
Constitution has kept Indiaunited during crisis: CJI
Rajesh Kumar Pandey | tnn
Prayagraj: The Constitution of India has ensured that whenever the country has faced a crisis, it has remained united and strong, Chief Justice of India BR Gavai said on Saturday.
Justice Gavai was speaking at the inauguration of the new advocate chambers and a multi-level parking facility at Allahabad high court. This marked his first official engagement as the CJI.
"When the Constitution was being drafted, some said it was too federal while some found it too unitary. Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar replied that the Constitution was neither wholly federal nor wholly unitary. But one thing I can tell you is that we have given a Constitution which will keep India united and strong both in times of peace and war," said the CJI, adding, "Whenever there has been a crisis in the country, it has remained united and strong.
The credit for this should be given to the Constitution."
Crediting the Constitution for guiding India on the path of development, Justice Gavai said, "We can see what is the condition of our neighbouring countries while India is making a journey towards development."
In the 75-year journey of the Constitution, the legislature, executive and judiciary have contributed a lot in bringing social and economic equality, he said.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất
IC Markets
Đăng ký
Undo
"It is our fundamental duty to reach out to the last citizen of this country who needs justice. Be it the legislature, executive or judiciary, everyone has to reach out to that citizen," the CJI told the gathering.
Referring to the land reforms, he said some laws were brought under which land was taken from the landlord and given to the landless persons. "These laws were challenged from time to time. Before 1973, the Supreme Court's view was that if there is a conflict between the Directive Principles and the Fundamental Rights, then the Fundamental Rights will prevail."
"However, in 1973, a 13-judge bench ruled that Parliament has the right to amend the Constitution and for this, it can amend the Fundamental Rights, but it does not have the right to change the basic structure of the Constitution," he said. The 1973 bench also stated that both the Fundamental Rights and the Directives Principles are the soul of the Constitution, said Justice Gavai.
Justice Gavai also congratulated judicial officers involved in 'Operation Sindoor' and noted the significance of inaugurating the project on the birth anniversary of Ahilyabai Holkar.
"She was a pioneer in social welfare, and it is our constitutional duty to reach the last citizen. The bar and the bench must work in unison to move the chariot of justice forward. Today, the Allahabad High Court has set a shining example -- a true role model," he said.
Allahabad HC Chief Justice Arun Bhansali in his welcome address said the newly constructed advocates' chambers and multi-level car parking building will redefine the working environment of this court.
"It's not just the inauguration of a building but affirmation of our collective efforts to a stronger and more accessible system of justice," he said.
Minister of State, Law and Justice, Arjun Ram Meghwal said one should learn from CM Yogi Adityanath how to complete projects quickly. He also praised the CM for the success of Maha Kumbh and said his work was appreciated all over the world.
Supreme Court's Justice Vikram Nath said, "Lawyers used to face a lot of problems due to the limited number of chambers and the new building will provide AC chambers to lawyers where they can meet their clients and do their work."
He further shared, "I was a member of the building committee of Allahabad HC and we were facing parking and chambers problems. Therefore, we decided to do something and this idea came up that by demolishing 12 official judges bunglow which was adjacent to High Court, we will get enough land to build chambers and parking for lawyers.
So I am personally very happy with the completion of this project."
Other apex court judges who attended the event included Justice Surya Kant, Justice JK Maheshwari, Justice Pankaj Mithal and Justice Manoj Mishra.
The advocate general of UP Ajay Kumar Misra and president of high court bar association (HCBA) president Anil Tiwari were also present.
Chairman of the building project committee, Justice Ashwani Kumar Mishra, who is a senior high court judge, proposed a vote of thanks.
BOX
'Allahabad HC name inscribed in golden letters'
CJI BR Gavai described the Allahabad high court as a historic institution whose name is inscribed in "golden letters" in the judicial spectrum.
"It is my good fortune that my first programme as CJI is at the Allahabad HC. I have a long-standing and close relationship with Prayagraj. When I joined the Supreme Court in 2019, I formed deep personal bonds with Justices Vineet Saran, Krishna Murari, and later, Vikram Nath," he said.
He lauded the rich legacy of the city and the High Court, saying, "Allahabad is spoken of with immense respect. It has given the country stalwarts like Motilal Nehru and Jawaharlal Nehru, and literary legends such as Mahadevi Verma, Harivansh Rai Bachchan, Suryakant Tripathi 'Nirala', and Subhadra Kumari Chauhan.
The nation also salutes the contribution of freedom fighter Chandrashekhar Azad, whose legacy lives on.
"
BOX
'I thank CM for commitment to judiciary, public'
Praising the new infrastructure at Allahabad HC, Justice Gavai said, "The advocate chambers and multi-level parking facility are outstanding. As far as I know, no court in the world has a facility of this scale and quality. I thank Chief Minister Yogi Adityanath for his commitment not only to judges and lawyers but also to the common citizen."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Hindu
10 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Senior Advocates not permitted to mention cases before CJI's Court from August 11
No Senior Advocate will be permitted to mention cases for urgent listing and hearing before the court of Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai from Monday (August 10, 2025). "As directed, designated senior counsels are not permitted to mention any case/s before the court of the Chief Justice of India with effect from Monday, August 11, 2025," a notice issued by the Supreme Court said. On August 6, the CJI had said that from August 11, no Senior Advocate will be permitted to mention cases for urgent listing and hearing in his court so that juniors get an opportunity to do it. CJI Gavai, who was sworn in on May 14, had reverted to the practice of oral mentioning of cases for urgent listing and hearing by lawyers and discontinued the practice adopted by his predecessor Justice Sanjiv Khanna. Justice Khanna discontinued the practice of oral submissions for urgent listing and hearing of cases by lawyers and asked them to either send emails or written letters instead. "There is a great demand that no matters should be mentioned by senior counsel(s)," CJI Gavai had said on August 6. He had asked the court staff to put out a notice that no senior lawyer will be permitted to mention cases for urgent listing and hearing in his court from Monday. "From Monday, no senior counsel, I mean designated senior counsel, will be allowed to mention matters. Let juniors get an opportunity to do it," the CJI had said. "This will be practised at least in my court," the CJI had said, adding that it was up to other apex court judges to adopt the practice. Usually lawyers mention their cases before the CJI-led bench at the outset of the day's proceedings for out-of-turn listings and hearing of cases on grounds of urgency.


Hindustan Times
40 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Senior advocates not permitted to mention cases before CJI's court from Aug 11
New Delhi, No senior advocate will be permitted to mention cases for urgent listing and hearing before the court of Chief Justice of India B R Gavai from Monday. Senior advocates not permitted to mention cases before CJI's court from Aug 11 "As directed, designated senior counsels are not permitted to mention any case/s before the court of the Chief Justice of India with effect from Monday, , 2025," a notice issued by the apex court said. On August 6, the CJI had said that from August 11, no senior advocate will be permitted to mention cases for urgent listing and hearing in his court so that juniors get an opportunity to do it. CJI Gavai, who was sworn in on May 14, had reverted to the practice of oral mentioning of cases for urgent listing and hearing by lawyers and discontinued the practice adopted by his predecessor Justice Sanjiv Khanna. Justice Khanna discontinued the practice of oral submissions for urgent listing and hearing of cases by lawyers and asked them to either send emails or written letters instead. "There is a great demand that no matters should be mentioned by senior counsel," CJI Gavai had said on August 6. He had asked the court staff to put out a notice that no senior lawyer will be permitted to mention cases for urgent listing and hearing in his court from Monday. "From Monday, no senior counsel, I mean designated senior counsel, will be allowed to mention matters. Let juniors get an opportunity to do it," the CJI had said. "This will be practised at least in my court," the CJI had said, adding that it was up to other apex court judges to adopt the practice. Usually lawyers mention their cases before the CJI-led bench at the outset of the day's proceedings for out-of-turn listings and hearing of cases on grounds of urgency. This article was generated from an automated news agency feed without modifications to text.


India.com
40 minutes ago
- India.com
Rahul Gandhi Acts Like Madman, Wants Votes Of Bangladeshi Infiltrators, Says Giriraj Singh
Union Minister Giriraj Singh on Sunday launched a scathing attack on Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of Opposition in the Lok Sabha, accusing him of disrespecting the Constitution and misleading the public with baseless allegations against the Election Commission of India (ECI). Responding to Rahul Gandhi's recent claims that the ECI manipulated the voter list in favour of the ruling party, Singh said the Congress leader appeared 'ignorant of the Constitution' and was behaving 'like a madman'. 'Rahul Gandhi seems ignorant of the Constitution and acts like a madman. They should respect the Constitution. Just say it straight: you want a board of Bangladeshi infiltrators," Singh said. He further accused the opposition of hypocrisy and misinformation: 'So many people who were alive were declared dead, or those who deserved to be on the list were removed. Say clearly that you want the votes of Bangladeshi infiltrators. Is it right to allow illegal immigrants the right to vote?' He added, 'If you have the strength, submit the list from your party in Bihar. Say how many were wrongly removed. Some people were declared dead, and some eligible names were removed. You won't submit the list but will engage in baseless politics. You think repeating lies makes them true? Lies remain lies.' Giriraj Singh also revealed that his own name was struck off from one location due to duplication, saying, 'My name was there at two places. One was removed. Many voter names were cleaned up, not unfairly deleted.' The Minister also lashed out at the Congress over its scepticism regarding Operation Sindoor, where Air Chief Marshal A.P. Singh has confirmed the downing of five Pakistani fighter jets and a surveillance aircraft in retaliation for the Pahalgam terror attack. 'They have no trust in the country's army; the generals and top leaders have spoken out. They don't trust Modi ji but trust Pakistan instead. Congress should sink and perish; it's their habit. Such people are anti-national,' he said. His remarks come after the Air Chief revealed satellite imagery and intelligence confirming the IAF's successful operation on May 7 and May 10, targeting Pakistan's terror infrastructure and air assets. Operation Sindoor has since become a flashpoint between the ruling BJP and the opposition, with the former accusing the latter of demoralising the Armed Forces by demanding proof of military actions.