US offers $5 million reward for arrest of Haitian gang leader
Cherizier, 48, and another man, Bazile Richardson, have been indicted on charges of conspiring to transfer funds from the United States to fund gang activities in Haiti, the Justice Department said.
"There's a good reason that there's a $5 million reward for information leading to Cherizier's arrest," US Attorney Jeanine Pirro said at a press conference.
"He's a gang leader responsible for heinous human rights abuses, including violence against American citizens in Haiti."
Cherizier has been under US Treasury Department sanctions since 2020 and UN sanctions since 2022.
The former policeman heads an alliance of gangs in Haiti dubbed the "G9 Family," whose members are accused of murder, robbery, extortion, rape, targeted assassinations, drug trafficking and kidnappings.
The alliance participated in an organised assault last year that ultimately led to the resignation of Prime Minister Ariel Henry, who was replaced by a frail transitional council.
The Justice Department said that Cherizier and Richardson, a naturalised US citizen who was arrested in Texas last month, raised funds from members of the Haitian diaspora in the United States and had the money transferred to intermediaries in the Caribbean nation.
Cherizier allegedly used the funds to pay salaries to members of his gang and purchase firearms.
Haiti is the poorest country in the Western hemisphere, with swaths of the country and the vast majority of the capital, Port-au-Prince, under the control of armed gangs.
Despite the deployment of a Kenyan-led multinational force to back up Haiti's police, violence has continued to soar.
At least 3,141 people have been killed in the first half of this year, according to figures released last month by the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights.
"Cherizier and (Richardson) sought to raise funds in the United States to bankroll Cherizier's violent criminal enterprise, which is driving a security crisis in Haiti," Assistant Attorney General John Eisenberg said.
'The National Security Division does not tolerate criminal gang fundraising in the United States, and will continue to pursue those who enable Haiti's violence and instability.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
15 minutes ago
- Business Standard
Trump admin calls out human rights records of countries accepting deportees
The Trump administration on Tuesday released human rights reports for countries worldwide, which eliminate mentions of discrimination faced by LGBTQ people, reduce a previous focus on reproductive rights and criticise restrictions on political speech by US allies in Europe that American officials believe target right-wing politicians. The reports, which cover 2024 before President Donald Trump took office, reflect his administration's focus on free speech and protecting the lives of the unborn. However, the reports also offer a glimpse into the administration's view of dire human rights conditions in some countries that have agreed to accept migrants deported from the United States under Trump's immigration crackdown. This year's reports were streamlined for better utility and accessibility in the field and by partners, the State Department said. The congressionally mandated reports in the past have been frequently used for reference and cited by lawmakers, policymakers, academic researchers and others investigating potential asylum claims or looking into conditions in specific countries. The reports were delayed by the Trump administration's changes The reports had been due to be released in March. The State Department said in an overview that the delay occurred because the Trump administration decided in March to adjust the reports, which had been compiled during the Biden administration. Among other deletions, the reports do not include accounts from individual abuse survivors or witnesses. Frequently, eyewitnesses are intimidated or prevented from reporting what they know, the overview said. On the other hand, individuals and groups opposed to a government may have incentive to exaggerate or fabricate abuses. In similar fashion, some governments may distort or exaggerate abuses attributed to opposition groups. Human rights groups decried the changes in focus and omissions of certain categories of discrimination and potential abuse. The new reports reveal a disturbing effort by the Trump administration to purposefully fail to fully capture the alarming and growing attacks on human rights in certain countries around the globe, Amnesty International said in a statement. The reports do follow previous practices in criticizing widespread human rights abuses in China, Iran, North Korea and Russia. Laying out the poor human rights records of countries accepting migrant deportees Although such deportations did not begin until after Trump took office, the reports, with one notable exception, detail general poor human rights conditions in many of the countries that have agreed to accept migrants, even if they are not citizens of that nation. The exception is El Salvador, which was the first of several countries in Latin America and Africa to agree to accept non-citizen migrant deportees from the US. Despite claims from rights advocates to the contrary, the report about the country says there were no credible reports of significant human rights abuses in El Salvador in 2024 and that the government took credible steps to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses. Human rights groups have accused authorities of abuses, including at a notorious prison where many migrants are sent. However, for Eswatini a small country in Africa formerly known as Swaziland South Sudan and Rwanda, the reports paint a grimmer picture. All have agreed to accept third-country deportees from the United States. In all three countries, the reports noted significant human rights issues included credible reports of arbitrary or unlawful killings, torture and cruel, inhuman, or degrading treatment or punishment serious restrictions on freedom of expression and media freedom, prohibiting independent trade unions or significant or systematic restrictions on workers' freedom of association. Those governments did not take credible steps or action to identify and punish officials who committed human rights abuses, the reports said. Singling out the treatment of white South Africans South Africa was also singled out for its human rights situation significantly worsening. The report pointed to unfair treatment of white Afrikaners following the signing of major land reforms that the Trump administration has said discriminate against that minority, which ran the country's apartheid government. That system brutally enforced racial segregation, which oppressed the Black majority, for 50 years before ending in 1994. With the signing of that law in December, the report said that South Africa took a substantially worrying step towards land expropriation of Afrikaners and further abuses against racial minorities in the country. It also said the government did not take credible steps to investigate, prosecute and punish officials who committed human rights abuses, including inflammatory racial rhetoric against Afrikaners and other racial minorities, or violence against racial minorities. This year, the administration admitted as refugees some groups of white Afrikaners. Accusations of European allies restricting right-wing speech The reports take issue with what the Trump administration believes are restrictions on free speech imposed against generally right-wing voices in the United Kingdom, France and Germany. The reports use identical language to say that human rights conditions in each of the three Nato allies worsened during the year. The executive summaries for each of the three reports say significant human rights issues included credible reports of serious restrictions on freedom of expression, including enforcement of or threat of criminal or civil laws in order to limit expression; and crimes, violence, or threats of violence motivated by antisemitism. These governments have rejected such assertions that have been made by senior US officials, including Trump, Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio. Targeting Brazil over allegations of restricting Bolsonaro's speech Similar freedom-of-speech issues were raised in Brazil, which has more recently provoked Trump's ire by prosecuting his ally former right-wing President Jair Bolsonaro and led to the imposition of massive US tariffs and sanctions against Brazil's Supreme Court chief justice. The human rights situation in Brazil declined during the year, the report said. The courts took broad and disproportionate action to undermine freedom of speech and internet freedom by blocking millions of users' access to information on a major social media platform in response to a case of harassment. It added that the government undermined democratic debate by restricting access to online content deemed to undermine democracy and specifically mentioned suppressing the speech of Bolsonaro and his supporters. (Only the headline and picture of this report may have been reworked by the Business Standard staff; the rest of the content is auto-generated from a syndicated feed.)
Hindustan Times
15 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
We are real SAD, will soon get EC stamp, says Giani Harpreet Singh
A day after getting unanimously elected as president of the breakaway Shiromani Akali Dal faction, Giani Harpreet Singh, 52, on Tuesday sharpened his attack on Akali Dal chief Sukhbir Singh Badal and dubbed the recruitment and presidential polls conducted by the group as 'bogus'. In an interview with Hindustan Times, the former Akal Takht acting jathedar said his faction will soon approach the Election Commission of India (ECI) with a claim over party nomenclature, election symbol and office. Edited excerpts: Giani Harpreet Singh How is your group different from SAD led by Sukhbir Singh Badal? What is the need for a separate outfit? They (Sukhbir camp) did not follow the party principles. We will do so. We are real Akali Dal. They buried the traditions for which the Akali Dal was formed over 100 years ago. We will revive that tradition and implement the principles. They discarded the panth and issues of Sikhs and Punjab. They did not address issues of Punjab and the panth and paid no heed to getting them resolved during the 15 years of power from 1997 onwards. Despite being a partner in the ruling BJP-led NDA at the Centre, they made no efforts to get the issues resolved. They don't care about the interests of Sikhs and Punjab. The Sukhbir group has alleged that this entire exercise was pre-planned, and you always harboured the ambition to lead SAD. Your response? It would have been pre-planned if I knew that I would be sacked as jathedar of Takht Damdama Sahib. I am a student of religious studies, and preaching religious ethos is my duty. Had I not been removed, I would have remained on that post, and panth would not have chosen me for the political post. It would have been pre-planned if I, as a jathedar, had resigned to become the president. Their allegations could have still made sense if I had resigned from the post after the December 2 decree. The decision to remove me was theirs. How can they say that it was pre-planned? How do you respond to their allegations that a person, who was part of the decree that called for Akali unity, is now leading a breakaway group? The dissident group 'Akali Dal Sudhar Lehar' was dissolved on the same day that the decree was pronounced. However, it was the Badal camp that never wanted reconciliation and did not accept the dissident leaders. Sukhbir camp also did not accept a 7-member committee constituted by the Akal Takht to reorganise the party. Instead, dissident leaders cooperated with the 7-member committee by dissolving their group. Sukhbir camp leaders should have cooperated with the committee, but instead conducted their recruitment drive and elected their president. It violated the decree, which had stated that present leadership had no moral right to give political patronage to the panth. What is the ground to claim SAD's election symbol and head office? The biggest ground of our claim is that the Badal camp conducted a bogus recruitment and made a bogus president. On the other hand, our recruitment drive is genuine and mentions Aadhaar card numbers and contact numbers. Anyone from the Election Commission of India (ECI) can check and investigate the documents. We will approach the ECI over this. If need arises, we will also move to the court. Is the merger of both factions possible in future? Yes, if the leaders of the Sukhbir faction express commitment to protect the principles and traditions which they have discarded. If they give up their ego and get ready to dissolve their faction, the merger is possible. There are allegations that you have the BJP/Centre's backing. Are you going to ally with them in future? Such decisions can only be taken when a working committee of the party is formed. My personal opinion is that the party principles and issues of Punjab and the panth should be of priority. No alliance will take shape with any party just to get ministerial berths. The party is new, and an alliance is not possible at this stage. We will sit and discuss what should be done or not. Linking dissident leaders to rival parties is an old business of the Sukhbir camp. They did not even spare former SGPC president Gurcharan Singh Tohra when he parted ways with Parkash Singh Badal in 1999, and dubbed him as 'agent of Congress'. How will you compete with the Sukhbir-led SAD, which has a lot of resources, office and controls SGPC? We are not bothered and don't care about these things. Our party is run by ordinary people. When ordinary people start backing and running political parties, then money or resources do not matter. The example of the Aam Aadmi Party (AAP) is there. Ordinary people became MLAs without any money or muscle power. Commitment, confidence and dedication is needed to run the parties. If Sukhbir has a lot of resources and money, how come the party is facing an existential crisis and was reduced to just three seats in the last assembly elections?
Hans India
15 minutes ago
- Hans India
TG govt alleges Centre's 'bias'
Hyderabad: The BJP-led government at the Centre has been 'blatantly discriminating' against Telangana in approving semiconductor projects despite strong investor interest, the state government alleged on Tuesday. While Telangana has a highly favourable environment for semiconductor manufacturing, the central government continues to maintain "intentional bias" against the state, an official release said. 'Despite multiple requests and representations by Chief Minister Revanth Reddy for approval of semiconductor projects in Telangana, the Union government continues to show blatant discrimination against the state,' the release said. The central government's intervention is leading to a concentrated semiconductor ecosystem in BJP-favoured states, 'unfairly outweighing' Telangana's policy attractiveness, infrastructure robustness and political stability, it added
