Rookie cops NYPD is trying to fire can remain on job amid legal battle, judge rules
At a hearing, state Supreme Court Justice Phaedra Perry-Bond denied a request from the city to lift a July 10 temporary restraining order obtained by the Police Benevolent Association union that stopped the NYPD from firing the cops.
The department is trying to fire the officers after determining they weren't qualified to join the force in the first place based, they say, on checkered histories that include arrests, drug use, hiring sex workers, traffic violations, and 'serious disregard for rules and consequences,' according to lawyers for the city and the NYPD.
All of the cops in question either failed a psychiatric evaluation or a character assessment while they were being vetted, according to the NYPD, and were told as such.
However, the city claims that a lone commanding officer, Inspector Terrell Anderson, the head of the NYPD's Candidate Assessment Division, mistakenly approved them after calling them back for additional interviews, sending them off to be sworn in and trained at the Police Academy.
'These candidates were approved by an individual whose actions were unauthorized. Now, we have them working in the field when they have been disqualified,' city Law Department attorney Marina Sukonnik said in court.
One officer the NYPD says was unqualified to serve — who, like all of the cops, has been on desk duty without a badge or a gun since July 10 — 'reported using LSD and marijuana to cope with stress,' while a third showed 'an extensive history of poor decision-making and recklessness,' the NYPD said in court papers.
Another officer 'openly discussed arguments and conflicts with other people in a boastful manner' during an NYPD psychological interview and said that when she received a failing grade from a college professor, she told the teacher, 'No one likes you; I don't like you, your students don't like you.'
Another officer was deemed unfit because 'he had a prior history of paying prostitutes for sexual favors,' the NYPD said in court papers.
'Because of the public trust placed in the NYPD and the sensitivity of many issues faced regularly by police officers, the police commissioner must have the ability to demand a high degree of character and fitness from police officers and certainly must demand that they be qualified under the appointment standards for the position,' the city said in court papers.
In court Tuesday, Matthew Daly, a lawyer for the PBA, said most of the cops were of minority, non-affluent backgrounds and had been making arrests and working patrol without incident — in some cases, commended for their performance — when they turned up to work last week and told to resign or face being fired before a court order put the firings on hold. Some have been on the job for more than 18 months.
Calling the NYPD's hasty firing attempt 'sloppy and heavy-handed,' Daly suggested the commanding officer had been scapegoated despite an ongoing internal investigation into the mix-up. He said many of the cops had left other jobs after the NYPD hired them and risk homelessness, student loan delinquency, and losing their family's medical insurance were they to get the boot.
The union lawyer stated that the PBA's position was that the NYPD had no right to revive the disqualifications; however, if it did so, Daly said the officers should be given 30 days to appeal.
'The city is trying to humiliate and condemn them,' Daly said. 'All we're asking for is that the status quo be maintained.'
Sukonnik countered by saying the officers had no right to keep their jobs or to appeal now the findings that they were unfit.
In pointed questions to the city's attorney, Perry-Bond sounded skeptical about the department's position that the rookie cops had blown the deadline to appeal the finding within the 30-day timeframe while simultaneously acknowledging they'd been rehired during that period and pressed Sukonnik about whether the NYPD was acting fairly.
'It isn't just, 'Oh, you shouldn't have been hired. Goodbye,'' the judge quipped, a few beats later denying the city's efforts to lift the restraining order and ordering the parties back in court in 60 days.
'There are people whose lives are on hold here.'
Union officials who attended Tuesday's hearing said the cops highlighted by the NYPD made up a small portion of the 31 whose jobs are on the line and that many of the group had worked for various city and law enforcement agencies in the past. One had worked as a correction officer for 10 years, and another had worked as an investigator for the Brooklyn D.A.'s office before being hired by the NYPD.
PBA President Patrick Hendry said singling out certain officers in court documents amounted to a 'shameful smear campaign' against the entire group.
'We're grateful to the judge for taking this case seriously, understanding that these are 31 police officers' lives. their livelihood. That she understands that they have families, understands that they have bills, understands that they have rent, understands that they were just told, 'Hey, you're not entitled to any process here. You're fired,' That is wrong,' Hendry said.
'They were deemed to be qualified to be New York City police officers. They were called back, they completed what they were asked to complete, those investigations, and they got hired by the police department. … They've been doing a great job, and they deserve to continue the job that they love.'
Capt. Chris Monahan, president of the Captains' Endowment Association, the union that represents NYPD captains and inspectors, staunchly defended Anderson on Thursday.
'Inspector Anderson had the authority under previous administrations to hire candidates,' Monahan said. 'He was under tremendous pressure to fill NYPD recruit classes. He had a careful review process and didn't place candidates with diagnosed mental health issues in any classes.'
Earlier this year, NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch said the department is in a 'hiring crisis' and significantly reduced the number of college credits required to join the force to broaden the candidate pool.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Yahoo
9 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Colombian man gets life sentence for Hawaii Loa Ridge murder
JAMM AQUINO / JAQUINO @ Juan Baron, right, stands with defense attorney Randy Hironaka while listening to his sentence from Circuit Judge Catherine Remigio today for the killing of Gary Ruby. Per a plea agreement, Baron was sentenced to life with the possibility of parole. JAMM AQUINO / JAQUINO @ Juan Baron, right, stands with defense attorney Randy Hironaka while listening to his sentence from Circuit Judge Catherine Remigio today for the killing of Gary Ruby. Per a plea agreement, Baron was sentenced to life with the possibility of parole. Juan Baron, a 26-year-old Colombian man, who negotiated a plea deal in, was sentenced today to life in prison with the possibility of parole. Baron confessed to police in Los Angeles that he strangled and buried Ruby's body in a bathtub with cement in Hawaii Loa Ridge. Prosecutors say the crimes were committed sometime between Jan. 19, 2022 and March 7, 2022. Judge Catherine Remigio followed the plea agreement which removed the sentencing enhancements the state initially suggested for the second-degree murder charge, which would have meant life without the possibility of parole. The plea agreement also included a joint recommendation to the Hawaii Paroling Authority of a 20-year minimum for the murder charge. The judge sentenced him to 10 years each for the two counts of theft for the theft of Ruby's car and house, and 20 years for first-degree identity theft, to run concurrently. Both Ruby's family from Kansas, friends from California and elsewhere, and Baron's mother and other friends and family were present for the sentencing either on Zoom and in the courtroom. See more : 8 Comments By participating in online discussions you acknowledge that you have agreed to the. An insightful discussion of ideas and viewpoints is encouraged, but comments must be civil and in good taste, with no personal attacks. If your comments are inappropriate, you may be banned from posting. Report comments if you believe they do not follow our. Having trouble with comments ? .


Washington Post
11 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Miss Manners: Family feud, comment section edition
Dear Miss Manners: Some time ago, one of my wife's nephews (a grown man in his 40s) came across an opinion I had written in a digital publication. He didn't like it, so he insulted me in the public commentary section. I shrugged it off. The next day, he went hunting online for another opinion of mine he didn't like, and insulted me again so that all my family and friends could read it. He was beyond vile.


CBS News
11 minutes ago
- CBS News
Inside the U.S. Marshals' Fugitive Task Force Partnership with Oakland Police
OAKLAND — For the first time in at least five years, media cameras were allowed inside a U.S. Marshals fugitive operation in Oakland, offering a glimpse into the work of the U.S. Marshals Service and their local law enforcement partners as they track down the region's most dangerous fugitives. From a discreet command center in Oakland to boots on the ground along International Boulevard, the Marshals' Bay Area Fugitive Task Force has teamed up with the Oakland Police Department as part of the city's Summer Safety Plan, a time when crime is known to climb along with temperatures. "We're trying to be high visibility. We're not trying to hide what we're doing," said Senior Inspector Chris Tamayo, a Bay Area native who has spent the last 12 years tracking fugitives across Northern California. "There is a lot of significance for me to feel like I'm actually at home in my area, not just supporting my friends who are officers looking for people. But it's my community. I feel like I have ownership." The U.S. Marshals Fugitive Task Force partners not just with Oakland, but also with police departments in San Francisco, Alameda, Marin, Antioch, Oakley, and others across the Bay. The partnership could be expanding. The San Jose City Council is considering a partnership with the task force as well. Oakland's police resources are already stretched thin, as it remains short roughly 200 police officers. But the Marshals bring federal resources and a broader arrest authority, helping local departments close high-priority cases. So far this year, the Pacific Southwest Fugitive Task Force has made 273 arrests, nearly half of them in Oakland. In just three months, between April and June, the team made 70 arrests on homicide charges and 79 more related to assault. This week, the team turned its focus to sex offenders, serving warrants for rape, molestation, and failure to register. One suspect, last seen wearing gray and a Raiders hat, was spotted riding a bus down International Boulevard. The task force moved in quickly, arresting him without incident and allowing the bus to continue its route. "When we take someone off the street, even if it's for a week before they get released, at least that person's out of the game for a little bit," Tamayo said. But the team has recently faced a new challenge. Inspectors say they've encountered an uptick in confusion and tension, as residents mistakenly believe the Marshals are part of Immigration and Customs Enforcement. "We're dealing with a lot of people thinking we're ICE, and so sometimes places have become unsafe to make the arrest," Tamayo explained. While the Marshals Service can support federal immigration enforcement, this task force is focused squarely on violent offenders, not immigration violations. "It really just goes to show that there's a lot of people here that want police to do their job," Tamayo said. "They want crime to come down." The Oakland Police Department said the partnership with the Marshals is essential to restoring safety this summer. "The Oakland Police Department (OPD) is grateful for the support of our federal, state, and local law enforcement partners as we continue our Summer Safety Plan," the department told CBS News Bay Area in a statement. "This collaboration allows our residents, businesses, and visitors to live, work, and enjoy their time in Oakland without fear of crime."