatening their survival as distinct people. The report found that students are restricted from enrolling in Tibetan language classes or engaging in religious activities, even during school breaks.
As per activists, such boarding schools are now believed to house approximately one million Tibetan children, however, the exact number is difficult to confirm.
The report titled 'When They Came to Take Our Children': China's Colonial Boarding Schools and the Future of Tibet' says the children are separated from their families at an early age –– as young as four years old in some rural areas –– and indoctrinated to be loyal to the Chinese Communist Party.
'There is now additional evidence that even younger children are being compelled to board across Tibet. At present, Tibetan children aged three or four to six must attend Chinese-language preschool,' the report states.
TAI, is a US based advocacy group created in 2009 to assist Tibetans after large protests were held before the Beijing Olympics in 2008.
The research for the report is based on rare firsthand accounts by Tibetans either still in Tibet or who have recently escaped. This includes fifteen in-depth interviews conducted between 2023 and 2024 with Tibetans who had recently fled to India, statements published online by people still in Tibet, and approximately 75 private or public comments by people in Tibet from January 2022 to April 2025 that were documented by Tibetans in exile.
The report stated that China's education policies in Tibet seek to deracinate Tibetan children from their culture, language, and identity. In the colonial boarding school system, children are first separated from their families, and then bombarded with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) ideology through carefully curated images, texts, and songs, all in Chinese language.
The report also added that as one of the persons who recently escaped from Tibet as saying: In boarding schools, the indoctrination process begins from a very young age. The children are taken away from their parents, restricted from speaking their mother tongue – Tibetan – taught in Chinese language, forced to learn and speak Chinese, and taught only state-approved history.
A stated in the report, former boarding school student described how politicised education was implemented in their classroom: 'All the materials put on our class walls were in Chinese. All [my] class teachers [were] Chinese…. In all the classes, we had pictures of Xi Jinping, Mao Zedong, Deng Xiaoping, Jiang Zemin, and Hu Jintao.'
The report outlined that all students in China are subjected to a politicised curriculum that is intended to cultivate loyalty to Xi Jinping and the Communist Party. However, in Tibet, education is part of a larger effort to methodically strip away a sense of Tibetaness and manipulate students' primary identification to be Chinese, rather than Tibetan.
Notably, the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights echoed the Special Rapporteurs', in March 2023, concern that the colonial boarding schools violate China's obligations under the ICESCR, urging the Chinese government to 'abolish immediately the coerced residential (boarding) school system imposed on Tibetan children.
'A generation of Tibetan children is being harmed by China's colonial boarding school policy — socially, emotionally, and psychologically,' said Lhadon Tethong, director of TAI, calling on the international community to step up all efforts to push the Chinese government to abolish this abusive and coercive system.
TAI urges the United Nations and concerned governments to call on the Chinese government to immediately conduct a public investigation into the alleged abuses, deaths, and mental health concerns of Tibetan children in Chinese state-run boarding schools, to abolish the coercive system of boarding schools and preschools, and to enable Tibetan children to access high-quality mother tongue education while living at home.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Trump targets tariff evasion, with eye on China
WASHINGTON: As the United States ramps up tariffs on major trading partners globally, President Donald Trump is also disrupting strategies that could be used -- by Chinese companies or others -- to circumvent them. Goods deemed to be "transshipped," or sent through a third country with lower export levies, will face an additional 40-percent duty under an incoming wave of Trump tariffs Thursday. The latest tranche of "reciprocal" tariff hikes, taking aim at what Washington deems unfair trade practices, impacts dozens of economies from Taiwan to India. The transshipment rule does not name countries, but is expected to impact China significantly given its position as a manufacturing powerhouse. Washington likely wants to develop supply chains that are less reliant on China, analysts say, as tensions simmer between the world's two biggest economies and the US sounds the alarm on Beijing's excess industrial capacity. But "it's a little more about the short-term effect of strengthening the tariff regime than it is about a decoupling strategy," said Josh Lipsky, chair of international economics at the Atlantic Council. "The point is to make countries worried about it and then have them err on the side of not doing it, because they know that Trump could then jack up the tariff rates higher again," he added, referring to tariff evasion. The possibility of a sharply higher duty is a "perpetual stick in the negotiations" with countries, said Richard Stern, a tax and budget expert at the conservative Heritage Foundation. He told AFP that expanding penalties across the globe takes the focus away from Beijing alone.


Indian Express
13 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Don't give China pass, burn relationship with ‘strong ally' India: Nikki Haley
The US should not burn its relationship with a 'strong ally like India' and give a pass to China, Indian-American Republican leader Nikki Haley said on Tuesday, amid President Donald Trump's attacks against New Delhi over tariffs and purchases of Russian oil. 'India should not be buying oil from Russia. But China, an adversary and the number one buyer of Russian and Iranian oil, got a 90-day tariff pause,' Haley said in a post on X. 'Don't give China a pass and burn a relationship with a strong ally like India,' she said. Haley, the former Governor of South Carolina, was the US Ambassador to the United Nations under Trump's first presidential term, becoming the first Indian-American to be appointed to a cabinet-level post in the US administration. India should not be buying oil from Russia. But China, an adversary and the number one buyer of Russian and Iranian oil, got a 90-day tariff pause. Don't give China a pass and burn a relationship with a strong ally like India. — Nikki Haley (@NikkiHaley) August 5, 2025 In 2013, she officially announced her candidacy for the 2024 presidential election and withdrew from the race in March last year. Her comments came hours after Trump said India has not been a 'good trading partner' and announced he will raise tariffs on India 'very substantially over the next 24 hours' because New Delhi is buying Russian oil and 'fueling' the 'war machine'. India on Monday mounted an unusually sharp counterattack on the US and the European Union for their 'unjustified and unreasonable' targeting of New Delhi for its procurement of Russian crude oil. New Delhi's response came after Trump asserted that Washington will substantially raise tariffs on goods from India over its energy ties with Russia. Meanwhile, Trump, in an interview with CNBC responded to a question on China and its leader, Xi Jinping, and said, 'We have a very good relationship'. Trump added that he might have a meeting with the Chinese President 'before the end of the year, most likely, if we make a deal.' He said he won't have a meeting if a deal doesn't materialise. 'But we're getting very close to a deal. We're getting along with China very well.' Trump added that China is 'very reliant' on the US. 'My relationship with them is very good. I think we'll make a good deal. It's not imperative, but I think we're going to make a good deal.' He added that he has had a 'great relationship' with President Xi. 'We respect him a lot. They respect us a lot.'


Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
'I never said a percentage': Trump keeps tariff threat vague as India faces heat over Russian oil
US President Donald Trump has threatened a sharp hike in tariffs on Indian imports, citing India's continued purchases of Russian oil. He denies ever naming a percentage, but says "we'll be doing quite a bit of that." India has pushed back, calling the move unjustified. The fallout could reshape trade flows, squeeze exporters, and further complicate US-India relations. President Donald Trump answers questions from reporters after signing an executive order about the 2028 Los Angeles Olympic Games, in the South Court Auditorium of the Eisenhower Executive Office Building on the White House campus, Tuesday, Aug. 5, 2025, in Washington. (AP Photo/Alex Brandon) Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads India pushes back Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Haley's criticism and China's 90-day pass Trump's tariff war: The bigger fallout US tariffs: What's at stake for India Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads US President Donald Trump says he never mentioned a percentage. That was his answer when asked about the rumoured 100% tariff on countries buying Russian energy. Standing at a White House podium on a day meant to promote the 2028 Olympics, Trump veered into trade policy, saying, "I never said a percentage, but we'll be doing quite a bit of that. We'll see what happens over the next fairly short period of time... We have a meeting with Russia tomorrow. We're going to see what happens."The immediate target is India. Trump has repeatedly hit out at New Delhi over its oil ties with Moscow, threatening to raise tariffs on Indian goods "very substantially" within 24 hours. The figure currently stands at 25%. In an interview with CNBC, he said, "They're fuelling the war machine, and if they're going to do that, then I'm not going to be happy."He framed it as a matter of fairness. 'India has not been a good trading partner,' he said. 'They do a lot of business with us, but we don't do business with them. They're the highest tariff nation. They have the highest tariff of anybody.'India has not taken this quietly. The Ministry of External Affairs called the threats "unjustified and unreasonable" and warned it would take "all necessary measures" to protect its national interests. Indian officials argue that buying oil from Russia has helped stabilise global energy prices by easing pressure on supply Kremlin echoed that view. Spokesman Dmitry Peskov said sovereign countries should choose their economic partners freely. 'We believe that sovereign countries must have, and do have, the right to choose their trade partners... and independently determine those modes of trade and economic cooperation that suit the interests of a country in question.'Enter Nikki Haley, Trump's former UN ambassador and Republican primary rival. Her criticism of Trump was direct. On X, she wrote: 'India should not be buying oil from Russia. But China, an adversary and the number one buyer of Russian and Iranian oil, got a 90-day tariff pause. Don't give China a pass and burn a relationship with a strong ally like India.'Her comments underscore a bigger political contradiction. While Trump is singling out India, China, whose purchases of Russian oil far outstrip India's has been given a temporary sudden shift on tariffs isn't just a political message, it's sending ripples through the markets. ICRA , the Indian ratings agency, downgraded India's GDP growth projection for FY26 from 6.2% to 6.0%, citing US tariff risks and trade sectors expected to suffer most are textiles, tyres, chemicals, auto parts, agrochemicals and cut and polished diamonds. Exporters in these sectors are already exploring ways to reroute trade through the UAE, Belgium or pivot to other markets like the UK or Asia-Pacific. But that won't happen petroleum products and telecom equipment are expected to be spared for now. But ICRA warned that unless a bilateral deal is struck soon, India's export trajectory could be seriously US remains India's biggest export market, with a trade surplus rising from $21 billion in FY2015 to $41 billion in FY2025. This isn't a minor trading partner, it's a pillar of India's economic yet, Trump seems set on confrontation. On his social platform, Truth Social, he claimed: 'India is not only buying massive amounts of Russian Oil, they are then, for much of the Oil purchased, selling it on the Open Market for big profits. They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA.'This, despite the fact that the US and EU both continue to import key materials from Russia, from uranium for nuclear energy to fertilisers and RT reported that India's National Security Adviser, Ajit Doval, arrived in Moscow just as Trump's tariff threat escalated. India has also pointed out that it is the world's fastest-growing major economy, challenging Trump's remark that Russia and India could 'take their dead economies down together.'Meanwhile, in the background, global trade tensions are simmering elsewhere. Japan's chief negotiator flew to Washington, hoping to finalise a long-delayed tariff cut on car exports. Canada and Mexico are also working to shore up trade ties. And in the US, the trade deficit with China has fallen to its lowest in over two for Trump, the final decision may follow his meeting with Russian officials. Asked about it again on Tuesday, he replied: 'We have a meeting with Russia tomorrow, we will see what happens.'His position is shifting by the hour. But one thing is clear tariffs are back at the centre of his foreign policy playbook.(With inputs from ANI)