Calcutta High Court directs Centre to resume MGNREGA in West Bengal from August 1
The matter will come up for further hearing after August 15.
Between 2022-23 and 2025-26, Bengal was supposed to receive allocations. From 2016 to the next six years, West Bengal was allocated 50,593 crore under the 100 Days Work Scheme (MGNREGA). Allegations of irregularities surfaced in works amounting to only 9.20 crore, against which action was also taken.
All related documents and records have been submitted to the Ministry of Rural Development.
The court highlighted that the 100-day work scheme is a long-term, centrally funded project where money is directly transferred to workers' bank accounts. It stressed the importance of resuming the scheme in the public interest
A division bench led by Chief Justice T. S. Sivagnanam observed that while instances of fund misuse had been proven in four districts, the suspension of the entire scheme for three years was unjustifiable.
BJP leader Amit Malviya welcomed the HC Verdict calling it a huge blow to the Mamata Banerjee government.
'In a landmark ruling, the Calcutta High Court has ordered that the MGNREGA scheme in West Bengal must restart from 1st August 2025 -- a huge blow to the Mamata Banerjee government and a massive win in the fight against corruption. Here's what the verdict means: The scheme cannot be kept in abeyance indefinitely just because the State misused it. Control will now rest with the Central Government for strict monitoring -- Mamata Banerjee will no longer be able to loot. No retrospective payments -- only genuine beneficiaries will receive fresh entitlements. All recovered money from the scam will go to the Consolidated Fund of India, not to TMC's coffers. Since the Act itself hasn't been scrapped, the benefits must reach the poor -- and the Court has ensured that they will. This is a tight slap on TMC's corruption-ridden governance. The poor of Bengal will now get what is rightfully theirs. But make no mistake -- Mamata Banerjee will do everything to stall its implementation... because she cannot tolerate a system she cannot manipulate,' he posted on X.
The Trinamool Congress also welcomed the verdict claiming that it vindicates the party's stand.
'The Calcutta High Court has directed the Centre to resume MGNREGA in Bengal from August 1, a clear acknowledgment of the injustice faced by 59 lakh job card holders. Under the leadership of Smt. Mamata Banerjee and Shri Abhishek Banerjee. We fought relentlessly against this discrimination. Today's verdict vindicates our stand, and marks a crucial victory for Bengal's people,' the TMC posted on X. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Air India 171 plane crash: Victim families who hired US law firm to file RTI plea for flight recorder data, other info
The victim families of the Air India 171 air crash of June 12, who have engaged US law firm Beasley Allen, will file applications under Right to Information (RTI) act seeking raw data on the crash, the firm's Principal Attorney Mike Andrews told The Indian Express on Wednesday. The RTI applications will be filed with the 'entities who have the FDR (Flight Data Recorder) data', Andrews, who is concluding his second visit to Gujarat on Wednesday, said. Andrews, whose law firm will make 'direct appeals' to Air India and the Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) for information sourced from the site of the crash that killed 241 of the 242 passengers and crew and 19 on the ground, said that over 80 victim families, including passengers and those who lost their lives on ground, had signed contracts with the firm so far. The firm is looking to do a 'reconstruction' of the crash and could proceed under the US product liability law once it gets the data. There were 53 British nationals, seven Portuguese, one Canadian and 169 Indian nationals on board the Gatwick (London)-bound Boeing 787 that went down soon after takeoff, crashing into the mess building of the BJ Medical College at Meghaninagar in Ahmedabad. 'We have some victims who were cooking food in the medical school, some who were out serving tea, and some who were on the scooters passing by. Those families highlight the fact that aviation safety affects everybody. They never bought plane tickets. They never expected it to be involved in an aviation crash,' said Andrews, with rakhis tied on his wrist by a Diu family which lost a daughter in the crash. Reiterating that his focus would be to 'find out what happened', Andrews said this is a first among the air crash cases he has handled in 30 years where there is a survivor and several ground casualties. He said he met the lone survivor, British national Vishwash Kumar Ramesh at his home in Diu 'briefly' — 'not as his attorney'. Vishwash lost his brother Ajay in the crash. His family is not among those who have signed up with Beasley Allen. 'The goal and the focus is to find out why and what happened. We do that after getting the data. First, we figure out what happened, and if it shows that Boeing is at fault or there's a manufacturing defect or a design defect, and those are different… we'll know if there's a claim for the product failure. That's my area of expertise. If that's the case, we would anticipate filing individual actions in the United States in federal court on behalf of each family,' the attorney said. According to Andrews, though the crash site is here, the company (Boeing) is American and thus the US product liability law would apply. 'If it is a defect, the company is in the US, the executives, engineers, decisions, the paperwork, the witnesses that matter to the engineering decisions, those are all in the United States. That is why it is so important to bring these cases there, because the goal of this is to fix accountability,' he told The Indian Express. Andrews said the findings of this investigation will decide what to fix. 'If it is a pilot issue, if it's a pilot error, if it's a maintenance problem, if it's something local to Air India, it should certainly bring about changes there. If it is a design problem or a maintenance problem with the design of the aircraft, and if this is a problem that's shown up in previous incidents, then something has to be done immediately to change that'. Andrews said he would not 'interfere' with the AAIB probe into the crash. 'We don't want to interfere with what they're doing. We'll file letters to them. The families or us on their behalf will seek information under the RTI Act. Beyond that, we know that there are potential petitions available to us through various courts. We would like to avoid that, if at all possible,' he said. He added that the firm was working with local counsel to 'determine the applicability of RTI to the various entities'. Visiting the site again On Tuesday evening, Andrews was part of a candlelight vigil held at the site of the air crash with some 25-30 victim families. Comparing it to his visit in July, Andrews recalled how the last time he was at the 'exact spot where the survivor walked out' and how it was cordoned off and 'really really quiet'. On the day marking two months of the crash, the cordon was lifted and the area had 'come back to life' with the traffic, he said. 'There were a lot of emotions in that group, you know, one of them was telling me: This is the first time I am seeing the place where my husband was killed. And I mean, that's powerful to hear somebody say that I don't think there's a thing like healing or closure, but a new normal that you're dealing with,' he said. Speaking about his role and interest in the case, Andrews said he would not approach anything with an agenda. 'I am curious. I want to know what happened. And after that, we'll know if somebody's accountable and who is responsible,' Andrews said. According to the Beasley Allen contract terms, there is no cost upfront but in the event there is a 'recovery', there is a 30% 'contingency fee in the end', says Andrews, who is headed to the UK to meet more victim families.
Indian Express
27 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Only police can take action against illegal cattle transport: Maharashtra police issues order after Ajit Pawar's intervention
Days after Deputy Chief Minister Ajit Pawar held a meeting with the Qureshi community in the presence of top police officers and instructed police authorities to take note of the problems created by 'private individuals' in the transportation of legally permitted animals, the Maharashtra police has issued a circular stating only police authorities should take action against people involved in illegal cattle transport. The circular issued by Special Inspector General (Law and Order) Dr Manoj Kumar Sharma stated that many traders have submitted statements on private individuals stopping and checking when traders transport cattle, with some of them being beaten up. 'Only police or other authorities concerned should take action against people involved in illegal cattle transport as soon as they receive information. It is not legal for private individuals to stop vehicles and check/beat them (traders) up. However, if any citizen complains about illegal cattle transport, they (authorities) should immediately take legal action,' it stated. The circular further stated that it should be ensured that traders who follow all the rules while transporting animals are not disturbed. Also, legal matters should be completed regarding the return of captured animals from traders who follow all the rules and action should be taken as per the rules. 'It should be ensured that in the case of animals mentioned in the Maharashtra Animal Preservation Act, 1976 (As amended in 2015), action will be taken only under Section 8 (3) of the said Act,' it concluded. On August 6, Pawar had asked police authorities to direct district police heads to not allow private individuals to inspect vehicles transporting animals. Several delegations of the Qureshi community were present at the meeting with Pawar. It was attended by Director General of Police Rashmi Shukla and Mumbai Police Commissioner Deven Bharti along with other officials. In a memorandum of demands submitted to Pawar, the representatives of the community demanded a ban on illegal gaurakshaks (self-styled cow vigilantes), protection to transport legally allowed animals, withdrawal of false cases and clearing restrictions on transport licences. 'The Qureshi community is traditionally associated with meat trade and is a part of Maharashtra's agriculture-based economy. Therefore, no injustice will be allowed to be done to the traders of this community and the farmers who transport animals,' Pawar said in the meeting, as per the official statement from the Deputy Chief Minister's office. The delegation had raised the issue of harassment of animal traders by illegal gaurakshaks. 'The violent acts against the traders from Qureshi community and farmers who transport legally allowed animals has led to many losing their lives. The community is forced to call for a strike… Following the 2015 ban on cow slaughter, the transport is already limited. Now, the ongoing actions will affect the legal transport of animals such as buffaloes,' said the letter submitted to Pawar.
NDTV
27 minutes ago
- NDTV
They Lack 'Expertise' In Handling India: Expert On US' Op Sindoor Response
The way the US treated India at the end of Operation Sindoor shows a lack of expertise on their part in terms of understanding how to act towards India, Max Abrahms, an international security professor and author on terrorist dynamics said. In an interview with ANI, Abrahms said that India does not feel respected by the US in its treatment, "Pakistan became very vocally supportive of the US role and recommended a Nobel Prize for Trump, whereas India really chipped at the level of US involvement and especially Trump claiming so much credit for the course of the short war." He explained how even though India is the largest democracy in the world, with the largest population and will soon be the third largest economy, the Trump administration does not regard India as a "fully independent country on the world stage". He also said that because of how the US is treating India, it seems like it does not fully appreciate its contributions. "I cannot really say with any level of confidence exactly what the Trump administration's role was", Abrahms said regarding Trump's claim of being involved in stopping the conflict between the two South-Asian nations. He stated that India-US relations are dependent on the US-Russia meeting, as Russian oil is the major bone of contention between US and India, adding, "We need to be a little bit patient in terms of the meetings between Trump and Putin". Highlighting how important it is for the US to mend its relations in the Indo-Pacific in order to control China, he said, "But you know the China threat isn't going away and the United States, especially under this administration, sees China as a threat that needs to be contained. And that is going to require the US to mend relations with allies in the Indo-Pacific region", adding that this aspect makes him "optimistic" about moving forward. He pointed out that the US cannot become isolated or have asymmetrical trade relations with other countries as we live in a globalised world. He said, "If something's bad for the Indian economy, it's also not good for the US economy" and noted that it is in the US interest for the Indian economy to grow. Warning about how "dangerous" Trump's 'America First' policy is, he said, "That's a dangerous path to go down. It can have not just a negative effect on the financial system, but also in terms of military ties."
