logo
We're familiar with the evils of fast fashion. But is high fashion so much better?

We're familiar with the evils of fast fashion. But is high fashion so much better?

Irish Times6 days ago
When I was 22 all I wanted was a
Chanel
2.55 bag. My desire was spawned in part by the TV show The OC, where teenagers paraded the halls of their high school with quilted bags draped over their bony shoulders. The other influence was Vogue;
women quizzed on their essentials often name-checked the clutch for its timeless elegance. Back then, the bag retailed for about €1,500 – already aspirational. Today, the same bag costs €11,000.
Why is the Chanel 2.55 so expensive? Is it because a) it takes time and skill to make? b) because it's rare?, or c) because the materials are so costly? Each quilted bag uses several metres of premium leather. It takes 18 hours for a skilled artisan to produce. Although the direct cost of production (materials and labour) is not made public, luxury analysts estimate a gross margin of 80-85 per cent for luxury bags. This doesn't include factory overheads, logistics, marketing and above all, the branding that makes the 2.55 not just a bag, but a cultural object.
Western culture places a hefty premium on authenticity, and consumers are willing to pay a lot for 'the real thing', especially when it's exclusive. Not all cultures have the same baggage. In China, philosopher Byung-Chul Han argues, a good copy can rival – or even surpass – the original.
So why is this bag so expensive? I'd wager the answer is d): the Chanel 2.55 isn't expensive because it's valuable; it's valuable because it's so expensive. Luxury handbags such as the 2.55 and the Hermès Birkin are the ultimate Veblen goods: as prices rise, so does demand. Some fashion houses (ahem – Burberry) have been known to destroy their stock rather than sell at a discount.
READ MORE
[
Jane Birkin's original Hermès handbag sells for record €8.6m at Paris auction
Opens in new window
]
But maybe we've hit the limit of this fiscal mindmelt. About five years ago, I stopped wanting a Chanel 2.55. I still think the bag is beautiful. But everything it once represented for me – timeless, long-lasting artistry – began to feel like a pale imitation.
As Chanel bags have grown more expensive, craft hasn't kept pace. While pre-2008 the bag had 24-karat gold-plated hardware, the newer models have brass finishings that tarnish. Vintage editions had sturdier handles, thicker lambskin and higher stitch counts. Around the time Chanel prices began to soar, production also went through the roof. The result is a more expensive and, to my mind, poorer product.
A Chanel bag on the runway at Paris Fashion Week: as Chanel bags have grown more expensive, craft hasn't kept pace. Photograph: PascalThe fate of the Chanel 2.55 is emblematic of what has happened to the fashion industry in the past decade. If luxury once meant a quality, ethically produced object, today it may just mean stupidly expensive.
We're all familiar by now with the evils of fast fashion – ecologically devastating practices, quick churn, poor quality and exploitative labour costs. But is high fashion really so much better?
A slew of recent news stories about alleged labour abuses by high-end Italian brands suggests not.
'People think 'Made in Italy' means you're getting a long-lasting craft item,' says Caoimhe Grant, a Dublin-based designer and founder of the handbag line, August Night. 'But real artisans can't produce at the speed luxury brands demand. If it's mass produced, how luxury is it?'
Last week the luxury cashmere brand Loro Piana (a subsidiary of the
LVMH
group) was
placed under court administration in Italy
. The company is accused of exploitative labour in its production line. In Loro Piana's case, its main contractor outsourced to a Chinese subcontractor called Evergreen. A police search of the factory premises uncovered 10 Chinese migrant workers. These workers put in 90-hour weeks for €4 an hour, housed in illegal dorms on the premises. A Loro Piana wool coat can retail for €5,000. One factory owner claims the contractor was charged €118 per unit.
Loro Piana is the fifth luxury brand – and the second LVMH-owned one, after Dior – to be investigated for alleged violation of Italian labour laws.
How did this happen? In the past decade, Chinese workers emigrated en masse to Prato, a textile manufacturing hub in Tuscany. While most worked in fast fashion, some now work in the luxury manufacturing business. Chinese-owned workshops offered fast, flexible garment production that was still legally 'Made in Italy'. Today the practice has spread to Milan and Lombardy, the heart of Italian luxury. Companies such as Evergreen are Chinese-owned and staffed by Chinese immigrants, a shadow supply chain the consumer doesn't see.
The internet only accelerated this demand for speed. Luxury brands, once operating on two collections a year, now produce up to six. The churn of novelty, the pressure to deliver product faster and cheaper – all while maintaining the illusion of Italian craftsmanship – has hollowed out the old idea of luxury.
In 1955, a designer bag would have been a once-in-a-lifetime purchase, made to last a lifetime. Today, influencers say they're 'no longer reaching for' a bag bought last month. The recession trained customers to expect discounts; ecommerce platforms such as Net-a-Porter and Mytheresa squeezed brands with exclusives and RTS deals (where designers eat the loss when stock doesn't sell).
[
Handbags at dawn: It was obvious I was not the typical Chanel customer
Opens in new window
]
It's not surprising then that many people are leaning towards circular fashion and resale. I've been devoted to eBay for 20 years. Some of my best buys: The Row trousers (€80) and a Margiela coat (€45). Others are leaning into luxury 'dupes' – counterfeit goods produced in China for a fraction of the cost. While the factory still has to pay for materials and labour, they get the brand for free. In the new world of mass luxury, a good copy might be just as 'good' – even better – than the cheaply made original. Reddit purse forums are hopping with details on where to find the best-made Chanel replicas. (187 Factory in Guangzhou is popular.)
Maybe this is our sign to reject the logo game altogether and look for real luxury elsewhere — small, local, upcycled or direct-to-consumer brands that aren't caught in the hamster wheel of mass production. 'It's thoughtful, clever design, quality fabric, high-end, ethical production,' says Grant, who makes sculptural bags from fabrics such as silk, velvet and Irish linen. 'You can see the ideas, the work, and the story behind it. That's real luxury for me.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Amazon is not the only multinational losing confidence in Ireland. Will a €102bn plan fix it?
Amazon is not the only multinational losing confidence in Ireland. Will a €102bn plan fix it?

Irish Times

time13 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Amazon is not the only multinational losing confidence in Ireland. Will a €102bn plan fix it?

This week we got a State investment plan with no list of projects and a pre-budget document with no estimate of the likely position of the public finances next year. Economic nerds like me felt short-changed. The first document was all uppy stuff about boosting investment and securing the future. The second doubled down on the scary backdrop provided by a changed world and the unpredictable actions of Donald Trump . The Government has clearly made a political decision to 'go for it' on State investment. But the document published this week was more a manifesto for the multinationals than a plan. It was a pitch to foreign investors, who have become increasingly outspoken about Ireland's energy and water infrastructure and the lack of housing for their staff . And it was a bid to try to allay public concern – on housing in particular. The head-wrecking details, including how to deliver it all – most notably in housing – are still being worked out. The decision by Amazon to abandon a project in northwest Dublin because of problems getting an electricity connection is by no means a first. There has been a building crisis of confidence in corporate headquarters in the US about Ireland's ability to deliver on these areas – and this week's plans are an attempt to send a message to these American boardrooms, who are central to our economic wellbeing. They will also look for evidence that Ireland can actually make this happen - reassurances over the years that the key infrastructure areas were being addressed have not been delivered on. READ MORE And so we have a €102 billion, five-year investment plan. It is, for sure, heading in the right direction. The Fiscal Council has estimated that Ireland's infrastructure is 20 per cent to 25 per cent behind other richer EU countries. In this context, the recent growth rate of the economy has been remarkable. But Ireland is now running hard into the infrastructural buffers. Turning this investment manifesto into a fully coherent plan and then implementing it will be a big task. Ireland has struggled to deliver on the scale of promised investment in recent years; Covid was factor, for sure, but the State missed opportunities to cash in on a time of fiscal plenty. Now, it plans to boost investment plans just as the outlook is getting uncertain. It is necessary – but it also carries some risk. It looks like a turning point may be approaching in the national finances, when more difficult decisions await and trade-offs have to be faced up to. The State has been swimming in cash in recent years – but the budget surplus is being eaten away. And this means some politically difficult choices, which have yet to be squarely faced. Corporate tax is still funding a spending rise across the board. The Government plans to increase current spending by almost 6.5 per cent next year, well ahead of inflation. However, the combination of a big investment plan and Donald Trump's policy decisions are changing Ireland's fiscal arithmetic. In the spring, the forecast budget surplus of revenue over spending for next year was €6.3 billion. And that was before any tariffs. This week's document does not update that figure. But on the basis of what we now know from this week's documents, economists have cut this forecast to around €2 billion. [ Taoiseach to 'delve into' Amazon's scrapping of Dublin plant over failure to secure power supply Opens in new window ] As Goodbody stockbroker economist Dermot O'Leary pointed out, this is a small margin for error in the light of the tariff threats and the hugely concentrated nature of our tax base. And the gamble is not so much that the State might have to borrow a bit for a few years to ramp up investment. It is that a bigger hole might appear, because such a large part of our corporate tax is potentially transitory – based on multinational tax planning rather than economic activity here – and that policy changes in the US could lead to some of this cash leaving. The Fiscal Council estimates that subtracting the tax planning froth, the public finances would be heading for a deficit next year of €13 billion. [ Corporation tax surge a sign investors have not been put off by economic uncertainty just yet Opens in new window ] Now we are, of course, into 'crying wolf' territory here. The council, Central Bank, Department of Finance and most of us who write about economics have been warning about this risk for years. In the meantime, the tax paid by multinationals has just kept heading higher. And this may not be over yet. The Fiscal Council has said that corporate tax may again outperform this year compared to forecasts, which could give the Government some leeway in 2026. But that does not remove the risk of hanging on to a tax pile which has grown so large than it has now attracted jealous eyes not only from the rest of the EU but from Washington DC. And the State investment plans lower the room for manoeuvre if something goes wrong. If you plan to spend another €34 billion over the next five years, it has to come from somewhere, and using an expected budget surplus each year to help pay is part of the plan. Already, there are signs of the budget scope tightening. We are seeing the potential juggling in Budget 2026, with the hospitality VAT rate possibly deferred until midyear to leave scope for an income tax package. But that is a bet that the cash will be there to pay for a full-year VAT cut in 2027. And this is really only budgetary small beer, if the Government is to really slow the growth of day-to-day spending to leave room for more State investment. If it does not, then any fall-off to corporate tax will leave tricky decisions. For example, the Government is committed to putting money into two State funds for the future. It is legally obliged to do so, though can stop if there is a downturn. But if the numbers do get tight, does the State borrow cash to then invest in these funds – which would look very strange? Or does it divert money from other cash holdings? Sitting watching will be the National Treasury Management Agency, which was set up to borrow on behalf of the State. It has had a quiet time on this front in recent years, with the budget in surplus and a requirement just to keep things ticking over and refinance maturing debt. Now, as the State finances tighten, it may soon be back in business.

Planning ruling on Dublin Airport ramps sends wrong message
Planning ruling on Dublin Airport ramps sends wrong message

Irish Times

time14 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Planning ruling on Dublin Airport ramps sends wrong message

The planning authorities have their hands full with Dublin Airport . Between passenger caps and night flights, they have enough to be getting on with, but added to the mix is a Dublin Airport Authority (DAA) plan to knock down the now unused spiral ramps for cars next to Terminal 1. On Wednesday An Coimisiún Pleanála turned down DAA's appeal to demolish the ramps . Doing so 'would diminish the visual amenity on approach to T1 and expose the crude architectural detailing of the existing structures to the rear of the spirals, including the prominent architectural elements of the energy centre screened by the spiral car park ramps and as such would erode the character of the area', the commission said. Please. READ MORE This is not an application to demolish something like a block of Georgian buildings in the city centre. The character of the area around Terminal 1 has changed dramatically since it was built in 1972. What character it has now is that of a hotchpotch of buildings and walkways built at different times in an effort to keep a rapidly expanding airport fit for purpose. It has little resemblance to what was a beautiful, and not always full, building in the 1970s and 1980s. [ Planners just cannot win at Dublin Airport Opens in new window ] The reality is the airport is a key part of the State's infrastructure. It is bursting at the seams as it is, and has to always be in position to evolve to match the changing demands of air travel. This is a much different issue to the likes of the 32 million passenger cap. The cap has been in place since 2007. It was only in the last 18 months or so that it has become an issue, with DAA and airlines railing against a rule in place for almost two decades. An Coimisiún Pleanála sends a very clear message to any owner or manager of a large development in Ireland with this ruling: don't build anything interesting. Don't seek a memorable design or anything that might be architecturally notable. Build something as boring and generic as possible. Think Hawkins House more than Terminal 1. It might be the only way you will be allowed replace it when it has reached the end of its functional lifespan in a few decades.

Tesco seeks High Court injunction to get horses off its Galway land
Tesco seeks High Court injunction to get horses off its Galway land

Irish Times

time15 hours ago

  • Irish Times

Tesco seeks High Court injunction to get horses off its Galway land

Tesco is seeking a High Court injunction requiring a couple to remove horses on an eight-acre site it owns in Galway . Martin and Kathleen Donovan, who live in a caravan on a halting site at Túr Uisce, Doughiska, Galway, have been keeping the horses, and using buildings as makeshift stables on the site at Briarhill Junction, Galway City, the court heard. At a meeting with the couple last month, Tesco Ireland Ltd representatives were told they would get the horses off if they were 'financially compensated' so that they could buy or rent new land to keep the animals. Tesco refused. The Donovans also claimed they have been on the site for 15 years and could claim adverse possession (squatters rights). Tesco disputes this and say the claim is bound to fail. READ MORE Galway City Council has also notified Tesco that it had to render the land 'other than derelict' and the site had been placed on the derelict sites register. If works are not carried out, this could result in punitive levies and the possibility of a compulsory purchase order. It has not been possible for Tesco's contractors to access the land and do the necessary work due to safety concerns. The court also heard that the Department of Agriculture also issued a notice requiring the horses to be removed. Inspectors arrived to see if the notice was being complied with, but the animals were returned to the site after the inspectors left. Tesco has erected paladin fencing around the site boundary and secured the gates to the site with locks. However, these locks have been removed and new locks placed there, but not by Tesco. [ Galway farmer granted permission to challenge Greenway purchase decision 'splitting' his farm Opens in new window ] Tesco wants to develop the site; part of it has been compulsorily purchased for the N6 Galway Ring Road project. Mr Justice Brian Cregan, following a one-side-only application on behalf of Tesco, granted permission for service of the papers on the defendants at short notice. He said a 'plain English' notice should also be provided in the service notice and the defendants could be informed in this way, as well as through a phone number and email address Tesco has for one of them, that the case will return next week.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store