With the pvt sector indifferent to R&D, India risks missing the deep-tech bus, or getting locked out
(Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this column are that of the writer. The facts and opinions expressed here do not reflect the views of www.economictimes.com .)
In the 2000s, China recognised that technological dependence was a strategic liability because it relied on US chips, Western operating systems and telecom infra. This triggered a strategy rooted in constructive paranoia, and the launch of mission-driven policies:This aimed to make China an 'innovation-oriented nation'.It targeted dominance in 10 hi-tech sectors.This programme was launched to reverse brain drain, and attract global researchers. It has received massive state support through guidance funds, industrial subsidies and tech-focused SOEs.China also doubled down on patenting, domestic standards and end-to-end industrial ecosystems, from semiconductors to green energy. R&D investment surged past 2.5% of GDP, with a rapidly rising share from the private sector. Today, China leads the world in AI patents, EV production, solar capacity and quantum publications.Meanwhile, India faces similar vulnerabilities China faced 25 years ago: imported chips, weak indigenous IP, low- tech exports and a fragmented research base. And the response has been uneven.GoI has launched Anusandhan National Research Foundation (ANRF), a ₹1 lakh cr R&D fund, expanded PLI schemes, and invested in semiconductors, space tech, clean energy and quantum. For the first time, the government is adopting a full-spectrum approach to funding research and innovation across all technology readiness levels (TRLs).While ANRF will focus on early-stage discovery (TRLs 1-3) and improve ease of doing science with DST, a soon-to-be-finalised ₹1 lakh cr R&D fund should drive private investment in mid-to-late-stage innovation (TRLs 4-9) through long-term, near-zero-interest loans. This fund shifts focus from grants to outcome-linked support for developing commercially viable tech. While the need for greater funding in basic research is acknowledged, GoI is laying the essential groundwork to build a self-sustaining R&D ecosystem.Yet, the private sector remains risk-averse, contributing barely a third of national R&D. India's R&D-to-GDP ratio remains stuck below 0.7%, with little traction in patenting or deep-tech commercialisation. The innovation pipeline is still thin.Ex-Intel CEO Andrew Grove made the line, 'Let's be paranoid' - with its philosophy of the importance of proactive preparedness for unexpected changes and strategic inflection points - famous. And, yet, even Intel wasn't paranoid enough. It missed the AI inflection point, and today Nvidia has overtaken it in valuation, strategic relevance and tech leadership.A similar inversion is unfolding between China and the US, driven by who innovates faster and scales deeper. Unfortunately, while GoI is paranoid, India's private sector isn't.In 2024, Foundation for Advancing Science & Technology (FAST) published a comparative study, 'State of Industry R&D in India', of 59 Indian and 60 global firms across six key sectors: pharma, software, defence, chemicals, automobiles, and energy. The study, conducted between FY16 and FY23, reveals a persistent input-output gap. Global firms, on average, reported 2.9x R&D intensity (spend as % of revenue), 3.7x share of PhD-qualified employees, and 2.9x R&D spending as share of profits than Indian firms.On output indicators, the disparity is starker. Global firms generated 13.1x patents and 1.3x scientific publications per billion dollars of revenue compared to their Indian counterparts.The European Commission recently released the EU Industrial R&D Investment Scoreboard 2024. It presents data on the top global 2,000 companies investing in R&D. They invested ₹1,257.7 bn in R&D in 2023. Indian firms accounted for ₹5.5 bn, or about 0.4%, of global industrial R&D investment, with only 15 companies featuring among the world's top 2,000 R&D spenders.This places India behind not only advanced economies like the US (₹531.8 bn, 681 firms) and China (₹215.8 bn, 524 firms), but also innovation-intensive small economies such as South Korea (₹42.5 bn, 40 firms), Taiwan (₹24.7 bn, 55 firms), and Ireland (₹10.4 bn, 24 firms).Sustained long-term economic growth is driven by investments in knowledge and innovation. India's failure to internalise this principle within its industrial ecosystem suggests presence of constraints: low absorptive capacity, weak industry-academia linkages, and limited interest from the private sector in high-risk R&D.Persistent underrepresentation of Indian firms in global innovation rankings reflects a missing industrial policy focus on Schumpeterian creative destruction, without which India risks being confined to low-value segments of GVCs.In Liu Cixin's 2008 science fiction novel, The Three-Body Problem, the world gets paralysed by the sudden collapse of scientific progress. Stagnation is the real nightmare. It's not fiction any more. For India, the risk isn't that we fail. It's that we're too comfortable even to try. Innovation can't be outsourced.If there's a gap between what scientists are doing and what businesses need, then companies must invest in R&D, collaborate with academia, and shape research. If the private sector stays disengaged, we'll keep watching others lead. We just aren't paranoid enough.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
How foreign students fuel US universities and turn them into global campuses
Decades ago, international students made up just a small slice of enrollment at elite American universities. But over the years, their growing presence has redefined campuses, reshaped university priorities, and sparked political tension—especially under the Trump Harvard University, foreign students once constituted only 11 percent of the student population. Today, they represent 26 percent. Across the Ivy League, international students now account for 27 percent of the student body, significantly higher than the national average of 6 percent. Columbia University leads the pack with foreign students making up 40 percent of its total growing international presence reflects a deliberate strategy by US universities to enhance their global appeal, diversify campuses, and tap into new revenue streams. According to education consultant Rajika Bhandari, rising middle classes in countries like India and China have fuelled the demand for elite Western education. Families in these nations are increasingly aware of global university rankings and see Ivy League schools as life-changing opportunities. Universities, in turn, have welcomed this trend. International students, particularly at the graduate level, often pay higher tuition rates and receive little to no financial aid. This influx has helped US institutions offset budget constraints and maintain robust STEM programmes. Schools like Harvard and Columbia now count foreign students as a critical part of their academic and financial this internationalisation has not been without pushback. Former President Donald Trump targeted foreign student entry as part of broader efforts to reshape higher education. In a controversial move, he used federal immigration powers to block foreign students from entering Harvard, triggering a legal challenge from the university, which denounced the action as retaliatory and dispute highlights a growing vulnerability: as colleges rely more heavily on international students, federal immigration policies have become powerful tools of influence. Trump even floated the idea of capping foreign student enrolment at schools like Harvard to the Ivy League continues to attract global talent—especially at the graduate level—public universities often face political pressure to limit international admissions in favour of in-state students. Despite this, the economic and academic contributions of foreign students are undeniable. Many go on to bolster the US workforce in critical areas like tech and engineering, injecting billions into the national economy along the historian William Kirby puts it, top graduate programs must recruit globally to remain competitive. Without access to the world's best minds, universities risk losing their what began as a slow international outreach has evolved into a defining feature of modern American higher education. But as political tides shift, universities must now navigate the fine balance between global ambition and domestic policy constraints.(With PTI inputs)Tune InMust Watch
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Russian intelligence says it collects WeChat data: What does that mean?
Russian counterintelligence agents are analyzing data from the popular Chinese messaging and social media app WeChat to monitor people who might be in contact with Chinese spies, according to a Russian intelligence document obtained by The New York Times. The disclosure highlights the rising level of concern about Chinese influence in Russia as the two countries deepen their relationship. As Russia has become isolated from the West over its war in Ukraine, it has become increasingly reliant on Chinese money, companies and technology. But it has also faced what the document describes as increased Chinese espionage efforts. The document indicates that the Russian domestic security agency, known as the FSB, pulls purloined data into an analytical tool known as 'Skopishche' (a Russian word for a mob of people). Information from WeChat is among the data being analyzed, according to the document. The document offers insights into the espionage tactics of two authoritarian governments that are preoccupied with surveillance. According to the document, the system processes detailed data on WeChat users, including account logins, contact lists and message archives, some of which are extracted from phones seized from people of interest to Russia's spy hunters. The tool is used to scrutinize the data trail of 'people using the Chinese messenger WeChat to talk to representatives of the PRC intelligence services,' the document says, using the abbreviation for the People's Republic of China. The exact functionality of the system is unclear. It is described in Russian as an automated data processing system that can be used in 'search activities.' Intelligence agencies typically use such tools to map messenger and social network connections to spot potential spies. The document makes clear that the FSB is particularly interested in WeChat. The Russian security agency asks field officers to send WeChat accounts and logins of interest to the China counterintelligence team, including 'lists of contacts (logins) and archives of chats from WeChat obtained during direct access to the smartphones of targets of interest.' The document says data can be run through another automated system, known as Laretz, a Russian word for a small decorated box, that can check 'more than a thousand electronic indicators simultaneously.' The Times was unable to confirm whether Skopishche had been effective as a counterintelligence tool or how extensively the FSB could intercept data from WeChat. One Western intelligence agency told the Times that the information in the document was consistent with what it knew about 'Russian penetration of Chinese communications.' The FSB and the Chinese Foreign Ministry did not reply to requests for comment. WeChat, owned by the Chinese tech giant Tencent, is one of the most widely used digital platforms in the world, mostly concentrated in China and among Chinese communities. It functions as an all-in-one tool that combines messaging, mobile payments, social networking and government services. The app has over 1.4 billion users globally, according to Tencent financial disclosures. Tencent did not reply to a request for comment. Russian intelligence agencies have worked to penetrate encrypted communication apps like Signal and WhatsApp. The FSB has have long viewed those apps, which are widely used by dissidents, as tools of subversion and foreign influence. In April, President Vladimir Putin of Russia barred government and bank employees from using foreign messaging apps. WeChat is different. By design, it does not use end-to-end encryption to protect user data. That is because the Chinese government exercises strict control over the app and relies on its weak security to monitor and censor speech. Foreign intelligence agencies can exploit that weakness, too. WeChat added some limited encryption features in 2016, according to Mona Wang, a research fellow at the University of Toronto's Citizen Lab. But the security improvements still fall short of the encryption offered by other messaging apps like Signal or WhatsApp. It is unclear why Chinese intelligence officers would use WeChat to communicate with sources, given its lack of end-to-end encryption. But sources or potential recruits may not know they are communicating with spies, who often pose as diplomats and strike up casual conversations at first. WeChat was briefly banned in Russia in 2017, but access was restored after Tencent took steps to comply with laws requiring foreign digital platforms above a certain size to register as 'organizers of information dissemination.' The Times confirmed that WeChat is currently licensed by the government to operate in Russia. That license would require Tencent to store user data on Russian servers and to provide access to security agencies upon request. Russia is separately pursuing a government messaging app of its own, one that has drawn comparisons to WeChat.
The Hindu
3 hours ago
- The Hindu
Travel ban might shut the door for Afghan family to bring niece to U.S.
Mohammad Sharafoddin, his wife and young son walked at times for 36 hours in a row over mountain passes as they left Afghanistan as refugees to end up less than a decade later talking about their journey on a plush love seat in the family's three-bedroom suburban American home. He and his wife dreamed of bringing their niece to the U.S. Maybe she could study to become a doctor and can have a better life. But that door slams shut on Monday as America put in place a travel ban for people from Afghanistan and a dozen other countries. 'It's kind of shock for us when we hear about Afghanistan, especially right now for ladies who are affected more than others with the new government,' Mohammad Sharafoddin said, referring to the country's Taliban rulers. Since the Taliban took control of Afghanistan in August 2021, as the Western forces were in the final phase of their withdrawal from the country, they have barred education for women and girls beyond sixth grade, most employment and many public spaces. U.S. President Donald Trump signed the travel ban on Wednesday. It is similar to one in place during his first administration but covers more countries. He said visitors who overstay visas, such as the man charged in an attack in Boulder, Colorado, earlier this month, are a danger to the country. The ban makes exceptions for people from Afghanistan on Special Immigrant Visas who generally worked most closely with the U.S. government during the two-decade war there.
