China to impose extra tariffs of 10%-15% on various US products
COMMENTS:
CHARU CHANANA, CHIEF INVESTMENT STRATEGIST, SAXO, SINGAPORE
"While the moves from China may not be particularly bold, there is a reason to believe that China wants to be on the negotiating table with Trump rather than sitting back and absorbing the blows. The move still brings risks of an escalation first in trade tensions before resolution.
"China's actions could also be indicative of the fact that they may be more confident of responding to domestic headwinds now, especially as they catch up to the AI race. There will be increased focus on what policy stimulus come through from the twin sessions."
TOMMY XIE, HEAD OF GLOBAL MACRO RESEARCH, OCBC BANK, SINGAPORE
"Exchange rate is a relative concept, and so is tariff. As long as other countries are also levied tariffs, or have such expectations, it won't be that bad. The thing to worry about is only one person gets tariffs. If the United States charges everyone, it will be considered as paying protection fee."
CHARLES WANG, FOUNDER, DRAGON PACIFIC CAPITAL MANAGEMENT, SHENZHEN
"The U.S. is facing various challenges, and the trade war will only make things worse. They include inflation, relations between the U.S. and Europe and China.
"For China, we have reduced trade dependency with the U.S. from 23% to around 13%, so the direct impact is limited. In addition, China's economy is recovering, and the parliamentary meeting will provide more signals for supporting the economy.
Therefore, I don't think the stock market trajectory will be changed. There're some curbs on the Hong Kong market, which, if anything, needs a small correction. But it's OK. Not a big deal."
LIU JINLU, AGRICULTURAL RESEARCHER AT GUOYUAN FUTURES, BEIJING
"This news has raised concerns about tightening domestic agricultural supplies, benefiting the sector. China's 10% tariff on U.S. soybeans will increase costs and reduce U.S. imports, leading China to boost imports from Brazil and other countries.
"However, South America, especially Brazil, is approaching its soybean export limit after years of growth (2024 exports are expected at 96 million tons). Currently in the harvest season, Brazilian soybeans have not yet arrived in large quantities at Chinese ports but are expected in Q2. With the additional U.S. tariffs, the already tight soybean stock will become even more strained."
GENEVIEVE DONNELLON-MAY, RESEARCHER AT OXFORD GLOBAL SOCIETY, MELBOURNE
"While the new tariff announcement is not as heavy as the 25% in 2018, it does target many of the same agricultural products. In addition, the 10% tariff may provide Beijing with the opportunity to increase the tariffs on U.S. agricultural goods by another 10% or even 20% in the coming months and years.
"Soybeans were considered a weak link during the first Trump administration but Chinese policymakers have learned lessons from that time and are, in theory, much better prepared, due in part to Beijing's food import diversification strategy."
WANG ZHUO, PARTNER AT HEDGE FUND ZHUOZHU INVEST, SHANGHAI
Raising tariff on China "will likely hurt the U.S. itself as it needs cheap Chinese products to bring down inflation. Higher tariffs on U.S. agricultural products will also negatively impact China", but countermeasures are politically necessary. "So, it would be wise to make some symbolic move without triggering an escalation in tensions."
DENNIS VOZNESENSKI, ANALYST, COMMONWEALTH BANK, SYDNEY
"Chinese tariffs on U.S. wheat and corn imports should be supportive for demand for Australian wheat and barley exports. However, China's recent slowdown in imports of feed grains from all origins should temper the excitement."
WAN CHENGZHI, ANALYST, CAPITAL JINGDU FUTURES, DALIAN CITY
"Considering that China's peak import period for U.S. soybeans has already passed, the impact of these countermeasures on the total volume of U.S. soybean imports is limited. Any price increases in the future are likely to be more of an emotional market response."
OLE HOUE, DIRECTOR OF ADVISORY SERVICES, IKON COMMODITIES, SYDNEY
"It is broadly negative for U.S. agricultural markets. It is going to have a bearish influence on prices. There are enough corn and soybean supplies in the world for China to make the switch, it is more of an issue for the U.S., 30% of U.S. soybeans still go to China."
EVEN PAY, AGRICULTURE ANALYST, TRIVIUM CHINA
"It's notable that Beijing's response is restrained. Trump has now imposed a total of 20% tariffs on all Chinese products. China's tariffs impact a limited number of U.S. products, and remain below the 20% level. This is by design. China's government is signalling that they do not want to escalate, they want to deescalate.
"It's fair to say we're in the early days of Trade War 2.0. There's still time and space to avoid a protracted, entrenched trade war if Trump and Xi can strike a deal."
ROSA WANG, ANALYST, SHANGHAI-BASED AGRO-CONSULTANCY JCI
"From the supply and demand perspective, the short-term impact on the domestic market won't be significant. The reasons are: 1. It is currently the South American soybean season, while the U.S. soybean is in the off-season; 2. The amount of U.S. soybeans purchased by China has decreased, and the proportion of U.S. soybeans in China's soybean imports has dropped to 17%.
"However, the large number of products involved this time will add further difficulties to China's aquatic product exports to the U.S., especially tilapia exports. With the additional 10% tariff, the tariff on tilapia exports to the U.S. will reach 45%, making it basically impossible to export to the U.S."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

The National
6 minutes ago
- The National
Anti-tech extremism: How AI could become target of political violence
Major investment in artificial intelligence in countries around the world, along with the societal changes it causes, could lead to a surge in anti-technology extremism, an expert has warned. Author and technology researcher Mauro Lubrano said that various issues brought about by AI development, such as job losses, might prompt anarchists and eco-terrorists to increase their attempts to make their message more public. "They believe that technology is a system that is beyond reform and cannot be changed, therefore, it must be dismantled. And they believe the only way to dismantle is to try and accelerate its collapse," Mr Lubrano said on Monday during a discussion hosted by the George Washington University programme on extremism in Washington. He said the potential for AI to disrupt labour, combined with other issues such as the burden it places on energy grids and the environment, means that elements of the far left and far right might be easily co-opted by groups with an extremist anti-technology agenda. That could come in the form of violence and attacks against infrastructure, said Mr Lubrano, who wrote the book Stop the Machines: The Rise of Anti-Technology Extremism. He warned that data centres, which have become a symbol of economic aspirations in parts of the world, could also become a target for extremist groups. "Technology extremism is quite flexible," Mr Lubrano said, comparing it to the recent anti-vaccine movement. "There's also a Maoist interpretation of anti-technology, whereby they say, 'We need to retreat to the parts of the country' where technology is less strong, and sort of build up strength, build up momentum, and carry out an assault on the centre of technologies." He said that while researching his book, learning about the groups emerging in the anti-technology extremist movement proved difficult because of their paranoia of anything remotely mainstream, but that paradoxically, because they use technology so much, he was able to gather ample source material. "You will find their manuals online on how to take down technology and so on, and these extremists are completely aware of the irony and and they also provide justifications for it," he said. Unlike other extremist movements, Mr Lubrano warned, the increasingly quickening pace of change could give anti-technology extremism significantly more staying power. A recent poll from the Pew Research Centre showed an increasing chasm between experts and the general public in terms of enthusiasm for AI in the US. Experts surveyed by Pew Research were significantly more likely - 56 per cent compared with 17 per cent - than the average American to say that AI would have a "very or somewhat positive" impact in society over the next 20 years. Pew data also showed that 73 per cent of experts believed AI will have a positive impact on how people do their jobs, while only 23 per cent of the general public felt that way. Mr Lubrano said that while many concerns about anti-technology extremism are legitimate and worth following up, those seeking to destroy the technological world will probably fail. He said history has shown those with 'realist views' about technology, along with government interventions to regulate its impact, have always managed to succeed in winning over hearts and minds. "We cannot get rid of technology but we can revisit the way that we interact with it to promote activities that foster a more meaningful relationship with one another and with nature," he said. Mr Lubrano said there was no indication that law enforcement agencies are incapable of dealing with a rising anti-technology extremist threat. Some level of violence, he said, will always be present "given the nature of many living in a democratic society", adding that "good intelligence" and "good law enforcement" have been able to disrupt similar threats in the past.


Middle East Eye
an hour ago
- Middle East Eye
Trump Administration says it will withhold disaster funding to states that boycott Israel
US states and territories that boycott Israeli companies or companies operating in Israel will be denied federal funds for natural disaster preparation, Reuters reported on Monday. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) stated in a notice of funding on Friday that it was making nearly $1 billion available to states to protect themselves from natural disasters. The funding announced on Friday applies to 15 different grant programmes that protect states from natural disasters such as floods, tornadoes, hurricanes, and fires as well as terrorist attacks and cyber disruptions. FEMA has also announced an additional $2.2 bn in funding for disaster preparation since 25 July. However, Reuters said that at least $1.9 billion of this funding was conditional on states following Department of Homeland conditions laid out in April that they will not cut 'commercial relations specifically with Israeli companies or companies doing business in or with Israel' to qualify, according to 11 agency grant notices it reviewed. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters However, the ruling is seen to be largely symbolic. More than 30 US states already have laws that require 'public entities to certify they do not and will not boycott Israel', according to an essay titled 'Anti-BDS laws and the politics of political boycotts' in the University of Pennsylvania's Journal of Law and Social Change. However, in recent months, calls for boycotts of Israeli and international companies who are doing business with Israel have increased. Most recently, UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese's called for action after she published a scathing new report in which she names over 60 companies, including major technology firms like Google, Amazon and Microsoft, alleging their involvement in what she calls "the transformation of Israel's economy of occupation to an economy of genocide". Albanese was sanctioned by the US after she published the report. Political blackmail It is the latest escalation in the Trump administration making war on institutions, departments, or states that do not fall in line with its goals and priorities such as its hardline approach to immigration or issues such as climate change. For example, FEMA's statement on Friday laid out that recipients will no longer be able to spend the funds 'to house illegal immigrants at luxury hotels, fund climate change pet projects or empower radical organizations with unseemly ties that don't serve the interest of the American people'. The statement also said that recipients are required to spend 10 percent minimum on 'supporting border crisis response and enforcement'.


UAE Moments
2 hours ago
- UAE Moments
You Lost Your Job. Now What? 10 Steps to Land Your Next Role
You Lost Your Job. Now What? 10 Steps to Land Your Next Big Role Let's not sugarcoat it—losing your job hurts. Whether it came out of nowhere or you saw it coming, the emotional and financial impact is real. But here's the truth: a job loss is not the end of the road, it's the start of a reroute. And for many, it's a much better one. I've seen this firsthand—talented people go from 'Why me?' to 'I'm glad it happened.' But only if they act. Here's what to do next—10 practical, mindset-shifting steps to help you reset, refocus, and relaunch: 1. Give Yourself 48 Hours to Feel Everything Don't rush into action. Take two days to process. Be angry. Cry. Reflect. But don't get stuck there. You need clarity, not chaos. Suggestion: Go silent for 2 days, then came back with a spreadsheet and a plan. 2. Get Clear on What You Want (Not Just What You Lost) This is your chance to redefine what matters. Is it better pay? More flexibility? A different industry? Write it down. Suggestion: It is your opportunity to pivot to something you really want to do. 3. Update Your LinkedIn—Boldly and Honestly Don't hide your exit. Use it to tell your story. Highlight achievements, growth, and what you're looking for next. Suggestion: 'My chapter at [Company] just ended. Grateful, but hungry for my next challenge in AI and product innovation.' 4. Reconnect with Your Network Without Shame This is not begging—it's building. Reach out to people you trust. Tell them you're exploring opportunities and open to conversations. Suggestion: Reach out with a simple message: 'I'm in transition. Would love 15 minutes of your perspective.' 5. Audit Your Finances and Make a Runway Plan Knowing how long you can go without income gives you breathing space. Look at expenses. Cancel what you don't need. Stretch what you do. Suggestion: Revisit your subscriptions (gym, Netflix, etc.). 6. Work on Something That Rebuilds Your Confidence Freelance. Volunteer. Start a blog. Teach a course. Do something that reminds you of your value. Suggestion: Every opportunity can open up a job opportunity. Just don't stay still. 7. Create a Weekly Structure Like You're Already Employed Treat your job hunt like a job. Set a schedule. Monday = applications. Tuesday = networking. Wednesday = learning. And so on. Suggestion: Plan a daily routine such as 'job search calendar' in Google or a visit to a colleague. 8. Upskill Smartly, Not Randomly Don't sign up for every online course. Focus on what your target industry values. Suggestion: If you're aiming for digital marketing, Meta Ads or Google Analytics courses matter. If it's tech, go deep on GitHub, AI, or product management tools. 9. Practice Interviewing Before You Land One Do mock interviews. Record yourself. Ask a friend or mentor to throw you curveballs. Confidence is built in the reps. Suggestion: Recorded yourself answering tough questions and playback the video. Awkward at first, but game-changing by round two. 10. Remind Yourself: You Are Not Your Job Title Don't let a layoff steal your identity. You're not 'ex-Company X.' You're a builder, a strategist, a leader in progress. Suggestion: Always introduce yourself as 'someone in-between roles and building clarity.' Final word? The next version of you might be stronger, smarter, and bolder—because of this, not despite it. The sooner you start acting with that mindset, the faster doors start opening.