
UK boiler upgrade grants could be extended to heat batteries
The government has a target of 600,000 heat pump installations annually by 2028. But data from the Resolution Foundation on Wednesday revealed worryingly low uptake of heat pumps. Last year, installation of gas boilers outnumbered heat pump installations by 15:1, according to the Resolution Foundation report, and only one in eight new homes were equipped with the low-carbon option, despite the government's clean energy targets.
According to government data, 62,031 vouchers have been issued to households to install heat pumps under the boiler upgrade grant scheme since it began in April 2022, suggesting the government is way off its target. The scheme provides grants of £7,500 to householders who switch from gas boilers to heat pumps.
The grants are specific to heat pumps and do not apply to other forms of low-carbon heating. A cross-party group of MPs has called for subsidies to be spread to other low-carbon technologies, including heat batteries.
Miatta Fahnbulleh, the minister for energy consumers, visited a home with energy from a heat battery last month and met two leading British suppliers of the batteries, Sunamp and Tepeo.
Heat batteries, or zero-emission boilers, can be installed in homes that have central heating radiators, and it is hoped they could be used in the 20% of domestic properties where heat pumps are not suitable. They are not eligible for the £7,500 grant in the boiler upgrade scheme or for VAT exemption, which heat pumps get.
Johan du Plessis, the founder and chief executive of Tepeo, said: 'Heat batteries offer a practical, flexible and cost-effective solution, particularly for homes where heat pumps may not be viable. We welcome the minister's engagement and look forward to working with the government to ensure that all homes have access to clean, affordable heating by extending the boiler upgrade scheme and VAT relief to heat batteries as part of the warm homes plan.'
Heat batteries are about the size of a washing machine. The boiler is filled with iron ore and takes in electricity to heat the ore and blow air across it. The air then heats the plumbing pipes running through and the ore stays hot for days, which allows the boiler to function as a heat battery, dispensing hot water when it is needed.
Sign up to Down to Earth
The planet's most important stories. Get all the week's environment news - the good, the bad and the essential
after newsletter promotion
A computer programme tells the boiler to take in electricity when it is cheap and green, and also takes account of the weather and household heating demand.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Mirror
an hour ago
- Daily Mirror
Police launch major crime review of Nuked Blood Scandal evidence
Top cops say they are taking allegations of a criminal over-up by the British state "very seriously" and have launched a review of the Nuked Blood evidence Police have launched a major crime review to assess evidence of a state cover-up about human radiation experiments on troops. Officers say they are taking "very seriously" allegations that officials at the Ministry of Defence may have hidden a blood testing programme that took place during nuclear weapon trials in the Cold War. Parliament and the courts have repeatedly been told no monitoring of troops took place. Details of blood and urine testing, and chest x-rays, have subsequently been found on a secret database at the Atomic Weapons Establishment, locked from view on the grounds of national security. News of the review comes after the Mirror revealed the names of Boris Johnson, Keir Starmer, and serving government officials had been handed to police as potential witnesses. Alan Owen of campaign group LABRATS said: "Veterans have been waiting 70 years to be taken seriously, and it is a relief to know these issues are being looked into at long last. What we need now is a thorough police investigation to expose the MoD's institutional rot to the light." The Nuked Blood Scandal blew open after the Mirror uncovered a 1958 memo discussing the "gross irregularities" found in blood tests of Group Captain Terry Gledhill, who flew through the mushroom clouds. The data collected by weapons scientists was later found to be missing from his medical files. A complaint was made to the Met Police in May, with a 500-page dossier of evidence. The Met refused to investigate, saying it was the jurisdiction of Thames Valley Police, which oversees the county of Berkshire where the AWE is based. Victims Commissioner Baroness Newlove intervened to urged a decision in veterans' interests, as campaigners felt the scandal's connections to government and Whitehall made it the Met's responsibility. Chief Constable Jason Hogg of Thames Valley Police said: "Given the extent and complexity of the material within the dossier, and the seriousness and complexities of the crimes alleged against a range of bodies and individuals, TVP is undertaking a thorough review to assess for the crimes that may need to be investigated and where the ownership of an investigation should most appropriately sit. "Please be assured that TVP is taking this very seriously and that momentum is not being lost; we have our highly experienced head of TVP's Major Crime Review Team personally undertaking the review, reporting into one of my assistant chief constables. This is critical groundwork for circumstances of such significance and scale." He said the force was liaising with the Met "to ensure that, for the victims' sake, the decision on ownership and set-up by policing of any required criminal investigation ensures that it is conducted in the most effective way." It comes as the Lib Dems have urged Labour and the Tories to confirm they will co-operate with any investigation. Defence spokesman Helen Maguire said: "As MPs, we owe it to our veterans to assist them in their pursuit of justice, and do whatever it takes to uncover the truth. As more and more of our nuclear test veterans pass away each week, I urge anyone with information to come forward, and the government must go further and faster in their efforts for the veterans." A ministerial review of the files is underway and the first part of the AWE database is due to be declassified later this year. The government says the criminal allegations are false and there is no evidence to support them.


Metro
2 hours ago
- Metro
Donald Trump boasts he's ended 'six wars in six months' but has he?
Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed to have ended 'six wars in six months' ahead of a crunch meeting with Volodymyr Zelensky. The US President insists he has already averted a nuclear apocalypse and now only has the 'complex' Russia-Ukraine war left in his sights as he makes a bold bid for a Nobel Peace prize. The Metro takes a look to see if Trump's claim that he is an international peacekeeper worthy of following in the footsteps of Nelson Mandela and long-term rival Barack Obama. 'I've settled 6 Wars in 6 months, one of them a possible Nuclear disaster, and yet I have to read & listen to the Wall Street Journal, and many other who truly don't have a clue, tell me everything that I am doing wrong on the Russia/Ukraine MESS, that is Sleepy Joe Biden's war, not mine. I'm only here to stop it, not to prosecute it any further', Trump wrote in a bragadocious post on Truth Social. 'It would have NEVER happened if I was President. I know exactly what I'm doing, and I don't need the advice of people who have been working on all of these conflicts for years, and were never able to do a thing to stop them. They are 'STUPID' people, with no common sense, intelligence, or understanding, and they only make the current Russia/Ukraine disaster more difficult to FIX. Despite all of my lightweight and very jealous critics, I'll get it done — I always do!!!' Donald Trump boasted he ended the standoff between India and Pakistan which has been running since the countries were divided along religious lines by the British in 1947. India launched military strikes under Operation Sindoor on May 7, in response to the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack in which terrorists killed 26 people, mostly civilians. Trump has claimed he was the one who stopped the conflict by offering trade deals between the two nations before it could escalate into a full-blown war. Pakistan hailed Trump's role and even backed the president's calls for a Nobel Peace prize. But India later revealed there was no call between Prime Minister Modi and Trump from the 22nd of April when Trump called up to convey his sympathy and the 17th of June, when he called up Prime Minister [Modi] in Canada to explain why he could not meet him. While Trump has repeatedly claimed credit for the ceasefire India has maintained that the halt in military action on May 10 was a result of direct contact between both nations. 'This contact was initiated by the Pakistani side,' India has said. In June, Trump intervened in the Iran-Israel conflict by ordering US strikes on three key Iranian nuclear facilities, bringing the Middle East to the brink of a new regional war. He then announced there had been a ceasefire. But the truce faltered when Israel accused Iran of launching missiles into its airspace after the ceasefire was supposed to take effect and vowed to retaliate. Iran's military denied firing on Israel, yet explosions boomed and sirens sounded across northern Israel and an official said two Iranian missiles were intercepted. Trump's frustration was palpable as he spoke to reporters, using an expletive to hammer home his point. 'I'm not happy with them. I'm not happy with Iran, either, but I'm really unhappy with Israel going out this morning,' Trump said. 'We basically have two countries that have been fighting so long and so hard that they don't know what the f—- they're doing.' On Monday, he told reporters that he had ended Iran's nuclear capability. Under pressure from Trump, who threatened to delay crucial trade talks, the two Asian countries agreed to a ceasefire on July 28. The recent fighting was triggered by a land mine explosion in disputed land along the border that wounded five Thai soldiers. That came just a week after a similar incident. 'It means that we only want to live side-by-side with Thailand as a good neighbor, living with unity and peace with each other,' Khem Sorn, the chief monk for Phnom Penh said. It was the latest eruption of hostilities in a decades-old dispute over ownership of several small pockets of territory along the 800-kilometer (500-mile) land border. A ceasefire that took effect on July 29 ended major fighting, though both sides have alleged violations of the truce and the underlying dispute over territorial claims has not been resolved. The leaders of Armenia and Azerbaijan shook hands at a White House peace summit before signing an agreement aimed at ending decades of conflict. The conflict between Armenia and Azerbaijan centres on the region of Nagorno-Karabakh, which is internationally recognised as part of Azerbaijan but has a majority Armenian population. This dispute has led to multiple wars and periods of intense conflict, most recently in 2020. Trump was in the middle as Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev and Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan flanked him on either side at a meeting in the White House. As the two extended their arms in front of Trump to shake hands, the president reached up and clasped his hands around theirs. Trump said Armenian Prime Minister Nikol Pashinyan and Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev would also be signing agreements with the US to 'pursue Economic opportunities together, so we can fully unlock the potential of the South Caucasus Region.' 'Many Leaders have tried to end the War, with no success, until now, thanks to 'TRUMP,'' Trump wrote on his Truth Social site. Foreign policy experts said Trump deserves some credit for recent peace agreements in several conflicts. But Trump has struggled to made headway on the world's two most vexing conflicts: the Russia-Ukraine war and Israel's offensive against Hamas in Gaza. Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff said last month that the US was bringing home its negotiating team from Qatar to assess its next steps. Witkoff said the move was made because Hamas was not showing 'good faith' toward reaching a ceasefire. No major breakthroughs have occurred despite weeks of talks in Qatar, along with a visit to the White House by Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu. Witkoff said the U.S. would 'consider alternative options to bring the hostages home,' but officials did not answer questions about what those options could include. President Donald Trump appeared to endorse Israel's plan to take control of Hamas's last strongholds in the Gaza Strip on August 18, writing on Truth Social: 'We will only see the return of the remaining hostages when Hamas is confronted and destroyed!!! The sooner this takes place, the better the chances of success will be.' Volodymyr Zelensky and Trump expressed hope that Monday's critical talks with Ukrainian and European leaders at the White House could lead to trilateral talks with Russian President Vladimir Putin to bring an end to Russia's war on Ukraine. 'They want to give protection and they feel very strongly about it and we'll help them out with that,' Trump said. 'I think its very important to get the deal done.' Monday's hastily assembled meeting comes after Trump met on Friday with Russian President Vladimir Putin and has said that the onus is now on Zelensky to agree to concessions that he said could end the war. 'If everything works out today, we'll have a trilat,' Trump said, referring to possible three-way talks among Zelenskyy, Putin and Trump. 'We're going to work with Russia, we're going to work with Ukraine.' He said: 'All of us would obviously prefer an immediate ceasefire while we work on a lasting peace. More Trending 'And maybe something like that could happen as of this moment it's not happening, but president Zelensky and president Putin can talk a little bit more about that. 'You know, in the six or so wars that we stopped, we haven't had a cease fire. You can do it through the war, but I like the ceasefire because you immediately stop the killing. 'But I believe a peace agreement at the end of all of this is something that's very attainable, and it can be done in the near future, with all of the wars that I got involved in, we only have this one left. 'Of course, as soon as I walk out the door, there'll probably be a new one starting, and I'll get that stopped too. But I thought this was going to be one of the easier ones. It's actually one of the most difficult. They're very complex.' MORE: Zelensky tells Trump 'it's the best I had' after turning up in black suit with no tie MORE: Russian troops troll Zelensky by flying US flag on mission into Ukraine MORE: From elite Oligarchs to cringeworthy fashion – readers discuss the Alaska summit

Rhyl Journal
4 hours ago
- Rhyl Journal
Trump says Zelensky can stop war with Russia ‘almost immediately' ahead of talks
The US president suggested Mr Zelensky would have to accept there was 'no getting back' Crimea, which was annexed by Russia in 2014, and Ukraine would not be allowed to join the Nato alliance. Sir Keir and other European leaders will seek to persuade Mr Trump not to push for a settlement which rewards Vladimir Putin's aggression and to get US security guarantees for any military peacekeeping force from the so-called 'coalition of the willing'. Those joining Sir Keir include France's Emmanuel Macron, Germany's Friedrich Merz, Italy's Giorgia Meloni and Alexander Stubb, president of Finland. Nato chief Mark Rutte and European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen are also attending. In a message on his Truth Social platform, Mr Trump said President Zelensky 'can end the war with Russia almost immediately, if he wants to, or he can continue to fight'. He said there would be 'no going into Nato by Ukraine' – keeping its neighbour out of the alliance and its mutual defence pact has been one of Russia's key aims. I'm on my way to Washington D.C. to meet @POTUS, @ZelenskyyUa and other leaders. Here's why: — Keir Starmer (@Keir_Starmer) August 18, 2025 But Sir Keir, along with other Nato leaders, has said Ukraine is on an 'irreversible path' to membership of the alliance. Government minister Stephen Kinnock said the 'pathway for Ukraine to Nato' could not be dictated by any other country. The health minister told Times Radio: 'Any decisions taken about Ukrainian territory must be taken with the agreement of the Ukrainian government and President Zelensky. 'The other is that the pathway for Ukraine to Nato and to security guarantees cannot be dictated to them by any other country, and the other is to send a very clear message that we the British people stand firmly shoulder-to-shoulder with the Ukrainian people as we showed when we opened our homes and our hearts to the Ukrainian refugees.' — Rapid Response 47 (@RapidResponse47) August 18, 2025 Mr Trump's envoy Steve Witkoff has suggested that measures similar to Nato's Article 5 mutual defence provision could be offered by the US without Kyiv joining the alliance. Mr Witkoff, who took part in the talks between Mr Trump and Russian president Mr Putin last week, said it 'was the first time we had ever heard the Russians agree to that' and called it 'game-changing'. 'We were able to win the following concession: That the United States could offer Article 5-like protection, which is one of the real reasons why Ukraine wants to be in Nato,' Mr Witkoff told CNN. Mr Zelensky said any peace deal must be lasting 'not like it was years ago, when Ukraine was forced to give up Crimea and part of our East – part of Donbas – and Putin simply used it as a springboard for a new attack'. He said: 'Russia must end this war, which it itself started. And I hope that our joint strength with America, with our European friends, will force Russia into a real peace.' I have already arrived in Washington, tomorrow I am meeting with President Trump. Tomorrow we are also speaking with European leaders. I am grateful to @POTUS for the invitation. We all share a strong desire to end this war quickly and reliably. And peace must be lasting. Not… — Volodymyr Zelenskyy / Володимир Зеленський (@ZelenskyyUa) August 18, 2025 At the White House, Mr Zelensky is expecting to face calls from the US president to concede to full Russian control of Donetsk and Luhansk, two mineral-rich regions of Ukraine that are mostly occupied by Vladimir Putin's forces. In exchange for these demands, the Russian president would reportedly withdraw his forces from other areas of Ukraine and accept the Nato-like guarantee designed to prevent him launching further incursions. Ahead of their Oval Office encounter, the allies are likely to be mindful of the previous occasion Mr Zelensky visited Mr Trump in the White House. February's public spat, which saw Vice President JD Vance accuse Mr Zelensky of not being thankful enough to the US, resulted in American aid to Ukraine being temporarily halted. Mr Trump will again host Mr Zelensky in the Oval Office before a separate meeting with the European leaders.