GPs: 'Some services will stop if funding deal not met'
"The minister has asked us to discuss next year's contract, but it is this year's contract that the vote was taken on and we are in dispute for."Dr O'Hagan said that without the minister returning to the negotiating table, "we have to look at what services we are providing that are not part of our contract, and stick to our contract so that we can provide more appointments for patients".She listed the kind of services GPs will not carry out if they move to work strictly within their contracts. The list includes heart screenings through electrocardiograms (ECGs), taking bloods from the hospital, and follow up investigations carried out in the hospital.
The BMA GP committee requested an additional £39 per patient per year to improve services. "That is not a lot", said Dr O'Hagan. "To be offered 50 pence per year per patient, i.e. less than a penny a week to improve access, I don't think many people will disagree with me that less than a penny is not going to improve access in any which way."We are seeing 200,000 patients per week in Northern Ireland, that's 10.1 million appointments a year, but clearly that's not enough, and if it's not enough then we have to have a service that can provide enough," she added.
The BMA had made a number of proposed collective actions, external in relation to the ballot.These included:Limiting daily patient consultations per clinician to the UEMO (European Union of General Practitioners) recommended safe maximum of 25Serving notice on any voluntary activityCeasing completion of unfunded paperworkSwitching off Medicines Optimisation Software
In a statement on Friday, the Department of Health (DoH) said it acknowledges the outcome of the ballot, but said it has not yet received details of the planned collective action.It stressed that any action must respect contractual obligations, protect patient safety, and maintain service access.The department said it recognises that the primary care system is under "considerable and sustained pressure" while also acknowledging the dedication of GPs and their teams in meeting patient demand.The DoH stated that, given the department's well-known financial constraints, the additional £9.5 million offered in the 2025/26 GMS [General Medical Services] contract "represented the best possible offer.""It is a matter of regret that the department has not been able to reach agreement," the spokesperson added.The department said, as stated by Health Minister Mike Nesbitt on 19 May, that it remains open to discussions on securing the future of general practice.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Sun
40 minutes ago
- The Sun
Warning as heat pumps could expose Brits to killer germs under Ed Miliband's green energy drive
FAMILIES will be exposed to killer germs under Ed Miliband's green heating drive, an expert is warning. The danger comes from legionella bacteria in heat pumps, a top adviser to the Net Zero Secretary has suggested. 2 Dr Matthew Aylott, who works in Red Ed's department, said cases were rare. But he added more research was needed to determine a 'disinfection strategy'. His warning came after a scathing watchdog study declared not enough was being done by the Government to reduce the risk of exposure to heat pump germs. The Health and Safety Executive study, seen by The Sun, said: 'There are concerns that these systems are susceptible to microbial contamination because they hold water at lower temperatures.' Heat pumps often keep water at about 50C to save energy. But legionella bacteria thrive between 25C and 45C — so can do so when systems are not hot enough to kill them off. Shadow Energy Secretary Claire Coutinho said: 'Red Ed seems determined to complete his mad dash to Net Zero — even if it means exposing Brits to killer germs.' The Department of Energy and Net Zero said: 'There is no evidence of more health-related issues coming from heat pumps compared to boilers.' It comes as Mr Miliband's green agenda faces a further backlash, with households being forced to pay solar farms to switch off on sunny days as the grid cannot cope. For the first time, solar operators such as EDF Renewables and Octopus Energy have been handed payments to reduce output — with the costs added to energy bills, research by the Renewable Energy Foundation revealed. Keir Starmer's deranged drive for Net Zero with eco-zealot Ed Miliband is a threat to UK's national security- here's why 2
The Sun
an hour ago
- The Sun
Warning to young women after surge in egg donations to fertility clinics despite risk of severe side effects
WOMEN as young as 18 are risking their health by donating their eggs in return for cash, campaigners warn. Surrogacy Concern said the number of 18 to 25-year-olds signing up to donate to private fertility clinics shot up from 190 in 2012 to 509 in 2022. It is illegal in the UK to buy a woman's eggs but clinics can pay up to £985 for expenses. The campaign group said some openly advertise the sum to young women and pay the full amount without asking for receipts. It said donation is generally safe but can be uncomfortable, with possible severe side-effects such as ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome, bowel perforations, abscesses and even sepsis. Surrogacy Concern founder Helen Gibson said teenagers may also underestimate the effects on their mental health. She said: 'We're really worried that women are doing this for money and are not being fully informed of the risks to their health. 'This is a lot of money at any age but especially if you're working-class or a student. 'You could do it three times and make nearly £3,000, and you're allowed to do up to ten cycles. It's insanity. 'We want the minimum age for donation to rise to 25, all payments ended to remove the risk of financial motivation and adverts asking for young women to donate their eggs to be banned.' Donor eggs must be taken from women younger than 35 as that is when they are most fertile. They take hormone drugs to stimulate the ovaries before the eggs are removed with a needle. Health Minister Karin Smyth said the £985 compensation had risen from £750 due to inflation, and clinics' ads are under the jurisdiction of the Advertising Standards Agency. She said: 'We will monitor the issues raised. "Women's health, particularly inequalities, are absolutely central to this Government's priorities.' White couple sue IVF clinic after their baby was born with 'Asian features' that left husband fearing wife had cheated on him 1
The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
Eradicating drugs from prisons may be unrealistic, but it should be the goal
The widespread availability of drugs in British prisons has long been among the more baffling conundrums of national life. How come institutions specifically built and managed to be secure have a drug problem that has, by common consent, reached crisis proportions? To put it another way, how can it be that places expressly designed to prevent people from getting out find it so difficult to stop illicit, and ever more harmful, substances from getting in? The figures we report today are truly shocking – or they would be, were it not for the pervasive sense of resignation about everything that pertains to our prisons. The ubiquity of drugs then risks being seen as just one aspect of a disastrously failing system. It is more than that. It is at the root of many other prison problems. Recorded at 21,145, annual drug seizures by prison officers in the year to March 2024 were more than 35 per cent up on the previous year, and nudging the record of 21,574 set four years before. Given the likelihood of undetected, or unchecked, possession, the figure for actual seizures is likely to understate the problem. In what comes perilously close to a concession of defeat, the Independent Monitoring Boards of prisons in the UK describe the movement of drugs into these institutions as 'a seemingly unstoppable flow'. There was a time when prison was seen as an opportunity to treat those with a drug habit. Success may have been limited, but it seems an even less realistic objective today. In our report, Mike Trace, head of a charity providing drug treatment in prisons and former drugs 'Czar' in the Blair government, says the number of treatment programmes in prison, including drug-free wings, has been slashed from 110 in 2013 to just 15 now. It is by no means unheard of for offenders who entered prison clean to emerge from their sentence with a dependency likely to land them back behind bars. No one, of course, would argue that freeing prisons from the scourge of drugs is simple. If it were, it would have been done long before now. The extent to which the problem has grown in recent years reflects a host of factors, from cuts to prison staffing under the austerity policies of previous governments – which resulted in the loss of many more experienced staff – to technological developments, such as miniature mobile phones and drones that allow inmates to circumvent more traditional prison security. Drones also facilitate deliveries of drugs in far greater quantities than would be possible via visitors or corrupt employees, and reduce the effectiveness of recently introduced X-ray scanners. A further complication is the wider variety of illicit drugs in circulation, some being hard to identify, which can have more harmful effects than before. The consequence is an increase, both in emergency hospital admissions and in violence among inmates and towards staff. Reprisals for drug-related debts have become a particular problem – and these are debts, it should be stressed, that have been incurred in prison. In the past, it was sometimes argued that drug-taking was tolerated in some prisons because it could calm down otherwise under-occupied and frustrated inmates. That argument is less tenable now. All these changes are well known to the prison authorities and those with monitoring and policy responsibilities. In our report, His Majesty's chief inspector of prisons, Charlie Taylor, is quoted as saying that drugs are the biggest challenge currently facing many prisons, and that it is 'not acceptable that these levels of criminality are going on, unchecked'. He is right. It is not acceptable. But where is any real sense of urgency and direction to get to grips with such a pernicious and growing problem? The government has embarked on what it bills as the biggest overhaul of the prison system in decades. In the short term, it is addressing prison overcrowding through an emergency programme of early releases. It has a longer-term schedule for building new prisons and welcomes talk about a greater focus on work and rehabilitation. So far, so modestly good. But there is a lot of catching up to do, too – starting, perhaps, with better training, pay and status for prison staff. And it is hard not to detect a note of complacency in the response of the Justice Ministry to The Independent 's findings, which blamed past governments for the current situation, while asserting a 'zero-tolerance approach to drugs' and 'a clear impact' from the use of body scanners and drone no-fly zones. We are, though, a year into the new government, and it is hard to detect that tolerance for drugs in prison is any closer to zero than it was before, while the impact of scanners and no-fly zones seems a lot less clear than the Justice Ministry insists. Eradicating drugs from prison altogether may be unrealistic, but it should be the ambition, and it needs to be pursued with a lot more urgency and application than has been in evidence so far.
