Ukraine received at least 20 bodies of Russian soldiers in recent exchanges: Zelenskyy
Ukraine's President said that Russia repatriated at least 20 of its own dead soldiers in recent exchanges with Ukraine, describing it as a result of Moscow's disorganisation in carrying out large swaps of wounded POWs and remains of troops.
Volodymyr Zelenskyy said that an Israeli citizen was among the dead Ukraine had received in recent exchanges. He spoke to journalists on Friday but his comments were embargoed until Saturday (June 21, 2025). Officials did not disclose the identities of the bodies.
'They threw the corpses of their citizens at us. This is their attitude toward war, toward their soldiers. And this is already documented. Sometimes these bodies even have Russian passports,' he said.
He said the Russian side insisted the dead were all Ukrainians.
Journalists were shown a Russian passport and ID belonging to one of the 20 dead Russians. According to the document, the man came from the Moscow region.
The exchanges of the dead and wounded soldiers are the only tangible result of direct peace talks in Istanbul. In June, Ukraine and Russia agreed to exchange the bodies of fallen soldiers in a 6,000-for-6,000 format during the second round of negotiations. Ukraine was concerned that the number was too high and that the sides did not have enough time for forensic examinations and checking the identities of the dead.
Mr. Zelenskyy said he suspected Russia's plan was to play along with peace talks to appease the U.S. and stave off more sanctions but without ending the war that Russian President Vladimir Putin believes he is winning.
He said that because of this, Ukraine would be 'in a really difficult situation' of deciding whether to continue the talks in Istanbul.
Mr. Zelenskyy said Ukraine was against Iran acquiring nuclear weapons, because of its military partnership with Russia, but stopped short of expressing explicit support for Israel's strikes. He repeated that the new war in the Middle East will affect Ukraine indirectly.
'Iran gave the Russians everything to kill us. They gave them martyrs, they gave them missiles, and they gave them licenses. The fact that their production capacities have now become weaker is (a) positive for us. But at certain points it may already be too late,' he said, also citing Russia's military cooperation with North Korea.
Russia has modified Iran-made Shahed drones and has used them, often hundreds at a time, in barrages targeting Ukraine.
Mr. Zelenskyy said 39 Russian companies were involved in the production of Oreshnik, an intermediate-range ballistic missile capable of carrying a nuclear warhead. He said 21 of them are not under sanctions. 'And therefore it is absolutely incomprehensible why sanctions should not be imposed urgently,' he said.
Russia attacked Ukraine with the missile in November, marking a serious escalation in the war and Russia's capabilities.
Mr. Zelenskyy dispelled reports that Patriots air defence systems were destroyed in recent Russian drone and missile barrages. He also said Ukraine has started using domestically produced interceptors to shoot down Shahed drones and is seeking financing from Germany to ramp up the weapon's production.
He added he sent signals to Western partners asking them to give up 0.25% of their GDP to support Ukraine's local defence industry.
Mr. Zelenskyy said it's likely he would attend a NATO summit later this week, but that he would make a final decision on Monday.
Though Zelenskyy did not meet Trump who had left early the Group of Seven summit in Canada last week, Ukraine's Economy Minister Yulia Svyrydenko and the head of the president's office, Andriy Yermak, gave U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent a list of weapons Ukraine is hoping to purchase. 'We will wait feedback,' Mr. Zelenskyy said, adding the package of weapons included Patriot systems.
The weapons package would be among the topics Mr. Zelenskyy plans to discuss with Trump in their next meeting, he added, as well as the issue of sanctions.
'Frankly, it seems to me that we need to talk about a new breath in the diplomatic track,' he said. 'We need greater certainty and greater pressure from the world on Putin.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hindu
23 minutes ago
- The Hindu
For the sake of peace, at the cost of war
Through history, Iran's relationship with nuclear weapons has had four phases. In the first, it was a model state. When the UN opened the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons (NPT) for signatures on July 1, 1968, Shah Reza Pahlavi signed it on the first day and ratified it two years later as part of his efforts to increase access to nuclear power in Iran under the White Revolution. Also Read: Data | 50 years of non-proliferation of nuclear weapons treaty: will disarmament be achieved? Until the late 1970s, Iran enjoyed a good reputation under the NPT by furthering its goals to restrict the use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes. Then the Islamic Revolution toppled the Shah in 1979, and the Ayatollah assumed supreme power in the new Islamic Republic. This launched the second phase, more like several phases of ambiguity, lasting from 1979 until 2002. The driving concern in these periods was whether Iran would build nuclear weapons. Will it? Won't it? While Ayatollah Khomeini had been ambivalent towards nuclear weapons, Saddam Hussein's use of chemical weapons during the Iran-Iraq war spurred him to reconsider his deterrence strategy. Thus, until the early 2000s, there were indications that Iran was amassing technical know-how of nuclear weapons but no overt signs that it was actually building one. But then in 2002, a group of dissidents called the National Council of Resistance revealed to the world that Iran had been secretly pursuing a nuclear weapons programme for at least two decades in the form of a nuclear enrichment facility in Natanz and a facility to produce heavy water in Arak. Since Iran had not declared the existence of these facilities under the NPT, it became persona non grata under the treaty. Also Read | U.S. spies said Iran wasn't building nuclear weapon; Trump dismisses that assessment The incident effectively launched the third phase in 2005, when inspectors of the UN International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) said Iran was not complying with its obligations to report evidence of past weapons-related activities. This was also a diplomatic failure since Iran had signed its Additional Protocol with France, Germany, and the U.K. in 2003 to allow more intrusive inspections of its facilities in exchange for diplomatic support and cooperation in multilateral fora. But in 2006, Iran said it would stop implementing the Protocol over frustration that its assurances were not being taken seriously. The IAEA's conclusion invited the UN Security Council to launch punishing sanctions from 2006 to 2014. This period also coincided with the rule of Iran's hardline President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who doubled down on what he called Iran's right to enrich uranium for civilian use even as he contended with a national economy significantly weakened by the sanctions. It was not until Hassan Rouhani succeeded him in 2013 that Iran indicated its willingness to return to the negotiating table in return for sanctions relief. The result was the historic Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) agreement between Iran and the P5+1 group in 2015. Although it imposed a slew of restrictions on Iran that took the Islamic nation far beyond its obligations under the NPT — which was still in effect — Iran complied in exchange for lifting the sanctions. In fact, in many respects, Iran returned to being a model state, serving a reminder that rational diplomacy à la the NPT during the Cold War could achieve non-proliferation. But all of this came to nought for reasons that are hard to understand, but increasingly tempting to guess at, when in 2018 the new U.S. President Donald Trump unilaterally withdrew from the JCPOA and restored 'maximum pressure' sanctions. Iran responded at first by resorting to what it said were mechanisms under the deal that allowed it to disobey enrichment limits when resolving disputes. But, by 2022, Iran had blown past its JCPOA safeguards when it became clear it had enriched uranium to within a hair's breadth from the level required to make an atomic weapon. Should Iran exit the NPT by coming in possession of such a warhead, it could spark a regional arms race and strike a profound blow to the treaty's credibility. West Asian states such as Saudi Arabia may be compelled to seek nuclear weapons of their own. Earlier this month, Israel launched air strikes against Iran's nuclear establishment as part of its insistence that Iran must never possess nuclear weapons while also touting its 'right to self-defence'. It had the U.S.'s backing under the returning Trump administration. Russia and China have demanded stronger sanctions while denouncing Israel. European nations have refused unilateral military action fearing the collapse of the non-proliferation regime itself. Their fear is not unwarranted: Article X of the NPT gives Iran the right to withdraw citing 'extraordinary events' that jeopardise its interests, grounds for which Israel's aggression has now created. Iran's twisting relationship with the NPT over the years has been a roller coaster of compliance and contention. While it long proclaimed adherence to the treaty's basic tenets and benefited from them vis-à-vis civilian nuclear technology, its covert activities in violation of the NPT's safeguards progressively undermined trust and led to an international crisis that is still unfolding. Evolving perspectives Both the IAEA's and the Security Council's evolving perspectives in this time echo the international community's split approaches towards Iran: pressure versus engagement. Nonetheless, the major powers agree on one point: Iran must not be allowed to obtain nuclear weapons. President Masoud Pezeshkian has also said Tehran is not seeking them but as long as Israel's campaign continues, Iran's path to diplomacy is blocked and it will keep one hand on the nuclear option. The situation today remains fluid and dangerous. Iran has advanced its nuclear capability to an unprecedented degree while still officially forswearing nuclear arms. The coming months will determine whether a new diplomatic understanding can be reached to bring Iran back into fuller compliance, and thus ease sanctions, or whether the NPT itself will be tested by a potential withdrawal. Since Iran has repeatedly asserted its right under the treaty to the peaceful use of nuclear energy, the U.S. had previously proposed in the Oman talks to set up a low-enrichment facility in a third country to supply just the reactor fuel to Iran. Israel's onslaught has left these talks in a limbo, however. International monitors have stressed that should Israel continue its bombing, which seems likely, the world may face either a nuclear-armed Iran or a war to prevent it. This is unfortunate because the NPT was created to prevent just these outcomes.
Mint
37 minutes ago
- Mint
Israel military launches fresh strikes, this time on Iran's Bandar Abbas, targets drone storage and weapons facility
The Israeli military has claimed it has launched a fresh wave of strikes against Iran's Bandar Abbas, this time targeting its drone storage and weapons facilities. Israeli forces are "currently striking UAV storage facilities and a weapons facility in southwestern Iran in the area of Bandar Abbas", a military statement said, according to AFP. Interestingly, this is a new wave of strikes in the ongoing conflict, soon after Turkish President Erdogan met with the Iranian foreign minister. Iran's Tasnim news agency has stated that the nation's air defences were active in the country's south after detecting Israeli enemy aircraft. The defense systems responded in regions like Bandar Lengeh and Bandar Abbas after the Israeli incursion.
Economic Times
38 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Backed into a corner, Iran may unleash hackers, spies, sleeper cells and terror proxies worldwide
Israel has launched multiple airstrikes against Iran, targeting nuclear sites and key Revolutionary Guard leaders. While Iran's military strength is affected, the country's ability to retaliate using cyberattacks, proxy groups and intelligence networks remains. Protesters, predominantly Houthi supporters, burn Israeli and U.S. flags as they demonstrate in solidarity with Palestinians and Iran, amid the Iran-Israel conflict, in Sanaa, Yemen June 20, 2025. REUTERS/Khaled Abdullah Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Israeli Strikes Focus on Nuclear and Military Targets Impact on Iran's Warfare Capabilities Forward Deterrence as a Strategic Tool Tired of too many ads? Remove Ads Quds Force Remains Active Iran's Global Reach Cyberattacks as a Response Option Unconventional Threats Still a Concern FAQs Israel has carried out a series of strikes on Iran in recent days. These attacks have destroyed parts of Iran's nuclear program and weakened its military defense systems. Despite the losses, Iran is still able to respond using irregular warfare methods that have long been part of its strategy, a The Conversation report airstrikes have damaged two nuclear sites and destroyed several air defense systems. The attacks took place in different cities and reportedly killed 14 nuclear scientists and some top members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. The strikes have also disrupted Iran's missile and drone strikes have reduced Iran's ability to use traditional military hardware. It may take time before Iran can return to previous levels of uranium enrichment. However, the country still maintains influence through other channels. Iran's use of proxy groups, organized crime links, and cyberattacks could still be used for retaliation, the report military strategy, called 'forward deterrence,' encourages striking threats outside the country's borders. This idea dates back to the 1980s during the Iran-Iraq War. Groups like the Badr Corps were formed under this doctrine. Iran has since developed relationships with groups like Hezbollah and the Houthis to pursue regional reportedly struck a Quds Force command center in Tehran. It is unclear if its leader, Esmail Qaani, survived. Some of Iran's partners like Hezbollah and Hamas have also suffered setbacks. However, Iran's proxy network is still present across the region and can be activated when needed, the report further has a history of targeting opponents abroad. These efforts have included kidnappings and assassinations using its Ministry of Intelligence and Quds Force operatives. Several incidents, including attempts in the US and Europe, show the reach of Iran's network. These threats remain even if military strength has has also focused on cyber warfare. Following recent Israeli strikes, a cybersecurity firm observed a sharp increase in malicious activity linked to Iran. These cyberattacks may involve disinformation, sabotage, or data theft. Iran is also using AI tools to spread propaganda and false media during Iran's conventional military is weakened, its ability to conduct irregular warfare remains. The more Iran is attacked directly, the more likely it is to use these hidden methods. Its network of proxies and cyber operatives can respond without warning and pose long-term challenges for Israel and the is a policy where Iran targets threats outside its borders using proxy groups and cyber tools, aiming to prevent danger before it reaches Iranian could use cyberattacks, intelligence operatives, or proxy groups to target Israeli or US assets without direct military engagement.
