
We're familiar with the evils of fast fashion. But is high fashion so much better?
Chanel
2.55 bag. My desire was spawned in part by the TV show The OC, where teenagers paraded the halls of their high school with quilted bags draped over their bony shoulders. The other influence was Vogue;
women quizzed on their essentials often name-checked the clutch for its timeless elegance. Back then, the bag retailed for about €1,500 – already aspirational. Today, the same bag costs €11,000.
Why is the Chanel 2.55 so expensive? Is it because a) it takes time and skill to make? b) because it's rare?, or c) because the materials are so costly? Each quilted bag uses several metres of premium leather. It takes 18 hours for a skilled artisan to produce. Although the direct cost of production (materials and labour) is not made public, luxury analysts estimate a gross margin of 80-85 per cent for luxury bags. This doesn't include factory overheads, logistics, marketing and above all, the branding that makes the 2.55 not just a bag, but a cultural object.
Western culture places a hefty premium on authenticity, and consumers are willing to pay a lot for 'the real thing', especially when it's exclusive. Not all cultures have the same baggage. In China, philosopher Byung-Chul Han argues, a good copy can rival – or even surpass – the original.
So why is this bag so expensive? I'd wager the answer is d): the Chanel 2.55 isn't expensive because it's valuable; it's valuable because it's so expensive. Luxury handbags such as the 2.55 and the Hermès Birkin are the ultimate Veblen goods: as prices rise, so does demand. Some fashion houses (ahem – Burberry) have been known to destroy their stock rather than sell at a discount.
READ MORE
[
Jane Birkin's original Hermès handbag sells for record €8.6m at Paris auction
Opens in new window
]
But maybe we've hit the limit of this fiscal mindmelt. About five years ago, I stopped wanting a Chanel 2.55. I still think the bag is beautiful. But everything it once represented for me – timeless, long-lasting artistry – began to feel like a pale imitation.
As Chanel bags have grown more expensive, craft hasn't kept pace. While pre-2008 the bag had 24-karat gold-plated hardware, the newer models have brass finishings that tarnish. Vintage editions had sturdier handles, thicker lambskin and higher stitch counts. Around the time Chanel prices began to soar, production also went through the roof. The result is a more expensive and, to my mind, poorer product.
A Chanel bag on the runway at Paris Fashion Week: as Chanel bags have grown more expensive, craft hasn't kept pace. Photograph: PascalThe fate of the Chanel 2.55 is emblematic of what has happened to the fashion industry in the past decade. If luxury once meant a quality, ethically produced object, today it may just mean stupidly expensive.
We're all familiar by now with the evils of fast fashion – ecologically devastating practices, quick churn, poor quality and exploitative labour costs. But is high fashion really so much better?
A slew of recent news stories about alleged labour abuses by high-end Italian brands suggests not.
'People think 'Made in Italy' means you're getting a long-lasting craft item,' says Caoimhe Grant, a Dublin-based designer and founder of the handbag line, August Night. 'But real artisans can't produce at the speed luxury brands demand. If it's mass produced, how luxury is it?'
Last week the luxury cashmere brand Loro Piana (a subsidiary of the
LVMH
group) was
placed under court administration in Italy
. The company is accused of exploitative labour in its production line. In Loro Piana's case, its main contractor outsourced to a Chinese subcontractor called Evergreen. A police search of the factory premises uncovered 10 Chinese migrant workers. These workers put in 90-hour weeks for €4 an hour, housed in illegal dorms on the premises. A Loro Piana wool coat can retail for €5,000. One factory owner claims the contractor was charged €118 per unit.
Loro Piana is the fifth luxury brand – and the second LVMH-owned one, after Dior – to be investigated for alleged violation of Italian labour laws.
How did this happen? In the past decade, Chinese workers emigrated en masse to Prato, a textile manufacturing hub in Tuscany. While most worked in fast fashion, some now work in the luxury manufacturing business. Chinese-owned workshops offered fast, flexible garment production that was still legally 'Made in Italy'. Today the practice has spread to Milan and Lombardy, the heart of Italian luxury. Companies such as Evergreen are Chinese-owned and staffed by Chinese immigrants, a shadow supply chain the consumer doesn't see.
The internet only accelerated this demand for speed. Luxury brands, once operating on two collections a year, now produce up to six. The churn of novelty, the pressure to deliver product faster and cheaper – all while maintaining the illusion of Italian craftsmanship – has hollowed out the old idea of luxury.
In 1955, a designer bag would have been a once-in-a-lifetime purchase, made to last a lifetime. Today, influencers say they're 'no longer reaching for' a bag bought last month. The recession trained customers to expect discounts; ecommerce platforms such as Net-a-Porter and Mytheresa squeezed brands with exclusives and RTS deals (where designers eat the loss when stock doesn't sell).
[
Handbags at dawn: It was obvious I was not the typical Chanel customer
Opens in new window
]
It's not surprising then that many people are leaning towards circular fashion and resale. I've been devoted to eBay for 20 years. Some of my best buys: The Row trousers (€80) and a Margiela coat (€45). Others are leaning into luxury 'dupes' – counterfeit goods produced in China for a fraction of the cost. While the factory still has to pay for materials and labour, they get the brand for free. In the new world of mass luxury, a good copy might be just as 'good' – even better – than the cheaply made original. Reddit purse forums are hopping with details on where to find the best-made Chanel replicas. (187 Factory in Guangzhou is popular.)
Maybe this is our sign to reject the logo game altogether and look for real luxury elsewhere — small, local, upcycled or direct-to-consumer brands that aren't caught in the hamster wheel of mass production. 'It's thoughtful, clever design, quality fabric, high-end, ethical production,' says Grant, who makes sculptural bags from fabrics such as silk, velvet and Irish linen. 'You can see the ideas, the work, and the story behind it. That's real luxury for me.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Irish Times
10 hours ago
- Irish Times
‘Cautiously optimistic': Trump officials hopeful of US-EU trade deal
Donald Trump will meet the president of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen as work gets under way on a five-day visit to Scotland. The US president flew into the country on Friday night and was then s een playing golf at his Trump Turnberry resort the following day. However, on Sunday, he will meet von der Leyen for talks on the trading relationship between Europe and the US. The talks come ahead of discussions with prime minister Keir Starmer on Monday, which are also expected to focus on trade issues. The UK and the US struck a trade deal recently, with discussions between the two men expected to focus on this, with reports suggesting Starmer will be looking for the US to cut the tariffs for British steel. The start of discussions show the US president getting down to business on what is a private, five-day visit to Scotland. On Saturday, he was spotted playing a round at the Turnberry course, which he purchased in 2014. A massive security operation was in place as he drove his own buggy. Even before he took to the course, police officers and military personnel could be seen searching the area around the resort, which has had a metal fence erected around it as part of heightened security measures. Police snipers are positioned on the roof of the Trump Turnberry hotel during US president Donald Trump's visit in Turnberry, Scotland. Photograph: Getty Images No protesters were seen while he was playing on Saturday, but hundreds of people gathered in both Edinburgh and Aberdeen for demonstrations against his visit, organised by the Stop Trump Coalition. Police Scotland said that no arrests were made but a 50-year-old woman was given a recorded police warning in Edinburgh. Trump has said there was a 50-50 chance that the US and the 27-member European Union could reach a framework trade pact, adding that Brussels wanted to 'make a deal very badly.' The EU faces US tariffs on more than 70 per cent of its exports, with 50 per cent on steel and aluminium, 25 per cent on cars and car parts and a 10 per cent levy on most other EU goods. Trump has said he would hike the rate to 30 per cent on August 1st, a level EU officials said would wipe out whole chunks of transatlantic commerce. Further tariffs on copper and pharmaceuticals are looming. A 15 per cent tariff on most EU goods would be seen by many in Europe as a poor outcome compared to the initial European ambition of a zero-for-zero tariff deal on all industrial goods. But it would be better than 30 per cent and it would remove uncertainty about business conditions that has already hit profits of European companies. For Trump a deal with the EU would be the biggest trade agreement, surpassing the $550 billion accord reached with Japan earlier this week. Trump, who is seeking to reorder the global economy and reduce decades-old US trade deficits, has so far reeled in agreements with Britain, Japan, Indonesia and Vietnam, although his administration has failed to deliver on a promise of '90 deals in 90 days.' The EU deal would be a huge prize, given that the US and EU are each other's largest trading partners by far and account for a third of global trade. While close, a deal still requires some final negotiations. US trade representative Jamieson Greer and commerce secretary Howard Lutnick departed Washington for Scotland on Saturday for talks with EU trade commissioner Maros Sefcovic, who is also travelling to Scotland, before the Trump-von der Leyen meeting. 'We're cautiously optimistic that there will be a deal reached,' said a Trump administration official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity. 'But it's not over till it's over.' In case there is no deal and the US imposes 30 per cent tariffs from August 1st, the EU prepared countertariffs on 93 billion euros ($109 billion) of US goods. EU diplomats have said a possible deal would likely include a broad 15 per cent tariff on EU goods imported into the US, mirroring the US-Japan deal, along with a 50 per cent tariff on European steel and aluminium. Trump told reporters there was 'not a lot' of wiggle room on the 50 per cent tariffs that the US has on steel and aluminium imports, adding, 'because if I do it for one, I have to do it for all.' It remains unclear if Washington would exempt EU imports from other sectoral tariffs on automobiles, pharmaceuticals and other goods that have already been announced or are pending although EU officials are hopeful the 15 per cent baseline tariff would apply also to cars and pharmaceuticals. After spending some time at his South Ayrshire resort, Trump will head to Aberdeenshire, where he is expected to open a second course at his Trump International golf resort in Balmedie. During his time in the north east, Trump is also due to meet Scottish first minister John Swinney. Speaking ahead of the talks, Swinney said it was his responsibility to 'raise global and humanitarian issues of significant importance, including the unimaginable suffering we are witnessing in Gaza' with the president. Saying he wanted to 'ensure Scotland's voice is heard at the highest levels of government across the world' Swinney added: 'That is exactly what I will do when I meet with president Trump during his time in Scotland.' Mr Swinney announced that he met Ms von der Leyen on Saturday evening in Glasgow and discussed the wars in Ukraine and Gaza. Mr Swinney said: 'I was pleased to welcome the president of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, to Scotland. 'During our meeting, I outlined Scotland's continued support for the European Union's leadership in demanding free and safe humanitarian aid in Gaza, alongside efforts to bring an end to the unbearable suffering unfolding. 'I also took the opportunity to reiterate Scotland's steadfast commitment to Ukraine and the country's commitment to work with European partners on key issues, including energy.' - Reuters and PA


Irish Times
13 hours ago
- Irish Times
If you didn't have qualms about Spotify before, wait until you hear what its founder has done
If you are one of Spotify 's 268 million subscribers, you might be interested to learn of a recent investment by the company's co-founder and chief executive Daniel Ek . In mid June, it emerged that Ek had led a funding round of €600 million into a Munich-based start-up called Helsing, through his venture capital firm Prima Materia. Helsing, whose founders have backgrounds in both the video games industry and in Germany's ministry of defence, makes military drones and AI software for the enhancement of weapons systems. By all accounts, this appears to be a very smart investment: the company, which was founded in 2021, has more than doubled its market value over the last year, and is now worth an estimated €12 billion. Ek is not just a major investor, he is also now chairman of the company's board of directors. Over the past couple of years, tech investors in both Europe and the United States have pivoted toward a collective embrace of the military-industrial complex. Just a few years ago, the culture of Silicon Valley was such that, for companies like Google and Meta , any kind of direct military application of their technology was considered beyond the pale. In 2018, after its employees staged a mass walkout in protest against a deal with the Pentagon, Google pledged not to work on AI weapons systems. READ MORE But a number of cultural and geopolitical factors – an openly rightward turn among the tech elite; the growing perception of a Chinese threat to US global hegemony; Russia's invasion of Ukraine , along with Trump's withdrawal from established defence arrangements , putting the fear of God into EU leaders – have made it clear that there is money, fast and deep money, to be made in defence tech. Silicon Valley, whose deep foundations were laid in the postwar years with a massive injection of US Defence Department money into a handful of technology firms in Palo Alto, has rediscovered its roots in the military-industrial complex. Perhaps the most arresting recent indication of this came earlier this summer, with the news that the US Army had launched a so-called Executive Innovation Corps, intended – in the words of a press release – to 'fuse cutting-edge tech expertise with military innovation'. Under this new programme, high-level tech executives from companies including Meta, Palantir , and OpenAI were commissioned into the armed forces as lieutenant colonels. Ek is, in this sense, by no means an outlier. He is simply and straightforwardly following the money. But there is something particularly galling about his ploughing such a massive amount of his personal wealth into the arms trade. Many people already feel ethical qualms about using streaming services like Spotify, whose total restructuring of the distribution model for recorded music has brought about the vast enrichment of people like Ek, a man with an estimated net worth in the region of $9.2 billion, while making it extraordinarily difficult for artists to make a living from their own work. Daniel Ek, chief executive of Spotify. Photograph:Rather than attempting to mitigate this situation – by, for example, using some of that money to pay musicians a fairer share of streaming revenues – Ek is putting it directly into a company that makes strike drones, and, in the words of its promotional materials, AI technology 'to achieve scaled target acquisition and co-ordinated precision effects'. So far, the response to Ek's move into the weapons industry has been relatively muted – for, I would guess, two intimately-connected reasons: first, thanks to their near-total destruction of the means by which musicians were traditionally paid for the recorded work, streaming services like Spotify are the only way most musicians can now reach an audience; and second, Spotify's standing among musicians was already about as low as it could get. [ Irish tech firms pivot to defence as EU rearms Opens in new window ] The most high-profile response has come from the indie rock band Deerhoof, who at the end of last month announced the removal of all their music from Spotify. ''Daniel Ek uses $700 million of his Spotify fortune to become chairman of AI battle tech company' was not a headline we enjoyed reading this week,' as the band put it in a statement it published online. 'We don't want our music killing people. We don't want our success being tied to AI battle tech ... If the price of 'discoverability' is letting oligarchs fill the globe with computerised weaponry, we're going to pass on the supposed benefits.' There is nothing very new about this interconnectedness of the music business and the arms industry. Back when there used to be such a thing as major record labels, EMI Records – along with its subsidiaries like Capitol Records and Parlophone – belonged to the Thorn EMI group, among whose multifarious corporate interests was the production of missile guidance technologies. In the artwork for their 2002 album Yanqui UXO, the Canadian instrumental post-rock group Godspeed You! Black Emperor included a hand-scrawled diagram mapping out the web of corporate connections between major labels and the arms industry. That band, and many others like them, went out of their way to avoid being ensnared in any such webs. But in the decades since that album was released, on a small Canadian independent label, the entire infrastructure of corporate record labels has all but collapsed, and streaming services like Spotify are practically the only show in town. If you want to listen to Yanqui UXO now, you can hear it on Spotify, along with all of Godspeed You! Black Emperor's other albums. There may, as they say, be no ethical consumption under capitalism. But there is a special queasiness to the dynamic by which the creative work of musicians, having been so thoroughly devalued by the likes of Spotify, has been used to fund a weapons company. Simply by firing up Spotify and streaming a song from Yanqui UXO – or by streaming, for that matter, John and Yoko's Give Peace a Chance, or Black Sabbath's War Pigs, or Bob Dylan's Masters of War – you can now do your bit to fund the arms industry. Alternatively, you could cancel your Spotify subscription, and take your business elsewhere.


Irish Times
13 hours ago
- Irish Times
Ryanair boss Michael O'Leary takes aim at governments, rivals and unions
Ryanair more than doubled profits to €820 million in the second quarter, and shares – up 45 per cent in 2025 – are flying high. Not that you'd know it from Michael O'Leary's mood on Ryanair's latest earnings call. It was less a corporate update, more a one-man roast, with O'Leary letting fly at regulators, rivals and unions with his usual blend of sarcasm and scorn. He dismissed the European Parliament as 'a home for crazies' and mocked Germany as having 'no aviation policy whatsoever'. France's air traffic control strikes drew particular ire: he urged Brussels to let overflights bypass national disruption. 'It does mean upsetting some French unions, but I think that's always a cause well worthwhile. The more you can upset French unions, the better.' READ MORE Spain's consumer fines on low-cost airlines? 'Minister [Pablo] Bustinduy's mad cap bag fines,' he said. Dublin Airport's 32 million passenger cap? 'Indefensible' in a country 'five years from an election', run by politicians 'about to go on three months' holidays.' Beleaguered airline Wizz Air was treated less as a rival than a punchline. Asked by a UBS analyst about the 'low-cost' competitor's retreat from Abu Dhabi and a potential expansion into central and eastern Europe, O'Leary said he felt compelled to explain that 'Wizz is not a low-cost competitor of Ryanair. It's a high-cost competitor ... and therefore, not really competitor at all.' Wizz will be 'taken out' within five years. 'We welcome the competition,' O'Leary added. He signed off briskly: 'Thank you very much, everybody, and we'll all go back to work now'.