Trump says he's open to regime change in Iran; Vance, Rubio say that's not the goal
Just hours after Vice President JD Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the United States did not want 'regime change' in Iran, President Donald Trump said that might be a desired outcome.
'It's not politically correct to use the term, 'Regime Change,' but if the current Iranian Regime is unable to MAKE IRAN GREAT AGAIN, why wouldn't there be a Regime change??? MIGA!!!,' Trump wrote in a Truth Social post on June 22 as Mideast tensions continued to escalate the day after the U.S. military bombed three Iranian nuclear sites.
Trump's post signaling an openness to new leadership in Tehran followed his vice president and secretary of State appearing on the Sunday morning talk shows arguing the U.S. focus was not at launching a war with Iran.
"We don't want a regime change," Vance told NBC's Meet the Press. "We want to end the nuclear program, and then we want to talk to the Iranians about a long-term settlement here."
During an interview with CBS's Face the Nation, Rubio said the U.S. had a very specific mission in mind to take out Iranian nuclear facilities and that the onus is now on Tehran showing an interest in diplomacy.
'There are a lot of regimes around the world that we don't like, okay?,' Rubio said. 'But in this particular case, what we are focused on is not the changing of the regime.'
Five days before ordering the U.S. airstrikes, Trump on June 16 threatened Iran's supreme leader on social media and followed up a short while later with another two-word post: "UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!"
In his remarks from the White House announcing the U.S. bombing operation on June 21, Trump said he wanted to 'stop to the nuclear threat posed by the world's number one state sponsor of terror.'
'Iran, the bully of the Middle East, must now make peace. If they do not, future attacks will be far greater and a lot easier,' Trump said. 'For 40 years, Iran has been saying, "Death to America, Death to Israel."
This article originally appeared on USA TODAY: Trump says he's open to regime change in Iran
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Washington Post
10 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Turmoil will come out of Iran — but what kind?
In today's edition: Over the weekend, in the wake of U.S. military strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, the Editorial Board tried to sort out what might come next. It wrote that 'Iran likely retains some ability to strike at U.S. targets in the region, particularly the 40,000 American forces stationed in various Middle Eastern countries.'
USA Today
11 minutes ago
- USA Today
Grass for gravel: Trump's Rose Garden revamp makes progress
The president has called for a variety of style changes to the White House, inside and out, since taking office again. WASHINGTON - Renovations are underway for the historic White House Rose Garden. Construction crews broke ground on the outdoor area earlier in June after President Donald Trump ordered a major remodel, including replacing the grass with gravel. The president has said in previous interviews he wanted the area paved for the ease of visitors − specifically those in heeled footwear. 'What was happening is, that's supposed to have events. Every event you have, it's soaking wet,' Trump told Fox News' Laura Ingraham in March. 'It's soaking wet ... and the women with the high heels, it's just too much.' Trump said at the time the grass would go but the flowers can stay. 'I think it's going to be beautiful,' he told Fox. 'I think it's going to be more beautiful.' The Rose Garden was first planted in 1913 during the Woodrow Wilson administration and has regularly hosted a variety of White House events, including speeches, press conferences and even weddings. Former First Lady Jacqueline Kennedy famously brought in landscape designer Rachel Lambert Mellon in 1962 to craft one of the most iconic layouts for the garden outside the Oval Office. In 2020, First Lady Melania Trump oversaw a Rose Garden revamp, including installing an updated irrigation system and replacing the flowers along the perimeter. The move received mixed reactions at the time, with some criticizing the look of the new garden and others condemning the unveiling's timing, months into the coronavirus pandemic. The more recent Rose Garden overhaul is one of several second-term renovations Trump has already launched. Under his direction, an 88-foot flagpole hoisting a massive American flag was recently installed on the south lawn. A second, matching pole was added in front of the White House on June 18 as well. 'How do you like it, everybody?' Trump said to reporters after the flag reached the top of the pole. The inside of 1600 Pennsylvania Ave has been made over as well. Since taking office again in January, Trump has accessorized the executive mansion with splashes of gold trimming. The White House has also added new portraits of Trump to its walls and it recently exchanged a bust of Martin Luther King Jr. for Winston Churchill in the Oval Office. Contributing: Joey Garrison, USA TODAY
CNN
11 minutes ago
- CNN
Analysis: A weakened Tehran lashes out against US airbases to save face
An empty base as a target, with many hours warning, and a limited number of missiles fired at some of the best air defense systems in the world. Iran's retaliation for the US's weekend strikes on three of its nuclear facilities can only have been designed to deescalate. The US-run Al Udeid airbase in Qatar had been evacuated days earlier, with satellite images showing the departure of planes and personnel widely publicised in the media. It is the most important US military airbase in the region, the home of Central Command. It even launched the drone that killed Iran's top military personality, General Qasem Soleimani, in 2020, Iranian state media said in the hours after 'Operation Glad Tidings of Victory.' The Monday strike against Al-Udeid had close to zero chance of American casualties – and provided the perfect moment of quasi-absurd face-saving for Iran. The first hint of a possible strike came when the US Embassy in Doha, Qatar, issued an emergency 'shelter in place' order for US citizens. As if to remove any doubt, Qatar closed its airspace about an hour prior to the launch of what appears to have been close to a dozen missiles by Iran. Adding to the favourable conditions of the launch for Iran's dwindling arsenal, Qatar is close enough to permit the use of shorter-range missiles, stocks of which have not been as depleted as the medium-range missiles used to hit Israel over the past week. To pour water on anything resembling a flame, Iran's National Security Council said moments after the attack the number of missiles fired had been 'as many as the number of bombs used in the attack on Iranian nuclear facilities.' Packaging the barrage as the definition of a proportionate response, the Iranian statement went on to insist the attack posed 'no dangerous aspect to our friendly and brotherly country of Qatar and its noble people.' Tehran's method of retaliation-without-fangs has been successfully tried and tested. After Soleimani was killed, Iran's retaliatory missile attack against the US's Al Asad airbase in Iraq was reportedly telegraphed to Baghdad beforehand, possibly helping reduce the level of US injury suffered to mostly concussions. Iran's response to Israel's assassination of Hamas leader Ismail Haniyeh in July 2024 in the heart of Tehran heavily telegraphed in advance. 'We knew they'd retaliate. They had a similar response after Soleimani,' a senior White House official said Monday night. A playbook appears to be forming. But it is one that compounds Iran's military weakness each time it is employed. In 2020, the Islamic Republic lost its pre-eminent military personality – an Iranian hardline hero. In 2024, it showed that valuable allies were not safe in central Tehran. This year, the regime has lost control of its own airspace to the point of previously unthinkable strikes on their prized nuclear facilities by both Israel and the US. This is stark testament to the differing powers on display. Iran has to feign its strength in a managed presentation of restrained and muted anger. The US and Israel get to break taboos daily, shattering Iran's long-held position as a regional power in under ten days, and perhaps ending its ambitions to be a nuclear power. There is now only one real red line left for the United States or Israel to cross, and that is to directly target Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. But that may seem ill-advised, given the likelihood this octogenarian theocrat would be replaced by a younger hardliner who is keener to flex Iran's muscles of deterrence. Better to accept toothless retaliations amid Tehran's slow decline. Each expression of Iran's anger has confirmed its slow erosion of power. An angry fledging nuclear power would have accelerated its race to an atomic bomb. That may still happen. But it looks more likely that Iran is desperately hoping its performative lashing out can sate what remains of its hardliners, decimated by Israeli strikes. It may even hope to shuffle back to diplomacy, with talks to contain a nuclear program and ballistic missile stockpile likely severely depleted to shadows of what they were merely ten days ago.
