Denver's Auraria campus subject of antisemitism investigation over pro-Palestinian protests
The Colorado Advisory Committee to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights voted unanimously to begin a year-long examination of the "presence and/or absence of antisemitism at Colorado universities and colleges, specifically at the Auraria Campus in Denver that hosts the Community College of Denver, Metropolitan State University of Denver, andUniversity of Colorado Denver."
CBS
The protest was one of many across the country against the war in Gaza. The encampment remained on Tivoli Quad for 23 days last year as students and others protested the war and called for the colleges to disclose all their investments with Israel and divest financially from them. They claimed that the campus administration was "standing with genocide." In response to the protests, the Jewish Coalition of Colorado called on the university to "take bold action" to protect Jewish students.
School officials said camping on the quad violates campus policy. Although some officials said they supported the student's right to protest, they insisted that the encampment be taken down for the health and safety of those on campus.
CBS
After refusing to disperse, approximately 40 people were arrested by the Auraria Campus Police Department. Officers handcuffed the protesters, who were led to a bus and eventually processed on charges of trespassing. Eight Coloradans arrested by campus police later sued, claiming they weren't given adequate warning that police would be making arrests and that their arrests were unjustified because they weren't camping there.
In response to the arrests, civil rights icon Angela Davis spoke with protesters about the parallels she saw between racism and the criminal justice system in the U.S. and Israel's treatment of Palestinians in Gaza and the West Bank.
Angela Davis addresses pro-Palestine demonstrators at an encampment set up on Denver's Auraria Campus on Friday, April 26, 2024.
COURTESY
The leader of Hillel Colorado, Daniel Bennett, said that Jewish students had been afraid to come to school since October. But protester Daryn Copeland said they hadn't seen any antisemitism on campus, and he and his fellow Jewish protestors felt safe. Bennet explained that if the demonstrators were only asking for peace in Palestine, he would understand, but to boycott Israel and treat them differently than other countries is anti-Semitic.
Donors offered to give $15,000 to the International Red Cross in the name of the Students for Democratic Society if the protesters agreed to take down the encampment. But protest leader Paul Nelson, a former student, said they rejected the offer as a bribe.
CBS
A week later, while protest leaders met with Dr. Angie Paccione, who oversees the Colorado Department of Higher Education, protestors reportedly began demonstrating inside the Tivoli Student Union building, singing, "We will not rest, we will not stop until you divest." President Janine Davidson's office said protesters blocked entrances while law enforcement secured doors with zip ties to limit who was able to go inside.
Campus officials said the protesters threatened to disrupt upcoming commencement ceremonies if the schools refused to divest from Israel. The Community College of Denver decided to relocate its ceremony "to ensure our college community can celebrate without interruption."
Lockdown on Auraria Campus after protesters enter CU Denver Student Commons building
CBS
On Mother's Day, students held a vigil for mothers in Palestine who lost their children and for Palestinian children who had lost their mothers. More than a dozen protesters marched to the CU Denver Student Commons building, causing officials to order a lockdown. Ten of those protesters were issued a summons for trespassing, interference and disturbing the peace.
A Saturday, May 18, 2024 photo shows Tivoli Quad at Auraria Campus cleared of tents and protesters at the site of an encampment that stood since April 25.
Courtesy / Auraria Campus
MSU Denver restricted access to campus buildings as the demonstration continued. CU Denver also chose to temporarily shift to remote learning and canceled all on-campus events. As they began dispersing and cleaning up the encampment, campus officials said cleanup would cost about $670,000.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
California voters will decide redistricting in November, escalating battle with Trump and Texas
Ratcheting up the pressure in the escalating national fight over control of Congress, the California Legislature on Thursday approved November special election to ask voters in November to redraw the state's electoral lines to favor Democrats and thwart President Trump's far-right policy agenda. The ballot measure, pushed by Gov. Gavin Newsom and other state and national Democratic leaders, is the latest volley in a national political brawl over electoral maps that could alter the outcome of the 2026 midterm elections and the balance of power in the U.S. House of Representatives. If voters approve the redrawn lines on Nov. 4, Democrats in the Golden State would see the odds tilted further in their favor, while the number of California Republicans in the House could be halved. Newsom initially said that new electoral districts in California would only take effect if another state redrew its lines before 2031. But after Texas moved toward approving its own maps this week that could give the GOP five more House seats, Democrats stripped the so-called "trigger" language from the amendment — meaning that if voters approve the measure, the new lines would take effect no matter what. The ballot measure language, which asks California voters to override the power of the independent redistricting commission, was approved by most Democrats in the Assembly and the Senate, where they hold supermajorities. California lawmakers have the power to place constitutional amendments on the statewide ballot without the approval of the governor. Newsom, however, is expected later Thursday to sign two separate bills that fund the special election and spell out the lines for the new congressional districts. Democrats' rush to the ballot marks a sudden departure from California's 15-year commitment to independent redistricting, often held up as the country's gold standard. The state's voters stripped lawmakers of the power to draw lines during the Great Recession and handed that partisan power to a panel of independent citizens whose names are drawn in a lottery. The change, Democrats said, was forced by an extraordinary change in circumstances: After decades of the United States redrawing congressional lines once a decade, President Trump and his political team have leaned on Republican-led states to redraw their district lines before the 2026 midterm elections to help Republicans retain control of the House. 'His playbook is a simple one: Bully, threaten, fight, then rig the rules to hang onto power," said Assembly Speaker Robert Rivas. "We are here today because California will not be a bystander to that power grab. We are not intimidated, and we are acting openly, lawfully, with purpose and resolve, to defend our state and to defend our democracy.' Republicans in the state Assembly and the state Senate criticized Newsom's argument that Democrats must "fight fire with fire," saying retaliation is a slippery slope that would erode the independent redistricting process California voters have chosen twice at the ballot box. "You move forward fighting fire with fire, and what happens? You burn it all down," said Assembly Minority Leader James Gallagher (R-Yuba City). He said Trump was "wrong" to push Gov. Greg Abbott to redraw Texas' lines to benefit Republicans, and so was California's push to pursue the same strategy. State Senate Majority Leader Lena Gonzalez (D-Long Beach), who co-authored the bill drawing the proposed congressional districts, said Democrats had no choice but to stand up, given the harm the Trump administration has inflicted on healthcare, education, tariffs and other policies that affect Californians. 'What do we do? Just sit back and do nothing?" Gonzalez said. "Or do we fight back and provide some chance for our Californians to see themselves in this democracy?" Senate Minority Leader Brian Jones (R-Santee) said the effort is "a corrupt redistricting scheme to rig California's elections" that violates the "letter and the spirit of the California constitution." "Democrats are rushing this through under the guise of urgency," Jones said. "There is no emergency that justifies this abuse of process.' Three Assembly Democrats did not vote in favor of the constitutional amendment. Jasmeet Bains (D-Delano), who is running for Congress against Rep. David Valadao (R-Hanford) in the San Joaquin Valley, voted no. Progressive Caucus chair Alex Lee (D-San Jose), and Dawn Addis (D-Morro Bay), did not vote. Democrats will face an unusual messaging challenge with the November ballot measure, said Matt Lesenyie, an assistant professor of political science at Cal State Long Beach. The opponents of mid-decade redistricting are stressing that the measure would "disadvantage voters," he said, which is "wording that Democrats have primed Democrats on, for now two administrations, that democracy is being killed with a thousand cuts." "It's a weird, sort of up-is-down moment," Lesenyie said. How did we get here? Trump's political team began pressuring Abbott and Texas Republicans in early June to redraw the state's 38 congressional districts in the middle of the decade — which is very uncommon — to give Republicans a better shot at keeping the House in 2026. "We are entitled to five more seats," Trump later told CNBC. Some Texas Republicans feared that mid-decade redistricting could imperil their own chances of reelection. But within a month of the White House floating the idea, Abbott added the new congressional lines, which would stack the deck against as many as five Texas Democrats in Congress, to the Legislature's special session in July. By mid-July, Newsom was talking about California punching back. In an interview with the progressive news site the TN Holler, Newsom said: "These guys, they're not f—ing around. They're playing by a totally different set of rules." Democrats in Texas fled the state for nearly two weeks, including some to California, to deny Republicans the quorum they needed to pass the new lines. Abbott signed civil arrest warrants and levied fines on the 52 absent Democrats while they held news conferences in California and Illinois to bring attention to the fight. While the Texas drama unfolded, consultants for the campaign arm of House Democrats in California quietly drew up maps that would further chop down the number of Golden State Republicans in Congress. The proposed changes would eliminate the district of Rep. Ken Calvert (R-Corona) and dilute the number of GOP voters in four districts represented by Reps. Doug LaMalfa, Kevin Kiley, David Valadao and Darrell Issa. The Democrats agreed to return to Texas last week and pointed to California's tit-for-tat effort as one measure of success, saying the Golden State could neutralize any Republican gains in Texas. Since then, other Republican-led states have begun to contemplate redistricting too, including Indiana, Florida and Missouri. Trump's political allies are publicly threatening to mount primary challenges against any Indiana Republican who opposes redrawing the lines. In California, the opposition is shaping up as quickly as the ballot measure. California voters received the first campaign mailer opposing the ballot measure a day before the Legislature voted to approve it. A four-page glossy flier, funded by conservative donor and redistricting champion Charlie Munger Jr., warned voters that mid-decade redistricting is "weakening our Democratic process" and "a threat to California's landmark election reform." Republicans have also gone to court to try and stop the measure, alleging in an emergency petition with the state Supreme Court that Democrats violated the state Constitution by ramming the bills through without following proper legislative procedure. The high court Wednesday rejected the petition. A wave of legal challenges are expected, not only in California but in any state that reconfigures congressional districts in the expanding partisan brawl. Assemblymember Carl DeMaio (R-San Diego) said Thursday morning that a lawsuit challenging the California ballot measure would be filed in state court by Friday evening. He said Republicans also plan to litigate the title of the ballot measure and any voter guide materials that accompany it. And, he said, if voters approve the new lines, "I believe we will have ample opportunity to set the maps aside in federal court." Sign up for Essential California for news, features and recommendations from the L.A. Times and beyond in your inbox six days a week. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump touts perceived wins while praising ‘healthy, attractive people' on DC federal patrol photo op
President Donald Trump has touted his perceived wins while praising 'healthy, attractive people' during a photo op to kick off his patrol with D.C. police and federal forces amid his crime crackdown. Trump met with local and federal law enforcement at the U.S. Park Police facility in Anacostia Thursday evening, complimenting the roughly 300 men and women in the crowd as 'healthy' and 'attractive.' The president also praised his own administration, telling the crowd, ' We've done a lot of good work, including the biggest tax cuts that you've ever had. ' This is a developing story...
Wall Street Journal
27 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Letitia James Gets Trumped on Appeal
When a New York state judge last year ordered Donald Trump and his business associates to pay $450 million for civil fraud, Attorney General Letitia James gloated that her case showed Mr. Trump's success 'was based on the art of the steal.' Now it's his turn to brag, after winning on appeal. On Thursday a panel of a New York appeals court threw out that unbelievable penalty. 'The court's disgorgement order, which directs that defendants pay nearly half a billion dollars to the State of New York, is an excessive fine that violates the Eighth Amendment of the United States Constitution,' the lead opinion says. It gets more complicated from there, because the five judges issued three fractured analyses that run 323 pages. But little looks good for Ms. James. One judge wanted to toss the AG's case. The law she wielded against Mr. Trump, Justice David Friedman says, 'has never been used in the way it is being used in this case—namely, to attack successful, private, commercial transactions, negotiated at arm's length between highly sophisticated parties,' and all profited. 'Plainly,' he adds, Ms. James's ultimate goal was 'the derailment of President Trump's political career and the destruction of his real estate business.' Two judges found the lower court's work so flawed they wanted to give Mr. Trump a new trial. As Justice John Higgitt sees it, the trial judge relied on an 'erroneous interpretation' of legal precedents on the statute of limitations. That judge granted summary judgment, yet 'failed to view the evidence in the light most favorable to defendants.' He 'impermissibly made credibility determinations not just of the evidence but also the experts.'
