Apple's $599 MacBook just tipped to launch this year — and it could be a game changer
However, that could change soon, as a new leak suggests that Apple is working on launching a MacBook for as little as $599, which is significantly below the normal price range of the company's popular laptop line.
Looking for a cheap laptop that's actually good? Check out our list of the best budget laptops you can buy based on our testing.
The leak, which comes from DigiTimes, states that Apple will release a MacBook for as low as $599. The report does also indicate that it could be $699 — either way, that price would be substantially less than the current models available. Most excitingly, the report also suggests that it could arrive as soon as this year, potentially opening up MacBooks to a whole new market.
Noted analyst Ming-Chi Kuo also spoke about a more affordable 13-inch MacBook on the horizon, but his report didn't mention the actual price of the upcoming laptop. If this price proves to be accurate, Apple could have affordable Windows laptops and Chromebooks in its sights, which is a market Apple has largely avoided to this point.
This got me thinking: how would a $599 MacBook SE (if that's the final name) compete with other budget-friendly devices in a similar price range?
According to the new leak, the affordable MacBook will feature a 12.9-inch display, slightly smaller than the 13.6-inch display of the Air.
The original report from Kuo said Apple will use the A18 Pro chip in the affordable laptop, which is the same chip used in the iPhone 16 Pro and Pro Max. It's quite powerful, at least for phones, but it'll be interesting to see how Apple optimizes it for a laptop. We're assuming Apple Intelligence features would be included.
Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips.
On the Windows side, the Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3x is a good comparison point, as it sells for around the $599 mark. Packing Qualcomm's Snapdragon X, it's been pretty mighty for budget performance.
Again, the only spec we have rumored for the MacBook is the processor, which happens to be the same processor used in the iPhone 16 Pro Max. Of course, comparing a phone to laptops is very "apples and oranges," but consider this a bit of context if the rumors are true.
Device
Geekbench 6 single-core
Geekbench 6 multicore
iPhone 16 Pro Max (A18 Pro in rumored low-price MacBook)
3,836
8,306
Lenovo IdeaPad Slim 3x (Snapdragon X)
2,124
10,505
Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro (Intel Core Ultra 7 256V)
2,760
11,115
I've thrown the Samsung Galaxy Book5 Pro in there for comparison to a more powerful mid-ranger. And while the multicore score of the A18 Pro does fall behind the more power-hungry likes of Snapdragon X and Intel Core Ultra (both consumer 20W, while the iPhone 16 Pro Max will slow sip that at a much lower wattage), it's a clear frontrunner for single-core.
That means apps will open snappily and at that high score, the UI will feel impressively responsive. If I had to guess, I'd assume Apple will offer 8GB of RAM in the affordable MacBook (MacBook SE, perhaps), which could give Lenovo the edge. However, that's just speculation on my part, and there's always a chance Apple uses a different amount of memory.
Now let's take what tops our Best Chromebooks list — the Lenovo Flex 5i Chromebook Plus. On sale for $499, you'll actually be saving money on this vs the rumored price of the new MacBook.
If the contextual benchmarks against the iPhone 16 Pro Max are close to what we see, it may be worth investing that extra hundred bucks in the cheap MacBook. And we're assuming Apple will be able to push more power through the MacBook, thanks to the bigger thermal envelope of a laptop.
Device
Geekbench 6 single-core
Geekbench 6 multicore
iPhone 16 Pro Max (A18 Pro in rumored low-price MacBook)
3,836
8,306
Lenovo Flex 5i Chromebook Plus (Intel Core i3-1315U)
1,845
5,310
The A18 Pro absolutely eats the Intel Core i3-1315U for lunch, but with the more simplistic ChromeOS, speeds and feeds has never been the sole focus of Chromebooks.
There are more powerful Chromebooks coming soon (such as the Arm-equipped Lenovo Chromebook Plus 14), but at $749, the price is wrong when stepping up to what Apple may be debuting here.
Take these contextual benchmarks with a pinch of salt. Like I said, the iPhone is legendary for its power management — Apple doesn't need to worry about endurance as much with the larger battery inside a laptop. So chances are, the A18 Pro could go even faster.
But based on initial data, this could be the ultimate budget laptop to beat. The simplicity of macOS Tahoe and its huge selection of apps paired with the ergonomics and design that the Cupertino crew is known for? If the leaks are true, sign me up!
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Tom's Guide
an hour ago
- Tom's Guide
Reddit says this is the best laptop — here's what I think as a laptop reviewer
I recently wrote an article about the gaming laptops Reddit recommends, and found the experience enlightening as a laptop reviewer of 5+ years. To that end, I've now searched Reddit for the best laptops its users recommend for everyday work. As with their recommendations for the best gaming laptops, Redditors are very knowledgeable on this subject and generally deliver solid advice. I mostly referenced this post since it was the first Reddit link that popped up on Google when I searched for 'best laptop.' That said, I also checked out a couple of similar posts to get a general idea of what Redditors think. The community has an affinity for Lenovo laptops, particularly ThinkBooks and ThinkPads. The MacBook Air also gets a lot of love, which doesn't surprise me since it's one of the best MacBooks. Here are some of the top laptops that Reddit recommends, and what I think of these recommendations as a professional laptop reviewer. MacBooks come up many times in the post linked above. Specifically, Redditors recommended the 13-inch MacBook Air M4 for its strong performance and long battery life. Surprisingly, no one mentioned its portability, which is one of the main reasons to get Apple's 'Air' laptop. Regardless, I agree with Reddit on this one. The MacBook Air is not only a great laptop to travel with, but as I recently wrote, it also makes for a fine desktop replacement. While folks recommended the MacBook Air, two concerns popped up. The first is the Apple ecosystem. 'Some people recommend the MacBook M4 Air, which seems to be a really good machine, although I am slightly concerned by the fact that I don't own any other Apple products,' said user LenkkiNakki. However, user T1nyRaccoon responded by saying you 'don't need other stuff in the Apple ecosystem to have [a MacBook Air], but if you plan on sending stuff to and from your phone or want to send messages from your laptop, an iPhone would be useful.' The 13-inch MacBook Air M4 offers the same design as the previous model but delivers better performance and a sharper camera while also delivering long battery life. We wish Apple had included a nano-texture display option to reduce glare and that the SSD were a bit faster, but the $200 price cut makes this configuration hard to pass up. In this post, some users discussed their dislike of what they call the 'Apple Tax,' or how expensive MacBooks can get when you want to configure them with more RAM or storage. T1nyRaccoon also shares this sentiment, saying that the 'downside is [Apple] has abysmal storage/RAM base configurations and costs a ton to upgrade.' They correctly say that it would cost you an extra $200 if you want a MacBook Air with 512GB of storage (entry-level has 256GB). Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. I won't argue with these folks about how expensive MacBooks can be. That said, new MacBooks are frequently on sale at Amazon. For instance, you can currently buy a 13-inch MacBook Air M4 with 16GB of RAM and 512GB of storage for $999, which is a $200 savings. If I were shopping for a new MacBook, I'd go through Amazon instead of Apple's online store. As I mentioned in the intro, many Redditors like Lenovo laptops. This also doesn't surprise me since laptops like ThinkBooks are pretty ubiquitous for office workers. ThinkPads, which is another line of business-focused Lenovo laptops, also came up in conversations. Generally, ThinkBooks are popular for those who work at home or who operate a small business, while ThinkPads are better for those who frequently travel for work. Though ThinkPads and ThinkBooks received a lot of praise, some users said to stay away from Lenovo laptops. 'Lenovo [equals] poor quality, cheap parts, shady, misleading models,' said user s1gnt. They also said that ThinkPads are not 'iconic device(s)' and are 'pure hype and dated.' Ouch! A user named Opti_span said they used a Lenovo laptop for three years and that it 'basically fell apart.' They didn't specify which Lenovo laptop, however. The one Lenovo laptop people recommended was the ThinkPad X1 Carbon. We reviewed the Lenovo ThinkPad X1 Carbon Gen 13 Aura Edition and awarded it 3.5 out of 5 stars. Though not a terrible machine, we feel that its underwhelming performance doesn't justify its high $1,870 starting price. Another Windows laptop that Reddit recommends is the latest model of the Asus ROG Zephyrus G14. While this is a gaming laptop, it doesn't look like one, which makes it great if you're working in an office. Of all the Windows laptops I saw in the Reddit threads I read, this is the machine I would recommend. I called last year's Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 the MacBook of gaming laptops thanks to its elegant design and killer performance. That laptop is currently on sale for $1,439 at Best Buy, and is a solid choice even if it doesn't have the latest GPU. If you want the latest model, there's a configuration with an RTX 5070 that's on sale at Best Buy for $1,799, which is $350 off. The Asus ROG Zephyrus G14 (2024) delivers the goods thanks to its thin design, powerful performance, gorgeous OLED display and excellent typing experience. Though there's a newer model available, this Windows laptop is still perfect for everyday work and for gaming. I'm once again impressed by Reddit's laptop choices. The 13-inch MacBook Air M4 might seem like an obvious one, but there's a reason it's at the top of our best MacBook and best laptops buying guides. The Asus ROG Zephyrus G14/16 is another fantastic option for folks who want a Windows laptop with enough power for work and play. If you're in the market for a new notebook, check those out! Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Tom's Guide
2 hours ago
- Tom's Guide
iPhone 17 Air — here's where Apple can succeed where Samsung failed
Samsung intended to start a revolution when it launched the Galaxy S25 Edge not long ago, but the reality is that the phone turned out to be underwhelming. I've been using it for more than two months now, and given my experience with the ultra-thin phone, Apple certainly has the opportunity to steal its thunder with the iPhone 17 Air. It's one of the many new iPhones tipped for reveal at an upcoming rumored Apple September event. The iPhone 17 Air could end up being the most compelling model the company introduces in years. I've been keeping tabs on all the rumors and leaks, so while it's unlikely we'll see dramatic changes between now and its reveal, there are still ways Apple could make it a more compelling thin phone. I know there are areas where we could see compromises, but I'll explain how the iPhone 17 Air could still succeed where the Galaxy S25 Edge failed. Here's how. Since I'm a camera guy, I'm most interested in the cameras rumored to accompany the iPhone 17 Air — or should I say, camera? While I'm a bit forgiving about Apple's decision to give the iPhone 16e a single rear camera, it feels wrong to do it with the iPhone 17 Air. So far, the rumors suggest that it will have a single 48MP camera on the back, which isn't appetizing when you're used to a triple camera setup. This might be an area where I could say the Galaxy S25 Edge is better than the iPhone 17 Air, but Apple can still surprise us. That's because I need to just look back at my 200 photo shootout between the iPhone 16e and Pixel 9a, like the side-by-side shot above. Even though the iPhone 16e narrowly lost, it did impress me for its strong telephoto and dynamic range performances. It's proof of Apple's excellent image processing with its iPhones, so it could do the same for the iPhone 17 Air. Another thing worth pointing out is all the leaked images and renders of the iPhone 17 Air. The back of the phone shows a prominent camera bar that spans one side to the other, which could lead me to suspect that there could be a larger sensor in there — perhaps the same one for the iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max. If so, that would give it more leverage. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. The only thing it would lack is an ultrawide, but I wouldn't mind keeping it to just a single camera if its field of view ends up being a smidge wider. There's no denying that the iPhone 17 Air is going to be a remarkable feat of engineering for a modern device. So far, it looks like it's going to be thinner than the Galaxy S25 Edge with rumors of it being as thin as 5.5mm. In comparison, the S25 Edge measures in at 5.8mm. As I've noted in my Galaxy S25 Edge review, the biggest compromise to designing a thin phone is that battery life is dramatically impacted. A thinner phone means less room for a battery, subsequently resulting in a much shorter battery life. However, Apple could squash any battery drain concerns with the iPhone 17 Air — by looking at what the current iOS 26 beta offers. Apple's latest iPhone software has a ton of features, but one that's overlooked is the new adaptive power mode. I suspect this could be the answer to addressing any anxiety about its battery endurance, by dynamically adjusting the phone's performance to get more juice out of the battery. Plus, I think the A19 Pro chip rumored to power the iPhone 17 Air would be power efficient enough to hopefully make it last longer than the standard iPhone 17. I'm hoping that the iPhone 17 Air ends up taking the same $899 price point that the current iPhone 16 Plus holds in Apple's lineup. However, I'm not as optimistic about that given the price of the Galaxy S25 Edge and Galaxy Z Fold 7. There are rumors that the iPhone 17 Air could end up being even more costly than the iPhone 17 Pro Max. Hopefully, that's not true because it would have an even tougher time convincing people (myself included). Realistically, Apple could fit the Air in between the iPhone 17 Pro and 17 Pro Max — which would put it at $1,099, assuming Apple maintains its pricing structure from before. This would put it in direct competition with the Galaxy S25 Edge, but a higher price point still wouldn't make it a dealbreaker. Even though I'm all about the best cheap phones, I would be shocked if there aren't deals for the iPhone 17 Air at launch to bring down its price. Nearly every major carrier will offer some kind of deal because that's been their standard procedure with every major phone release. Take the iPhone 16 Pro Max last year when it dropped down in price to a penny less than a month after its launch. Sure, you'll have to sign off on some sort of phone plan, but the end result was getting a new iPhone on the cheap. This could happen for the iPhone 17 Air, so I'm not too worried about a higher price point. It would only really affect those buying the phone outright. Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Yahoo
4 hours ago
- Yahoo
Steve Jobs' first Silicon Valley boss turned down an offer to buy a third of Apple for $50,000—today, his share would be worth nearly $1 trillion
Atari cofounder Nolan Bushnell turned down his former employee, the late Steve Jobs, when he was offered to buy a third of Apple for $50,000 in the 1970s. With the iPhone titan now standing at $3.1 trillion, the video gaming pioneer missed out on making $1 trillion from his relatively small investment. But he isn't troubling himself with regret, reasoning he might not be as happy—and Apple may not have been as successful—if he accepted the deal. Many people may be kicking themselves for not buying Bitcoin or investing in Nvidia stock sooner—but few will have missed out on a bigger deal than Atari cofounder Nolan Bushnell, the first Silicon Valley boss of the late Steve Jobs. A young Jobs offered the gaming mogul an eye-popping deal: buy a third of Apple for just $50,000. What might come as a shock to many is that Bushnell turned it down. Apple has since grown into a $3.1 billion sensation with over a billion iPhones sitting in people's back pockets, and over 100 million Mac users worldwide—and if Bushnell had taken the deal, his cut would have made him $1 trillion today. But Bushnell isn't crying over the missed opportunity Bushnell first witnessed Jobs' potential as a businessman in the 1970s, when the college dropout joined Atari as a technician and games designer before moving into entrepreneurship. Jobs was an essential engineer 'solving problems in the field' at Atari, Bushnell recalled, but his leadership mentality also meant some tension at the office. The Atari cofounder strategically employed Jobs during nightshifts, knowing that Wozniak would also join and help out on projects like the brick-breaking game 'Breakout.' But Jobs would also barge into his office to tell Bushnell that the other employees weren't good at soldering, offering to instruct them. Bushnell recognized that Jobs was a genius—albiet, a complicated one. 'He was a difficult person,' Bushnell told ABC News in 2015. 'He was very smart. Often he was the smartest person in the room, and he would tell everybody that. It's generally not a good social dynamic.' But years later, the tech pioneer isn't quietly simmering over his choice to reject the offer. 'I could have owned a third of Apple computer for $50,000, and I turned it down,' Bushnell said in the interview. 'I've got a wonderful family, I've got a great wife, my life is wonderful. I'm not sure that if I had been uber, uber, uber rich that I'd have had all of that.' In fact, Bushnell even thinks Apple may not have been so successful if he had taken the deal. And his potential payout may not have soared to that trillion-dollar height. 'I'm still an Apple fan and you know I think that hindsight is 20/20,' he told Tech Radar in 2013, when asked about his decision to say no. 'I can go through a thread very easily which, by me turning Steve down led to me introducing him to Don Valentine, and he introduced him to Mike Markkula who is as responsible for Apple's success as Steve Woz[niak] and Jobs.' He's not the first tech boss to have missed out on billions Bushnell isn't the only one who missed out on critical business opportunities that would launch them into billionaire status—there are even others who blew it on big deals with Apple. Ronald Wayne, the lesser-known third Apple cofounder, was also working at the electronics company Atari when he stepped up as Jobs' friend to help convince Wozniak of formalizing Apple's launch. Wayne even typed up the contract, penning that he would receive a 10% share in the tech company, while Jobs and Wozniak would each be awarded a 45% stake. However, less than two weeks after drafting up the document, Wayne sold his stake for just $800, also reaping $1,500 to forgo any claim to the company. Looking back, it's a massive misstep as his 10% share could now be worth between $75 billion and $300 billion today. His wasted opportunity isn't as stark as Bushnell's—and the decision mainly came from a desire to have financial stability in his life. 'Jobs and Woz didn't have two nickels to rub together,' Wayne told Business Insider in 2017. 'I, on the other hand, had a house, and a car, and a bank account—which meant that I was on the hook if that thing blew up.' YouTube's cofounders, Chad Hurley, Steven Chen and Jawed Karim could also be sitting in a sizable nest egg today if they didn't sell their company so early. The YouTube creators sold their popular video platform to Google for $1.65 billion in fall 2006—each receiving millions of dollars worth of stock. Hurley got company shares worth around $345 million, according to The New York Times, while Chen accepted about $326 million worth. Karim, who left the business early to go back to school, got $64 million of shares. They were ecstatic about the deal in the beginning, but the buyer's remorse would potentially creep up less than 20 years later. Today, YouTube is valued at $550 billion—333 times higher than its market cap from nearly two decades prior, adjusted to inflation. If Hurley and Chen accepted the same stock deal today that they did in 2006, each could have more than $100 billion in their bank accounts. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
