Just three nights of poor sleep might harm your heart
In a new study from Uppsala University in Sweden, researchers found that just three nights of restricted sleep – around four hours a night – triggered changes in the blood linked to a higher risk of heart disease.
The researchers looked at inflammatory proteins in the blood. These are molecules the body produces when it is under stress or fighting off illness. When these proteins stay high for a long time, they can damage blood vessels and raise the risk of problems like heart failure, coronary heart disease and atrial fibrillation (irregular heartbeat).
The study involved 16 healthy young men who spent several days in a lab, where everything from their meals to their activity levels and light exposure was carefully controlled.
Get your news from actual experts, straight to your inbox. Sign up to our daily newsletter to receive all The Conversation UK's latest coverage of news and research, from politics and business to the arts and sciences.
The participants followed two routines: three nights of normal sleep (8.5 hours) and three night of sleep restriction (4.25 hours). After each sleep phase, the men completed a short, high-intensity cycling workout, and their blood was tested before and after.
Researchers measured almost 90 different proteins in the blood samples. They found that sleep deprivation caused a clear rise in inflammatory markers linked to heart disease. And while exercise usually boosts healthy proteins such as interleukin-6 and BDNF (which support brain and heart health), these responses were weaker after poor sleep.
Strikingly, the changes happened even in young, healthy adults, and after only a few nights of bad sleep. That's worrying given how common it is for adults to experience poor sleep from time to time – and around one in four people work shifts that disrupt sleep patterns.
The researchers also discovered that the time of day blood was taken mattered: protein levels varied between morning and evening, and even more so when sleep was restricted. This suggests that sleep affects not only what's in your blood, but when those changes are most visible.
Although modern life often encourages us to trade sleep for productivity, socialising or screen time, studies like this remind us that the body keeps score – quietly, chemically and without compromise.
This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
Annie Curtis does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
a day ago
- Yahoo
Scientists raise red flags over hidden risks of popular garden plant: 'Should serve as a bright yellow warning'
Golden oyster mushrooms, with their bright yellow caps and nutty flavor, have exploded in popularity among home gardeners for being easy to grow and packed with health benefits. But new research has suggested that this trend could be fueling an environmental threat, according to The Conversation. Scientists warn that the species is spreading into the wild and disrupting native ecosystems — a development that "should serve as a bright yellow warning" that non-native fungi should be grown with great care, if at all. What's happening? The recent study found that golden oyster mushrooms, originally native to Asia, have become invasive in North American forests. By collecting and analyzing fungal DNA from trees around Madison, Wisconsin, the researchers discovered that trees colonized by golden oysters housed only half as many fungal species as unaffected trees — sometimes even less. According to the research, which was originally published in Cell's Current Biology journal, some native fungi, such as the mossy maze polypore, elm oyster, and the chemically rich Nemania serpens, were completely pushed out. The sharp decline in fungal diversity is a strong indicator that golden oysters are outcompeting native fungi for critical resources, altering the delicate balance of forest life. Why are invasive mushrooms concerning? Fungi play an essential role in keeping ecosystems healthy for humans and other organisms. They break down dead organic material, recycle nutrients, form symbiotic relationships with plants, and help sequester carbon in the soil. When an invasive species like the golden oyster mushroom takes hold, it can decimate native fungal communities that have evolved over centuries to support local forests, as The Conversation explained. As the native fungi are pushed out, forests may become more vulnerable to disease, biodiversity loss, and nutrient imbalances. This is an even more concerning problem in regions already stressed by climate change and habitat destruction. This disruption doesn't just affect trees and soil. Protecting native fungi and other species helps safeguard natural resources, food webs, and even the resilience of forest ecosystems against emerging threats. Would you live in a house made of fungus? Heck yes No way Maybe Only if you paid me Click your choice to see results and speak your mind. What's being done about invasive mushrooms? In The Conversation, study author Aishwarya Veerabahu recommended that mushroom growers and hobbyists avoid using golden oyster mushroom grow kits. Cultivating them indoors only and disposing of all substrate material responsibly was one suggested alternative to completely avoiding them. Commercial sellers can also include labeling to inform buyers about the species' invasive potential. Those eager to grow mushrooms at home can try cultivating native fungi from their local area. Choosing native species supports biodiversity and helps maintain the unique ecological networks your region depends on. Long-term solutions may include developing sporeless strains of golden oyster mushrooms or using biological controls, such as targeted mycoviruses. In the meantime, public awareness and responsible cultivation are vital to preventing further spread. As golden oysters continue spreading in North America and begin showing up in forests in Europe, Africa, and beyond, Veerabahu expressed hope that the research encourages more thoughtful approaches to growing and managing mushrooms. Join our free newsletter for good news and useful tips, and don't miss this cool list of easy ways to help yourself while helping the planet. Solve the daily Crossword
New York Post
2 days ago
- New York Post
Lots of Americans think they have this allergy — but only 1% really do
You've been itching to avoid this antibiotic — maybe for no reason. Penicillin was discovered in 1928 by a Scottish bacteriologist. The medication has since become a common treatment for a range of bacterial infections, including strep throat, pneumonia, skin infections and certain urinary tract infections. But not everyone can tolerate penicillin. People allergic to the drug may suffer hives, itchy skin, a rash or, in severe cases, a potentially life-threatening reaction known as anaphylaxis upon exposure. Advertisement 4 A penicillin allergy can lead to a rash or hives if exposed to the drug. Image'in – These patients may struggle to breathe, feel dizzy or experience facial swelling. The good news is that penicillin allergies are far less common than once believed. Advertisement Studies have shown that over 90% of people who report a penicillin allergy aren't actually allergic when tested. Less than 1% of Americans are truly allergic. 'Incorrectly being labeled as allergic to penicillin can prevent you from getting the most appropriate, safest treatment for an infection,' Dr. Elizabeth W. Covington, an associate clinical professor of pharmacy at Auburn University, recently wrote in The Conversation. 4 Penicillin is used to treat strep throat, pneumonia, skin infections and certain urinary tract infections. luchschenF – 'It can also put you at an increased risk of antimicrobial resistance, which is when an antibiotic no longer works against bacteria,' she added. Advertisement Those reporting penicillin allergies are often treated with broad-spectrum antibiotics, which target lots of different types of bacteria. Covington noted that this puts helpful bacteria in the cross-hairs, potentially paving the way for the survival and spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. 'Broad-spectrum antibiotics … aren't always the best fit and can have more side effects' than penicillin, she said. 'What's more, your medical bills could end up higher due to using more expensive drugs.' Advertisement People tend to get mislabeled as allergic to penicillin if they have a rash, nausea, diarrhea or headaches after taking an antibiotic as a child, Covington reported. But those reactions can be common side effects of antibiotics or triggered by the illness itself. 4 In severe cases, a person with a penicillin allergy may suffer throat swelling. SKT Studio – 'People also often assume penicillin allergies run in families, but having a relative with an allergy doesn't mean you're allergic — it's not hereditary,' Covington said in The Conversation. 'Finally, about 80% of patients with a true penicillin allergy will lose the allergy after about 10 years,' she continued. 'That means even if you used to be allergic to this antibiotic, you might not be anymore, depending on the timing of your reaction.' How to tell if you're allergic to penicillin Talk with a doctor or pharmacist about any symptoms you have after taking antibiotics. Be sure to note when the reaction began, whether treatment was needed and what happened with subsequent attempts at taking similar drugs. Advertisement 'In many cases, this interview is enough to determine you aren't allergic,' Covington said. 'But sometimes, further testing may be recommended.' 4 An immunologist performs a skin prick allergy test on a woman's arm. Microgen – Penicillin skin testing typically involves putting a small amount of penicillin solution on the forearm and pricking or scratching the skin to let the solution enter. Then you're observed to see if you develop redness or raised bumps. Advertisement If the skin test is negative, an immunologist may administer a small oral dose of the drug and monitor you for signs of a reaction. Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center said the skin and oral testing typically takes 90 minutes to two hours. The NYC-based cancer hospital suggests wearing a short-sleeved shirt for the test, which allows for easy access to your arm, and eating a meal or snack beforehand to prevent cramping, gas and bloating.
Forbes
5 days ago
- Forbes
Missing Cosmic Lithium Problem Could Still Point To New Physics
Lithium, currently in such high demand for electric vehicles and smart phones, also continues to push astrophysical theory to the limit. Known as the Cosmological Lithium Problem, the primordial abundance of this light metal has puzzled astrophysicists for more than two decades now. And the eventual solution to this conundrum might require new physics. The crux of the issue is the observed underabundance of Lithium-7, a stable isotope of Lithium that consists of three protons and four neutrons. For every nucleus of lithium, there are two billion nuclei of hydrogen in the early universe, Andreas Korn, a stellar astrophysicist at Uppsala University in Sweden, tells me in Stockholm. And among old galactic halo stars, the Lithium-7 underabundance is a factor of two to three below big bang nucleosynthesis predictions. That is, the process that (within the first three minutes after the big bang) produced the first light elements --- hydrogen, helium, and tiny amounts of lithium and beryllium. Lithium is not a rare earth element, but it is a very rare element in the cosmos --- about nine orders of magnitude less than hydrogen and five orders of magnitude less than oxygen in the present-day universe. Why Does This Matter? The Lithium-7 problem is important because it poses the only remaining inconsistency in big bang nucleosynthesis, says Korn. Too much Lithium-7 was produced in the big bang, and we see too little of it in old stars, he says. If it's not solved through conventional theory, then the door will inherently be left ajar for new physics. Defining the true nature of the universe's exotic dark matter, for instance, through big bang nucleosynthesis or some other observation would represent a revolution in fundamental physics, says Korn. Physicists know that the standard model of particle physics is not complete. Unsurprisingly, we physicists are looking for clues other than the gravitational effects of the cosmos' missing exotic dark matter to further constrain the realm of new physics, says Korn. Discrepancies in BBN could provide such clues, he says. The hope has been that such an extension of conventional physics could at the same time explain the cosmos' elusive dark matter. The Lithium problem was aptly described in a 2011 review paper. In a paper appearing in the journal Annual Reviews of Nuclear and Particle Science, author Brian Fields notes that BBN represents our earliest reliable probe of the cosmos. However, Lithium-7 observations lie at least a factor of three below predictions, he writes. And in the last 14 years since Fields' paper was published, there has only been incremental progress in resolving this Lithium-7 discrepancy. Precise observations of solar neutrinos also point to new physics. Nuclear reaction networks applied to the Sun predict how many neutrinos are created in the fusion reactions, but it turns out that the number of electron neutrinos falls short of expectations, says Korn. They are changed to other types of neutrinos on the way to us, through a process called neutrino oscillations, he says. BBN also tells us that there were three neutrino types present in the early universe. Any discrepancy between BBN predictions and observations could, in principle, provide such clues for new physics. But there is a possibility that most of this problem is simply solved by conventional stellar physics, says Korn. In BBN, Lithium represents only a trace element. In the Sun, 99.5% of the lithium is gone because it has been mixed down to layers that are hotter than two and a half million degrees Kelvin, and that Lithium has disintegrated. Tracing Old Stars Halo stars are very old, metal poor stars on the outskirts of our own Milky Way Galaxy that can trace the state of the universe as it was 10 or 12 billion years ago, says Korn. Stellar Mixing But the challenge is that astronomers have a hard time determining how much lithium and other elements have been mixed deep into the interior of the target star. In particular, theorists need to know how much mixing of lithium occurs at the boundary between the star's outer convective envelope and its stellar interior. As in a hot pot of soup, stellar material that is brought to the bottom of the convection zone reaches temperatures of two and a half million Kelvin and subsequently destroyed, says Korn. Hard Work Korn says that particle physicists, nuclear theorists and observational astrophysicists have all had their nose to the grindstone, trying to resolve this lithium-7 underabundance issue for decades now. It's important to understand just how much lithium is depleted by stars because only then can we scientifically address the remaining cosmological lithium problem, says Korn. Future Observations In a 2021 paper published in the journal Experimental Astronomy, the authors write that a proposed European Space Agency mission known as HAYDN (High precision AsteroseismologY of DeNse stellar fields) would potentially see launch by mid-century. If so, it would observe stars in metal-poor globular clusters in both our own Milky Way Galaxy and nearby dwarf galaxies. The HAYDN mission will be crucial to getting a better handle on the real abundance of Lithium in the Milky Way and nearby dwarf galaxies like the Large and Small Magellanic Clouds via a process known as asteroseismology which uses stellar oscillations (literally seismic waves inside a star) to probe its interior. These space-based observations, says Korn, would help theorists place better constraints on just how much lithium-7 is being destroyed in stellar interiors. A Stellar Solution? I'm upholding the idea that at least part, or even a significant part, of the problem is a stellar problem, says Korn. But it remains a hard nut to crack, he says.
