US Delegation Reportedly on Visit to MINURSO Headquarters in Laayoune
According to converging reports, the delegation comprises diplomats and a military attaché. They are set to commence their visit with a meeting with Alexander Ivanko, the Special Representative of the UN Secretary-General and head of MINURSO.
Subsequent discussions are reportedly scheduled with General Fakhr Al Ihsan, the mission's military commander, to assess the challenges faced by peacekeepers, particularly in light of the Polisario Front's 2020 resumption of hostilities and subsequent ceasefire violations.
The visit aligns with the United States' reaffirmed support for Morocco's sovereignty over Western Sahara. President Donald Trump recently reiterated this stance, endorsing Morocco's autonomy plan as the 'only viable solution' to the territorial dispute.
In a message to King Mohammed VI on the 26th anniversary of the Throne Day, Trump reaffirmed that 'the United States of America recognizes Moroccan sovereignty over the Western Sahara, and supports Morocco's autonomy proposal, serious, credible and realistic, as the only basis for a just and lasting settlement of this dispute.'
'I look forward to continuing our collaboration to promote regional stability, security, and peace,' the US president added.
This position has garnered backing from several Western nations, including the UK, France, and Spain, in addition to several African countries.
The US delegation's visit occurs amid a broader international shift, with Morocco's Autonomy Plan enjoying international momentum. Notably, Panama has reversed its previous recognition of the self-styled Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, now supporting Morocco's sovereignty over Western Sahara.
The United Nations Security Council is scheduled to review the mandate of the United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara (MINURSO) on October 31.
In the most recent extension , the Security Council emphasized the need to achieve a realistic, practicable, enduring, and mutually acceptable political solution to the conflict in Western Sahara. The Council also expressed support for the Personal Envoy of the Secretary-General for Western Sahara, Staffan de Mistura, and his efforts to advance a political solution. Tags: LaayouneMINURSOUSWestern sahara
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Morocco World
an hour ago
- Morocco World
Gibraltar: The Strait That No Longer Divides Africa from Europe, but Two Visions of the World
For decades, the Strait of Gibraltar marked the boundary between a developed North and a dependent South. Today, it has become something else entirely, a strategic fault line between Europe turning inward and an emerging African front, anchored by Rabat, Dakar, Nouakchott, among others, that refuses subordination and now intends to set its own terms. The End of a One-Way Orientation For much of the modern era, the western Mediterranean revolved around a clear strategic gravity, African states along the Atlantic coast looked to Europe as a promise. The Strait of Gibraltar's mere 14 kilometers of water concentrated that silent tension, a passage to hope for some, a defensive barrier for others. That asymmetry has reversed. What was once a border between a decision-making center and an executing periphery is now a line of tension between two poles of assertion. No longer do Paris, Rome, or Brussels dictate the terms unilaterally. Rabat, Dakar, Nouakchott, and, to a lesser degree, Cairo now impose their own frameworks. Europe: A Disoriented Partner, a Diminished Player This loss of strategic clarity has been accelerated by successive crises, from the Eurozone's financial turmoil to the migration waves of the past decade, the Brexit rupture, and the war in Ukraine. Each has chipped away at Europe's confidence, deepening its instinct to protect rather than project, to manage rather than lead. Europe has retreated into a defensive crouch, most recently illustrated by the European Commission's abrupt reversal in the face of a resolute Donald Trump on tariffs. Shaken by internal crises, undermined by the rise of extreme parties, and constrained by energy dependencies, the EU hides behind its borders. It now views foreign relations less as a tool of influence than as a risk to be contained. In doing so, it struggles to inspire. Meanwhile, emerging African powers are pragmatically sketching the outlines of an alternative order, one more fluid, resilient, and free to maneuver. Morocco: From an Aspirant to Architect Consider Morocco. The days when Rabat dreamed, sometimes naively, of joining the European Union are gone, buried alongside the illusions of the Barcelona Process, the ambiguities of the Union for the Mediterranean, and the arrogance of an unbalanced partnership. Today, Rabat is not seeking to join a 'center,' it is redrawing the periphery. Over the past two decades, Morocco has built a deliberate architecture of influence, forward positions in sub-Saharan Africa, footholds in major logistics corridors, an economic diplomacy rooted in reality, and an increasing ability to play on multiple boards. The expansion of ports like Tangier Med, Nador West Med, and soon Dakhla Atlantic is more than logistics. Their very names signal sovereign commercial intent and a strategic nod to a regionalization that reaches beyond Europe to American, Emirati, Chinese, and African horizons. Even the now-abandoned Morocco–UK power cable project sent a political message, Morocco can conceive and launch a major intercontinental initiative without passing through France or Spain, and even bypassing the European mainland to connect directly to post-BrexitBritain. The signal was unmistakable, Morocco will project itself without asking permission, and respect will be the condition for partnership. Senegal: Negotiating, Not Submitting Morocco is no longer alone. Since Bassirou Diomaye Faye came to power, Senegal has shifted its stance. The era of automatic consensus with Paris is over. Dakar aims to remain a partner, but a free one. The new president is not calling for rupture but for recalibration. Old ties are not to be erased but renegotiated, firmly, and without turning back. New hydrocarbon resources have undoubtedly strengthened Dakar's leverage, but it would be naive to believe the shift in narrative stems solely from the discovery of oil and gas. The change reflects a deeper, generational evolution, a slow-cooked transformation, much like a well-prepared Tabaski feast, whose roots go back decades. Still, the recent economic reshaping of Senegal has accelerated this trajectory. With the boost from gas, mining, and port projects, Senegal now asserts its rights, demands contract reviews, and ends the blank-check era for multinationals. It seeks not merely to 'benefit' from the international order but to help shape it, and to choose its allies freely, whether in Washington, Beijing, Rabat, or Ankara. West Africa, the message goes, is no longer a receptacle, it is becoming a pole. Mauritania: The Sahel's Gatekeeper Then there is Mauritania, more discreet, but no less pivotal. Long seen as a flat transit country with little weight, Nouakchott has become the last viable strategic entry to the Sahel. To the east, Libya is fragmented and militia-controlled. To the west, Algeria has closed its airspace to French operations and severed links with southern borders, choosing symbolic confrontation over tactical partnership. And in the center, Mali, Niger, and Burkina Faso have broken with the West. Today, no one enters the Sahel without the consent of Nouakchott, Rabat, and a few West African ports still supplying the AES bloc, chief among them Dakar. Together, they filter, coordinate, or block. Mauritania's position, won rather than granted, gives it silent but formidable leverage. It can choose cooperation or raise the stakes, arbitrate between Gulf states, Western powers, and rising Asian ambitions. And crucially, it no longer has to ask, it is others who must come to it. A Fault Line, Not a Bridge The key takeaway in this analysis is that Gibraltar is no longer just an active tectonic fault, it is a sharper geopolitical and ideological divide. What was once a passage is now a strategic demarcation, on one side, a Europe too weary to persuade, on the other, an Africa advancing without asking. This is not a simple reversal of power, as the northern side of the strait remains too strong and influential. What is happening instead is a recalibration of posture and ambition. The South is no longer trying to join the North's order, it is building its own, with its own values and objectives. In this new geometry, Gibraltar is no longer a bridge, but a mirror.
Morocco World
2 hours ago
- Morocco World
Morocco Appoints Arbitrator in $2.2 Billion Emmerson Mining Dispute
Marrakech – Amid the ongoing arbitration process between Morocco and British mining company Emmerson Plc (Khemisset UK Limited and Potasse de Khemisset S.A.), the country has appointed Professor Zachary Douglas KC as its arbitrator at the International Center for Settlement of Investment Disputes (ICSID). The appointment, officially recorded by ICSID on August 15, marks an important step forward in the dispute registered under case number ARB/25/22. Douglas, who holds both Australian and Swiss nationality, is a professor of international public law at Geneva and Rome, with substantial experience before international courts as an arbitrator, lawyer, and expert witness. Emmerson had previously appointed its own arbitrator, Bulgarian national Stanimir A. Alexandrov, whose nomination was registered on August 5. Alexandrov brings 30 years of experience in international commercial arbitration, particularly in investor-state disputes, and is the current president of the International Council for Commercial Arbitration (ICCA). He previously served as Bulgaria's Deputy Foreign Minister. The arbitration tribunal now awaits only the appointment of a president, who must be accepted by both parties, before proceedings can formally begin. This president will play a crucial role in directing discussions and potentially influencing the outcome of the arbitration. The dispute stems from Emmerson's claim that Morocco violated multiple provisions of the bilateral investment treaty between Morocco and the United Kingdom, signed in 1990 and enacted in 2002. The company is seeking full compensation for what it values at $2.2 billion after its Khemisset potash project was halted. Located approximately 90 kilometers from Rabat, the Khemisset project represented Emmerson's primary asset. With estimated resources of 311 million tons at an average grade of 10.2% potassium oxide, the mine was expected to produce over 700,000 tons of potash annually for 19 years. This would have positioned Morocco as a major player in the global potash market. The project was derailed following an unfavorable environmental and social impact assessment issued by the Regional Unified Investment Commission (CRUI) on October 28, 2024. The commission determined that the project's projected water consumption was incompatible with local capacities. Emmerson, represented by law firm Boies Schiller Flexner (BSF), views this decision as an unjustified eviction from its investment and is pursuing arbitration under the provisions of the bilateral treaty, which allows for private arbitration in case of disputes. The Moroccan government has appointed attorney Hicham Naciri as its representative in the proceedings. Observers in international arbitration circles note that Morocco's choice of Douglas may be strategic, as he is described as a 'typical state defender' who has 'ruled massively in favor of the state' in previous cases. Even when tribunals have ruled in favor of investors by majority, Douglas has reportedly filed dissenting opinions. As both parties await the appointment of the tribunal president, this case brings to light the tensions between foreign investment protection and environmental concerns in resource development projects in Morocco. Tags: Emmerson MoroccoEmmerson plcEmmerson potash
Morocco World
3 hours ago
- Morocco World
Algeria's Gas Gambit: Desperate Bid to Sway US on Sahara Dispute
Marrakech – Algeria is frantically courting American energy giants in a transparent attempt to influence US policy on Morocco's Western Sahara. According to Bloomberg, Algeria is nearing deals with Exxon Mobil Corp and Chevron Corp to tap its gas reserves, including shale, for the first time. 'The technical aspects have more or less been agreed upon, but the commercial alignment is still under negotiation and will soon be finalized,' Samir Bekhti, chairman of energy regulator Alnaft, told Bloomberg. Algeria is clearly betting big on shale as it attempts to shore up state revenue in a country where hydrocarbons account for more than three-quarters of exports. This energy push comes as Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune received delegations from both Chevron and Exxon Mobil last June. These meetings revealed Algeria's calculated strategy to leverage oil and gas to attract strategic investments while simultaneously building indirect influence channels within Washington decision-making circles, above all to ward off any attempt by Congress to designate the Polisario as a terrorist organization. For the same reasons, Algerian political analyst Oualid Kebir even suggested that the military regime was ready to sell shale gas from the Eastern Sahara to Israel, not out of goodwill but to block any serious attempt within the UN to close the Western Sahara file – laying bare Algeria's toxic cocktail of hypocrisy, desperation, and utter moral bankruptcy. Algeria's frantic moves show it is feeling the heat, as US President Donald Trump's administration has made clear his intention to close the Sahara file once and for all. According to a June report by Instituto Coordenadas, Washington is preparing unprecedented pressure on Algiers – from demanding Polisario disarmament and dismantling the Tindouf camps to raising the threat of sanctions – measures designed to force Algeria into accepting Morocco's Autonomy Plan as the only realistic endgame. Furthermore, the ultimate blow looms: if the Polisario is designated a terrorist organization, Algeria would stand unmasked before the world as a state sponsor of terrorism – a pariah stripped of credibility, dragged into isolation, and branded by its own failed obsession with Morocco. Gas blackmail is not a Sahara policy For decades, the Algerian regime has persisted in the same exhausted maneuver – weaponizing its gas reserves, financing and sheltering the Polisario separatists who exist only in the vacuum of Tindouf, and attempting to manipulate global capitals. Algeria desperately wants the world to believe that the Western Sahara dispute remains an unresolved colonial chapter, when in fact the tide of history and diplomacy has already moved decisively in favor of Morocco's sovereignty with its Autonomy Plan. Yet this regime refuses to accept reality, clinging to Cold War dogmas and feeding off the illusion that blackmailing neighbors or threatening energy partners can somehow reverse a US recognition that has been in place since 2020, never withdrawn, and consistently reaffirmed through successive administrations. The Western Sahara file has moved decisively away from 1970s slogans and toward 21st-century realism, while Algeria's doctrine remains stubbornly stuck in the Cold War era. Algiers has run the same play for years: weaponize gas, bankroll the Polisario, and hope the world blinks. It hasn't worked. What Algiers calls foreign policy is in fact nothing more than tantrum-driven brinkmanship – a brittle and transactional game. Entire pipelines have been shut down, not because of economic necessity but out of the pathological desire to punish Morocco and any country that dares to align with Rabat's proposal. This was precisely the case in 2022, when Spain publicly backed Morocco's Autonomy Plan and Algeria immediately froze a twenty-year friendship treaty, strangled trade ties, and rattled the energy saber. Threats to halt gas, followed by punitive economic measures, were less a strategy than a tantrum – broadcasting to European capitals that Algeria's foreign policy is transactional, brittle, and ultimately unreliable. Algeria once again proved that its diplomacy is built on vengeance rather than vision, on sabotage rather than strategy. Analysts ask: What kind of state deliberately destroys integration projects that could bring regional prosperity, merely to indulge its hatred of Morocco? Self-destruction disguised as principle The Maghreb-Europe pipeline closure in 2021 perfectly exemplified this self-harming obsession. Algiers cut a vital artery that had carried Algerian gas to Europe via Morocco since the 1990s – a decades-old infrastructure that symbolized regional interdependence. Yet, the regime in Algiers willingly severed it – not to advance peace, not to gain leverage for real negotiation, but simply to strike at Rabat. This self-destructive decision punished neighbors, spooked markets, and signaled that Algeria will gladly torch regional integration to score a point against Rabat, even at the cost of destabilizing markets, losing revenue, and damaging its own standing. According to observers, this is not leadership; it is self-destruction recast as principle – a policy posture that prioritizes starving itself and destabilizing its neighborhood over confronting the strategic futility of its Sahara gamble. Meanwhile, the so-called Sahrawi 'state-in-waiting' that Algeria sustains is nothing but a dependency structure built in the sands of Tindouf. The Polisario leadership enjoys privileges while the camps remain locked in poverty, an arrangement that has lasted almost five decades and produces nothing but grievance politics and propaganda. This machine forbids transparency and thrives only on indefinite stalemate, because the moment accountability is introduced, the entire facade collapses. Colonization by proxy in Tindouf Commentators view this not as decolonization but as colonization by proxy – a deliberate policy of freezing human lives to keep alive a failed narrative that the rest of the world has moved beyond. The serious diplomatic failures of Algeria's approach were brutally put into light by Rachid Nekkaz, former presidential candidate, who recently criticized Foreign Minister Ahmed Attaf's performance as 'a complete failure on all levels.' Nekkaz pointed out that Attaf, who 'was unemployed for 19 years before being appointed as head of Algerian diplomacy,' has failed to 'stop Morocco's diplomatic successes regarding the Sahara.' Algeria's reliance on energy blackmail is doubly shortsighted; gas leverage is finite, and time is not on Algiers' side. Europe, shaken by Russia's invasion of Ukraine in 2022, has already diversified its supply – securing US LNG, Gulf producers, and new routes that dilute Algerian influence. Every time Algiers reaches for the gas weapon, it diminishes its credibility and accelerates its own irrelevance. In long-term energy markets, only reliability is rewarded, not tantrums; trust, not threats. Even where Algeria has expanded ties, notably with Italy, its volumes and dependability are now judged against a crowded field, and weaponizing energy may buy headlines but ultimately erodes the only currency that matters in strategic partnerships: trust. At the heart of this failure lies a poisonous mindset: Algeria treats the Sahara not as an issue to be solved but as a theater to bleed Morocco, a tool to box in Rabat diplomatically, and a national myth to justify repression at home. It repeats the same sterile slogans of 'referendum or nothing,' ignoring that the UN process itself has moved on, that major capitals from Washington to Madrid to Paris have embraced Morocco's Autonomy Plan as the only serious solution. No amount of gas-fuelled pressure can reverse that trajectory. Washington's 2020 proclamation recognizing Moroccan sovereignty remains firmly in force, and US diplomacy has stayed fixed on Rabat's Autonomy Plan as the realistic path forward. Morocco, for its part, has done the slow, unglamorous but necessary work: devolving powers, investing in the southern provinces, and building a coalition of states that see autonomy as both ethical and executable. This is not a temporary mood swing; analysis suggests it has proven durable through subsequent administrations and UN cycles – especially as Trump himself reaffirmed this stance as recently as late July in a letter addressed to King Mohammed VI on the occasion of the 26th Throne Day. The naked truth is this: what Algeria sustains is not a foreign policy but a failing project propped up by energy bullying – a hollow strategy that confuses volume (of gas, of rhetoric) for vision, noise for influence, and mortgages the lives of so-called 'Sahrawis' to keep alive a grievance industry, Sahrawis whom the military regime does not even allow a census for. In the process, it even undermines its own economic interests just to preserve the fantasy of striking at Morocco. History is moving, the Sahara file is moving, Washington has locked in its recognition, and Europe increasingly treats autonomy as the only executable outcome. Yet Algiers continues to act as if time stopped in 1976, dragging its people into isolation, wasting billions on separatism, and reducing itself to little more than a supplier with a flag – a state that could have been a regional power but has chosen instead to be a regional saboteur. Tags: algeria and the USAlgeria and Western SaharaWestern sahara
